Quantcast
Channel: Gawker
Viewing all 24829 articles
Browse latest View live

500 Days of Kristin, Day 373: Saylor the Dog

$
0
0

500 Days of Kristin, Day 373: Saylor the Dog

Future published author Kristin Cavallari had a baby a couple months ago, and she named her “Saylor.” Why? Well, as Kristin explained in an interview with the baby registry site Cricket’s Circle last September, it all started with a dog.

“We picked out this baby girl’s name when I was pregnant with our first,” she said. “I met a woman and her dog, and I loved her dog’s name. Funny enough, it was the name she had picked out if she had a girl, but she had boys, so she used it for her dog instead. Here we are 3.5 years later, and we are going to use that name for our little girl!”

Now that we know the name and where it came from, I have to wonder: Did the dog’s owner spell the name S-A-Y-L-O-R? Or did Kristin just hear it and guess?


This has been 500 Days of Kristin.

[Photo via Getty]


A Close-Up Photo of Donald Trump's Hair

$
0
0

A Close-Up Photo of Donald Trump's Hair

This is a close-up photo of Donald Trump’s hair, taken by Christopher Furlong of Getty Images, at Gerald W. Kim Middle School in Council Bluffs, Iowa, on Jan. 31.

Click to enlarge!

Previously in Donald Trump’s hair:

http://gawker.com/watch-gawker-e...


Justice Department Announces "Comprehensive Review" of San Francisco Police Department

$
0
0

Justice Department Announces "Comprehensive Review" of San Francisco Police Department

Federal officials announced on Sunday that the U.S. Department of Justice will conduct a “comprehensive review” of the San Francisco Police Department, the San Francisco Chronicle reports. Five SFPD officers shot and killed Mario Woods, a black man, in contested circumstances last December.

DOJ said it began the review after being invited to do so by San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee and Police Chief Gregory Suhr, the Associated Press reports. The investigation will take two years, with reports issued every six months.

“This can be the first step in healing the division between the minority communities and the Police Department,” Woods’ family attorney John Burris said Sunday. “Of course, the investigation should be without limitations and should allow for a wide open investigation into the circumstances surrounding the shooting and the policies, procedures and training, and let the chips fall where they may.”

Early last year, a group of more than a dozen San Francisco police officers were found to have exchanged racist, homophobic text messages—prompting the review of some 100,000 convictions for “potential bias.”

Suhr said that the department will cooperate fully with the review.


Contact the author of this post: brendan.oconnor@gawker.com.

Hillary Clinton Officially Wins Iowa Caucus

$
0
0

Hillary Clinton Officially Wins Iowa Caucus

Hillary Clinton can now officially claim victory in Iowa, beating Bernie Sanders by a razor-thin margin of 0.2 percent according to Breaking News.

http://gawker.com/your-guide-to-...

The final tally put Hillary Clinton at 49.8 percent of the delegate vote, Bernie Sanders at 49.6 percent of the delegate vote, and Martin O’Malley in what we imagine will probably be at least a few months of therapy. This is almost certainly going to spark some outcries over the now notorious coin tosses that just so happened to fall in Clinton’s favor.

http://gawker.com/your-guide-to-...

Of course, even though Hillary may have technically won, we all know who the real champion last was. Another warm congratulations to Sticker Kid—you did it, pal.


Enger Javier Spent Two Years In Rikers For a Murder That Even the Victim's Family Doesn't Think He Committed

$
0
0

Enger Javier Spent Two Years In Rikers For a Murder That Even the Victim's Family Doesn't Think He Committed

After midnight on August 19, 2012, Enger Javier was standing in the McDonald’s parking lot where he hung out every weekend, talking with his friends and enjoying the Latin music that was pumping out of the souped-up cars congregated there. The fast-food eatery was a popular late-night hangout spot for young people in the Claremont section of the Bronx, a neighborhood where household income is less than half the citywide median and gang violence is common. The Trinitarios, Javier’s gang, were engaged in a bitter feud with another crew called Dominicans Don’t Play. On the night of the 19th, a former DDP member was stabbed to death following a scuffle, and Javier was arrested for the killing.

Three and a half years later, he was standing outside the same McDonald’s, on Webster Avenue, wearing a necktie and dressy blue shirt, a court-ordered GPS bracelet around his ankle. Standing next to him were the mother and sister of Hansell Arias, the 19-year-old victim. Javier has steadfastly maintained his innocence since the stabbing, and his legal team arranged the meeting to give the media a firsthand look at one of the more extraordinary particulars of his case: even the Arias family is advocating for charges against Javier to be dropped.

Lisania Arias, Hansell’s sister, shook Javier’s hand. “I don’t understand the criminal justice system. Right now, we are very mad. Very mad as a family. Both families are mad,” she told a Bronx News 12 television reporter who documented the scene.

Like Lisania, Javier and his lawyers believe that the Bronx District Attorney’s office got the wrong man when it charged him with manslaughter, gang assault, and possession of a weapon in 2012, citing DNA evidence, surveillance video, and statements from multiple eyewitness. The real killer is still at large, they say. “I knew in my mind I was innocent, you know?” Javier said outside the McDonald’s earlier this month. “I was waiting for this day.”

He’d been waiting a long time. For two years after Arias was murdered, Javier was imprisoned in Rikers Island, a time he spent studying the details of his own case. In 2014, he was granted bail after DNA samples from Arias’ fingernails were tested and found not to match his own. He has been on house arrest since then, legally prohibited from leaving the Bronx. He spends nearly all of his time inside the ground-floor Bronx apartment he shares with his mother, out of fear that Trinitarios or DDP members might have interpreted his attempts at clearing his name as acts of snitching.

The NYPD, the Bronx DA, “they didn’t do the investigation right,” the soft-spoken Javier said this month, sitting at a coffee table in the apartment where he’s been holed up. “They wanted to blame it on me.”

He’d been in Rikers once before, on a weapon charge, but his more recent stay was different. “The last time I was in jail, I knew why I was in jail. I knew I was guilty,” he said. “But this time—imagine being in jail, being charged for something you didn’t do. You would go crazy, thinking about it every day, you know?”

Enger Javier Spent Two Years In Rikers For a Murder That Even the Victim's Family Doesn't Think He Committed

Enger Javier, left, with his mother and attorney

Javier’s defense attorney, David Cohen, filed a motion to dismiss the case against his client on Friday. Included in the motion is testimony from five eyewitnesses who allege that they saw a different allegedly high-ranking Trinitarios member stab Arias, and that Javier was not involved. Their claims may be supported by surveillance video obtained from the scene by police, which shows a large crowd chasing Arias down Webster Avenue moments before his death. Javier appears in the video, but he is not among the murderous crowd. As the mob runs by, he casually stands on the sidewalk, holding a soda. Speaking in court on Friday, Bronx assistant district attorney John Morabito said that he took the claims in the motion “extremely seriously.”

If the motion is successful, Javier’s case will be remarkable in the sense that it is remarkable whenever justice comes to an apparently innocent person who has fallen afoul of the courts. But the years he spent inside Rikers before even facing a jury are anything but. In America, 450,000 people are in jail awaiting trial at any given time. Many of them are there because they are too poor to afford bail. Kalief Browder, the charismatic teenager who took his own life last year, spent over three years inside—two of which were in solitary confinement, with all the horrors that treatment entails—without being convicted of a crime. (He was accused of stealing a backpack.) The average pretrial detention term is much shorter than that, but any length of time in prison without a conviction, on so large a scale, would seem a glaring violation of the presumption of innocence. Some of those incarcerated people may be guilty of the crimes with which they are charged; even they deserve to be tried before they are jailed. Others, like Javier, may be innocent.


The case against Javier consists of two statements from witnesses who positively identified him as the killer, according to police reports presented to the defense as discovery evidence. John Scola, an attorney who plans to represent Javier in a civil suit against the city, argues that both of those statements are suspect.

The first, from a lineup administration report filed by NYPD detective Carlos Faulkner on August 19, shows a witness who seems far from positive about Javier’s role in the evening’s events. The witness, whose name is redacted, indicated that she recognized Javier from Webster Avenue, but was uncertain about who he was. “Out of all six guys number 3 looks like he was with the other guys. I don’t know where I remember him. Not sure,” she is recorded as saying. If the witness gave any more definitive statement than that, it is not in Detective Faulkner’s report.

The second statement was given by Jansel Paula, a friend of Javier’s who’d traveled with him to the McDonald’s that night, and who was also initially detained for the murder. During interrogations, Paula told police that he’d seen his friend stabbing Arias, but now, he claims that the statement was untrue, the product of coercive questioning.

A portion of Jansel Paula’s new statement

Last month, Paula gave a new video-recorded statement to Manuel Gomez, a private investigator hired to work on Javier’s behalf. In it, Paula alleges that he was taken into police custody for three days and pressured by Detective Faulkner to name Javier as the killer. He claims that he was deprived of food and told that he’d go to jail for 20 years if he didn’t put the blame on his friend—claims he later reiterated in an interview with ABC 7.

“[Faulkner] would say a lot of things,” Paula said in the 2015 statement. “It was like, if I don’t say who did it, I’m going to be over there, and I’m never going to be with my family or nothing. Pressured me and pressured me and pressured me for three days.”

Javier’s attorneys also claim that the surveillance video showing Javier on the sidewalk was improperly withheld from them for years before the Bronx DA released it in December 2015. Police reports indicate that officers were able to find pertinent video when canvasing the scene immediately after the killing in 2012, but in court, prosecutors later alleged repeatedly that no such video was found.

“Three years later, they turned over the video, which clearly shows that Enger Javier was not involved in the stabbing,” David Cohen said outside the courtroom Friday afternoon. “I do believe that they were deliberately withheld,” he added. Cohen believes the videos were likely withheld by police, not prosecutors. The Bronx DA and the NYPD declined to comment on this story.

Morabito said Friday that his office would conduct an investigation into the defense’s claims before Javier’s next appearance later this month. For now, after three years of waiting, Enger Javier has to wait some more. He said that the experience has made him turn his back on the gang life, and that he’d like to get out of the Bronx and go to college when the ordeal his over. He wants to be a lawyer.


Would Elizabeth Warren Have Beaten Hillary Clinton?

$
0
0

Would Elizabeth Warren Have Beaten Hillary Clinton?

Hillary Clinton eked out a narrow victory over Bernie Sanders last night in the Iowa caucuses, which has led to a lot of punditry. There’s one branch of that punditry that I think ought to be examined a bit more rigorously before it spreads. Here’s Ezra Klein, last night:

This seems to rely on the assumption that Sen. Elizabeth Warren is a more mainstream or “electable” populist than Bernie Sanders, which she may well be. But is she actually a better politician? She’s certainly a much less experienced one: In her entire political career, Elizabeth Warren has won one election. Unless I’m miscounting, Bernie Sanders has won fourteen.

Had she decided to run, Elizabeth Warren might have been a serious contender for the presidency, and she might have dominated in Iowa last night. But she’s also still a political novice—and there’s evidence to suggest that Sanders is a better-than-average politician.


Photo via Getty

Meet Trump, One of Marvel Comics’ Least Super Supervillains

$
0
0

Meet Trump, One of Marvel Comics’ Least Super Supervillains

There is an evil man in New York who preys on the gullible. He’s a flamboyant showboat. He lacks scruples. He cares for nothing but his own gain. I speak, of course, of Annoying Orange progenitor Donald Trump—so let’s meet the Marvel villain who shares the same name.

Marvel’s Trump—real name Carlton Sanders—is a delightfully lame bad guy from the ‘80s who had no superpowers to speak of, and very few skills. He’s a former small-time stage magician who turned his non-considerable powers to committing crimes. I should specify that When I say he’s a magician, I do not mean he does magic like Dr. Strange does; I mean he performs basic, standard magic tricks that you’d see someone perform on stage at a small club.

While it may seem that the comic book criminal and the real estate mogul have little in common—although Donald has been investigated for bribery and racketeering (no charges filed!)—the two Trumps have some striking similarities that you may not have realized.

1) They Both Have an Overinflated Sense of Self-Worth

If you are a breathing human being—even if you’re living under a rock—you have been forced to acknowledge Donald Trump’s ego in some way. The fact that he’s running for president is omnipresent, as is his sense of self-entitlement about leading the free world despite a platform based entirely on bloviating, lies and hate.

Marvel’s Trump isn’t as hateful, but he does have a similarly high opinion of himself. Witness what happens in Captain America #371, where he barged into a small magic club where Captain America happened to be going on a date with the in-the-middle-of-reforming Serpent Society villain Diamondback.

Meet Trump, One of Marvel Comics’ Least Super Supervillains

If the outfit didn’t give it away, only an asshole would say “legerdemain” instead of the infinitely less pretentious “magic” or “tricks” or even “slight-of-hand.” Trump not only deems himself “ultra-stylish,” but that his appearance in this club is a “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity” as if he was performing at Carnegie Hall instead of some craphole where the current act is dude who is literally juggling three apples on stage (which is an indictment of the club, but an even more severe indictment on where Cap takes his dates).

2) They Have No Real Solutions

Despite his strident claims to the contrary, Donald Trump offers no realistic plans to combat crime, racism, the health care crisis, illegal immigration, pay discrepancy, income inequality, etc. He simply says he has these solutions for these things, and then offers nonsense with asked for details (or, more often, simply ignores the request).

In his debut in Daredevil #203, in which he and his gang tried to steal some weapons for some criminal enterprise, Trump fought the Man Without Fear but was having his ass handed to him. Trump’s solution? Use flash paper to blind Daredevil:

Meet Trump, One of Marvel Comics’ Least Super Supervillains

If you know anything about Daredevil, you know he’s already blind, and thus Trump had the least effective possible solution to his dilemma.

Just as Trump the comic character did not realize his plan to defeat Daredevil was worthless, Trump the presidential candidate’s plans to fix the country’s ills are even less tenable. Trump wants to keep illegal immigrants out by building a giant wall on the Mexican border, but offers no clue as to how such a monumental structure could possibly be paid for (besides asking Mexico to pay for it, which they’ve already declined). He wants to create a mandatory database for Muslims, apparently unaware this is incredibly fascist. He wants to force Apple to relocate all of its operations to America, even though that this is not something the president can order, and is one of the most insanely anti-capitalist ideas ever espoused by a presidential candidate.

To be fair to the comic Trump, it was not public knowledge at the time that Daredevil was blind, so the magician couldn’t have known. If Donald Trump has any knowledge of finance, the law, the powers of the position he is trying to gain, or even just basic common sense, he should know his grand plans are impossible and stupid.

3) They Have No Real Substance

While Donald Trump fails to have coherent plans to “make America great again,” he sometimes also fails to have coherent thoughts as well. There are an embarrassment of examples of his gibberish in his speeches, although the most terrifying is his answer when asked about the “nuclear triad,” a phrase a man who wants to be in charge of the U.S.’s arsenal of nuclear weapons should know. That he doesn’t know is upsetting; that his response during a live debate doesn’t even approach a complete thought is horrifying.

The comic-book Trump isn’t as grandiose with his claims, but he equally fails to meet them. After his grandstanding to the crowd, Trump is unable to perform a single trick... because unknown to Trump or Cap, Diamondback had asked her pal from the Serpent Society, Black Mamba, to watch over the date and make sure it didn’t get ruined. When Mamba spied Trump, she not only assumed he was getting ready to fleece the audience, but also recognized him as someone she once went on a date with and stuck her with the check. She immediately used her superpowers to hypnotize the jerk and lead him off stage before he accomplished a single trick.

Meet Trump, One of Marvel Comics’ Least Super Supervillains

Both Trumps talk big, and yet have nothing to offer. (Also, I’m not sure what is more concerning: That Cap is dumb enough to believe this is part of the show, or his utter wonder at seeing a deck of cards that smokes. I know he’s from the past, but come on.)

4) They Both Believe Violence Is a Solution

After the mass shootings in San Bernardino, Donald Trump’s “solution” to gun violence in America is for more people to have guns, which is like a solution for obesity is to give more people pop tarts.

The two-dimensional Trump is equally pro-guns, especially Trump’s magic tricks fared somewhat better here than in Captain America, although one might argue Daredevil was having an off day:

Meet Trump, One of Marvel Comics’ Least Super Supervillains

Donald Trump thinks this problem would have been Daredevil should have carried a gun.

Sadly, Donald Trump’s chance of winning the Republican nomination for president far exceeds the chance of comic Trump making his appearance in Marvel Cinematic Universe, despite the fact both should be equally impossible. However, Marvel’s Trump has one advantage over the real-life mogul, and that’s the fact that he has more realistic hair, despite the fact it is a two-dimensional drawing done in ink and four-color processed dots.

[Comics Alliance, ComicVine, and Super Mega Monkey]

Trump image: AP Photo/Paul Sancya.


Which Candidate's Campaign Spends the Most Money on Pizza: An Investigation

$
0
0

Which Candidate's Campaign Spends the Most Money on Pizza: An Investigation

There is nothing more American than pizza, a dish we stole from another culture, claimed as our own, and have argued about ever since. It’s deeply American in other ways, too; fatty, mostly cheap, and occasionally exceptional. So of course, it’s a clear favorite when it comes time for our presidential candidates to feed their hungry, freedom-loving staffers.

But can a candidate’s worth be judged by his or her campaign’s pizza consumption? In a word, no. Still, we went through their campaign finance reports for the last nine months anyway, just to see how aligned they are with America’s pizza values.


Carly Fiorina—$0

April-June: $0

July-Sept: $0

Oct-Dec: $0

Incredibly, Carly Fiorina’s campaign had zero explicit pizza expenditures. And a brief scan of Carly’s restaurant payments over the last three months shows only one venue that even had pizza listed on the menu: Reagan’s County Cafe, which offers diners a choice between a $6.95 three-cheese pizza and a $7.50 pepperoni pizza. This woman will never be president.


John Kasich—$69.18

April-June: $0

July-Oct: $0

Oct-Dec: $69.18

  • Donato’s Pizza $69.18

This guy gets it...


Marco Rubio—$293.21

Which Candidate's Campaign Spends the Most Money on Pizza: An Investigation

April-June: $0

July-Oct: $0

Oct-Dec: $293.21

  • Caesario’s Pizza $293.21

Last quarter Marco Rubio’s campaign spent $40,090.57 on food. Less than $300 went towards pizza. A bad ratio, in my opinion.


Donald Trump—$1,233.64

Which Candidate's Campaign Spends the Most Money on Pizza: An Investigation

April-June: $0

July-Oct: $0

Oct-Dec: $1,233.64

  • Angelo’s Pizzeria $520.28
  • Famous Original Ray’s Pizza $18.00
  • Original Ray’s Pizza $32.03
  • Vinny’s Italian Grill and Pizzeria $663.33

Observations: Donald Trump looks like a pizza, but his campaign sure isn’t paying for it. And he has no loyalty to Pizza Hut, the company that once paid him to make alimony jokes with Ivana in a commercial.


Chris Christie—$1,527.24

Which Candidate's Campaign Spends the Most Money on Pizza: An Investigation

April-June: $0

July-Oct: $32.29

  • Godfather’s Pizza $32.29

Oct-Dec: $1,494.95

  • Giovanni’s Pizza $70.50
  • Godfather’s Pizza $265.36
  • Grand Slam Pizza $725.35
  • Otto Enoteca $94.91
  • Paisano’s Pizza $338.83

It’s nice to be surprised by people.


Rand Paul—$2,185.48

April-June: $203.82

  • We the Pizza $203.82

July-Sept: $747.95

  • Chico’s Pizza $334.40
  • Domino’s $327.52
  • We The Pizza $86.03

Oct-Dec: $1,233.71

  • Domino’s $637.39
  • Papa John’s $308.85
  • We The Pizza $287.47

Once a quarter, Top Chef superfan Rand Paul gets to order whatever he wants off the menu at We The Pizza. It is his favorite day of the year each time it happens.


Ted Cruz—$2,481.45

Which Candidate's Campaign Spends the Most Money on Pizza: An Investigation

April-June: $433.59

  • Pizzeria Solario $328.96
  • We The Pizza $104.6

July-Sept: $446.32

  • Domino’s $283.86
  • Fuel Pizza $24.40
  • Pizza Hut $45.00
  • Sammy’s Woodfired Pizza $93.06

Oct-Dec: $1,601.54

  • Armand’s Chicago Pizza $31.88
  • Barry’s Pizza $12.72
  • Domino’s $772.26
  • Island Slice $57.24
  • Old Chicago Pizza $27.06
  • Pagalo’s Pizzeria $39.56
  • Papa John’s $67.87
  • Pizza Hut Houston $316.87
  • Pizza Hut Mount Pleasant $86.53
  • Pizzeria Solario $117.06
  • Rockwall City Pizza Ranch $8.55
  • Villa Pizza Detroit Airport $12.88
  • We the Pizza $51.06

I do not respect Ted Cruz but I do respect his campaign’s pizza consumption.


Bernie Sanders—$3,354.76

April-June: $0

July-Sept: $484.70

  • Leonardo’s Pizza $275.70
  • Panacea Pizza $209.00

Oct-Dec: $2,870.06

  • 900 Degrees $224.00
  • Circus Circus Pizzeria $387.83
  • Leonardo’s Pizza $389.07
  • Olympus Pizza $242.34
  • Panacea Pizza $110.00
  • Portland Pie and Co Manchester $796.54
  • River Bend Pizza & Subs $359.43
  • Sunset Pizzeria $750.68

For a “man of the people” who will “never wear a tux,” Bernie Sanders’ pizza disbursements are, frankly, underwhelming.


Jeb Bush—$3,583.29

Which Candidate's Campaign Spends the Most Money on Pizza: An Investigation

April-June: $307.12

  • Domino’s $307.12

July-Sept: $687.39

  • Leo’s Pizza $225.00
  • Papa John’s $462.39

Oct-Dec: $2,588.78

  • Domino’s $109.18
  • Leo’s Pizza $1,102.63
  • Pizza Ranch $1,097.09
  • Super Pizzeria $279.88

Jeb Bush spends a lot of money to have such terrible taste in pizza.


Ben Carson—$3,707.33

April-June: $0

July-Sept: $1,195.02

  • Bertuccis $298.44
  • Crust $165.09
  • Domino’s $15.91
  • Grimaldi’s $33.63
  • Little Ceasars $363.76
  • Pizza My Dear $164.00
  • Taste of New York $89.39

Oct-Dec: $2,512.31

  • Anthony’s Old Style Pizzeria $66.52
  • Caesarios Pizza and Subs $40.39
  • Dimitri’s Pizza $166.23
  • Domino’s $611.93
  • Godfather’s Pizza $50.07
  • Gold House Pizza $495.71
  • Gusto Pizza $38.98
  • Il Porto $495.71
  • Lancaster House of Pizza $11.27
  • Mountain Mike’s Pizza $145.40
  • Papa John’s $1,161.96
  • Pizza Barn $54.97
  • Pizza My Dear $15.81
  • Pizza Rock $58.89
  • Taste of New York $121.05
  • The Pizza Joint $36.45

As Ben Carson’s popularity dropped, his pizza consumption went way up. Causation or correlation, you ask? I pick the judgmental one.


Hillary Clinton—$9,046.38

Which Candidate's Campaign Spends the Most Money on Pizza: An Investigation

April-June: $0 (but she did spend $645 on hot dogs.)

July-Oct: $4935.10

  • Alley Cat Pizzeria $471.22
  • Amber Waves Pizza $500
  • Domino’s $235.97
  • Gusto Pizza $1,119.19
  • Need Pizzeria $2,053.76
  • Sal’s Pizza $554.96

Oct-Dec: $4,111.28

  • Alley Cat Pizzeria $403.81
  • Broadway Pizzeria $136.12
  • Chef D’s RockPower Pizza $209.17
  • Domino’s $2,535.21
  • El Fredo Pizza $250.31
  • Little Ceasar’s $304.85
  • Pizza Hut $271.81

Hillary Clinton is the one true Pizza Queen.


Image by Jim Cooke, photos via Getty and AP. Contact the author at gabrielle@gawker.com.


Remember When Bill de Blasio (Allegedly) Murdered That Groundhog?

$
0
0

Remember When Bill de Blasio (Allegedly) Murdered That Groundhog?

On this day, February 2, in the year 2014, newly minted New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio dropped a groundhog from his formidable six-foot six-inch stance. A week later, that very same groundhog was found dead. The Staten Island Zoo claims the two events were unrelated—whether you believe them, is a different matter entirely.

The groundhog incident of 2014—already dubious in its own right—is shrouded in inconsistencies and half-truths. The people of New York City were led to believe that the groundhog de Blasio so-briefly cradled (as the mayor does every year on Groundhog Day) was New York’s traditional harbinger of spring, Staten Island Chuck. It was not Staten Island Chuck.

This is Staten Island Chuck.

Remember When Bill de Blasio (Allegedly) Murdered That Groundhog?

Image via Youtube.

And this is the late groundhog Charlotte, Chuck’s very own granddaughter.

Remember When Bill de Blasio (Allegedly) Murdered That Groundhog?

Image via Youtube.

The difference is night and day.

Why, then, did the Staten Island Zoo lie to us about exactly which groundhog it planned to trot out on that fateful day? The zoo claims it feared Chuck’s contentious relationship with Mayor Bloomberg (the groundhog had understandably bit Bloomberg on prior occasions) would carry over to the new administration. So it decided to bring out Charlotte in the hopes that she might prove more even-keeled in the new Mayor’s colossal hands. And according to a zoo insider who spoke to The New York Post, Charlotte’s handlers kept quiet about the switch “to protect the groundhog brand.”

We all know what happened next: De Blasio sent Charlotte soaring (to the ground).

The mayor smiled abashedly. The handler quickly collected the fallen woodchuck. And we all had a good laugh at the silly mayor’s antics before going on about our day.

Then, nine months later, we found out the awful truth: The zoo had concealed the fact that Charlotte had died one week after her fall. Charlotte, beloved granddaughter to Chuck and friend to all, had been dead for months, and the zoo hadn’t said a damn thing.

From The New York Post’s report on the alleged coverup:

The stand-in was found dead in her enclosure at the Staten Island Zoo on Feb. 9 — and a necropsy determined she died from “acute internal injuries,” sources said.

She had fallen nearly 6 feet when the mayor lost his grip during the Groundhog Day photo op. Sources said her injuries were consistent with a fall.

Instead of revealing the sad loss, the zoo — which gets nearly half of its $3.5 million in annual funding from the city — told the staff to keep the mayor’s office in the dark about the animal’s fate.

...“I was told he died of old age, that he went to that big farm in the sky,” said Assemblyman Matthew Titone (D-SI), who later learned how the animal had died.

The claims of old age, though, were lies. According to The Wall Street Journal, zoo officials did ultimately admit that Charlotte’s untimely end stemmed from “internal injuries and bleeding.” Still, Brian Morris, a Staten Island Zoo spokesman, went on to assert that “We don’t know how it fell. We don’t suspect any foul play or anything like that.” Of course you don’t, Brian.

Some might say there’s no need to “suspect” anything when the facts of the matter are so plainly evident. And now, de Blasio has mysteriously and suddenly decided to skip out on this year’s Groundhog Day event altogether.

http://gawker.com/what-is-non-gr...

Is it because he genuinely, truly wanted to campaign for Hillary Clinton in Iowa? Does anyone ever actually want to go to Iowa? Or does de Blasio know something that we don’t?

As one anonymous Wall Street Journal commenter keenly observed back in 2014:

The groundhog was suicidally reckless despite the absence of any immediate threat. Let’s try to be clear... the groundhog jumped in an act of misanthropic disrespect for the solemn nature of the ceremony for which he was invited to be a major participant.... While the groundhog may have been lacking human intelligence, surely the animal had a clue that he should not be taking flying leaps from 5 feet up. Would [s]he do that under ordinary circumstances?

Yes, why would the groundhog take such a leap? And how many other groundhogs have similarly plunged (by choice?) to their own deaths? We reached out to the Staten Island Zoo for comment, but the zoo has apparently decided to keep the truth—like so many precious animals—under lock and key.

If you have any information at all about Charlotte, what happened to her, and why these groundhogs are acting out, please do send us an email here.

And of course, happy Groundhog Day.


Contact the author at ashley@gawker.com.

Can You Open a Bottle of Wine Without a Corkscrew?

$
0
0

What do you do when you have a lovely bottle of wine but your corkscrew has gone missing? When teetotaling is not an option, there are countless unconventional ways that people claim you can open a bottle of wine. We put them to the test.

Tip Tester is a new video series in which we’re evaluating commonly touted “life hacks,” and today we’re partaking in the classic battle of man versus cork. Let’s say you’ve misplaced your corkscrew and you need to MacGyver the situation with whatever you have on hand. As per common advice we found online, we tried trying to open a bottle of wine using a screw, paperclips, and a shoe. Are any of these option possible? Sure, but we wouldn’t recommend it.


Contact the author at andy@lifehacker.com. Thanks to Madeleine Davies for contributing her expertise.

Cliven Bundy Tells Last Remaining Oregon Militia Idiots to Stand Their Ground

$
0
0

Cliven Bundy Tells Last Remaining Oregon Militia Idiots to Stand Their Ground

Rancher and outspoken racist Cliven Bundy earned notoriety in 2014 for starting a large, armed standoff against the federal government because he was angry about his cows. This week, he’s urging the rural radicals once commanded by his son to continue their armed occupation of a remote wildlife refuge in Harney County, Oregon.

http://gawker.com/ammon-bundy-is...

After a month of dildo-waving and threatening to kill FBI agents, the Oregon confrontation seems to be winding down. A shootout with law enforcement left one of the militia’s main figures dead and several others apprehended and facing prison time. Following his arrest, Ammon Bundy (the de facto commander and most public face of the aggrieved pseudo-patriots) urged his former followers to stand down and vacate the Malheur Wildlife Refuge. His father doesn’t agree.

http://gawker.com/watch-some-nut...

In a letter posted to the official Bundy Ranch blog and addressed to Harney County’s sheriff, Governor Kate Brown, and Barack Obama, Cliven insists the refuge will remain occupied:

Cliven Bundy Tells Last Remaining Oregon Militia Idiots to Stand Their Ground

Bundy also demands that “all federal and state policing agents” be removed from the entire county. Notably, Cliven Bundy is not in Harney County. He also misspells the name of the wildlife refuge.

Photo: Getty


It's Almost Time For Women to Register as Conscientious Objectors

$
0
0

It's Almost Time For Women to Register as Conscientious Objectors

In Washington today, the leaders of the U.S. Army and Marine Corps told Congress that it’s time for all American women to register for the draft. Must we begin to fret?

Currently, only American men are required by law to register for the possibility of a military draft, the thing that helped us win the Vietnam War. But because of the fact that social progress in gender equity has finally trickled all the way up to U.S. military combat troops, military leaders are now encouraging Congress to require “every American who’s physically qualified” to register for the draft. Since women are now able to serve in combat roles, they say, it is only fair that they also put their names in in case we need to have another World War, the likelihood of which has certainly been reduced by advances in military technology but which probably depends even more on who wins the next presidential election.

Superficially, this request may cause feminists to feel conflicted. Register as an official (possible) member of the imperialist American war machine, or risk not supporting equal rights for women? What to do???

Fortunately, this is a false choice. All American women can now full embrace the same right enjoyed by American men: to register with the Selective Service as a conscientious objector. When the draft rolls around for President Cruz’s Middle Eastern War of Supremacy, you go before the board and honestly explain your philosophical objection to being asked to kill people you don’t know as part of insane wars of imperialism. Then you go teach poor kids for a while or something. While doing so, enjoy the warm sense of righteousness that comes with civic participation.

If that doesn’t work we can go back to burning draft cards. No big deal.

[Photo of male draftees participating in America’s rich history of public debate: AP]

It Sure Does Seem Like Ted Cruz's Campaign Tried to Sabotage Ben Carson in Iowa

$
0
0

It Sure Does Seem Like Ted Cruz's Campaign Tried to Sabotage Ben Carson in Iowa

Ben Carson’s sinking campaign hit another low point last night when the famed surgeon finished fourth in the Iowa caucus, a good 14 points behind Marco Rubio in what appears to now be a three-person race for the Republican nomination. The Carson camp has so far offered one reason for his poor showing: a quick-spreading rumor started by Ted Cruz that Carson was dropping out of the race.

This may seem like sour grapes served up by a foundering, poorly-run campaign, but Ted Cruz’s people aren’t exactly saying they didn’t do it. Per a well-reported MSNBC story:

Cruz campaign spokesman Rick Tyler denied the allegations to MSNBC, but said his people did alert some supporters that Carson planned to go to Florida after the Iowa caucuses instead of campaigning.

That’s quite a needle to thread. The Cruz campaign says it didn’t explicitly state that Carson was dropping out; they only implied it by telling their supporters to tell Carson’s supporters that he was, like, going on vacation.

But Rick Tyler is either lying, or the Cruz campaign’s directive to its supporters got lost in translation. The Carson campaign has cited this tweet from Rep. Steve King, one of Cruz’s top endorsers in Iowa, as evidence that Cruz’s campaign was spreading the rumor that Carson was dropping out:

MSNBC’s Jane C. Timm quotes several Carson supporters who were told by Cruz volunteers at separate precincts that Carson was dropping out. Timm also spoke to at least one presumably unbiased source—a Huckabee supporter—who gave a detailed account of what Cruz’s campaign appeared to be up to last night:

Barb Heki, a homeschool activist and Gov. Mike Huckabee supporter who said she is friendly with nearly all the campaigns in Iowa, told MSNBC that the speakers supporting Cruz at her caucus location, Hyperion Point Country Club in Johnston, Iowa, announced that Carson was getting out of the race before several-hundred caucus-goers at her location took a vote.

“They gave their speech for Ted Cruz and said we also need to announce, and let you know, that Dr. Ben Carson has announced that he’s suspending his race for awhile after the caucuses are over,” Heki said. The Cruz supporters suggested the campaign had alerted them.

Again, Tyler, Cruz’s spokesperson, “denies” this characterization but makes it pretty easy to read between the lines:

Tyler denied this, saying that they’d shared the “newsworthy” news of Carson’s travel plans and that kind of communication to supporters was not unusual.

Carson’s campaign is maintaining that upper-level Cruz staffers directly misled their volunteers across Iowa:

“To have campaigns come out and send emails to their caucus speakers suggesting that Dr. Carson was doing anything but moving forward after tonight is the lowest of low in American politics,” Carson campaign manager Ed Brookover told reporters.

Well, anyway, if you’re feeling bad for Ben Carson: don’t!


Contact the author at jordan@gawker.com / image via Getty

When Stadium Security Goes Bad

$
0
0

When Stadium Security Goes Bad

Last December, the University of Houston terminated its contract with Contemporary Services Corporation after the company’s security guards assaulted Cougars fans attempting to celebrate their team’s AAC championship. UH athletic director Hunter Yurachek stated he was “disappointed and angered” by the incident, videos of which illustrate CSC employees shoving, tackling, and punching jubilant students while other CSC personnel stand aside, allowing the fans to rush the field in celebration.

http://deadspin.com/fake-cops-unde...

It was a revealing look at how the physical territory of sports is protected, and at how many things can go wrong with the contractors and low-paid, trained-in-a-day security guards hired to do the job. Employees of CSC, which markets itself as the “world leader” in stadium security, will work many of the biggest upcoming events on the sports calendar, including the NBA playoffs and the Final Four—though, notably, not the Super Bowl. (In 2006 the NFL ended its deal with CSC to provide Super Bowl security, citing cost as a factor.)

Every major sports league in the U.S. has employed CSC. The company has worked 10 Olympics, four presidential inaugurations, and three papal visits. Their yellow jackets are ubiquitous and instantly recognizable at most large public events.

But with that ubiquity comes a number of complaints. Since 1991, CSC has been sued in federal court at least 21 times on claims ranging from personal injuries, civil rights violations, and assault and battery. While it’s impossible to draw a direct comparison, their closest competitors, Elite Services, has been sued five times in a similar timeframe.

Most of these lawsuits resulted in out-of-court settlements between CSC and the plaintiffs. Taken together, they provide a glimpse of just how fine the line is between keeping order and abusing power, and how, to sports promoters, fan safety is just another cost center to be weighed against profits.


On November 16, 2013, USC upset fourth-ranked Stanford at the L.A. Coliseum. The Cardinal were en route to another Rose Bowl; the Trojans, meanwhile, had just fired Lane Kiffin amidst a disappointing season. The 20-17 win sparked USC fans to rush the field. This happens everywhere, always, after victories of this magnitude, and there’s not much security or the team can do to keep a tide of rowdy college kids off a field they want to occupy, at least after the initial wave gets through. And—at least in football—the fans rarely pose much threat to person or property, save the goalposts.

Landon Cohen—a USC sophomore at the time—was one of these fans who leapt over the Coliseum rail to celebrate. But rather than joining his classmates at midfield, he was having his head slammed into a wall after a CSC employee tackled him “like a linebacker destroying a defenseless receiver,” in Cohen’s words.

You can see the tackle in the first three seconds of this video, right in front of one of the two yellow banners hanging on the wall.

Cohen told Deadspin that the security guard lay on top of him for up to 10 seconds, screaming at him to “stay the fuck down” and not to move (not that he could move, with the much larger man on top of him). The guard then stood up, walked away, and watched as other fans scaling the Coliseum rail trampled Cohen, he says.

It landed Cohen in the emergency room with a torn knee ligament that left him unable to walk for a month, he says; his lawsuit against CSC would later be settled for around $5,000.


Before a 2005 Eagles game, Moacir Lopes and his wife Jennifer drank at McFadden’s, a bar across the street from the stadium. Court paperwork states Lopes was a business invitee at the bar, where he got a bit drunk. As they entered the stadium and attempted to make way to their seats, security personnel ordered Moacir Lopes to “keep quiet.”

CSC employees forcibly escorted Lopes out of the seating area. After initially holding him, a different group of security guards then “negligently and carelessly shoved [Lopes] into the back seat of a golf cart, causing his head to slam against one of the poles of the cart,” according to the filed complaint. CSC handed Lopes over to Philly cops, who recognized his shortness of breath and nausea. The complaint alleges he went to the hospital, and was discharged back into police custody two days later.

This left Lopes in a holding cell to wait arraignment, barefoot, and clad only in his hospital gown. (We asked Philadelphia cops for the arrest report; they haven’t provided it to us yet.) Lopes alleges his pleas for continued medical assistance went unanswered; the family’s lawsuit names CSC, McFadden’s, the city of Philadelphia, and the Philadelphia Eagles Stadium Operator as co-defendants.

Lopes claimed he sustained a substantial list of injuries:

“Plaintiff husband has sustained injuries including but not limited to post-tramautic stupor and coma, left parietal subarachnoid hemorrage, injury to nervous and muscular systems, resulting in headaches, nausea, weakness in his extremities, sensitivity to light and dizziness, some of which [he] claims are permanent and have caused a serious impairment of bodily functions and mental and emotional distress.”

CSC denies everything; the company claims Lopes himself was sufficiently negligent, that his injuries were pre-existing, and that he provoked the incident with security guards. Despite this, CSC settled with Moacir and Jennifer Lopes in 2008 for an undisclosed amount.


At a Tennessee Titans game in 2011, Marcia Richardson claims she was tripped by a CSC security guard after an argument over whether or not she could bring in her bag (a promotional giveaway from the prior week’s game). Richardson’s suit alleges she fell and smacked her head on the concrete.

While her husband went to help her, she claims the guard who had caused the fall never looked down to help, and she alleges she was walked over and stepped on by other fans. Richardson suffered dental fractures and broke her patella in the fall. CSC denied that Richardson was hassled at the gate, as well as all the accusations of negligence. CSC settled out of court with Richardson.


More than half the suits against CSC stem from confrontations at concerts and clubs. In 2012, Albert Elhiani filed a suit against CSC (among others) for a New Year’s Eve incident wherein a bouncer at Pacha NYC employed by CSC allegedly beat him up in a darkened corner of a nightclub and used anti-Semitic epithets:

The bouncer grabbed Elhiani and dragged him into an obscured area in the nightclub, where he grabbed Elhiani’s throat and yanked the necklace off Elhiani’s neck. He threw Elhiani to the floor while screaming profanities and racial slurs at Elhiani, [such as] “filthy Jew.”

[...]

The bouncer, a man physically larger than Elhiani, overpowered Elhiani as he repeatedly kicked Elhiani in the torso and abdomen...[Afterwards,] He dragged Elhiani’s limp body through the hallway, leaving Elhiani alone on the ground and all but unconscious.

Elhiani alleged emotional trauma, in addition to physical injuries. CSC denied wrongdoing and claimed that an unknown third party was the one who actually beat Elhiani up—and that if their security guard did hit him, it was in self-defense against “plaintiff’s assaultive conduct.” Elhiani and CSC dismissed their case without prejudice, which is usually a sign that a settlement was reached. [Waiting on word from his lawyer if there was a settlement.]

But none of these incidents drew as much public attention as December’s fiasco in Houston. The structure of that incident was similar to what Landon Cohen says happened at USC: the fans that got past the first line of security weren’t touched, but the unlucky few who were caught were made examples of. CSC claims these were the actions of a few bad seeds, and responded to UH terminating its security contract with the following statement:

Contemporary Services Corporation (CSC) is aware of the events that occurred following today’s University of Houston football game. Training is provided to CSC employees for responding to such situations. Any actions by CSC personnel that contradict our training, CSC’s other requirements, or the law, are not condoned by CSC and will not be tolerated. We are currently performing an investigation of the events and will take appropriate action based on the outcome of our investigation.

Court records show that this is a typical defense by CSC: that when employees cross the line, it’s because they’ve gone rogue and aren’t representing the company’s standards. CSC has a high employee turnover (they are straightforward on their website about the fact that security jobs are part-time), which makes sense given the difficulties of the job and the accompanying low pay. According to their own site as well as former employee reviews on Glassdoor, employees are paid minimum wage or close (getting a raise to $10 an hour requires an extra class), and do not always receive the amount of training CSC claims. (I’ve reached out to CSC regarding this claim, but I have yet to hear back from them).

As the biggest private-event security contractor in the country, CSC is emblematic of larger problems in an industry that promotes cost-efficiency above nearly all else. But don’t blame the contractors; that’s what their clients want, too. All told, the lawsuits say less about CSC and more about how organizers cut corners on fan safety, occasionally to the point of irresponsibility.

Stadiums need to keep fields, concourses, and courts secure, and it can’t be done without anyone ever getting hurt. But the more dramatic instances of violence and negligence seem preventable, even at the scale at which CSC operates. Whether the answer is more rigorous employee training or higher pay, security guards shouldn’t be mercilessly wailing on college football fans or causing lengthy, expensive hospital stays. So far as the main reason they are is the bottom line, these incidents are more a function of the system’s design than an aberration.

Reporter Fabricated Quotes, Invented Sources at The Intercept

$
0
0

Reporter Fabricated Quotes, Invented Sources at The Intercept

The Intercept disclosed today that a former reporter for the national-security focused website fabricated quotes and invented sources for a number of stories published last year. According to a post published on Tuesday afternoon by editor-in-chief Betsy Reed, that reporter, Juan Thompson, went so far as to register fake email addresses, including one in Reed’s own name, to deceive his editors about the extent of his fabrications:

An investigation into Thompson’s reporting turned up three instances in which quotes were attributed to people who said they had not been interviewed. In other instances, quotes were attributed to individuals we could not reach, who could not remember speaking with him, or whose identities could not be confirmed. In his reporting Thompson also used quotes that we cannot verify from unnamed people whom he claimed to have encountered at public events. Thompson went to great lengths to deceive his editors, creating an email account to impersonate a source and lying about his reporting methods.

Shortly before Reed’s post, The Intercept prepended lengthy editor’s notes to five of Thompson’s prior articles. Four of the notes amount to severe corrections; the fifth, attached to an article containing quotes attributed to a cousin of the white supremacist Dylann Roof, indicates a total retraction: “After speaking with two members of Dylann Roof’s family, The Intercept can no longer stand by the premise of this story. Both individuals said that they do not know of a cousin named Scott Roof.”

In the now-retracted article, Thompson had claimed that “Scott Roof” had speculated during a phone conversation that Dylann Roof may been driven to murder nine black churchgoers at a Charleston, South Carolina church because “he kind of went over the edge when a girl he liked starting dating a black guy two years back.” Thompson’s report was picked up by dozens of other news outlets.

Thompson was hired by The Intercept’s founding editor-in-chief, John Cook, in November 2014. Reed replaced Cook, a former editor of Gawker.com and the current executive editor of Gawker Media, in December 2014. Prior to The Intercept, Thompson had reported in Chicago for DNAInfo and interned at the local NPR affiliate, WBEZ.*

Based on his Twitter account, Thompson appears to be invested in the outcomes of other journalism controversies. In several tweets from last year, for example, he argued that former BuzzFeed editor Benny Johnson, who was fired for committing widespread plagiarism in the summer of 2014, would not have been been able to bounce back so quickly (to editor positions at National Review and the Independent Journal Review) if he were not white:

Shortly after The Intercept’s note was published on Tuesday, a former colleague of Thompson’s suggested on Twitter that his past behavior had sent up some red flags. That colleague, a social media editor at DNAInfo Chicago named Jen Sabella, tweeted:

When asked for clarification, Sabella referred us to DNAInfo Chicago’s managing editor, Shamus Toomey, who provided the following statement about Thompson’s tenure there: “He briefly served as a summer intern in 2013, covering mainly event stories.”

When asked for comment by Gawker, Thompson sent us a copy of an undated letter he apparently sent to editor-in-chief Betsy Reed:

Ms. Reed:

I’ve been undergoing radiation treatment for testicular cancer and, since I no longer have health insurance, I’ve been feverishly struggling and figuring out how to pay for my treatment. All of this, of course, has taken up my time and energy; except for the few moments I’ve spent searching for some relief.

With regards to verifying the comments, I’m in STL undergoing treatment, again, and not in NY, thus I lack access to my notebooks (which I took for most stories) to address these matters. Moreover, after finally looking over the notes sent to me, I must say this: I had a habit of writing drafts of stories, placing the names of ppl I wanted to get quotes from in there, and then going to fetch the quotes.

(Was it sloppy? Yes? But I’m a cub reporter and expected a sustained and competent editor to guide me, something which I never had at your company and something with which The Intercept continues to struggle as everyone in this business knows.)

But, I digress; back to the situation before us.

If I couldn’t obtain a quote from the person I wanted, I went somewhere else, and must’ve forgot to change the names—clearly. Also, yes I encouraged some of my interviewees to use another name; they’re poor black people who didn’t want their names in the public given the situations and that was the only was of convincing them otherwise. That also explains why some of them didn’t want to talk with your company’s research team or denied the events. These weren’t articles in Harpers or The Nation. Instead, these are the lives of people forgotten by society and their being in public and talking to white, NY people, no less, could harm and turn them off. They’ve lost loved ones to violence you and others couldn’t possibly imagine.

Ultimately, the journalism that covers the experiences of poor black folk and the journalism others, such as you and First Look, are used to differs drastically. This dilemma is the Great Problem with the white media organizations that dominate our media landscape. As Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote: “The standard [white] progressive approach of the moment is to mix color-conscious moral invective with color-blind public policy.” Such an approach ignores the differences in the way we must navigate these various fields: including journalism.

The comments from editors calling me a stray dog; the lower pay; the being told on a trip to DC that I “shouldn’t spend like it’s the first of the month”. I shrugged it all off.

I hope you and your company can understand all this and give me time to recover so that I may eventually look over my notes. I must say, though, it’s a very nefarious and ill liberal and anti humanist position to take if you do otherwise: kicking a cancer patient when he’s down. I’ve been through a lot tougher situations than this and will weather anything thrown my way.

Ms. Reed, I also just read Counsel Oberlander’s letter. I’m not in NY and have been sick and bed-ridden from radiation so of course I can’t return that laptop—that I also broke by the way. But if your company wishes to withhold my separation pay, which I was banking on for my treatment, go right ahead. I’m also owed reimbursement from the trip to DC which I haven’t received. But I’m not angry because, naturally, I didn’t bring this up because my focus is on much more important things.

Juan Thompson

According to Reed’s note, Thompson “did not cooperate in the review” of his past reporting.

Update — 3:40 p.m.

Reed has responded:

From: Betsy Reed
Subject: Re: quick question
Date: February 2, 2016 at 3:38:46 PM EST
To: Keenan Trotter

Keenan,

I did receive an email from Juan today but it was not identical to the letter he sent to you, which you posted.

In particular, this paragraph was not in the email he sent me:

The comments from editors calling me a stray dog; the lower pay; the being told on a trip to DC that I “shouldn’t spend like it’s the first of the month”. I shrugged it all off.

Thanks,
Betsy

Update — 4:40 p.m.

A reader points out that Thompson provided a third and slightly different version of the letter he purportedly sent to Reed to CNN media reporter Tom Kludt. In the version he sent to Gawker, the 7th paragraph reads:

The comments from editors calling me a stray dog; the lower pay; the being told on a trip to DC that I “shouldn’t spend like it’s the first of the month”. I shrugged it all off.

In the version he sent to CNN, the same paragraph contains two extra clauses (bolding ours):

The comments from editors calling me a stray dog; the lower pay; the being told on a trip to DC that I “shouldn’t spend like it’s the first of the month”. I shrugged it all off. And did this force to exaggerate and work to prove my worth? Yes.

Update — 4:52 p.m.

Thompson attempted to explain the differing versions of his letter to Reed in an email to Gawker:

From: Juan Thompson
Subject: Re: Press inquiry from Gawker
Date: February 2, 2016 at 4:49:08 PM EST
To: Keenan Trotter

It’s the same I’m editing as I think of more things.

Hmm.

* Update — 6:15 p.m.

Ben Calhoun, who serves as vice president of content and programming at Chicago Public Media, which operates WBEZ, tells Gawker that Thompson’s staff biography at The Intercept, which we paraphrased above, erroneously described him as a reporter for the NPR affiliate:

I wanted to reach out to you about Juan Thompson.

Among the things that Juan apparently misled people about was his role at WBEZ. In his bio for The Intercept Juan stated that he was a reporter at WBEZ. That claim is not true. Juan was never a reporter at WBEZ.

Juan was an intern for a local talk show for 4 months (May – August of 2014). The extent of his duties was minimal, and he certainly was never responsible for any piece of journalism – nor does he have any bylines with us.

We’d obviously appreciate very much if Gawker didn’t propagate this particular piece of bad information.

Up until an hour or so ago, Thompson’s biography at The Intercept read as follows:

Juan Thompson is a journalist with a focus on crime, punishment, the police state, and race. Prior to joining The Intercept, he worked as a production assistant and reporter at Chicago’s NPR member station WBEZ and as a reporter for DNAinfo Chicago.

He lives in Brooklyn.

It now reads:

Juan Thompson is a former staff reporter for The Intercept.

Update — 6:45 p.m.

Thompson apparently provided a fourth version of the letter he purportedly sent to Reed, this time to Recode’s Noah Kulwin. The seventh paragraph of Recode’s copy includes an additional passage referring to a different reporter who used to work at The Intercept:

The comments from editors calling me a stray dog; the lower pay; the being told on a trip to DC that I “shouldn’t spend like it’s the first of the month”. I shrugged it all off. Even after the only black reporter there was fired and the editor said to him “You seem too angry”, invoking the angry black male stereotype. Did all this force to exaggerate my personal shit in order to prove my worth? Yes.


Email the author of this post: trotter@gawker.com // Photo credit: BRIC / YouTube


The Abortion Rights Dystopia Brought On by the Zika Crisis

$
0
0

The Abortion Rights Dystopia Brought On by the Zika Crisis

Like most of the pregnant population in the Western Hemisphere, I’ve spent the past weeks unusually engrossed by the spread of the Zika virus. In case you have not been joining me in Googling “Zika” while clutching your baby bump in terror, here’s the gist: the virus, spread by mosquitoes and multiplying in the Americas at a rate the World Health Organization deems “explosive,” appears to be linked to an uptick of microcephaly in infants. In South and Central America, pregnant women are getting bitten by bugs (mosquitoes love to dine on pregnant women because we’re swollen with blood) and their babies are often arriving with tiny brains, the condition either ensuring they need a very advanced level of care or are unable to live long after birth. How exactly Zika causes microcephaly remains unclear, although we can assume the virus crosses the placenta.

On Tuesday, the WHO officially dubbed Zika “an international health emergency,” and the urgency with which it’s being addressed has tempted me to imagine that this crisis will force the right flank of the abortion debate from insanity to sanity, from callousness to empathy. It’s within reasonable hope that the circumstances around Zika could at least prompt the following question in future presidential debates: “Are you prepared to look at a woman who has been bitten by the wrong mosquito and tell her she has no option but to carry a micro-encephalitic fetus to term?”

After all, the element that brings this crisis from “emergency” into “totally fucking dystopian” realm is the fact that the virus is wreaking havoc in countries with dismal, even draconian approaches to abortion and contraception. In El Salvador, for instance, where women have just been told to avoid getting pregnant until 2018, abortion is punishable by jail sentences, which means miscarriages can be criminally investigated, while birth control and sex ed are hard to come by throughout the region. Even in Brazil, abortion is only legal in limited cases, and women whose babies have been born with microcephaly say they’ve been “abandoned by the state.”

Steph Herold of Sea Change, an organization that combats abortion stigma, calls the situation for women in many of these countries a “Catch-44”: “If you get pregnant, you’re stigmatized because you’re not supposed to reproduce in this environment; if you have an abortion, you’re stigmatized; and then there’s a lack of support if you have an unhealthy baby.”

The situation reads like a combination of Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale with P.D. James’ Children of Men; women are being forced to get pregnant by government policy limiting family planning, while simultaneously being urged not to reproduce, with no help to that end. (Men are being given no behavioral guidelines, it should be noted, because governments seem to think men have nothing to do with pregnancy). Governments are entering gang-ridden areas to control mosquito populations, yet women’s control of their reproduction is barely being discussed.

Right now, pregnant American women are being warned not to travel to affected regions (so much for “babymoon” packages to the Caribbean). But when the weather heats up, projections indicate that Zika will make its way to the mainland United States. Count me among a likely large pregnant population starting to calculate exactly when mosquitoes will start buzzing near our homes. Now, as I watch the various preggo lady message boards I lurk on begin to blow up with concerns about the virus, I can see that this a worry that cuts across all demographics, possibly forcing more attention to abortion and its availability. Will Americans be satisfied with a government response that amounts to, “Ladies, wear your DEET?” And when something like a mere bug bite can endanger a fetus, can conservative politicians and clergy in the Rick Santorum school of thought comfortably assure a great many fearful citizens that the potential outcome, including a possible stillbirth, is an act of God?

Ideally, Zika might bring about an overdue series of political epiphanies: hey, the unpredictability of mosquito bites is like the unpredictability of life itself. That’s why abortion rights should be universal, right? It’s not impossible; as Sarah Zhang pointed out in WIRED last week, a rubella epidemic that required “therapeutic” abortions helped set the stage for Roe and the legalization of abortion back in the middle of the last century. Remember this spring when GOP candidates practically vaulted over each other, thumping their chests, to proclaim their enmity for Planned Parenthood and disapproval of abortion? That would look quite callous in the face of a nationwide health crisis, and might conceivably at least change the tone of the conversation.

But some of the activists I spoke to weren’t sure that that kind of awakening is possible in today’s Ted Cruz-friendly climate. They instead compared this potential outbreak to the early years of HIV/AIDS, in which (as has happened already in Central and South America) social prejudice hindered effective treatment. When the disease does arrive, it may demonstrate that the “Catch-44” Herold describes isn’t limited to other countries. While privileged women like me huddle near air conditioners with our windows shut, Zika could easily entrap American women in areas with standing water that breeds mosquitoes, closed clinics, no access to the later abortions a microcephaly diagnosis might require, and a patchwork system of healthcare.

Herold noted that separating “good” (Zika-infected) and less good (typical) abortion seekers into separate categories would only backfire and add to abortion’s stigma. And Pamela Merritt, co-founder of reproductive direct action group ReproAction, lives in Missouri, which she notes has a mosquito problem during much of the year and a healthcare policy problem during all of it. She compares the potential crisis of Zika to the current disaster in Flint, Michigan, calling it a “perfect storm” about to hit any warm state with bad policy on the books. “You can build all the walls you want on the border, but you’re not going to stop the mosquitoes from coming up,” she told me.

“I sincerely doubt that this is going to jumpstart the anti-abortion folks to rethink their policy, nor do I think that states that are refusing to expand Medicaid are going to suddenly wake up to the reality that health care policy needs to be proactive and that abortion is key to this,” Merritt added. “What you’re talking about is major states that are particularly vulnerable: they’ve been defunding family planning, they don’t have good health care.” And if the pregnancies do go to term, she notes from personal experience as the sister and guardian of an adult with a developmental disability: “These families are going to be caught up in the underfunded cycle that I’m dealing with with my autistic brother.”

Add one more factor to this total nightmare scenario: global warming. The Sierra Club’s A. Tianna Scozzaro notes that global warming, which facilitates the further spread of mosquito-borne viruses, hits low-income women the hardest, and that reproductive control is a major front in fighting that impact, whether it’s hundreds of sick babies or families having to pick up and move from areas affected by climate disasters. As always, these issues are intersectional, one indignity piling on another. Everyone may be equally terrified by Zika, but the less socioeconomic privilege people have, the more they are likely to get caught in that Catch-44—and if it’s not this virus, changing temperatures ensure that there will be another one. “By ensuring self-determination and access to reproductive rights we can prevent the health impact of a virus like this in the United States,” Scozzaro says. “When you look at who is being most impacted, it’s those who are least prepared to respond.”

Sarah M. Seltzer is a writer of fiction, journalism and criticism in New York City and the Editor-at-Large at pop culture website Flavorwire.

Image via AP

Catskills Town Accused of Preventing 160 Hasidic Jews From Voting

$
0
0

Catskills Town Accused of Preventing 160 Hasidic Jews From Voting

Last January, the board of elections in the tiny Catskills village of Bloomingburg, New York, attempted to cancel the voting registrations of 160 Hasidic residents, claiming that they needed to provide more proof of residency to vote. Ten of those residents filed a federal lawsuit against the board claiming voter discrimination, and today, the Sullivan County Board of Elections settled for $575,000.

According to the Times Herald-Record, the board still denies discriminating against any Hasidic residents. The settlement, however, requires the county to pay $550,000 in legal fees and $2,500 to each resident who was part of the suit. The settlement also requires both sides to come together and appoint a monitor to oversee voting practices in the town for the next five years.

An attorney for the Hasidic residents told the Herald-Record that the settlement a victory “not only for Bloomingburg’s Hasidic Jewish community, but citizens of every faith.”

The New York Post points out that this is not the first time officials in Bloomingburg have been accused of anti-Semitism:

In 2014, the village was also accused in a $25 million lawsuit of trying to block members of Brooklyn’s Satmar Hasidic community from relocating there by tying up a approvals for a school as well as a 396-unit townhouse project.

“The village and town are seeking to use their political power, economic pressure, zoning laws, and sheer intimidation to prevent a certain type of people from joining their community,” the suit said.

That case is still pending in Manhattan federal court.


Photo of Hasidic man voting in Brooklyn in 2008 via AP. Contact the author at allie@gawker.com.

Pundits Have Literally No Clue What Happened in Iowa

$
0
0

Pundits Have Literally No Clue What Happened in Iowa

A sampling of headlines analyzing the results of last night’s Democratic caucus in Iowa:

Bernie Sanders should be the biggest story of the caucus because he won the party’s future, but the virtual tie still wasn’t enough, and he needs more, because it was better for Hillary Clinton, who must really hate Iowa, where the Democrats won, because it went wrong for her.

If you don’t consume any news between now and mid-November you will wake up one day and there will still be a new president and your life will probably be better for having done anything else.


Contact the author at jordan@gawker.com / image via Getty

Uber Got a New Logo, Which Doesn't Mean Shit

$
0
0

Uber Got a New Logo, Which Doesn't Mean Shit

In corporate America, the most persistent refuge of outright charlatanism is “branding.” The only thing more offensive to honesty than a “rebranding” campaign is a breathless feature story about a rebranding campaign.

What do we have in Wired today... ah, it’s a breathless feature story about a rebranding campaign! “The Inside Story of Uber’s Radical Rebranding Campaign.” If I were to give you an honest summary of all of the important facts about Uber’s rebranding campaign, that summary would just be an empty box. There are no important facts about Uber’s branding. It is not an important subject. Uber’s effective dismantling of the modern concept of “employee rights?” That is an important story. Uber changing its logo from a “U” to a little kind of bluish sideways ass? Not an important story.

Theoretically it could be an amusing story, in the right hands, because Uber’s billionaire boss clearly took this exercise in kindergarten-level picture drawing very seriously. But Wired, having been granted access for this story, is somehow compelled to try to dress this up into a story with meaning. “Does it work?” the magazine asks rhetorically. “Do you like it? Are you freaking out? Be honest.”

No.

The story of how Kalanick and his design team came to replace the ubiquitous “U” logo is about more than a corporate rebranding effort. It’s a coming-of-age tale.

It is not. It is, in fact, about a corporate rebranding effort.

It’s about Uber’s attempt to transform its purpose and cement a new reputation—to change not only how it is perceived throughout the world, but how it perceives itself.

If Uber wanted to change how it is perceived around the world, it could treat its drivers as employees, taking a concrete step to prevent the most destructive consequences of the “gig economy.” Instead, it got a new logo.

Here’s the thing, though. Kalanick is not a designer.

Words are incapable of communicating how irritating this grating, attention-starved “Here’s the thing” writing construction is. I apologize for this digression.

Kalanick’s involvement makes more sense when you understand the rebranding was personal. “There’s an evolution here, for the founder as well as for the company,” he says, “because really, they’re very connected.” During Uber’s early years, Kalanick came across as a bellicose bro, a rebel-hero always angling for a confrontation—with regulators, the taxi industry, and competitors. Reflecting on this image, Kalanick says it was all a misrepresentation by the media. When you don’t really know who you are, he explains, it’s easy to be miscast—as a company, or as a person.

Uber was misrepresented by the media, says Uber’s CEO, unchallenged. Uber’s CEO was on a journey of personal and professional evolution, you see. On his journey of personal and professional evolution, did he find, I don’t know, workers’ rights? No. He found a new logo.

A long and very boring story of font and design minutiae ensues, which we shall skip. The primary finding of this feature story is that the process to redesign Uber’s logo from a “U” to an ass shape took years, complete with an entire team of deep thinkers doing extremely tough work.

It took them a year and a half to agree on five pillars they thought best described the company Uber aspires to be: grounded, populist, inspiring, highly evolved, and elevated.

What do you do for a living? Drive a car, while receiving no benefits? I work as a branding designer conceptualizing one “brand pillar” every three months. I get paid much more than you.

Anyone can draw an icon, he told them. What’s the story behind it? As they sketched on the wall and sifted through materials, the group began to focus on a blog post Kalanick had written, in which he described Uber’s culture as the combination of bits and atoms. Bits represented the machine efficiency involved in Uber’s mapping and dispatch software. The atoms represented people.

Travis Kalanick is a billionaire several times over and worth every penny.

We won’t ruin for you the drama of the thousands of subsequent words expended on who exactly decided to make Uber’s logo a little sideways ass, and why. I will only tell you—with no fabrication or exaggeration—that it all ends with this:

It’s a question Kalanick is beginning to answer for himself. “The warmth, the colors, those things,” he says, nodding to the new brand. “That happens, when you start to know who you are.”

Anyhow they changed their little logo.

[Pic via]

500 Days of Kristin, Day 374: Surprising Fact About Kristin

$
0
0

500 Days of Kristin, Day 374: Surprising Fact About Kristin

In a new interview with Momtastic.com, a blog about moms fantastic, Kristin Cavallari revealed something new about herself. When asked, “What’s something about you that would surprise others if they knew it?”, she responded:

I’m such a neat freak. I’m a little OCD when it comes to organizing. There’s nothing I love more than organizing my closet, the fridge, pantry—you name it!

Surprise.


This has been 500 Days of Kristin.

[Photo via Getty]

Viewing all 24829 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images