Quantcast
Channel: Gawker
Viewing all 24829 articles
Browse latest View live

Stupid Idiot Lost His $1 Million Winning Lottery Ticket Jesus Christ 

$
0
0

Stupid Idiot Lost His $1 Million Winning Lottery Ticket Jesus Christ 

A Rosemeade, Ca. man lost out on $1 million last night after the deadline passed for him to claim his cash from the state. Fucking idiot lost his winning ticket.

It gets worse: The man, whose name has not be revealed, presumably out of fear of being rightfully shamed, did not even know he had won until the California Lottery sent security camera footage of him buying the winning ticket on Sept. 13 at a supermarket to local news stations.

Only after seeing himself on the news did the man try to claim his prize—with the 180-day deadline (Thursday) looming. Too bad, the California Lottery said: The state requires winners have the ticket to redeem their winnings. He lost it, he told the Los Angeles Times. Now all the money will go to state public schools.

Idiot!!!!!!!

[Image via California Lottery]


Contact the author at aleksander@gawker.com .


Pilot's Flight Path Forms Majestic Sky-Dick Over Florida

$
0
0

Pilot's Flight Path Forms Majestic Sky-Dick Over Florida

A Florida pilot out for a jaunt in his private two-seater yesterday took an unusual path from Kissimee toward Florida's western coast, dipping south toward Lakeland, and then suddenly heading due Nort—he drew a big dick in the sky, okay? That's what I'm getting at. His flight path was 20 miles of penis and testes. He was the captain, welcoming himself aboard the nonstop to donger city.

This fine achievement in amateur aerial dickography was captured by flight tracking site Flightradar24, which had noted a recent uptick in pilots drawing pictures with their GPS units:

"Last few weeks we have tracked a couple flights that were trying to draw a flower on Flightradar24. It looks like one pilot in Florida yesterday decided to draw something different..."

Indeed, it was different. The main difference being: It was a sky-dick.

[Image: Flightradar24/Facebook]

The Face of Japan Is Changing, But Some Aren't Ready 

$
0
0

The Face of Japan Is Changing, But Some Aren't Ready 

Change happens slowly in Japan, but it does happen. You wake up one day, and things that weren't possible years ago are happening today. Nowhere is that more evident than in the woman who will represent Japan in the Miss Universe pageant—but that's to the chagrin of some who wanted a more "Japanese" winner.

Eriana Miyamoto is the twenty-year-old selected to represent Japan in the upcoming Miss Universe pageant. As reported by Mainichi News, Miyamoto even expressed uneasiness as to whether or not it would be okay for a hafu [half-Japanese] like her to represent Japan.

When introducing herself to reporters after her selection, Miyamoto said that her mother is Japanese and her father is American. She added that she was born and raised in Nagasaki and that while she doesn't "look Japanese" on the outside, on the inside, there are many Japanese things about her.

The Face of Japan Is Changing, But Some Aren't Ready 

[Photo: MissUniverseJapan/ Facebook]

Let's be clear. She is Japanese. She's a Japanese citizen. She grew up here. She was born here. She's Japanese. Yet, out of politeness or even humility, she explained herself to the Japanese press. After this was out of the way, the rest of her interview progressed fairly normally with questions about how she felt when her name was announced or if she's thinking of entering the Japanese entertainment industry.

Her selection has caused controversy online in Japan. Website Byokan Sunday and Naver Matome have a good round-up of comments that appeared on Twitter. Comments like, "Is it okay to select a hafu to represent Japan?" or "Because this is Miss Universe Japan, don't you think hafu are a no-no?" When not wondering if this was "okay," others said things like she didn't look Japanese, her face was "too gaijin" or that the country deserved a "pure-blooded Japanese" (純日本人 or "junnihon") beauty instead. Elsewhere online, one commenter wrote, "It makes me uncomfortable to say she's representing Japan."

Because the vast, vast majority of Japan is filled with Japanese people from homogeneous backgrounds, you get comments like this from people who have no idea what it is like to be different or not to be part of an overwhelming majority. There's a lack of empathy, and unfortunately, that can reflect poorly on Japanese society.

Consider that mixed marriages between Japanese and Chinese and Koreans have been happening since the 7th century and that by the 9th century, a third of all nobles in Japan claimed foreign ancestors. This intermingling has happened throughout Japan's history, so the term "pure-blooded Japanese" can seem ambiguous at best. However, while the number of hafu are increasing, the number of mixed marriages is still low. In 2006, for example, 5.46 percent of all brides were foreign (and 1.18 percent of the grooms were foreign). Yes, the vast majority were with Filipino, Chinese, and Korean spouses. But, annually, there are 20,000 mixed babies born in Japan.

On GirlsChannel, a popular site that allows readers to vote on comments, many of the highest-rated comments said that they wanted a more "Japanese" contestant to represent Japan—with the explicit implication that half-Japanese people do not reflect the country. However, not everyone thinks that way. This is extremely important to point out. There were comments supporting her selection, with people saying that the only thing that matters is whether or not she's a citizen and loves this country or whether or not she was born and raised in Japan. Others said criticizing the selection because she wasn't "Japanese" enough was "pathetic" and outdated thinking.

The notion of being Japanese has traditionally been narrow. There is no denying that. But babies that are born here, grow up here, and speak Japanese as their native language act and think, well, Japanese. The same goes for anyone who is raised in any country. Your environment breeds culture. Your culture is how you define your identity. Your identity is what makes you who you are.

You know, you see movies like Hafu (above), and you think the country is changing, and then, you see stuff like this. One commenter on website GirlsChannel put it best: "Even if you are hafu, if you have Japanese citizenship, then you're Japanese." If only more people felt that way. Many do. Over time, maybe more will.

I wish Miyamoto-san the best as she represents her country to the world, even if her country doesn't always do the best job of representing itself.

The Face of Japan Is Changing, But Some Aren't Ready 

[Photo: MissUniverseJapan/Facebook]

Top photo: MissUniverseJapan/Facebook

To contact the author of this post, write to bashcraftATkotaku.com or find him on Twitter @Brian_Ashcraft.

Kotaku East is your slice of Asian internet culture, bringing you the latest talking points from Japan, Korea, China and beyond. Tune in every morning from 4am to 8am.

Butt Wipe Epidemic Threatens to Destroy New York City's Sewers

$
0
0

Butt Wipe Epidemic Threatens to Destroy New York City's Sewers

The New York Times published a startling article this morning about one of the great underreported issues of our times: the wet wipe epidemic slowly but surely destroying New York City's sewer system. The butt wipes have reportedly caused millions in damages, and workers have been forced to physically remove the shit-stained ghosts of the unprocessed sanitary products from the sides of pipes and screening machines.

Sales for the wipes have surged in recent years, in large part because more adults have starting using them to clean their butts; Bloomberg reports that sales grew 23 percent from 2008 to 2013, to a staggering $367 million.

Booming sales of the wipes, only a small percentage of which are labeled as "flushable," have translated to high costs for cities around the world. New York, the Times reports, has spent more than $18 million over the past five years repairing damage caused by wet wipes; London, Charleston, West Virginia, Portland, Oregon, and cities in Alaska, Hawaii, California, and Wisconsin have also reported costly wipe-related problems.

What's being done to rid the world of this butt wipe plague? Government officials and butt wipe lobbyists are encouraging users to throw away the wipes instead of lazily flushing them, which would work if people were willing to actually retrain themselves after decades of depositing used toilet paper directly into the toilet. And Mayor Bill de Blasio has introduced a bill that would prevent wet wipes from begin advertised as flushable, in part because of the flawed methods for determining what is and isn't water disposable. From the Times:

At issue, primarily, is an industry trial known as the "slosh box test," designed to gauge disintegration thresholds. Critics say the test, which rocks wipes back and forth in a crate of water, does not properly mimic the wastewater system, allowing manufacturers to claim flushability for a product that may be too sturdy for treatment systems. The test is "a lot more turbulent than the flow that you find in a wastewater pipe," said Cynthia Finley, director of regulatory affairs for the National Association of Clean Water Agencies. Flushed materials, she added, generally move "on very gentle slopes."

That's all very nice and maybe even helpful but there's an even simpler solution: Adults should stop using wet wipes to clean their butts.


Image via Shutterstock.com. Contact the author at taylor@gawker.com.

Racist SAE Frat Suing Oklahoma University for Calling Them Racist

$
0
0

Just days after two members of Oklahoma University's defunct SAE chapter were expelled from the school, the fraternity is lawyering up: "They should not be tarred and feathered as racists," their attorney says. Good luck to this guy.

KFOR News in Oklahoma City reports the chapter, which doesn't even technically exist as a fraternity and is basically now just an informal association of racist young men, has tapped Stephen Jones, the lawyer whose most notable client was Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh:

Jones says the two students who were expelled because of the incident have apologized sincerely for their remarks, and now the incident is being exploited.

He said they lacked judgment in a social setting, but they should not be tarred and feathered as racists.

Proving that a bus filled with white men singing "There will never be a nigger in SAE!" isn't racist will be only slightly less challenging than defending McVeigh in court.

Lowe's Anti-Union Training Video Walks a Fine Line

$
0
0

"Now, to put it in basic terms: Lowe's strongly opposes unions in our company." This is true!

Like most major retail chains, $71 billion home improvement monster Lowe's is firmly committed to doing whatever it takes to prevent its employees from organizing in order to seek better wages and working conditions. Like most major retail chains, unions have long been interested in organizing Lowe's employees, but have never found a very welcoming atmosphere. Government investigators have found evidence of Lowe's managers intimidating employees who tried to unionize in the past.

At the top of this post you will find an in-house Lowe's video, nearly an hour and a half long, which is used to train managers how to deal with unions and their attempts to unionize employees (or employees' attempts to join unions). Managers are instructed to immediately contact the company's "labor hotline" at the merest hint of union activity.

The video displays the sort of incongruous schizophrenia about unions that is the hallmark of many such corporate videos. First, they denigrate unions as useless and unwanted, as evidenced by declining membership; immediately after that, they portray unions as fearsome and sophisticated machines for brainwashing the average workers. "They have huge staffs of paid professional organizers and business agents whose only task in life is to get your employees to sign up with them," the video warns. "Unions today even offer summer internships to college students to teach them the inside aspects of labor in the workplace."

Scary!

Around the 15:00 mark, the narrator says that unions may try to send organizers to get hired at Lowe's stores in order to aid union drives from the inside, and follows with this: "The courts have ruled that it is illegal for an employer to discriminate in hiring based on an applicant's union status or history. This means that it's very important to use proper techniques when interviewing and make sure you hire the right people, to avoid giving a union easy access." These proper techniques surely do not involve discriminating against union members. We presume?

This video has been circulating on the internet for at least a couple of years now, but Lowe's has had it pulled down from Youtube before with a copyright claim. When it popped up again this week, we decided to post it as well. Just like Target's similar anti-union propaganda videos, this deserves to be seen. Not just so that you can see what workers are up against, but for some very entertaining conspiratorial play-acting.

[If you would like to share your employer's anti-union training materials, email me.]


Contact the author at Hamilton@Gawker.com.

Rise of The Kardashians: How a Family Created a Magazine Cover Dynasty

$
0
0

Rise of The Kardashians: How a Family Created a Magazine Cover Dynasty

On Sunday, the 10th season of Keeping Up with the Kardashians premieres on E!. Love them or hate them, this family has become arguably the biggest success reality television hath wrought. Their show turned them from a mildly famous wealthy California family to global superstars. And what's so beautiful about the whole thing is that we've got the glossy paper trail to prove how it all happened.

Their story is not one of luck, but one of careful plotting and planning, most of which can be credited to family matriarch Kris Jenner. While Rob, stepfather Bruce, and stepbrother Brody have gotten some increased fame from the show, it's truly the sisters that Kris has had the biggest success with, parlaying their good looks, dramatic relationships and pregnancies into beauty products, clothing lines and endless party sponsorships.

In the eight years KUWTK and its spinoffs have been on the air, the Kardashian sisters have been on more than 120 covers—some of them together, but most of them individually. While the ratings of their shows have ebbed and flowed over the years, racking in between roughly 2 and 5 million viewers an episode, their status as people who are controversially dominant in the cultural conversation and apparently not going anywhere has only gotten firmer.

Click to enlarge timeline.

The Kardashians have bought their success, to some degree, and it can plainly seen each week through their slowly increasing presence on the covers of tabloids. But one of the best ways to visualize their rise is through their presence on the covers of the magazines they didn't somehow pay for. From Kim's debut on the cover of Complex in 2007, which she quickly followed up with an appearance on Playboy that was documented for KUWTK, the quality of the magazines the family has been featured on has dramatically improved. Kim has gone from being a sexpot on men's magazines to nabbing the holy grail of all magazine covers, Vogue. And, now on her way to becoming a supermodel, Kendall has gone from being featured on the cover of Teen Prom to getting her own Allure cover.

These are the sisters' respective non-tabloid cover counts to date, as fully accounted for as possible:

Rise of The Kardashians: How a Family Created a Magazine Cover Dynasty

Of all the sisters, Kim by and large has been on most covers, which is largely a credit to the years in which KUWTK was airing but her sisters had not quite yet gained her level of fame. From 2007 to 2010, she was basically the only family member with her own notable cover presence. In the first year, those covers were for men's magazines, and it was sexy stuff: Playboy, Complex, King.

Rise of The Kardashians: How a Family Created a Magazine Cover Dynasty

But by 2009, things were starting to change. Kourtney had her first child, Mason, which was the start of years of her appearing on magazines like Fit Pregnancy. The KUWTK spinoff Kourtney and Khloé Take Miami started airing, and Khloe married NBA player Lamar Odom. Meanwhile, Kim had moved away from men's magazines and was nabbing spots on the covers of lower-brow women's/entertainment magazines (including Atlanta's very own Jezebel).

Rise of The Kardashians: How a Family Created a Magazine Cover Dynasty

In 2010, Kim and her football playing boyfriend Reggie Bush, who had been featured on the show, broke up. That year, the three eldest sisters appeared together on a couple more low-budget magazines: Vegas Magazine and Las Angeles Confidential. And Kim had moved from sexy men's magazine model to women's magazine cover star, nabbing covers on multiple international editions of Cosmopolitan and Shape. Her big coup, however, was getting on "The Art issue" of W magazine, which—like her Playboy cover before it—was dramatically televised on KUWTK, when she found out she would be nude, covered in only body paint, on the inside of the issue.

Rise of The Kardashians: How a Family Created a Magazine Cover Dynasty

In 2011, the whole family–well, Kim, Kourtney, Khloe, Kris, Kendall and Kylie–were featured together on the cover of The Hollywood Reporter; the headline read "Inside Kardashian Inc." (Later that year, they'd do the same on Redbook, though Kendall and Kylie would be relegated to the fold out.) This was the year Kim, Khloe and Kourtney's covers peaked, numbers-wise. Kim appeared on Harper's Baazar, Glamour and Cosmopolitan; Kourtney celebrated her status as a mom, and all three sisters got separate covers of the same issue of Lucky, a nod to their fashion empire and a foreshadowing to Kim's inevitable acceptance by the haute couture fashion world at large.

Rise of The Kardashians: How a Family Created a Magazine Cover Dynasty

Entertainment and life-wise, the spin-off Kourtney and Kim Take New York began to air, Khloe's spinoff with her husband Lamar Khloe and Lamar launched, and most notably, Kim got engaged to Kris Humphries. Their wedding was televised in a special episode on E!, to 4.4 million viewers.

Rise of The Kardashians: How a Family Created a Magazine Cover Dynasty

In 2012, the idea that Kim was going to be taken seriously in the fashion world was floated forward in a cover story for New York magazine's fashion issue; the cover line read, "Does Kim Kardashian Belong on the Cover of a Fashion Magazine?" That same year, Kourtney had her second child, Penelope, though any excitement in her life was hugely overshadowed by Kim, who broke up with Kris Humphries, got together with Kanye West, and, by the end of the year, was pregnant with their daughter North West. Kendall and Kylie Jenner were growing up and gaining prominence too; they started appearing on covers themselves, like Seventeen and Teen Vogue.

Rise of The Kardashians: How a Family Created a Magazine Cover Dynasty

By 2013, Kourtney and Kim Take Miami was airing, Khloe's marriage to Lamar was disintegrating, and Kim gave birth to North. The older sisters were only covering top-tier general interest women's magazines, while the Jenner sisters were making their mark on magazines like Girlfriend and Kurv.

Rise of The Kardashians: How a Family Created a Magazine Cover Dynasty

But it was 2014's covers that really demonstrated how far the family had come, largely because of Kim's Vogue appearance with new husband Kanye West and her nude Paper magazine cover. While the number of magazines the family appeared on had dipped, the quality of those magazines had substantially risen. Elsewhere: Kourtney & Khloe Take the Hamptons aired; Khloe started dating rapper French Montana; Kendall had begun modeling in earnest, nabbing impressive runway spots; and Kourtney, who was pregnant with her third child Reign, would appear nude for DuJour magazine.

Rise of The Kardashians: How a Family Created a Magazine Cover Dynasty

2015 looks just as promising for the family. As the 10th season of KUWTK premieres, Kendall has already gotten on the cover of Allure, Kim and Kylie have appeared in LOVE magazine with Cara Delevingne,and Kim has been recognized as a tech mogul on the cover of AdWeek, moving away from women's magazine fare and even fashion to legitimate business woman, based mostly on the success of her app Kim Kardashian: Hollywood.

Rise of The Kardashians: How a Family Created a Magazine Cover Dynasty

What of the Kardashian/Jenner men? While their fame has increased, their stories remain mostly relegated to the tabloids–or coverage of the tabloidslike Bruce Jenner's possible decision to transition and Rob's struggles with weight. Kris Jenner's ability to monetize her daughters' via their femininity and sexuality has not stretched to the men in her life.

Nor has it stretched to her own life. While Kris has nabbed a few of her own covers, her role has been that of the supporter, the pusher, the puppet master. She's occasionally gotten her own brushes with fame (see her in this recent LOVE mag video), but she's constantly in their shadow. It's been this way since the beginning, and it will likely be this way until the end. During season one of KUWTK, when Kim poses for Playboy, Kris ends up taking her clothes off too–but just for fun, in a shoot of Olympic-themed photos she says she's giving to former-Olympian Bruce. She's the joke, the afterthought, the punchline of the episode.

So while she may have just negotiated four more seasons of a show about her family, while her ex-husband might be getting his own show about his own new life choices, while her youngest daughters are becoming just as famous as her eldest, there's one Kardashian that's in every episode of the show, who made all of this happen, but is never the star. Her name is Kris.

Additional reporting by Ellie Shechet.

Images by Jim Cooke


Contact the author at dries@jezebel.com.

Did a Religious Conspiracy Drive a Missouri Politician to Suicide?

$
0
0

Did a Religious Conspiracy Drive a Missouri Politician to Suicide?

Tom Schweich was not supposed to become national news this early, and certainly not for this reason. But when the Missouri state auditor and Republican gubernatorial candidate shot himself in the head just three weeks ago in a suburb west of St. Louis, he posthumously became one of the most fascinating and mysterious stories in American politics.

The hours prior to Schweich's death appear to have been very frantic. The auditor, age 54, spent much of the morning of February 26 personally arranging a set of interviews at his home with both local and national journalists—a perhaps unusual step for a political candidate with a staff at his disposal. At 9:41 a.m., after speaking with a reporter at the AP, Schweich left a voicemail with someone at the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, requesting an interview. Immediately after, he spoke to a family friend named Martha Fritz, who had been asked by Schweich's chief of staff, Trish Vincent, to alert Schweich's wife: Schweich's behavior had worried Vincent and she suggested that his wife check on his well-being. Fritz later said in a statement that during that phone call Schweich threatened to kill himself. She said that seconds after handing the phone back to his wife, Schweich went ahead with that threat. At 9:48 a.m., just seven minutes after Schweich left a voicemail with the Post-Dispatch about an interview, his wife called 911 to report that her husband had shot himself in the head.

In attempting to understand why Schweich—who officially announced he would be seeking the Republican nomination for governor of Missouri just less than a month prior to his death—might have taken his own life, it's important to understand why he was setting up those interviews in the first place.

Two days prior, Schweich had scheduled a press conference. The subject of that press conference, it was revealed after his death, was a rumor he believed local politicians in his party were spreading about his faith. Specifically, Schweich was going to publicly accuse Missouri Republican party chairman John Hancock of telling donors and other important figures in the local party that Schweich was Jewish. Schweich was eventually talked out of holding that press conference, but had decided to reveal his allegations against Hancock in the interviews he was setting up the day that he died.

But that never happened. Schweich did not appear to give any stated reason for his suicide to either his wife or Fritz, but the timing is certainly, well, interesting. Did Schweich kill himself because the leader of his party in his state was telling people that he was Jewish? Or was it something else?

The Religion Theory

The relevant history between Schweich and Hancock is short but fractious. Last summer, a man named Kevin Childress, who is identified in news reports as a "Schweich supporter," convinced Schweich that Hancock was bad-mouthing him. Childress apparently told Schweich that—deep breath, here—Hancock's brother-in-law Peter Christy told him at a party that Hancock was telling people that Schweich was Jewish.

Here is a quote from Childress via The Missouri Times that might make this all a bit more clear:

"I had one conversation with John's brother-in-law last summer where Peter told me that the crowd in St. Louis that John ran with were saying that Tom was Jewish," Childress said. "That is what I told Tom."

As recently as yesterday, Hancock denied to the press that he had started a whisper campaign against Schweich based on his religion. Hancock says he made the same declaration to Schweich when the two talked about Schweich's concerns on the phone in November, but it's clear that Schweich believed that his own party was lining up against him—and he might have been right.

Hancock was actually only elected as the chairman of the Missouri GOP the weekend before Schweich died. Prior to that he had served as the party's "executive director" and hosted a local political radio show. But most pertinent to Schweich, and what appears to have led him to believe that his party was conspiring against him, was work that Hancock's consulting firm had done early in 2014 for Catherine Hanaway, a former speaker of the house in Missouri and the candidate who was Schweich's primary competition in the race for the party's gubernatorial nomination. (Hancock noted his work for Hanaway's campaign in a statement this week.)

Schweich's specific allegation was that Hancock was telling wealthy and important donors in the heavily Catholic suburbs of St. Louis that Schweich was Jewish as a means of undermining his campaign and furthering Hanaway's. (One of Schweich's grandfathers was Jewish, but Schweich himself identified as Episcopalian.) Hancock, again, has denied all of this, but in doing so has been making a pretty shitty case for himself.

Here is how Hancock characterized his actions to the AP in an interview shortly after Schweich's death:

Hancock told the AP on Thursday that Schweich had talked to him about the alleged comments last November, but not since then. Hancock, who is a political consultant, said he held meetings last fall with prospective donors for a project to register Catholic voters. Hancock said that if he had mentioned that Schweich was Jewish, it would have been in the context that Hanaway was Catholic but that was no indication of how Catholics were likely to vote.

"I don't have a specific recollection of having said that, but it's plausible that I would have told somebody that Tom was Jewish because I thought he was, but I wouldn't have said it in a derogatory or demeaning fashion," Hancock said.

In that passage, Hancock cops to talking about Schweich's religion, and holding meetings with important Catholic political figures, and possibly mentioning Schweich's religion in those meetings, but promises that if he did—and, of course, he doesn't recall—it was perfectly innocuous.

Schweich's belief was also likely strengthened by his chief of staff Vincent, who claimed this week that Hancock admitted to telling people that Schweich was Jewish in a phone call last December.

The timeline for the theory that Schweich killed himself in a panic over the alleged whisper campaign is pretty linear: Schweich hears that Hancock has been trying to undermine his campaign and the fear and anger over that simmers for months, and when Hancock is elected as chairman of the party Schweich feels compelled to expose him but is talked out of it, and things snowball so quickly from there that Schweich ends up taking his own life just a few days later.

In this theory, Hancock was doing the type of political maneuvering that is common in local and state politics across the country, but in this case the result was beyond the scope of anyone's imagination.

But what if Schweich killed himself for other reasons?

The... Something Else Theory

Here is how a Gawker commenter named "Frenemy of the state" put it in a recent comment:

I don't have leak so much as a conspiracy theory. Tom Schweich, the Republican gubernatorial candidate for Missouri's suicide is VERY fishy. He had press conferences for later that day concerning other Republicans, he had threatened to expose corruption in the capital the way he had the rest of the state claiming half the capital to be run by "mercenaries" his words. He compared the politicians to Afghan warlords. He had no scandals, one lame attack ad and was pretty much GUARANTEED easy election. He received ONE phone call, and blew his brains out that hour. This looks like blackmail. No 55 year old man who graduated Harvard and Yale is so offended at a radio add calling him "Barney Fife" that he kills himself. He was going to expose something. Please keep looking.

It's worth noting here that some of Frenemy's facts are wrong or mischaracterized. Schweich had interviews set that day, not press conferences. He had mentioned in campaign speeches that he was going to root out corruption in the Missouri state government, but that's typical rhetoric of an upstart candidate. The attack ad, by some accounts, was not lame but vicious, calling Schweich a Democratic "pawn" who would be "squashed like a bug."

But Frenemy also makes a good point: Were rumors about Schweich's religion so serious that they would lead him to end his own life in the midst of a political campaign? Maybe Schweich was scared of some other, different, information being passed around. Or, as Frenemy notes in a subsequent comment, maybe his role as state auditor was at play:

He was the state Auditor. He knew where all the money was flowing and where all the government contracts were going and who was embezzling what and buying whom. Names and specifics? Died with him.

The Everything Theory

Yesterday, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch published an article about the months leading up to Schweich's death. The piece, titled "Tom Schweich's final obsession," is thorough, but it also not-so-subtly insinuates that Schweich was maybe starting to go crazy:

Tucked within Schweich's vision of a bright new Missouri, however, was something darker.

From the stage, the Missouri auditor expressed bitterness toward fellow Republicans he believed were arrayed against him. He talked vaguely of a suspended lawyer working for the other side who was "telling a dizzying series of lies" about him. He berated wealthy conservative activist Rex Sinquefield, who was supporting Schweich's chief rival for the GOP gubernatorial nomination, Catherine Hanaway. He vowed: "There is a lot more corruption going on in that camp that we will be talking about in the days to come."

Here, the theory is that Schweich killed himself not because of a whisper campaign about his religion, but because a series of events that he believed had been set in motion by Hancock and others to derail his political career.

The Dispatch continues:

But interviews and emails from the back channels of Missouri politics show an accomplished and ambitious politician becoming increasingly obsessed with what he believed was a stealth campaign against him by GOP state party Chairman John Hancock — and increasingly frustrated that his own top advisers kept recommending restraint.

"He said, 'There's an insidious movement going on here,'" said Julius Schweich, Tom's father, recalling a conversation they'd had in February, two weeks before his son's death. The comment stuck in the elder Schweich's mind because it was unusual. "He never talked like that."

Missouri Republicans, the media and others are still trying to determine whether that "insidious" in-party campaign against Tom Schweich was real, or a figment of his imagination, or something in between.

Schweich had become convinced of a conspiracy against him, and though it seems eminently plausible, especially in the case of the religious whisper campaign, the problem was likely compounded by the fact that the people he had surrounded himself were (perhaps sensibly) urging him not to go public with his theory.

Unfortunately, at the time, they couldn't have known that he would make his theory known in the most tragic way possible.

This is Illuminati Month on Black Bag, in which Gawker locks itself in the woodshed and breaks out the red yarn to explore its favorite conspiracy theories. Photo by AP


A Few Days in the Wilderness

$
0
0

A Few Days in the Wilderness

This winter my family gathered at a rental compound in Yucca Valley, beside the immensity of Joshua Tree National Park, which none of us had ever seen. We were just an American family, trying to enjoy the outdoors, or something like that. On Christmas Eve, amid the clinking of wine glasses and crinkle of wrapping paper and the roar of a fireplace—longing in my case to spend some time outside, a place I'd spent more time when I was younger and not married or a father and lived in the desert, rather than in Los Angeles, where I made a home now—I found myself perusing the rental's bookshelves when I found a title that had once meant a lot to me.

Edward Abbey, who died a quarter of a century ago this spring, in 1968 published the memoir Desert Solitaire, written about the seasons he spent as a park ranger at then-undeveloped Arches National Monument, outside Moab, Utah. The book is, together with his 1975 novel, The Monkey Wrench Gang, a kind of founding text for a complicated love of the desert—a love that I now see advances what is actually a rather dark idea: that wilderness "needs no defense, it only needs defenders."

As a young man, I spent my first two years of college on a desert campus, cottoning quite easily to Abbey's romantic brio and the manic, mad-cap deliriousness of The Monkey Wrench Gang, which called in some measure for solo-camping, hitchhiking, pints of whiskey, and the argument, perhaps, that "defense" might require one to set fire to bulldozers. But I never lit a match. I grew up. I moved East and lost my hiking boots, misplaced my sleeping bag, and ceased thinking altogether about what happens when you're alone in a canyon. Flipping through Abbey's writing twenty years later, I was beginning to remember.

"Near the first group of arches," he writes early in Desert Solitaire, "looming over a bend in the road, is a balanced rock about fifty feet high, mounted on a pedestal of equal height; it looks like a head from Easter Island, a stone god or a petrified ogre."

Abbey rises often to this kind of imagery, at least in the first riveting chapters of the memoir, and I found it alarming how easily I found some former version of myself in his character: Months alone, only a snake for companionship, boiling a pot of beans to eat all day, hours and hours spent admiring the color of the sky or the cut of a broken branch or the path through sand of a spring rain.

On a family holiday night, both so close and yet so far from such things, I read and read—semi-ignoring my family, sipping more wine—and I felt nostalgia both for a time surrounded by rock and an era when I could more easily define what I thought mattered (and perhaps who.) My wife poured me another glass. It was time for our daughter to go to bed. "You're loving that book, huh?"

In the next chapter, disheveled men in helmets and khakis drive up to Abbey's remote trailer, desperate for water. "As they passed the pitcher back and forth, I got the full and terrible story, confirming the worst of my fears," he writes. They were a survey crew, laying out a new road into Arches, and what follows is a whole chapter's postulation about industrial tourism and its evils:

"You can't see anything from a car," Abbey writes. "You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk, better yet crawl, on hands and knees, over the sandstone and through the thornbush and cactus. When traces of blood begin to mark your trail you'll begin to see something, maybe. Probably not."

At this point, I regarded my family, none of them candidates to blow up any dams or hike until they bled. I thought again of an earlier time in my life, when I might have taken this book and some gear and disappeared long enough to do some purifying self-damage. (When I was 18, for example, I thought it normal to set off with an hour's notice for a 15-mile hike. At 19, I hitched to Alaska and worked on fishing boats. When I was 27, in a final gasp of something, I set out on foot from New York City to New Orleans, a walk that took me nearly two-thousand miles.)

Mid-way through a nostalgic re-reading of both a book and an idea of how to live—both of which I'd more or less forsaken—I put down Desert Solitaire and tried to imagine how it might have worked if Abbey (or the character he creates for his books) tried to gather with family for a nice, relaxing Christmas. It was time for bed for me, too.


The next morning, in a very large minivan, still reeling from what I'd read, I joined the family as we set out to see Joshua Tree National Park. It was a long drive. My daughter was restless and my in-laws were being good sports and my brother-in-law had, perhaps wisely, decided to stay at the rental where he was reading his own good book.

At 800,000 acres, Joshua Tree is among our largest national parks, of which there are nearly five dozen. It's rather beautiful, in a bleak sort of way. (There are no waterfalls or jungle or buffalo or dramatic carvings of presidents.) When we passed a turnout where you could admire the view, we parked the car and did some view admiring. After a while, we stopped at a second turnout, this one offering some informational signage. My father-in-law declined the chance to get out of the car a second time. He hollered out, mocking what I admit now sort of looked like the moon.

"Does the sign say there are more rocks and small trees?" he said.

Later, in the parking lot of a trail called Hidden Valley, my mother-in-law, who recently had surgery on a toe, stood stiffly beside her husband, both of them squinting in the sun. For a moment, I regretted not renting us a house closer to a more inviting national park. On the other side of Abbey's spectrum of people who were not as badass as Abbey was my daughter, L, five years old and ready to run to the moon and back, until she got tired or scared.

It was decided: The in-laws would stay with the car, but my mother, wife, daughter, and I would attempt to hike over the boulders and through sandy washes, encountering at last and up close a density of the local cactus: Joshua Trees, also known as Yuccas. They were gorgeous, spiny and wizened things, but I suppose I could be honest and say I was suppressing a feeling of despair at how slowly we had been moving and at the crush of other tourists who were also pausing to admire this tree. Hidden Valley was a mile-long trail.

I thought about a line of Abbey's: "Despite its fierce defenses, or perhaps because of them, the yucca," he writes in Desert Solitaire, "is as beautiful as it is strange, perfect in its place wherever that may be."

What's a perfect place? Once, I found it alone on the side of the road. Another time I thought I saw it far out on an Alaskan sea. For a long time, in part because of Abbey, I sought out a place in the world that was harsh and lonely.

Fifteen years after I'd last read Desert Solitaire, my daughter became obsessed with the idea of being the leader of our modest hike and sprinted ahead. My mom's knee was acting up and she was hungry. I felt torn. But nearing the end of the trail, there was a moment when we all stopped to marvel at the colors of a cliff: a young daughter, a man, his wife, a grandmother, all enjoying the outdoors in different ways. The wind tousled our hair. I admit I was touched by this short trail.


Back in L.A. I did some research: A set of decisions had been made to preserve certain rugged and pristine parts of our country, including places like Joshua Tree or the more famous Yosemite, where two tough loners recently spent nineteen days climbing a big rock. For much of the 20th century—securing land that otherwise might have been turned into parking lots, bombing ranges, or cattle ranches—our country set aside vast acreage that would become synonymous with the idea of what America was and could be. Young men enjoyed these wild places, but so did families. For several generations, a tour of the national parks with a station wagon full of tents and sleeping bags was synonymous with the idea of vacation, and how we could enjoy our surroundings.

In the last twenty years, however, our flagship parks—even majestic Yosemite—have attracted fewer and fewer visitors. Attendance totals for many facilities peaked in the 1990s. The country is changing. (I, too, have changed.)

One of the reasons for the larger change was that America was becoming less white and more urban, and it wasn't necessarily guys like Abbey or climbers in Yosemite or suburban families with a station wagon who were helping articulate the future of America's parks—or even what was worth "defending."

In California, for instance, President Obama recently declared 350,000 acres of the city-adjacent and relatively unlovely San Gabriel Mountains a national monument—and park rangers for this non-Yosemite-ish piece of land told reporters they'd use the new money to fight graffiti and take care of problems with trash.

I myself don't get these days to many mountains, canyons, or arches. I live in Venice and commute by car to a job in Westwood, where my young daughter goes to elementary school. My wife is often traveling. In my carefully planned urban existence, I have found a good and safe enough bike route, up the Pacific Coast Highway, to a steep hill bisecting Pacific Palisades from Santa Monica. Maybe once a week, I pedal the 12 miles, up San Vicente, through the old Veterans Affairs complex, under the 405, and up to UCLA. Other weeks, I might carve out a few hours to paddle from a dirty harbor out into a less dirty ocean. There's trash and the scream of jets from LAX. But a few weeks ago, there were also two grey whales and a sense that life wasn't so bad.

"Each thing in its way, when true to its own character, is equally beautiful," Abbey writes in Desert Solitaire. It had been twenty-five years since the writer's death. If he were still alive, character be damned, he'd be an old man. Maybe he'd enjoy a walk in the San Gabriel? Some of the trails probably even have handrails.

Nathan Deuel is the author of Friday Was the Bomb, an Amazon "Best Book of the Month." He lives in Los Angeles.

[Illustration by Jim Cooke]

God Bless Tony, He's the Guy Who Found Tom Hanks' Credit Card

$
0
0

God Bless Tony, He's the Guy Who Found Tom Hanks' Credit Card

Tom Hanks has never won a Tony. But now he has a friend named Tony—which, to be honest, is just as good!

Tom Hanks, that clumsy motherfucker, misplaced the credit card he uses to buy nice things, such as men's shaving kits and expensive candles and wine and organic dog food. But guess what? Tony found it. Who's Tony? He's the guy who found Tom Hanks' credit card and who now has a friend in Tom Hanks. Sounds like a win-win.

Tony! You make this city even greater, baby. But one wonders—how did he get it back to Tom Hanks? And did he spend a little bit of Tom Hanks' money before he returned it?

HANX: [reading his credit card statement in his clean brownstone] Aw, man, who charged four hundred dollars to the Home Depot? [pause] Tony!!!!

[Image via Getty]


Contact the author at dayna.evans@gawker.com.

South Pacific's Vanuatu Hammered by 165 MPH Tropical Cyclone

$
0
0

South Pacific's Vanuatu Hammered by 165 MPH Tropical Cyclone

The world is on edge this afternoon as we await news from Vanuatu's capital city of Port Vila to see how they fared the wrath of Severe Cyclone Pam. The storm had estimated winds of 165 MPH as its eyewall brushed the capital island's 66,000 inhabitants on Friday around 9:00 AM EDT. http://thevane.gawker.com/vanuatu-threat...

South Pacific's Vanuatu Hammered by 165 MPH Tropical Cyclone

Tropical cyclones—also known as "hurricanes" around North America and "typhoons" in Asia—don't get much more intense than Pam. The storm's display on satellite imagery is as close as you can get to perfect, with vast, spiraling bands radiating from a dense donut of angry rain and winds.

Cyclones are reversed in the Southern Hemisphere, with winds flowing clockwise around the circulation. When we deal with hurricanes in the Atlantic Ocean, for example, the most dangerous part of the storm is the right-front quadrant—in the Southern Hemisphere, the most intense winds in a cyclone are in the left-front quadrant, or in this case, on the eastern side of Pam's eyewall. This is a small but important detail when you see that Port Vila wound up just on the western edge of the cyclone's eye:

South Pacific's Vanuatu Hammered by 165 MPH Tropical Cyclone

The fact that Efate was on the western side of the eyewall—and Port Vila is on the western side of Efate—likely spared the city from a worse fate than it may have already suffered. A weather station in Port Vila recorded 76 MPH winds with gusts to 99 MPH before it went offline around 2:00 AM EDT. Australia's Bureau of Meteorology has an excellent resource for keeping track of weather conditions in Port Vila, and the station managed to stay online through the whole storm.

South Pacific's Vanuatu Hammered by 165 MPH Tropical Cyclone

The air pressure in Port Vila dropped to a minimum of 942.2 millibars, which is about what you would expect in the center of a category three hurricane in the Atlantic Ocean, and extremely deep considering that the actual eye of the cyclone was 10 or 20 miles to Port Vila's east. The central minimum pressure of Cyclone Pam probably bottomed-out between 915 and 925 millibars. The station's anemometer only recorded wind gusts up to 59 MPH, which means it's either obstructed (by debris, trees, or a building) or malfunctioning. Winds were likely more than twice that strong in the city.

Reports from residents and visitors to the island nation are few and far between, as one would expect for such an intense cyclone striking a relatively remote location. Several people in and around Port Vila have commented on iCyclone's Facebook posts. Earlier this afternoon, the BBC published unconfirmed reports of "dozens feared dead" on Vanuatu's northern islands as the cyclone pushed through, but initial reports are often speculative or wildly inaccurate; it will be days before we know the true extent of the damage.

Cyclone Pam is the strongest storm to strike Vanuatu since Cyclone Uma tore through the country back in February 1987, and Pam will go down in the books as one of the strongest tropical cyclones ever recorded in the South Pacific.

[Images: Wunderground, Colorado State University, CIMSS, BoM]


You can follow the author on Twitter or send him an email.

Lil Wayne Throws the Mic and Storms Off After DJ Fucks Up His Song

$
0
0

Lil Wayne really can't catch a break this week. On top of his ongoing battle with Cash Money Records over the release of his next album, he's apparently been the victim of a persistent troll: someone falsely reported a mass shooting at his home and booked him an unwanted appointment with a prostitute. At times like these, at least he can still get on stage and everything'll be alright for an hour or so.

Or not.

Weezy was seven songs into his set at Nova Southeastern University last night when he launched into his remix of O.T. Genasis' "CoCo," the track he used to vent about the Cash Money situation on his latest mixtape. It lasted approximately one second before Wayne and the crowd both realized the DJ had fucked up. Instead of the "CoCo" instrumental, he'd put on the original version, with Genasis' vocals still on the track.

Wayne stopped mid-sentence, threw his mic at the DJ table, and walked off, leaving fans shouting "WorldStar!" and singing along with the Genasis track.

TMZ reports Wayne's reaction "piss[ed] off the crowd."

It's okay, Lil Wayne. It's Friday. Have a relaxing weekend at your five-story island mansion, besieged though it may be by an unstable prankster, and maybe next week will be better.

[h/t TMZ]

Gawker v. Department of State

$
0
0

Today, Gawker Media filed a Freedom of Information Act complaint in U.S. District Court against the Department of State, seeking email correspondence between former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Philippe Reines and members of the news media.

The backstory: Gawker first reported in 2013 that as secretary of state, Hillary Clinton was using a private, off-the-books email account (hdr22@clintonemail.com) to conduct government business. We sought comment from Clinton and from the White House about whether those emails were being properly retained and archived, and we filed a FOIA request at the time for some of those emails. That request was denied, with the State Department explicitly claiming that it didn't have any records. We had also filed a separate request for emails to and from Clinton aide Huma Abedin and that request was also denied in full.

Since then, we have learned that Clinton and some members of her senior staff, including Abedin, conspired to communicate over a private server, controlled by Clinton, that kept their emails out of the reach of FOIA requestors and congressional investigators. We declined to administratively appeal the State Department's denials of our requests for Clinton and Abedin's emails, which leaves us unable to sue the State Department over its failure to produce them thanks to Clinton's scheme.

But in 2012, we also filed a request with State for Reines' email exchanges with reporters, inspired by this colorful back-and-forth with Buzzfeed's Michael Hastings. State claimed in response to that request—preposterously, given the fact that Reines' job was to correspond with reporters and that one of those exchanges were already on the internet—that it simply didn't have any such emails. We did appeal that denial, and State has been purportedly searching for those emails for more than a year. It has not produced them. The fact that we have appealed and that State has long missed the statutory deadline for responding to our request means that our request is ripe for a lawsuit, and with the help of Washington, D.C., FOIA attorneys Mark Zaid and Bradley Moss, we filed one today.

According to our reporting, Reines did not use a clintonemail.com address, but was known by at least one Clinton insider to use private accounts to conduct government business. Reines himself told us— in a colorful email exchange!—that he is mystified as to why State has failed to honor our request for this long. It's time for the State Department to turn over these records. You can read the complaint here or read it below.

Gawker v. Department of State

Jamie Dornan and Dakota Johnson Had Chemistry, Says Jamie Dornan, Still

$
0
0

Jamie Dornan and Dakota Johnson Had Chemistry, Says Jamie Dornan, Still

Like a song you cannot get out of your head no matter how hard you try, its chorus forever returning to your idle mind—"Staaay with me / 'Cause you're...all-I-need"—Jamie Dornan just cannot stop telling interviewers that he and Dakota Johnson had chemistry and also that he is a father and a husband too, and do you know that his wife is actually fine with 50 Shades?

Though the press tour for 50 Shades of Grey ended about a month ago, Jamie Dornan was interviewed recently in the Daily Mail, where he stuck strictly to his talking points, thank goodness. For example, is his wife mad at him for being in 50 Shades of Grey?

"Of course she would have read the scripts well in advance, and she's massively supportive of Fifty Shades."

Is he a father and a husband, and does that make it somewhat weird for him to be in 50 Shades of Grey—a movie that includes sex with someone other than his wife?

"I'm just a father and a husband, really," he said. "I wouldn't have been in the conversation for Fifty Shades without The Fall."

Speaking of 50 Shades, does he think that he and Dakota had chemistry?

"They wouldn't have shot the film with us if there was a chemistry problem... whatever chemistry means. You have to jump through a lot of hoops to get a part like this, and they simply wouldn't have cast us."

Cool. Glad we had this time to catch up!

[image via Getty]

Good News: Dick Transplants Now Possible

$
0
0

Good News: Dick Transplants Now Possible

Rejoice, peen-having members of this Earth: Doctors from University of Stellenbosch in South Africa successfully completed the world's first purported penis transplant—the patient has made a full recovery and "is sexually active."

The surgery was conducted last December on a 21-year-old man who suffered a botched circumcision as a teen. Background from the Telegraph:

The practice is seen as a rite of passage for young South African boys entering manhood including Nelson Mandela. He described the traditional stay in the bush that accompanies the operation in his book Long Walk to Freedom.

However, experts believe that up to 250 initiates lose their penises to amputation each year, and many more suffer horrific disfigurements because of unskilled or unscrupulous practitioners, unsterilised instruments and infection.

Prof. Andre van der Merwe, head of the university's urology department, told Bloomberg that they were able to convince a family to donate a deceased relative's penis after devising "a penis-like appendage on the corpse using a leftover skin flap." "The family is much happier to send the body to the grave with something resembling a penis," van der Merwe said.

Technically, NBC News points out, this is the medical community's second attempted penis transplant: A Chinese man underwent surgery in 2005, but asked to have the penis removed two weeks later "because of psychological problems experienced by him and his wife."

The patient, doctors say, is expected to have full function use of his new member "in about two years."

[Image via Shutterstock]


Creflo Dollar Getting More Into Satan

$
0
0

Creflo Dollar Getting More Into Satan

Something—the sneaky finger of Jesus, perhaps—seems to have taken down the web page where His Holiness Pastor Creflo A. Dollar was asking followers to give him $65 million to buy a new private jet.

Though Jesus is, as always, the most likely culprit, it is possible that the good reverend himself took down the funding page today after reports of its existence in the secular media prompted many of ye with little faith to insinuate that this Man of God had done something wrong by appealing for $300 donations from 200,000 of his humble followers so that he could replace the old private jet he was using with a new private jet—a Gulfstream G650, billed as "the best private jet money can buy."

The old plane was old, you see. So Creflo, if I may call you that, Creflo, needed some way, any way, to continue to reach the lost souls of the world. "Believe it or not, there are still millions of people on this planet who have never heard of Jesus Christ and know nothing of His greatness," read the now-disappeared plea for $65 million. "Our hearts desire to see precious lives changed and snatched out of darkness and thrust into His marvelous light! We need your help to continue reaching a lost and dying world for the Lord Jesus Christ."

It's easy to mock Reverend Dollar, so please keep in mind that your mockery will be held to a higher quality standard than usual.

[Photo via Christian Post]


Contact the author at Hamilton@Gawker.com.

15 Things You Probably Didn't Know About Farts

$
0
0

15 Things You Probably Didn't Know About Farts

Admit it. You've always wanted to know whether farts can carry germs.

Photo Credit: John Sibley | CC BY-NC 2.0

1. Farts can probably carry germs, but you don't really need to worry about it unless you're naked

A brief entry in the British Medical Journal's 2001 holiday issue recounts how one Dr Karl Kruszelnicki "established whether human flatus was germ-laden, or merely malodorous":

I contacted Luke Tennent, a microbiologist in Canberra, and together we devised an experiment. He asked a colleague to break wind directly onto two Petri dishes from a distance of 5 centimetres, first fully clothed, then with his trousers down. Then he observed what happened. Overnight, the second Petri dish sprouted visible lumps of two types of bacteria that are usually found only in the gut and on the skin. But the flatus which had passed through clothing caused no bacteria to sprout, which suggests that clothing acts as a filter.

Our deduction is that the enteric zone in the second Petri dish was caused by the flatus itself, and the splatter ring around that was caused by the sheer velocity of the fart, which blew skin bacteria from the cheeks and blasted it onto the dish. It seems, therefore, that flatus can cause infection if the emitter is naked, but not if he or she is clothed. But the results of the experiment should not be considered alarming, because neither type of bacterium is harmful. In fact, they're similar to the 'friendly' bacteria found in yoghurt.

Our final conclusion? Don't fart naked near food. All right, it's not rocket science. But then again, maybe it is?

2. Herring (yes, the fish) may use farts to communicate with one another

About a decade ago, researchers led by marine biologist Ben Wilson discovered that Atlantic and Pacific herring can create high-frequency sounds by releasing air from their anuses. Wilson and his colleagues named the distinctive bursts of pulses "Fast Repetitive Tick" (aka FRT) sounds, after the noise they make.

Because darkness and high densities of fish seem to trigger the farts, Wilson and his colleagues suspect herring may use the FRT sounds to help them form protective shoals at night.

3. Some people are sexually aroused by farts

(The official term is "eproctophilia.")

4. According to master satirist Jonathan Swift, there are five types of farts

To our knowledge, there is no official classification system for farts, but the tradition of categorizing them predates fartnames.com by several hundred years, at least. Jonathan Swift, for his part, maintained in his notorious treatise "The Benefit of Farting Explain'd," that there exist at least five "different species of farts, and which are perfectly distinct from each other, both in weight and smell. First, the sonorous and full-toned, or rousing fart; Second, the double fart; Third, the soft fizzing fart; fourth, the wet fart; and Fifth, the sullen wind-bound fart."

5. One of the most famous depictions of farts in the Italian literary canon comes from Canto XXI of Dante's Inferno

15 Things You Probably Didn't Know About Farts

The passage describes a scene in which a band of demons gathers to escort Dante and Virgil through the fifth pocket of Malebolge:

Per l'argine sinistro volta dienno;

ma prima avea ciascuna la lingua stretta

coi denta, verso lor duca, per cenno;

ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta. (XXI, 136–9)

[They made left face on the bank; but first each had bit his tongue toward their leader, as a salute, and he of his ass had made a trumpet.]

These demons were clearly just having some harmless, farty fun, though, right? Maybe not:

6. "In medieval Italy the demonic anus functioned as a locus for the generation of sinners' souls."

So says Suzanne Magnanini, an associate professor in the Department of French and Italian at the University of Colorado at Boulder and author of the book Fairy-Tale Science, in which she contextualizes Dante's infamous fart-scene:

If we consider the iconography of devils and hell contemporary with Dante's poem, it becomes clear that in medieval Italy the demonic anus functioned as a locus for the generation of sinners' souls. In the Scrovegni chapel in Padua, Giotto depicted the devil as eating sinners while defecating others into hell. Similar images could be found ion the walls of churches and abbeys in Bologna, Modena, Pisa, and San Gimignano. Camporesi locates the origins of such depicctions of Lucifer and devils in a figure associated with ancient agrarian festials, stating, 'nel corpo gigantesco e villoso di Lucifero rimane sottesa l'arcaica immagine del'orso padre dai cui peti nascevano le nuove anima, il gigantesco mostro delle feste agrarie, l'orso carnevalesco, una bestia pelosa e peteggiante' [in the gigantic and furry body of Lucifer there remains underneath the archaic image of the father bear from whose farts were born new souls, the gigantic monster of agrarian festivals, the carnivalesque bear, a hairy and farting beast.]

7. In Japanese folklore, flatulence can serve as a form of defense

15 Things You Probably Didn't Know About Farts

In Japanese folklore, the kappa is a mischievous water sprite with a penchant for reaching up people's butts in pursuit of their shirikodama, a magical, soul-bearing orb. That said, it is said that kappa can be repelled by blasting them with powerful bursts of flatulence. The technique is immortalized in Tsukioka Yoshitoshi's (1839-1892) ukiyo-e work "Farting at a kappa at the lumber yard in Fukagawa" (above), and elsewhere.

8. Basically, flatulence plays an important role in the folklore, myths, and fairy tales of many cultures

In Innu mythology, one of the most powerful spirits is called Matshishkapeu, which translates to "The Fart Man." The Greeks were also partial to farts. Folklore scholar D.L. Ashliman lists a handful of legendary farts on his website, though his account is by no means exhaustive.

If you decide to seek out more examples of flatulence in myths and fables, keep an eye out for common motifs. One of the more interesting similarities I've found between seemingly disparate folk tales and belief systems is the association of farts with the giving and taking of life. Two examples: In Viola, a tale by 16C Italian storyteller Giambattista Basile, an ogre believes his flatulence to have reproductive, i.e. life-giving powers. In Maya tradition, the god of death is occasionally referred to as "the flatulent one."

In his book Death and the Classic Maya Kings, mesoamerican archaeologist James L. Fitzsimmons writes that the biological associations of flatulence with death are "obvious." I admit, this had not previously been obvious to me, but as it turns out...

9. Dead bodies fart

In fact, according to Caleb Wilde (a sixth-generation mortician and creator of the hugely popular blog Confessions Of A Funeral Director), "some dead bodies fart a bunch."

10. You can thank the microbes in your intestine for your death-farts

Your large intestine is home to hundreds of species of beneficial bacteria that help digest whatever food your small intestine misses. In doing so, these bacteria generate a variety of gases, including carbon dioxide, oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen and methane, to name a few. It is here where farts are born – not just in life, but in death (just because you've kicked the bucket doesn't mean your microbes need to stop doing their thing.)

Another source of death farts is putrefaction. As the body decomposes, it releases noxious gasses. Occasionally, these gasses are released in the form of a postmortem toot. When these gasses have nowhere to go they can accumulate, sometimes with explosive results.

11. The same microbes responsible human farts are occasionally responsible for explosive colonoscopies

The medical literature contains a record of at least 20 instances of a colonoscopy resulting of "colonic gas explosion" between 1952 and October 2006. One of these was fatal.

12. Wait, I know farts are flammable – but people explode during colonoscopies? How?

15 Things You Probably Didn't Know About Farts

Image via Shutterstock

Yep. It's interesting, actually – a lot of people think farts are flammable due to their methane content. While this is technically true, most human farts are actually flammable due to the hydrogen, which is also produced, and typically in greater volumes. Some people's guts produce both both gasses, in which case they burn together.

ANYWAY, according to researchers led by gastroenterologist Emmanuel Ben-Soussan, an explosion of colonic gasses requires three things: The presence of combustible gases (hydrogen and/or methane); the presence of combustive gas (oxygen); and the application of a heat source. As we previously reported:

Your bacteria provide the first two; electrocautery — a technique that uses heat to remove potentially cancerous intestinal growths known as polyps — provides the third. The perfect colonic storm would comprise a high concentration of hydrogen and/or methane (greater than 4% or 5%, respectively), plenty of oxygen and a piping-hot electrocautery tool. Concentrations of hydrogen and methane in the colon can vary considerably (0.06%—47% and 0%—26%, respectively, according to this study). Taking these thresholds into consideration, it is estimated that almost half of colonoscopy patients with unprepared large intestines harbor potentially explosive concentrations of hydrogen and methane in their bowels.

13. In the late 60s, scientists studied the farts of NASA astronauts

The purpose of the study? To quantify the potential buildup of hydrogen and methane in people on a "space diet," namely the one followed by astronauts on the early Gemini missions. It was thought that these gasses "could constitute a fire hazard in a closed chamber." Say, a spacecraft. Or a space suit.

You can read the details behind the experiment here, but the results basically showed that astronauts fed a Gemini-style diet produced a lot more flammable gas than those fed a "bland" formula. "Computed from 12-hour values, maximum potential daily H2 and CH4 are per man: for S, 730 ml and 382 ml; for F, 80 and 222 ml," write the researchers, though they note that these "volumes would be larger at reduced spacecraft and suit pressures."

14. Apollo 16 astronaut John Young, by his own admission, farted prolifically while on the moon

He's even known to have described his flatulence during a mission briefing.

15. The marginalia of illuminated manuscripts are loaded with visual fart jokes.

15 Things You Probably Didn't Know About Farts

Poop jokes, too.

500 Days of Kristin, Day 47: The Kristin Touch

$
0
0

500 Days of Kristin, Day 47: The Kristin Touch

Page Six reports that NBC is "looking to replace" Meredith Vieira's daytime chatfest The Meredith Vieira Show. Meredith recently hosted Kristin Cavallari on the program.


This has been 500 Days of Kristin.

[Photo via Getty]

Forward or Delete: This Week's Fake Viral Photos

$
0
0

Forward or Delete: This Week's Fake Viral Photos

Occasionally, against all odds, you'll see an interesting or even enjoyable picture on the Internet. But is it worth sharing, or just another Photoshop job that belongs in the digital trash heap? Check in here and find out if that viral photo deserves an enthusiastic "forward" or a pitiless "delete."

Image via Imgur


DELETE

Forward or Delete: This Week's Fake Viral Photos

Baring the caption "Tree with spiraling roots," the above image shot to the top of Reddit's /r/pics page last Friday, becoming one of the section's most popular posts of the week. Even non-botanists, however, soon realized there was something suspicious about the oddly bark-less octopus tree.

In reality, the tree is the work of Swiss artist Sylvain Meyer, whose online gallery features this and other examples of his outdoor art. There's even a shot of Meyer putting his composition together, in case you were still unsure about the existence of tentacled pines.

Images via Twitter


DELETE

Forward or Delete: This Week's Fake Viral Photos

Yes, a British woman found some spider eggs on her bananas. But were they deadly boner spiders? Probably not.

As arachnologist Richard Vetter explained after a similar incident last year, it's extremely difficult to identify a spider species by its egg sac alone, as 43-year-old Maria Layton says she did this week.

"When I saw the cocoon [sic] it rang a bell and I thought I should check it so I googled it," Layton told The Telegraph. "I went through the images and there was an image which looked very similar to mine."

Eventually, Layton determined the egg sac to belong to the Brazilian wandering spider, infamous for its dangerous—and yes, boner-inducing—bite.

According to Vetter's research, however, Brazilian wandering spiders are grossly over-identified, even by experienced entomologists. From Live Science:

Typically, when one of these big, hairy spiders shows up overseas, it automatically gets labeled as a "deadly" Brazilian wandering spider without anyone identifying what genus or species the spider belongs to, Vetter said. And that's a shame, he said, because only one of the two genera of wandering spiders, Phoneutria, contains species that could actually pose a threat to humans. The other genus, Cupiennius, contains some big, but totally harmless, spiders.

Still, there has been at least one case of a Briton getting bit by such a spider—although it's unknown whether the victim was left firm or just infirm.

Image via Twitter


DELETE

Forward or Delete: This Week's Fake Viral Photos

While lightning striking sand has been known to create a natural glass structures called fulgurites, they look nothing like this, typically forming below ground as hollow tubes.

Seen here is a large "drip castle" created by Flickr user sandcastlematt, who captioned the photo "The biggest sand castle I've ever made."

Image via Twitter//h/t @PicPedant


FORWARD

Forward or Delete: This Week's Fake Viral Photos

Native Floridians may scoff at the hub-bub surrounding this (supposedly quite ordinary) golf dragon spotted last Friday, but the creature's prehistoric appearance had at least a few Facebook users questioning the picture's authenticity.

As additional photos show, however, the alligator is both very real and maybe a little less monstrous than it seemed at first glance.

Forward or Delete: This Week's Fake Viral Photos

Images via Facebook


DELETE

Forward or Delete: This Week's Fake Viral Photos

Presented as commentary on contemporary beauty standards, the argument made here is slightly undercut by the fact the picture was taken in 2004. As Snopes notes, the model is actually porn actress Aria Giovanni, born 22 years too late for a 1955 photo shoot.

Image via Twitter//h/t Snopes

Bill Simmons Is A Name-Dropping Waste

$
0
0

Bill Simmons Is A Name-Dropping Waste

So Bill Simmons offered a "sneak" preview today of the third part of his NBA Trade Value column. And yes, his self-mythologizing has gotten to the point where he a) breaks some random-ass rankings into three parts, b) releases a "sneak preview" of the third part of those rankings because "we couldn't resist" (and by we, he means him), c) repeatedly refers you to the archive of that column, as if you really need to know the 2006 trade value ranking of Shaun Livingston, and d) treats said rankings as the fucking Ten Commandments, as if the people couldn't live without them.

Simmons now lives in a bizarre one-man ecosystem where everything he writes must be placed in the context of some other shit he's written before. Like so …

For Grantland's Trade Value TV special that ran on ESPN on February 8, I ranked Kyrie 26th overall and sent Cleveland fans into a rancorous frenzy.

Okay, first of all, no one watches that show. We've seen the numbers. It gets beaten by a test pattern over on CSPAN-12. Who are the rancorous Cleveland fans who give a shit about this? Nowhere, that's where. There's probably like, ONE GUY, watching that glorified vidcast on his phone at a Buffalo Wild Wings, shaking his fist for three seconds because Simmons relegated Kyrie Irving to the Ryan Reynolds tier.

In January, everything started to flip: Cleveland made two shake-it-up trades, came together defensively and ripped off a 12-game winning streak that included Kyrie's 55-point game against Portland. Cavs fans started feeling themselves a little. Kyrie … 26th??? He's only 22! If he played for Boston, you'd have him ranked in the top 10!!!! CHOKE ON YOUR OWN #%@%@, YOU #&#$%!%!%!

Again, it always comes back to Simmons. Kyrie Irving is good. Now let's see how that made Cleveland fans feel about Bill Simmons saying he's not quite that good. That's the REAL story.

I spent the next two weeks watching Cleveland more closely, ultimately bumping Kyrie's ranking before Part 2 of the written column was posted on February 25.

OMG STOP THE FUCKING PRESSES, or whatever McSweeneys-approved parchment the Grantland Quarterly is printed on.

But no, it gets worse from there …

When Jalen Rose and I taped The Grantland Basketball Hour with Kobe last month…

"He's just Kobe to me. We're friends now."

..we were killing time during one of the commercial breaks and I asked Kobe if he had any "new" favorite players. You know how great chefs always identify the other up-and-coming great chefs?

No.

(Kobe) loves Kyrie. So that was a game changer for me.

BILL: I don't like Kyrie.

ACTUAL BASKETBALL PLAYER: Actually Bill, that guy is good.

BILL: Whoa! Game changer! I've been thinking about this all wrong! Tell me: How is Kyrie with desserts?

When Chef Kobe blessed Chef Kyrie, I knew it was time to wipe my Kyrie Opinion Hard Drive and start over.

The hard drive is where Chef Kobe keeps all his best steaks!

You know who loved hearing Kobe praise Kyrie? Jalen.

So? Fuck Jalen Rose.

We had been arguing about Kyrie's potential for months. Now Jalen was smiling like someone had just served him a 7-pound lobster.

Welcome to my column, where I recap an old TV show and then tell you how things have changed SINCE that TV show.

Which brings me to Tangent No. 2 …

EVERYTHING YOU'VE EVER DONE IS A TANGENT.

One of the coolest things about my job as it has evolved these past few years: getting access to so many memorable basketball players and basketball minds.

Could you list them for me?

Bill Walton and Larry Bird changed my too-harsh opinion of Kobe's style…

No way! Two great basketball players told you a great player was great? WHAT A REVELATION.

Shit, the epilogue of my NBA book…

Oh, you wrote a book, too? What other properties of yours can be synergized into this post? Tell us how Kyrie Irving completely changed the latter portion of your old screenplay: "J-Bug Needs A Toilet."

…told the story about Walton and I arguing about "The Secret" or "The Choice."

What am I reading? What is this? Are those recipes?

I spent a year watching basketball games in a tiny conference room with Magic…

So small! I actually watched games on his shoulders! Chef Magic's hair smells like tulips.

…and then a second year with Doug Collins.

Those are basketball people! I know them! I AM ZELIG.

I talked shop with Kobe, off the record, a number of times. I spent a whole day with the great Bill Russell. I got to know Steve Nash and Steve Kerr. I spent multiple days with Charles Barkley. I spent three hours with Durant and Harden once. I've picked the brains of dozens of famous NBA people on my podcast. I've spent the past three years talking for hundreds and hundreds of hours with Jalen. I spent an afternoon in Vegas with Isiah Thomas that became the second chapter of my book. And I've talked basketball with dozens of ex-players and ex-coaches who passed through the league — everyone from Kiki Vandeweghe to Danny Ainge to Doc Rivers to Elgin Baylor to Jeff Van Gundy to Hubie Brown…

And over the years, I have learned HOW to listen to that community.

Have you really? Because all I see is you name-dropping a bunch of fuckers to burnish your credentials. If you were a point guard, you'd be Nick Van Exel, who I'm told Jalen Rose adores.

Just put it through its own little filter. For instance, Jalen enjoys Jamal Crawford's work for a variety of reasons…

Why are you still talking about Jalen? Have HIM write the fucking column if he's so jazzed. Chef Jamal makes a MEAN pecan pie that Jalen can't stop raving about!

Jalen has raved about Kyrie's ceiling for three years and learned to discount MY unenthusiastic opinion; Jalen knew that I wasn't totally seeing what he saw. I wanted Kyrie to be something that he could never be: basically, late-'80s Isiah or Right Now Chris Paul, the point guard who spends 42 minutes making everyone better before taking over in the final six minutes. Jalen maintained that Kyrie wasn't that guy. I maintained that, until anyone proved they could win with him, I was out on him. We were in no-man's-land.

We're not even talking about Kyrie Irving anymore. This column could have been about a fucking rock. I know LESS about him than when I started reading. This column is, "Jalen and I were arguing about a basketball player … YOU'LL NEVER BELIEVE WHAT HAPPENS NEXT!"

If Kyrie keeps blossoming over these next two months, then it will start to feel like Miami in 2005 — Shaq's first year, when Dwyane Wade made a massive in-season leap and suddenly they looked like Kobe-and-Shaq reincarnated. The biggest difference: 2015 LeBron is better than 2005 Shaq. The second-biggest difference: Kyrie is two months younger than Wade was in 2005. Sticking him 10th might not be high enough. Regardless, I'm glad I came around on Kyrie. Better late than never.

Good for him! He might even make it onto your podcast one day!

Simmons has become so insufferably wrapped up in his own Bill Simmonsness … don't you people see this? Don't you Simmons fanboys get it? JUST OPEN YOUR EYES AND FUCKING GET IT. This is shameless, name-dropping horseshit. Motherfucker gets paid bank to blow smoke up his own ass, and can't even file on time! God dammit. I want to punch a cloud.

Viewing all 24829 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images