Quantcast
Channel: Gawker
Viewing all 24829 articles
Browse latest View live

Taylor Swift's House Was Vandalized by a Bunch of Damn Nerds

$
0
0

Taylor Swift's House Was Vandalized by a Bunch of Damn Nerds

You may remember when three millennials were arrested outside of Taylor Swift's beachside Rhode Island mansion for throwing beer bottles and flipping off her security guards. You probably had a good idea in your head of what these brats looked like, but, surprise, two of them are basically fucking geniuses!

I mean, obviously they're geniuses, considering they were arrested for vandalizing Taylor Swift's house. But they might be actual geniuses, per TMZ. Of the three, one has a degree from MIT and another is a chemist. The other is nothing less than a certified hero of Connecticut.

— Tristan Kading, 28, a master of science in chemical oceanography conferred by MIT. He also received the Richard Montgomery Award for Achievement in Mathematics.

— Emily Kading, 26, Nuclear Scientist specializing in agriculture and natural resources. She's studying to be a nuclear physicist.

As for Michael Horrigan — the 29-year-old was working on a ferry crew on the Long Island Sound last May with Tristan ... when a 12-year-old girl's canoe capsized. Both guys helped pull her to safety, and got citations from Connecticut for heroism.

So, where did this burst of terror sprout from? Well, there is some damning evidence:

  • Kading spent time in Boston
  • Horrigan spent time in Long Island

Hmmmm. I think that just about settles it.


​Tuesday Night TV Is Almost Too Much To Deal With Right Now

$
0
0

​Tuesday Night TV Is Almost Too Much To Deal With Right Now

Tonight we've got pet cemeteries, sneaky soccer players, Anderson Cooper and Kelly Ripa, the drunk history of some truly classic American music, and a wife swap you're going to be hearing about tomorrow.

At 8/7c. you've got the best of the Audition rounds on America's Got Talent, an episode of Bad Girls Club on Oxygen entitled "Bad News Brit," presumably about a no-good gal named Brit and not a British person who wanders—"Bad news, Brit!"—into that house of horrors, and of course tonight's very exciting Pretty Little Liars, picking up the pieces of last week's honest-to-Ella fantastic bombing.

(Why it's fantastic is this is like the third time this particular bitch, which is a word I do not throw around, got blown up. The first time she was blinded, the second time I don't remember how the fire started but her blindness returned, then she got conked on the head and drowned in a lake, and now here she goes again, and it's thrilling. Not that great a girl, to be honest, or it would be sad, but instead it is straight up amazing.)

At 9/8c. you have the risible but loveable Chasing Life on ABC Family—bearing the risible, full-stop, title of "Clear Minds, Full Lives, Can't Eat!"—and if you can't quite handle ABC Family's characteristic harshness there's always the Canadian Realness of Degrassi: The Next Generation on Teen Nick. Finally, the fascinating El Rey network premieres its new drama Matador, which of course is about a futbol star-slash-CIA operative. (Man, and you thought ol' Sydney Bristow had it rough just going to grad school.)

Alternately you have the two-hour Bravo block: Criminally underrated Real Housewives Of New York City, appropriately rated The People's Couch, and a very special Watch What Happens: Live with Anderson Cooper and Kelly Ripa. (Andy Cohen is at his tip-top very best with precisely those two people, so the three of them together is like, something I will be Watching as It Happens: Live.)

At 10/9c. it's all about Comedy Central: First the Drunk History of Johnny Cash and Kris Kristofferson (man in black meets silver-tongued devil!) and then what seems like a particularly crazy Nathan For You as he first advertises for a pet store in a graveyard and then employs a focus group to help a maid service. (I know we lavish Amy Schumer amounts of love on Nathan Fielder of late, but honestly it's just so satisfying to see that show take off. Of all the ventriloquist's dummies who could have gotten the old hocus pocus alamagocus, I'm sure glad it was him.)

Otherwise there's Finding Carter on MTV, which I don't mind telling you I absolutely love; Tyrant, about which lots of very vocal people do not mind doing the same; the premiere of something on a network called FYI called Born To Style—which I mention because this first episode is entitled "Homeless Boy To Rock Star Glam" and that seems highly notable—and then you've got ABC's Celebrity Wife Swap doing, get this, Blossom's Jenna Von Oÿ and Jill Motherfucking Zarin.

Big night! Big night all around. I didn't really think about it until I said it all at once, but... That's some pretty varied entertainment, isn't it? Some bang for your Kabletown buck.

[Image by Bravo]

Morning After is a new home for television discussion online, brought to you by Gawker. What are you watching tonight? What are we missing out on? Recommendations and discussions down below.

San Francisco Boldly Stands Up to Tech Buses with $3.55 Fee

$
0
0

San Francisco Boldly Stands Up to Tech Buses with $3.55 Fee

San Francisco's plan to legalize the armada of tech buses has sailed past its last regulatory hurdle. The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency voted today to approve increased fees charged to tech companies for using city bus stops, as part of its controversial shuttle pilot program.

According to KQED News, SFMTA raised the per-stop fee charged to shuttle operators from $1 up to $3.55. The fee was increased for two reasons. Residents demanded fewer city stops be included in the pilot program, which means there would be less revenue coming in, and the projected administrative costs were higher than anticipated.

Carli Paine, the manager for the SFMTA pilot program, said providers are making about 40 percent fewer stops than initial estimates suggested.

Paine said the fees will cover the program's fixed costs and will be spread over 2,449 stops, well under the 4,121 stops originally estimated. [...]

The total estimated program cost is expected to be $3.7 million, more than the January estimate of $1.7 million.

When the program was initially proposed, local activists complained that tech companies were being charged too little. But raising the fee by 255 percent hasn't seemed to placate the protesters. According to San Francisco Chronicle transit reporter Michael Cabanatuan, who covered today's SFMTA board hearing, they still feel like their voices have been unheard.

Those critics are proceeding with a lawsuit, challenging the luxury shuttle program on environmental grounds. But it's unlikely that the suit will prevent the pilot from going forward: Google buses are slated to begin rolling legally through San Francisco on August 1st.

[Photo: Ryan Blauvelt]

Camera Captures Terrifying Video of a Tornado Destroying a Store

$
0
0

A surveillance camera in a Farmer's Co-Op Store in Pilger, Nebraska caught the terrifying moment that one of the twin EF-4 tornadoes swept through the town last month, demolishing a large part of the building in mere seconds.

The video is about ten minutes long — skip to the 1:00 mark for the "action," if you will. A few minutes after the tornado sweeps through, the people who sought refuge in the back of the store return to survey the damage. The video is a testament to the power of tornadoes; it took seconds to go from relative calm to utter calamity.

This is the latest in a string of intense security camera videos released by organizations struck by tornadoes this year. Two weeks ago, a gas station surveillance camera in Wisconsin captured a direct hit from an EF-1 tornado, and back in April a camera installed outside a church in Tupelo, Mississippi witnessed the full fury of a destructive EF-3 twister.

Shoppers Break Window After Kids Get Locked Inside Hot Car

$
0
0

A group of shoppers in the Houston suburb of Katy, Texas felt compelled to smash the window of a Jeep after hearing cries from children inside. The children's mother had apparently locked her keys inside the car by accident. According to the Fox affiliate in Houston, the woman seen climbing through the broken car window in cell phone video from the scene is the mother—previous reports had erroneously stated that she had left the children in the car while she got a haircut.

From KRIV:

The images also show a woman who crawled through the chattered window. We later found out she was the mother of the kids, who minutes before had been in this postal center seeking help to rescue her kids.

The manager showed us surveillance video which shows the mom moments before with the kids by her side. We later see her leave with the two little ones but at 5:39 she comes back into the store without them.

"She came inside and was talking to her and I still didn't know what was going on, but used our phone and I don't know who she was calling, either 911," say Heidy Lopez, works at postal center.

Heidy tells us the mother explained she had locked the keys in her car. But while waiting and then making a call, the timer on the surveillance shows almost five minutes have passed, it wasn't until 5:44 that we see her run out the door.

Gabriel Del Valle recorded the group breaking into a woman's Jeep with his phone, telling KHOU that he heard the children crying out as he was leaving a store in the shopping center. "The kids were in there crying," he said. "I mean you would understand. It's real hot."

The police, KHOU reports, were never called to the scene.

[H/T Time // Video via KHOU]

Navy Nurse Refuses to Force-Feed Gitmo Prisoners on Hunger Strike

$
0
0

Navy Nurse Refuses to Force-Feed Gitmo Prisoners on Hunger Strike

A Navy nurse at the prison at Guantánamo Bay has refused to comply with orders to force-feed detainees on hunger strike, citing ethical objections to the practice. The male medical officer is the first known member of the U.S. Navy to defy the Pentagon's policy.

"There was a recent instance of a medical provider not willing to carry out the enteral feeding of a detainee," Navy Capt. Tom Gresback told the Miami Herald by email. "The matter is in the hands of the individual's leadership." More from the Herald:

Word of the refusal reached the outside world last week in a call from prisoner Abu Wael Dhiab to attorney Cori Crider of the London-based legal defense group Reprieve. Dhiab, a hunger striker, described how a nurse in the Navy medical corps abruptly refused to "force-feed us" sometime before the Fourth of July — and disappeared from detention center duty.

Crider called the male nurse the first known U.S. military conscience objector of the 18-month-long hunger strike in the prison camps, and said his dissent took "real courage ... none of us should underestimate how hard that has been."

Dhiab, 43, is challenging Guantánamo force-feeding policy in federal court. A Syrian who was cleared for transfer from Guantánamo in 2010 but who can't be repatriated because of unrest in his homeland, has been an on-again, off-again hunger striker to protest his indefinite detention.

Gresback refused to identify the number of Guantánamo's 149 prisoners currently on hunger strike, saying that it is “policy to not address the number of detainees who choose to engage in non-religious fasting or those who would require enteral feeding.”

According to retired Army Brig. Gen. Stephen Xenakis, a psychiatrist against force-feeding prisoners, the nurse is unlikely to be punished, telling the Miami Herald, "They have said to us directly that if a provider objects for ethical reasons or other reasons they would not be ordered to participate—and they would not suffer any adverse consequences."

[Image via AP]

Parents: Son Committed Suicide After Viral Video of Him Masturbating

$
0
0

Parents: Son Committed Suicide After Viral Video of Him Masturbating

The parents of 14-year-old Matthew Burdette claim that their son committed suicide after he was "mercilessly" bullied for a video taken by one of his classmates of him allegedly masturbating in a bathroom stall. Timothy and Barbara Burdette have filed a $1 million claim against the San Diego Unified School District, claiming that a number of employees at their son's high school were aware of the bullying, but did nothing to stop it.

According to the Los Angeles Times, the school district has rejected their claim, giving the Burdettes six months to file a lawsuit.

Matthew Burdette committed suicide last November while with his family at a cabin for Thanksgiving. According to the claim, Matthew left a note saying that he couldn't "handle school" and had "no friends."

The video was apparently recorded after Matthew had been kicked out of class last year. From CBS News:

According to their claim, Matthew, who was on the water polo and wrestling teams, was kicked out of class on Nov. 15 for eating sunflower seeds. The teacher didn't give him anywhere to go, so he wandered the halls and ended up in a boys' bathroom, the claim said.

Another student peeked over a bathroom stall and videotaped Matthew, allegedly masturbating. That student posted the video on social media, including SnapChat and Vine, and it quickly went viral among students at schools through the district, the claim said.

"Kids saw this video and began to tease Matthew mercilessly—they teased him, they harassed him. They made his life miserable over a two-week period," Laura Burdette Mechak, Matthew's aunt, told KGTV.

The Burdettes only learned of the video's existence from other students and after Matthew had committed suicide. As the Los Angeles Times reports, a hearing is being held later this month to determine if the student who took the video could face charges under California's anti-bullying law.

[ H/T The Daily Dot // Image via KGTV]

Police responded to a shooting at Las Vegas' Fashion Show mall Tuesday evening, where one man was ap

$
0
0

Police responded to a shooting at Las Vegas' Fashion Show mall Tuesday evening, where one man was apparently shot in the neck after getting into an altercation with the gunmen near the mall's food court. Both fled the scene when police arrived.


Here's The Derek Jeter Farewell At The All-Star Game

$
0
0

John Farrell waited for the American League to take the field in the top of the fourth inning so he could remove Jeter from the game and give the crowd a proper chance to send off Jeter. It was a nice moment, Jeter tipped his cap (face) to the crowd, the players, and the coaches. He then went into the dugout and fist bumped the AL squad and popped out for another tip of the cap to the crowd.

Jeter left the game 2-2 with a single and a double, the double coming in the first inning off Adam Wainwright. As is typical in these kinds of events, Farrell was not the only one working to put on a good show. Wainwright pitched in, as well.

Indeed he did.

Goodbye, Jeets. You are in the running for All-Star MVP because it is your last, but you will nevertheless be missed, if for nothing else than giving us this GIF of Bud Selig realizing he was on television while you exited and should probably start clapping.

Here's The Derek Jeter Farewell At The All-Star Game

[FOX]

House Speaker John Boehner winks at Politico's Jake Sherman at the Republican National Committee hea

$
0
0

House Speaker John Boehner winks at Politico's Jake Sherman at the Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington, Tuesday. Sherman had asked Boehner whether had ideas for border legislation. "I've got lots of them," Boehner said. Image by J. Scott Applewhite via AP.

Why I Love So You Think You Can Dance, Dopey (Or Dead) Dads And All

$
0
0

Why I Love So You Think You Can Dance, Dopey (Or Dead) Dads And All

Less than 10 minutes into the first episode of the 11th season of Fox's So You Think You Can Dance, a contestant's dad was onstage dancing to "Blurred Lines." To begin, he set a water bottle on the floor before him, and then, as though initiating an ancient mating ritual, he approached and hovered above that artifact with gesturing arms, gyrating crotch, wriggling ass. "It's a party-starter," explained his daughter, the talented and astoundingly unmortified 18-year-old Shelby Rase from Covington, La., who'd just performed a contemporary routine to a languid piano version of Avicii's "Wake Me Up."

If every last word in that paragraph seems deliberately chosen to prevent you from reading any further, I understand. I was a reluctant convert to SYTYCD myself. My initial exposure, seven years ago, was involuntary—my girlfriend was a regular viewer, and I watched along dutifully. But I soon found myself, like Shelby witnessing her dad's "bottle dance," strangely un-repulsed by what I saw: sexy young people enthusiastically performing emotionally charged and physically demanding feats of skill. Kind of like sports, but with a little more leg and a lot more Sara Bareilles.

My life as a fan of this show hasn't always been easy. Like a mom who always says the exact most embarrassing thing in front of her daughters' friends, it seems compelled to showcase whatever current bit of pop flotsam will annoy me most. But I've accepted this eagerness to please as inextricable from its effectiveness. As anybody in the snack-food or reality-show biz knows, the key ingredients of American culture are corn and cheese—both processed. So You Think You Can Dance is the Doritos of prime-time talent competitions.

The bottle dance wasn't the last we saw of Shelby's dad. (As on playgrounds, parents don't have names of their own here .) Soon he was back to compete in a brief dance-off with another contestant's father, and in these two short segments, the show accomplished everything that Jimmy Fallon's bit with New Jersey governor Chris Christie a few weeks later about "The Evolution of Dad Dancing" would set out to, but with more gently teasing affection and less viral-thirsting savvy.

For all its corn and all its cheese, this Wednesday-night summer staple has, for 200 episodes now, consistently expressed an excited and infectious curiosity about the many ways people dance to popular music. But that's not all this show is up to. Because while it may encourage its young viewers to identify with the contestants, it also recognizes how preoccupied that audience is with the adults in their lives. Even as the show choreographs elaborate dreams for the kids who watch, it soothes their often unacknowledged fears about the corniest, cheesiest ideal of all: the American family itself.


On So You Think You Can Dance, 20 adorably young, impossibly telegenic, physically ideal amateurs, each trained in a specific style (such as ballroom, contemporary, or hip-hop), perform choreographed routines with partners, often in styles outside their areas of expertise, typically to current pop songs. Fans vote, and, in a system as skeptical of democracy as the U.S. Constitution itself, the judges choose which of the least popular dancers must go home.

This is not Dancing With the Stars, this program's wicked (and more popular) stepsister, which struck me as a reactionary corrective designed to appeal to the sort of Americans who complain about "undeserved" reality-show fame. On DWTS, celebrities must display some actual talent, dammit, or suffer humiliation. (I said dance, famewhore, dance!) It makes me long for the simpler days of Battle of the Network Stars, when wet t-shirts and tugs-of-war were sufficient punishment for TV success.

By contrast, larger-than-life celebrities only disturb SYTYCD's self-contained equilibrium. In this universe, Christina Applegate or Jenna Dewan are plenty famous enough for the guest-judge's chair, and Ellen DeGeneres far too much so. This season's audition episodes, which began in late May, clumsily tacked on a side contest where viewers could vote for which amateur hip-hop crew they'd like to see perform on the show; Justin Bieber introduced the crews, disastrously. The segments were pre-recorded, and the Biebs summoned as much enthusiasm as he might if fulfilling court-ordered community service (and maybe he was), but his presence was still a distraction, like if Elvis had shown up on Gilligan's Island.

This ain't American Idol either, though the genetic makeup overlaps: SYTYCD creator Nigel Lythgoe was the impresario who brought Popstars to Britain, from whence (with Lythgoe's assistance) sprang Simon Fuller's Pop Idol, and later, of course, AI itself. But while that now-fading Fox juggernaut, particularly in its early years, encouraged a rampant vocal emotionalism that could ruin even songs I enjoyed, SYTYCD, though no less sentimental, somehow redeems even songs I can't stand. In fact, at its best, the show does something incredible: It allows me to hear how a song I hate might sound to someone who loves it.


When I first started watching So You Think You Can Dance, I knew nothing about dance, nor did I think much about its particulars. Today I know only what the show has taught me, and I could very well be living a lie. (Is "lyrical hip-hop" really a style that professionals refer to outside this program's bubble, or is it just a branding gimmick to put a "street" spin on styles that more conventionally trained dancers are comfortable performing? I may never know.) If at any point I start to jabber about leg extensions or pointe work, please take my commentary as seriously as the simulated expertise of your buddy who last watched soccer in 2010 but knows exactly what Mexico needed to do to beat the Netherlands.

The judges do mention technique when critiquing the routines, especially when the styles picked are technically demanding: Bollywood and its cartilage-shredding knee-bends, or quickstep and its exacting manic elegance. And one of the show's genuine pleasures is watching dancers prove their versatility by mastering unfamiliar styles—to watch a pair of tappers, say, nail a cha-cha routine set to Ke$ha and Pitbull's "Timber," or ostensibly streetwise hip-hop dancers mastering something ostensibly more formal. But more often, what's evaluated here is "performance," a term which suggests an enthusiastic commitment to a display of technique, ideally accompanied by an emotional "connection" with one's partner, and a pleasing vivacity that's nonetheless "natural"—for all its showbiz glitz, SYTYCD discourages mugging and hamminess.

The show has desperately varied its format over the years as its ratings have slipped. It now partners contestants with "all-stars" from previous seasons instead of just with one another, and more drastically, it has cut back from two weekly programs to one. But the structure of the behind-the-scenes rehearsal clips that introduce each routine is unchanging: The choreographer muses on the story and emotion he or she hopes to get across, and maybe on the difficulty of the steps. The dancers goof around some and maybe endure a non-injurious mishap (a kick in the face, a dropped girl). We're left with a sense that's there's still so much work to do, and maybe the slightest (unwarranted) concern that there's too little time.

As for the routines themselves, some of the most effective are economical in concept and execution, centered around a single prop, rooted in a simple conflict. In season four (broadcast in 2008), choreographer Mia Michels cast freestyle hip-hop dancer Stephen "tWitch" Boss and contemporary dancer Katee Shean as sparring lovers and placed them on opposite sides of a door. Katee had two not-entirely-conflicting objectives: to make out with tWitch and to kick his ass. Whereas tWitch's one goal was simpler: to keep the frenzied Katee on the other side of that door. This was sex and violence at its most excitingly cartoonish, with the dancers even suggesting the unlimited flexibility and physical impossibility of animation. (At one point, tWitch opens the door, and there's Katee clinging to its other side.) For sure, Duffy's chintzy retro-soul tune "Mercy" never sounded so good.

More often, the show sublimates desire and aggression into swoops and swoons—exaggerated embraces evoking the orgasmic without the pornographic, limbs out-flung in vigorous spasms of rage. These climaxes are what you tend to remember later, minus much of the preceding foreplay or postcoital poses. The details of the routine Mandy Moore (not that one) choreographed to Bonnie Tyler's masterpiece of pop melodrama, "Total Eclipse of the Heart," in 2011's season eight are obliterated by a single cross-stage leap by Melanie Moore into the arms of Neil Haskell. You know the song, and you can guess the exact moment the leap will occur without watching the video. Like a roller coaster, this is a machine carefully engineered to elicit from us the simplest elemental thrill, and like a roller coaster, the excitement's only accentuated because you know that thrill is coming, and when.

But it's another performance from season four, with Mark Kanemura as a briefcase-toting workaholic and Chelsie Hightower as his ignored lover, that epitomizes what So You Think You Can Dance can accomplish for me. Choreographers Tabitha and Napoleon D'umo, standard-bearers of the aforementioned "lyrical hip-hop" style, burrow into the seemingly commonplace rhythm of Leona Lewis' hyperventilating mega-pop hit "Bleeding Love." The beat itself builds programmatically and predictably, but the dancers construct a clear dramatic arc, in sync with it or in counterpoint, their movements suggesting nuances the track doesn't in fact possess. When the music drops out, their bodies throb in simulated heartbeats, imagining a rhythm in a space of silence.

Lewis's big, featureless voice attempts to make vague lyrics of desire and fear seem superhuman; the dance instead gives emotions a coherent, physical form, returns them to human scale without diminishing them. The last time TV made me care this much about a song I don't care about was when I watched Tara leave Willow, Giles fly to England, and Buffy make out with Spike while Michelle Branch sang "Goodbye to You" at the Bronze.


So You Think You Can Dance is reality TV, and reality TV requires that each contestant have a story. But these are kids, most barely in their twenties, some younger still, and you don't have much of a "story" at that age. You have photos of yourself in cute outfits and you have video clips from dance recitals. You have ambitions and you have dreams. Maybe you have a sick little brother or an inspiring older sister. But mostly what you have at that age is parents. Unless you don't. Unless they've abandoned you. Unless they're dead.

The dead dads of So You Think You Can Dance are hard to ignore. There have been so many over the years, folded so neatly into the contestants' biographical interviews, providing so much inspiration in their absence. There were two dead-dadded contestants in this season's audition episodes alone: Caleb Brauner, who'd tapped onstage with his father in last season's auditions, went home; Bridget Whitman, who declared, "He's gonna be onstage with me," made it into the Top 20.

It's hard to begrudge those kids playing the sympathy card—how often is a deceased parent an advantage?—and by encouraging them to do so, the show smartly plays up its overall affinity with young-adult fiction, where dead dads have long been a staple. But death is a tricky subject for such a sentimental show. Like pop music itself, SYTYCD is often at its best when, unlike the classier arts, it insists that our less reputable emotional extremes, from giddy infatuation to spurned heartbreak, deserve to be taken seriously. As such, it's a tool for empathy. But nobody needs to be told to take the death of a parent more seriously. To do so risks pop empathy's evil twin: pop sanctimony.

Indeed, there was a dead dad at the center of one of the show's most self-celebrated moments: Mia Michaels' tribute to her father in season three, set to Billy Porter's smoove jazz-pop ballad, "Time." Lacey Schwimmer stands in for Michaels, and Neil Haskell is her late father, both dressed in angelic white, sprinkling each other with multi-colored flowers. I snickered at the routine initially, dismissed it as Mitch Albom's Ghost Prom. The judges' fawning, which seemed to prize seriousness of intent over effectiveness of performance, fortified my resistance. But revisiting it, I noticed more control and understatement than I had remembered, and even its kitsch spirituality—Michels explained that she envisioned a "reunion in heaven"—has a homely charm. After all, I don't want grandmas to stop hanging poems about angels in their kitchens any more than I want dads to stop dancing to Robin Thicke.

Still, I know for dead dads: My own father died four months after I met the woman who taught me to love SYTYCD, and at 44, I'm now old enough to be a contestant's dead dad myself. And I know the loss of a parent is a subtle pain, dormant for months then unexpectedly sharp. I recognize my lusts and longings and heartbreaks in the show's dance routines, but not my feelings for my parents in this melodramatic shorthand. As my friend Evie said during a recent Facebook conversation about SYTYCD, "For people who have lost a parent, it's not the ones who have also lost parents that make you emotional, it's the ones who have them."

So maybe "Time" isn't for those of us whose parents have died. For young fans watching older kids competing to become adults, the dance resonates because it's not about losing your parents to death at all. It's about watching them becoming a smaller part of your life. It's about leaving childhood—and your family—behind.


So You Think You Can Dance is also about gaining a new family: When mom and dad are off-camera, the judges act in loco parentis. After one mess of a self-choreographed group routine during this season's auditions, a disapproving Lythgoe ordered the participants to leave the stage and decide among themselves who deserved to go home. The dancers conferred and returned to announce that they couldn't single out one dancer among them for blame. Lythgoe, claiming to be pleased that they were willing to sacrifice their chances of success in solidarity, allowed all the dancers to remain in the competition.

In other words, he decided they had learned their lesson, just like the sitcom dad he is. (Pause to barf into the receptacle of your choice.) Lythgoe was "Nasty Nigel" back in his Popstars days, where he established the judge-as-heel template that Simon Cowell later fleshed out on Idol. But here, as one of the three judges, his persona is paternally mercurial, doting one moment, lecturing the next. (Of course his Britishness is an asset, because England really still is America's dad, and nearly two and half centuries after we ran away from home, we still only truly acknowledge approval expressed in a proper accent.)

Lythgoe's favor is fickle and hard-won, but ballroom specialist Mary Murphy, who has settled in beside him as the surrogate mom, overcompensates with enthusiasm. (A third judge—either one of the show's choreographers or a small-time celebrity or, if all else fails, Jason Derulo—rotates in from show to show.) If the judges can be irritating—Lythgoe is inappropriately lecherous and overly concerned with the dancers' adherence to trad gender roles, whereas Murphy cackles insufferably and praises dancers in the singsong voice usually reserved for cute dogs—well, that just makes them more, you know, parental. And these flaws just throw into relief the role of the show's host, the supernaturally likeable Cat Deeley, who plays the fabulous aunt who swoops in to take you on a glam shopping spree or sparks an inappropriate tween crush.

If a nightmare version of stage-parents still rules the public imagination, lingering in its most grotesque mode on shows like Toddlers & Tiaras, here we're offered an idealized if conservative alternative: a world where adults just want children to do well, providing care and discipline and instruction. Yes, you may be eliminated, but the world will give you a fair shot first.

Still, this is America, where families ultimately exist to produce cheerful and effective workers, and the SYTYCD family is no exception. Contestants work hard, sometimes to the point of injury, learning two partner routines and a big group number each week, but must always maintain the correct attitude, expending emotional labor. And for what? The contestants don't compete for fame, as on Idol, or for love, as on The Bachelor and The Bachelorette. (And it's just as well, since those shows rarely deliver on their promise.) Supposedly, the winner becomes "America's Favorite Dancer," but that's obviously a lie, because in 11 seasons, Beyoncé hasn't won even once. He or she also makes the cover of Dance Spirit magazine and takes home $250,000. But the real prizes are unannounced. You get to dance behind Lady Gaga or become a third-string Pussycat Doll. You appear in a Step Up sequel or an episode of Bones. Of course, Dancing With the Stars is always hiring. The reward for all that toil is more of it.

It's the 21st century's rarest reward: meaningful work. "Doing what you love." Some old-timers even return to take their place in the family business, becoming choreographers like Travis Wall, helping with the auditions, or partnering with the contestants over the course of the season. Corny and cheesy it may be, but it's nice that SYTYCD provides a shelter for its own—until someday, when the show itself dies. As all parents must.

Keith Harris is an immigration attorney who writes about music (mostly) and lives in Minneapolis. Sometimes he tweets @useful_noise.

Image by Tara Jacoby.

The Concourse is Deadspin's home for culture/food/whatever coverage. Follow us on Twitter:@DSconcourse.

Detroit's "Testicle-Eating" Monster Fish Won't Actually Eat Your Balls

$
0
0

Detroit's "Testicle-Eating" Monster Fish Won't Actually Eat Your Balls

On Monday, Detroit's WXYZ reported a red-bellied pacu had been caught in nearby Lake St. Clair, renewing fears from last summer that the weirdly toothy piranha relative was coming for our junk. As described by Vocativ, KMGH Denver and others, the pacu is "known for consuming human testicles" earning it the nickname "the ball cutter." But America's testicle-havers will be happy to learn the chiefly vegetarian fish's reputation for ball consumption is unfounded, the result of a decade-long game of telephone.

Pacu hysteria first made the news last August when Denmark's Natural History Museum jokingly advised swimmers to "keep their swimsuits well tied" after a specimen was found in Scandinavian waters. As museum expert Henrik Karl told a Swedish newspaper:

"The pacu is not normally dangerous to people but it has quite a serious bite, there have been incidents in other countries, such as Papua New Guinea where some men have had their testicles bitten off."

However, the earliest and only report of pacu-on-testicle violence comes from a 2011 episode of Animal Planet's somewhat less than scholarly River Monsters. That account, in turn, appears to be based on a dubious story from 2001 of two Papua New Guinea fisherman bleeding to death after having their penises bitten bitten off by unidentified fish. Even then, a marine biologist explicitly believed the responsible party to be a species other than the pacu.

A popular aquarium fish, red-bellied pacus have been found in the waters of more than 40 states since 1988. In that time America has had 0 reports of pacu-related dick and/or ball attacks.

[Image via Henrik Carl/Natural History Museum of Denmark]

These 5 Paralyzed Dogs Love Playing Fetch in Their Wheelcarts

$
0
0

These five dogs in wheelcarts prove they're just as into chasing sticks as any "normal" mutt. Although some of them have survived awful, traumatic lives, a typical day now consists of walkies (wheelies?) with friends, writes Gritta Goetz, who operates an animal sanctuary in Lanzenhain, Germany.

One of Goetz's dogs, Rina, was paralyzed when her former owners in Bulgaria used her for target practice. She miraculously survived, although 20 projectiles had to be removed from her body. Two of them had lodged in her spine, causing inoperable damage.

It took a year for Rina to get comfortable outside a crate, but here she is playing with other dogs on her first walk with a wheelcart:

According to The Dodo, Goetz has rescued more than two dozen dogs, eight of whom get around using carts.

[H/T 22Words]

Fuck Stanford

$
0
0

Fuck Stanford

America's prettiest sun-soaked research university has somehow managed to become the "Harvard of the West" without getting any of the loathing that befalls the "Harvard of the East." It's time we talk about Stanford as it is: a stuck-up temple to new plutocracy, cronyism, and greed.

There's a reason lots of shitty people refer, wryly, to having gone to school in Cambridge, or Boston, or in the case of Yalies, New Haven. Saying Harvard without saying Harvard is a smug perk of the asshole overclass, one of those rare affectations that somehow sounds like modesty. But Ivy Leaguers also dissemble out of shame: everyone sort of hates Harvard because it's a brick emblem of every inequality and obnoxiousness that pervades the US. Going to Harvard comes with slight shame, like admitting you're a supermodel, or a convicted serial strangler.

Not so at Stanford, which has overtaken Harvard as the it-school for aspiring moguls, overachievers, and various other American teens who dream of creating a hot startup and then screwing their best friend out of it. Of course: Stanford offers a tremendously good education in one of the most picturesque parcels on our planet. For an undergrad, no matter their major, it's a dreamworld.

But it's also full of all the same aristocratic pus as any other elite school: rich misogynists, snobbery, and an emphasis on striking it rich. The school is a regular source of the New Most Annoying Americans. And although plenty of other top schools enjoy cozy relationships with industry—think Johns Hopkins and the Navy, or MIT and electronics. Stanford serves industry more than academia or its students, and instead of worrying over its function as econ-bubble vocational school, it's cuddling up even deeper with corporate interests. Stanford grads not only get a top-notch learnin' time: they graduate with none of the class guilt of the Ivy League, and all the self-righteousness of California exceptionalism.

Still, as is thoroughly explained in a new Harper's piece by Rebecca Solnit, Stanford has always been American capitalism's best college friend since its 19th century founding by railroad robber barons.

Stanford exists, Solnit argues, because of crooked capitalism:

[Leland] Stanford's brother Philip is said to have gone around handing out five- dollar gold pieces to San Francisco voters during an 1863 referendum on railroad investment; Stanford himself was, conveniently, governor of California at the time, and so in 1863 California also gave $15 million in state bonds to the railroad. In The Big Four, a history of Stanford and his three business partners, Oscar Lewis wrote, "from the middle '70s to 1910 the major share of the profit of virtually every business and industry on the Coast was diverted from its normal channel into the hands of the railroad and its controlling group." Or, into the tentacles. There was no alternative to their transit networks, just as there is nowadays, for example, virtually no alternative to Google's vast and spreading information networks.

Stanford stands upon some of the worst facets of the United States—facets that aren't just a legacy for the school, but foundational to its mission today. "The old railroad barons" behind the Stanford endowment, Solnit continues, "grew rich even when they created chaotic, dysfunctional corporations that ill served the public. They didn't have to benefit us to benefit themselves." Sound familiar?

It should. The spirit of 19th century money-grabbing by dudes in top hats is reborn in their millennial bootcut-jean-and-hoodie successors, who leave Stanford with the spirit of fuck-you-pay-me Manifest Destiny beating in their chests:

Fourteen years into [our] century, it looks a lot like the nineteenth. The economic divide has widened, and the ostentatiousness of the ultra-elite is a sneer at the rising desperation of most of the rest of the human beings on earth. Democracy in the United States has been undermined by corporate power, and that loss is augmented by the loss of privacy inflicted on us by the surveillance state with help from the tech sector. Amazon is intent on bringing the publishing industry to its knees; journalism, the great watchdog of the nineteenth century, has been bled almost to death by the Internet.

We can't—and probably shouldn't!—stop kids from dreaming of Palo Alto classrooms. But if they're going to reap the perks of a landed gentry heritage, we owe it to everyone to mock them as much as we would their counterparts at Harvard. Because, fuck Harvard, and ergo, fuck Stanford.

Image by Tara Jacoby

This New Summer Jam Shows You Exactly What Brooklyn Is Like

$
0
0

Summer jam alert! As long as you live in New York's great borough of Brooklyn, that is. Someone has finally written a song about us—well, Brooklyn girls to be exact, but doesn't everyone in Brooklyn love dancing on the street and "waiting for the L train" (North Brooklyn's main subway line)?

Catey Shaw is a singer from Virginia—one Brooklyn's many vibrant neighborhoods—and her new single "Brooklyn Girls" really just nails BK (local nickname): there are buildings... and people... and parties.

Everything is there, right down to the graffiti that looks like a fart cloud, a CLASSIC Brooklyn staple.

This New Summer Jam Shows You Exactly What Brooklyn Is Like


This Week in Tabloids: Kim Cries as Kendall Is Declared 'The Hot One'

$
0
0

This Week in Tabloids: Kim Cries as Kendall Is Declared 'The Hot One'

Welcome back, friends. Once again Callie Beusman assists as we "read" the tabloids so you don't "have" to. This week: Selena Gomez may have gotten boobs for Bieber; Mila Kunis is pregnant and alone; Beyoncé and Jay Z are done for real this time; and Kim Kardashian is in tears because Kendall says "I'm the hot one now."


This Week in Tabloids: Kim Cries as Kendall Is Declared 'The Hot One'

OK!

"I'M THE HOT ONE NOW!"

Kendall Jenner thinks she's the hottest Kardashian now, upsetting the fragile ecosystem of America's Favorite TV Family and threatening to plunge the world as we know it into perpetual disorder. Thus, OK! has dubbed her "HOLLYWOOD'S BIGGEST BRAT." Here is the evidence they've amassed: pictures of Kendall on the runway (Fig. 1, the image taken from the Chanel show is not actually her, oops!!!!), proving that she likes fashion now; summaries of some previous episodes of Keeping Up With the Kardashians in which she acts like a surly teen; a picture she Instagrammed of her butt. She is a terror, we are encouraged to conclude. Also, apparently she told Kim that she's a "total joke," which is illustrated on the cover with a particularly good Kim crying pic. A+ Kendall Jenner tabloid garbage-fabrication, would half-heartedly flip through again. In other news, OK! helpfully reminds us that Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux still do not live together all the time, a fact that tabloids have been bringing up for centuries now. Will they get married? OK! wonders boringly. Moving on: Selena Gomez got a boob job to win Justin Bieber back because he has been cavorting around with some large-chested girls and that is how love works. A plastic surgeon was consulted in creating this article; he says that her breasts are perhaps too round to be true. Responsible journalism. Elsewhere in the mag, Tina Fey and Amy Poeher are butting heads on set at their new movie because, you know, ladies be jealous and female friendship be something humans have a hard time believing is real. Siiiiigh. Finally, in a piece billed on the cover as "WHY WE KEPT OUR BABY A SECRET," we learn nothing about why Ryan Gosling and Eva Mendes kept their baby a secret. Perhaps because tabloids enjoy spreading batshit rumors about them, as evidenced by the series of batshit rumors contained within these very pages (Rachel McAdams is soooooo sad about the baby, the magazine insists).

GRADE: D (walking over razor blades)


This Week in Tabloids: Kim Cries as Kendall Is Declared 'The Hot One'

Us Weekly

LOVE TRIANGLE

There is a love triangle on the Bachelorette, a television program built around the premise of several men competing for one woman's heart. This is a very shocking development. Apparently, whomever did not successfully win her heart tried to pursue her after the show, and she was like, "Nah," and he thus became bitter. Wow. In other news, Ryan Gosling grocery shops for Eva Mendes, who is pregnant with a baby he helped create, and makes her pasta. He is dreamy. In addition, his mom likes Eva, so that's good for them. On the subject of extremely hot couples, Sofia Vergara and Joe Manganiello love making out all over California and onlookers seemingly love to gape at the PDA and then tell tabloids about it. A beautiful symbiotic relationship. The best part of this article is that Us Weekly interviewed Retta on how she feels about losing her imaginary boyfriend on two separate occasions: on July 10, she told the magazine that she had a "heavy heart." On July 13, she said she was doing "okay." We will all recover at our own speeds, Retta. Don't rush it. Finally, Kate Middleton and Kate Middleton of Across the Pond (Kim Kardashian) are both trying to get pregnant, according to hearsay. Sure, why not. They both want two kids. That will be fun.

GRADE: F (swallowing a razor blade)


This Week in Tabloids: Kim Cries as Kendall Is Declared 'The Hot One'

Life & Style

THEY'RE ALL PREGNANT!

They're all pregnant, guys. The Kardashians. All of them. Kim is pregnant, says Life & Style, because she has been consuming food in public: Specifically, "she inhaled a large portion of rich spinach and artichoke dip" in a restaurant, then "called a waitress over and asked for ribs — and looked crushed when the perplexed server told her they don't have them." WE'VE ALL BEEN THERE. Anyway, it seems that the mere idea that Kim might be pregnant again is more than enough justification for tabloids to trot out the body-shaming tropes (we are also told that she "stuffed her Cobb salad into her face" at the restaurant and consumed a churro and a corn dog in public another time). Hooray!!!! Kourtney is pregnant, which is actually true; the magazine says she gave Scott an ultimatum because of his partying, which is a tale as old as time. And Khloe is pregnant with French Montana's baby, 'cause why not try to include all three of the eldest Kardashians in this fabricated pregnancy pact. Cool. In other news, Selena Gomez got implants to win Justin Bieber back, as you may have already heard. This article did not consult with a plastic surgeon, although it did ask a psychotherapist to comment on her mental state. The psychotherapist is worried. And, in other redundant news, Bachelorette Andi is going to get married really soon to whomever won the show. Whoever said modern romance is dead?

GRADE: F (accidentally brushing teeth and gums with razor blade)


This Week in Tabloids: Kim Cries as Kendall Is Declared 'The Hot One'

Star

THE FIGHT THAT STOPPED THE WEDDING

Mila Kunis has been granted the highly coveted "Pregnant and Alone" headline inside this issue, and the story is about how she is insecure, controlling and needy, calling or texting Ashton Kutcher every 30 minutes, so he "stormed out of their house and flew to Brazil." Granted, he already had World Cup tickets, but still: They are "hanging by a thread" and he "has a history of cheating, so her insecurity is justified." Also inside: Selena Gomez is on a "sad spiral" and may have gotten "boobs for Biebs." Boobs for Bieber is kind of like Jews for Jesus, right? Bradley Cooper and Suki Waterhouse might be secretly married, since they are both wearing gold bands on that finger. Finally, in "Kim: Absentee Mom" we learn that Ms. Kardashian spends too much time in the gym and shopping and "has been spotted publicly with her daughter just four times." If you're not parading your infant in front of the paparazzi at all times you are a failure at modern motherhood.

GRADE: F (razor blade stuck in eyeball)


This Week in Tabloids: Kim Cries as Kendall Is Declared 'The Hot One'

In Touch

IT'S OVER!

If you read very carefully, the story inside says Beyoncé and Jay Z's "crumbling marriage is ending" and "the romance is over" but then a source clarifies that Bey has "considered ending their marriage after the tour wraps in September." Considered. So which is it? It's over or it MIGHT be over in a few months? The mag claims "it's just a matter of time before the fairy tale ends" and a "friend" says "divorce is inevitable." Jigga what? Like death and taxes. Also inside: Christina Aguilera's baby shower featured a cake of Christina, naked, and the head of an infant coming out of her vagina (Fig. 2). Next: Justin Bieber's father, Jeremy Bieber, is to blame for his bad behavior, says a former family friend named Cory Bernier. Cory claims that he's saw Jeremy give Justin Percocet when the kid was 18, and that they smoke weed and drink together. They also pick up chicks — mother-daughter pairs — in clubs. And! Jeremy taught Justin: "Stick to [getting blow jobs] and you won't have kids." Excellent paternal bonding. Moving along, J'Anthrax are supposedly getting married in Cabo; Portia thinks Ellen cheated on her; there's a Kim Kardashian spread titled "I Can't Stop Eating!" and the "i" in "eating is an ice cream cone. "Male Stars Get Plastic Surgery, Too" features Tom Cruise's filler-filled face and eye-bag-removal; Brad Pitt's smoothed-out crow's feet; Zac Efron's nose job; Mario Lopez's frozen forehead; and Matthew McConaughey's fab new hairline. Finally, news you can use: The "style spy" page declares: "Crotch Is The New Cleavage!"

GRADE: F (razor blade stuck in skin between thumb and index finger)


Addendum

This Week in Tabloids: Kim Cries as Kendall Is Declared 'The Hot One'

Fig. 1, from Ok!

This Week in Tabloids: Kim Cries as Kendall Is Declared 'The Hot One'

Fig. 2, from In Touch

​If You Want a Glimpse of the Future Food Wars, Look to Hawaii

$
0
0

​If You Want a Glimpse of the Future Food Wars, Look to Hawaii

After Hawaii banned GMO crops, local farmers say they have no idea whether their plants are illegal or not. Plus, it's unclear whether the state even has the right to enforce this ban in the first place. The Aloha State is about to become ground zero for the U.S. food wars.

Hawaii might seem an unlikely battleground for genetically modified crops, given that the state imports 85 percent of its food. But the subtropical climate—which is ideal for cash crops such as papayas, bananas and orchids—is also a thriving environment for weeds, insects and diseases. The papaya industry was nearly decimated by the ringspot virus in the 1990s, until scientists engineered a disease-resistant variety, the "Rainbow papaya." In short, this is a state where farmers appreciate what GM crops have to offer.

And, the GMO producers appreciate what Hawaii's climate has to offer. All the major agrotech companies are there because developing a new seed variety can require 10 to 12 growth cycles—which translates into 10 to 12 years on the mainland. In sunny Hawaii, 2 to 4 growth cycles can be squeezed into into a single year, significantly reducing the time required to bring seeds to market. Seed crops in Hawaii are worth more than $200 million—and most of those seeds are GM corn being developed for traits such as drought-resistance. An estimated 90 percent of all corn grown in the U.S. has been genetically modified, and each of those seed varieties spent some time being field tested in Hawaii.

Small wonder, then, that Hawaii would be fertile ground for anti-GMO activism—which is, in part, a product of the state's demographics. As historian Rachel Laudan, author of The Food of Paradise: Exploring Hawaii's Culinary Heritage and Cuisine and Empire, recently observed:

Underlying the debate about GMOs in Hawaii is, I suspect, a tension between those who have lived in the islands for generations and newcomers from the mainland. For the locals, the islands have always been a place of high tech agriculture. Many of them worked on the big sugar and pineapple plantations. They saved to buy small plots of land. Those who farm these plots know that the papaya growers have survived thanks to genetically modified varieties that have been safely used since the 1990s.

Indeed, the campaign to ban GMO crops in the County of Hawaii (the "Big Island") was led by Councilwoman Margaret Wille—neither a farmer nor a native Hawaiian, but a public advocacy attorney in Maine who moved ten years ago to the island, where her brothers had once owned a health food store.

Laying down the law

​If You Want a Glimpse of the Future Food Wars, Look to Hawaii

Last May, Wille introduced a bill to ban all genetically modified crops on the Big Island, and revealed her propensity to speak in the anti-corporate, back-to-nature lingo that has become de rigueur among anti-GMO activists. "Do we want dust-bowl monoculture owned by multinationals or do we want to have small, diversified farming on this island?," she asked in West Hawaii Today. And, commenting in the newspaper, Honolulu Civil Beat, "We are part of a web of life and affecting genes affects not only current populations but those of our children and their children."

The Council held months of public hearings on the bill. As the New York Times reported:

At the hearing on Sept. 23….Council members declined to call several University of Hawaii scientists who had flown from Oahu, instead allotting 45 minutes to Jeffrey Smith, a self-styled expert on GMOs with no scientific credentials.

Many University of Hawaii scientists had already registered their opposition to the bill, in written and oral testimony and letters in the local papers…. But Ms. Wille had largely dismissed the opinions of university researchers…."It is sad that our state has allowed our university departments of agriculture to become largely dependent upon funding grants from the multinational chemical corporations," Ms. Wille told reporters, suggesting that the university's professors were largely a "mouthpiece for the GMO biotech industry."

[Meanwhile], Mr. Smith, known for "Genetic Roulette," a movie he produced based on his book of the same title that had been shown at one of the island's "March Against Monsanto" events, appeared at the hearing by Skype from Arizona.

He praised the Council for stepping in where he believes that federal regulatory agencies have failed, and suggested that the Rainbow papaya could harm people because of a protein produced by the viral gene added to it, adding that no human or animal feeding studies had ever been conducted on the fruit.

​If You Want a Glimpse of the Future Food Wars, Look to Hawaii

According to Academics Review, Smith claims he has documented 65 health risks, associated with GMOs—and not one of them has been found to be scientifically valid. Oh, Smith also claims to have mastered the ancient yogic art of self-levitation. (Yes, he flies.)

It was on the basis of such expert testimony that, last December, the Big Island's anti-GMO bill became law, forbidding any open-air testing or production of genetically modified crops. It also prohibits farmers from growing any new GMO crops. Anyone who violates the measure will be fined $1,000 per day.

An exemption was made for GMO papaya farmers, since their crops, according to the legislation, are already too pervasive to control. (Although Hawaii resident and Special Guest Idiot Roseanne Barr suggested burning the papayas and providing the farmers with assistance until they could "grow something decent.") Still, the farmers were given a March 2014 deadline to register their fields with a detailed description of where each of them is located—and, also, to provide the names of all field employees. Papaya farmers would be required to pay an annual $100 registration fee per field.

Reaping the consequences

So, where do things stand seven months later?

For starters, the papaya farmers gave Councilwoman Wille the finger. In an open letter they declared:

Any anti-GMO legislation would sharply limit the tools that Hawaii farmers can use to produce their crops, and by association it would taint Hawaii's worldwide reputation for the highest quality papaya. The real intent of local anti-GMO legislation is to prohibit all GMO's and to ultimately destroy Hawaii's papaya industry.

Ms. Wille may have political, philosophical or religious reasons for banning GMOs on Hawaii Island, but any claim based on safety to human consumption and the environment is not supported by scientific evidence.

To that end, one papaya farmer has filed a lawsuit with the Hilo Circuit Court that seeks to stop the mandatory registration. The Court has granted a temporary restraining order.

And, what about genetic research? The law doesn't impact the large companies, since they don't have any open-air facilities on the Big Island. But, for universities, it's a different matter. As the Hawaii Tribune-Herald recently reported:

"It will prevent us from using biotech as a solution" to agricultural issues, said Russell Nagata, Hawaii County administrator for the University of Hawaii's College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources.

Scientists interviewed say it is necessary to grow modified crops outdoors to test their effectiveness. Under the county's law, testing can occur but it must be done indoors.

Nagata said his Hilo-based office was not conducting research on genetic engineering when the law was enacted.

For those with projects already in progress, the law provides less certainty.

Michael Shintaku, a plant pathologist at the University of Hawaii at Hilo, said he is continuing his research on creating genetically modified lettuce resistant to the tomato spotted wilt virus but is unsure of whether he can get it approved with the current restrictions.

The virus is transported by insects, and he thinks he can create resistance through processes similar to what allowed Rainbow papaya to be resistant to the ringspot virus.

"We are just kind of waiting to see what happens," Shintaku said.

And the farmers? Well, since their crops are always at risk of being one disease away from complete ruin, they're also kind of screwed. Researchers, for instance, have begun working on GM varieties of bananas that would be resistant to diseases such as the "bunchy top virus" and Race 4 Fusarium Wilt. Even if those banana varieties could be developed, growers would be prohibited from using them.

​If You Want a Glimpse of the Future Food Wars, Look to Hawaii

Likewise, floriculturists and nursery owners are currently working with a USDA research center on the Big Island to develop a new GM variety of anthurium (flowering plants) resistant to two prevalent pests, bacterial blight and nematodes. That research project will likely stop.

Even livestock farmers are affected. Imported feed is expensive, and they had hoped to develop a GM variety that they could grow on the island with a minimal amount of acreage. That's not going to happen.

What also frustrates the farmers is that the crop ban appears to be motivated by more than misguided concerns about public safety. Frequently, the law is presented as part of a wider endeavor in social engineering—an opportunity to transform the modern agricultural industry into a statewide commune.

As Michael Kramer, co-founder of the Hawaii Alliance for a Local Economy, wrote in an editorial:

The truth is that GMO and chemical agriculture is not needed to feed the world, we can do it the way nature intended, not just organically but through proper design. This requires that we collectively decide that the purpose of farming is not monocrop commodities for export on our limited prime agricultural lands.

We need to work as an island community—farmers, economic development organizations, County government, food wholesalers and retailers, restaurants, and citizens to cooperatively design a system that can shift the agricultural system to focus on local production and consumption that meets out needs.

Michael Shintaku, a professor of Plant Pathology at the UH-Hilo College of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Resources Management, offered a dissenting view:

The Hawaii County Council discouraging papaya or any food farming is a ridiculous concept, but they've done so and at great expense. Are we really growing so much food here that we need to cull some sectors?

If the Hawaii County Council believes that one kind of farming is superior to another (this bill says as much), they should put resources into encouraging organic agriculture. But they shouldn't discourage conventional agriculture. Organic and conventional agricultural systems can and do coexist, and sometimes the organic system benefits from a neighboring conventional one.

Taking precaution too far?

In June, a second lawsuit was filed. This time, it was in U.S. District Court, and the plaintiffs were several Big Island agriculture groups and farmers.

As banana grower Richard Ha explained in an editorial he wrote for West Hawaii Today:

You may be interested to know the inside scoop about the lawsuit Big Island farmers brought against Hawaii County.

We did it for clarity. We thought that the feds and the state had jurisdiction, not the county. We want clarity about the rules of the game. Farmers are law-abiding citizens and we play by the rules.

And we want equal treatment: Only Big Island farmers are prohibited from using biotech solutions that all our competitors can use. That's discriminatory against local farmers.

The central issue of the lawsuit is that the blanket prohibition against GM crops is predicated upon the "precautionary principle." The legislation states that "if a new technology poses threats of harm to human or environmental health, the burden of proof is on the promoter of the technology to prove that the technology is safe."

But, the lawsuit argues those burdens already are met through the federal regulatory process. That includes oversight from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Drug Administration, and, at least in some cases, the Environmental Protection Agency. According to the plaintiffs, the legislation "puts the County in direct conflict with determinations made after careful consideration by expert federal agencies, and purports to outlaw agricultural activities that the federal government has specially authorized after performing a thorough scientific review."

And here is where we're treading into uncertain legal territory. As the Library of Congress explains:

The United States does not have any federal legislation that is specific to genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Rather, GMOs are regulated pursuant to health, safety, and environmental legislation governing conventional products. The U.S. approach to regulating GMOs is premised on the assumption that regulation should focus on the nature of the products, rather than the process in which they were produced.

In effect, the legal dispute is predicated on whether states and local governments can demand that GMOs meet stricter standards for health and safety than those stipulated by federal regulatory agencies. Legal scholars are divided, with some arguing that anti-GMO laws are unconstitutional:

Courts have previously found that consumer education and protection is a legitimate state interest. This interest lies within the states' police power to protect its citizens' health and welfare. However, it is unclear whether GMOs pose any threat to health and welfare. If GMOs pose no greater risk than traditional food, it casts doubt on states' ability to regulate them separately under the guise of consumer protection.

The FDA maintains that genetically engineered foods do not present any "different or greater safety concerns" than conventionally bred foods. Courts give significant deference to the FDA's scientific judgment, and therefore would be unlikely to find substantial state interest unless presented with scientific evidence of safety risks.

Meanwhile, an opposing legal view argues:

Claims of rigorous regulation are not borne out in practice. The United States does not have a comprehensive regulatory scheme that considers all of the likely risks associated with GM crops prior to approval or, for that matter, on an on-going basis. Numerous reasons exist to bring more rigorous regulatory scrutiny to GM organisms….in the absence of such a regulatory scheme, critical risks associated with these cracks escape regulatory scrutiny. The end result is that private actors, motivated by short-term interests, are able to engage in conduct that imposes risks on wider society without any democratic consideration of the acceptability of those risks.

What we might end up seeing, therefore, are drawn out legal battles where the rights of states to impose anti-GMO laws could be based upon whether the existing regulatory system is deemed competent enough to determine that GMOs pose no health risks or, more significantly, whether sufficient scientific evidence exists to raise reasonable doubts about the safety of GMOs.

​If You Want a Glimpse of the Future Food Wars, Look to Hawaii

The battle will only get more intense, now that the big biotech companies are lawyering up. In Hawaii, anti-GMO legislation has spread to the island of Kaui and, most recently, a group of Maui County residents collected enough valid signatures to place a ban on genetically modified crops on the ballot this coming fall. Both Monsanto and Dow AgroSciences have an extensive presence in Maui, and Monsanto has said that the ban, if passed, "could devastate the company's operations."

So, if you want know the future of agriculture in the U.S., keep an eye on legal developments in Hawaii.

"This is a national movement," Hawaii Attorney General David Louie said at the recent gathering of attorneys general in Washington. "Don't think that it's not coming to you."

What Are BuzzFeed’s New Editorial Standards?

$
0
0

What Are BuzzFeed’s New Editorial Standards?

BuzzFeed publishes nearly 400 posts per day. Earlier this year, however, the viral giant began quietly deleting an unknown number of three- and four-year-old listicles that “no longer met our editorial standards.” So what exactly are those “editorial standards”?

Speaking to an audience gathered at the Fortune Tech festival in Aspen, Colorado, BuzzFeed CEO Jonah Peretti explained that the deleted posts were published when the site operated as a lab for studying viral content. The articles flagged for deletion, Peretti said, were “trolly,” “sloppily sourced,” or “not something we would ever do today.”

But on Twitter, editor-in-chief Ben Smith said that the deleted posts were “corrected” after Gawker pointed out, in 2012, that they insufficiently credited other websites. (He didn’t explain why “corrected” posts would later on disappear, and BuzzFeed declined to elaborate on the record about specific standards.) Peretti, meanwhile, compared the deleted content to “screen tests,” which reflected the site’s origins as a new media laboratory. Any real reporting, he insisted, remains untouched:

This is largely true. Besides the heavily aggregated listicles we noted on Monday, BuzzFeed editors also targeted short one-off items, like this October 2011 post by senior reporter Mike Hayes, which simply copied and pasted a cool image that other sites were passing around. The creator of that image, Travis Greenwood, told Gawker that Hayes’ post “was still live as of about 8 weeks ago—I use it in my résumé when applying for certain jobs—but was pulled down without any explanation.” (Greenwood’s account supports the theory that BuzzFeed was trying to comply with copyright law, which has given the site trouble in the past.)

Still, the site left at least one notorious listicle unscathed. Last year, The Atlantic Wire reported that the entries in a viral post titled “The 30 Happiest Facts of All Time” were largely cribbed from a recent Reddit thread, in most cases down to the specific wording. Unlike the listicles that got the ax, “Happiest Facts” was published in March 2013—well after BuzzFeed began calling itself a real news organization. Also unlike the deleted listicles: “Happiest Facts” racked up nearly 6 million page views.


To contact the author of this post, email trotter@gawker.com

Scientists Discover Pot Makes You Paranoid

$
0
0

Scientists Discover Pot Makes You Paranoid

In a groundbreaking study, Oxford University researchers found that pot can on occasion make you paranoid, in affirmation of the experiences of everyone who has ever smoked, talked to someone who smokes, or watched a movie about smoking.

"What?" the devoted pothead asks between hits, then passes the bowl to his two-faced, judgmental friends. "That's bullshit."

Not bullshit: science. Take it from here, scientists.

To discover whether cannabis really does cause paranoia in vulnerable individuals, we carried out the largest ever study of the effects of THC (∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the drug's principal psychoactive ingredient). We recruited 121 volunteers, all of whom had taken cannabis at least once before, and all of whom reported having experienced paranoid thoughts in the previous month (which is typical of half the population). None had been diagnosed with a mental illness. The volunteers were randomly chosen to receive an intravenous 1.5mg dose of either THC (the equivalent of a strong joint) or a placebo (saline). To track the effects of these substances, we used the most extensive form of assessment yet deployed to test paranoia, including a virtual-reality scenario, a real-life social situation, self-administered questionnaires, and expert interviewer assessments.

The results were clear: THC caused paranoid thoughts. Half of those given THC experienced paranoia, compared with 30% of the placebo group: that is, one in five had an increase in paranoia that was directly attributable to the THC. (Interestingly, the placebo produced extraordinary effects in certain individuals. They were convinced they were stoned, and acted accordingly. Because at the time we didn't know who had been given the drug, we assumed they were high too.)

"However," the pothead slowly intones as two cops who can probably tell he's high walk by outside the window, "By your own admission, you're interested in exploring the relationship between early-age cannabis use and 'later severe mental health problems.' Even if I was feeling paranoid right now, which I'm definitely not, what does that have to do with larger questions about my psychological well-being?"

Clearly cannabis doesn't cause these problems for everyone. And the suspiciousness wore off as the drug left the bloodstream. But the study does show that paranoia isn't tenuously linked to THC: for a significant number of people, it's a direct result.

"So all you're telling me is that pot makes some people paranoid while they're high, but that effect tends to wear off as they come down?" he asks. His phone starts to go off — probably mom wanting to chide him for being such a bad son; he should really call more — but he continues. "I'm not convinced. Can you at least tell me how THC is supposedly freaking me out right now?"

Our statistical analysis showed that in our experiment the culprits were THC's negative effects on the individual's mood and view of the self, and the anomalous sensory experiences it can produce. Negative emotions leave us feeling down and vulnerable. Worry leads us to the worst conclusions. So when we try to make sense of the anomalous experiences – when we try, in other words, to understand what's happening to us – the world can appear a weird, frightening and hostile place. Hence the paranoia.

Now the SWAT team is after our pothead, and he doesn't have much time to argue. He climbs out the fire escape, shouting over his shoulder as he goes: "Sounds pretty fuckin' tautological to me."

[Image via PathDoc/Shutterstock]

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

$
0
0

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Opened in 1938 and closed in 2001 after a new airport was built for the Olympics, Ellinikon International Airport sits abandoned without any hope for redevelopment since Greece is more broke than an autojourno crashing an uninsured Lamborghini.

The Ellinikon International Airport has a colorful history that involves America, too. Built in 1938, just 4 miles south of Athens, it was soon taken over by the Nazis only to serve as a Luftwaffe base from 1941.

Learning from that, the Greek government signed an agreement with the United States Army Air Forces, who used it as early as 1 October 1945. Greece came very handy for Mediterranean, African and Middle-Eastern operations in the next five decades.

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

In 1988, Greece decided not to extend the arrangement, and the USAF concluded its operations there in 1991. The end of the Cold War meant Ellinikon could focus on civilians as the base of former Greek flag carrier Olympic Airlines.

I guess it's ironic that the Olympics was what took care of the place for good. As you might remember, Greece was supposed to host the 1996 games to celebrate the centenary of the modern Olympics, but due to the country's financial difficulties, they could only get it done in 2004. Money well spent.

Anyway, Greece also built a new airport as part of the package, and Ellinikon was shut in 2001. During the games, they used its venues for canoe/kayak slalom, field hockey, baseball, and softball. One of the hangars even got refitted to become the main fencing venue and one of the larger indoor basketball arenas. Bit that was ten years ago.

This is what's left today:

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Athens' Abandoned International Airport Is Incredibly Creepy

Olympic Airlines went bust in 2009.

Image credit to all: Getty/Milos Bicanski

Viewing all 24829 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images