Quantcast
Channel: Gawker
Viewing all 24829 articles
Browse latest View live

We're Looking For Significant Others' Reviews Of Grand Theft Auto V

$
0
0

We're Looking For Significant Others' Reviews Of Grand Theft Auto V

Got a girlfriend who’s addicted to Grand Theft Auto V? Do you love watching your husband snipe virtual cops and rob fake banks? We want to hear from you!

We’re looking for light, one-paragraph reviews by significant others of GTA V players for an upcoming Kotaku roundup. We want to hear observations, insights, and thoughts on Rockstar’s blockbuster, as written by people who have watched their loved ones play it. Incorrect and inaccurate descriptions of the game are acceptable (recommended, even). The more it makes us laugh, the more likely we are to feature it.

If you’ve got a submission, send it my way. Remember: we’re looking for significant others’ thoughts, so if you’re the GTA player and your partner watches you play, we want to hear from them, not you.

You can reach the author of this post at jason@kotaku.com or on Twitter at @jasonschreier.


Everything We Know About David Cameron (Allegedly) Putting His Dick In A Pig, By a Britisher

$
0
0

Everything We Know About David Cameron (Allegedly) Putting His Dick In A Pig, By a Britisher

Late last night, the Daily Mail published an astounding excerpt of an unauthorized biography of UK Prime Minister David Cameron, alleging that he placed a “private part” of his body into the mouth of a dead pig’s head while at Oxford University.

He put his nob in a pig’s mouth. Popped his todger into the poor swine’s gob.

It’s crucial when dealing with such an important and weighty story to have all the facts, so please let this Brit guide you through the revolting tale of prime ministerial pig porkery.

What happened, allegedly?

Though you may have seen a lot of tweets referring to Cameron “fucking a pig,” that’s not entirely accurate. The Mail’s published excerpt of the book, co-authored by former Conservative party deputy chair Lord Ashcroft and journalist Isabel Oakeshott, actually alleges an act of porcine necrophilic oral:

A distinguished Oxford contemporary claims Cameron once took part in an outrageous initiation ceremony at a Piers Gaveston event, involving a dead pig. His extraordinary suggestion is that the future PM inserted a private part of his anatomy into the animal’s mouth.

[...]

Some months later, he repeated it a third time, providing a little more detail. The pig’s head, he claimed, had been resting on the lap of a Piers Gaveston society member while Cameron performed the act.

So, to clarify, the allegation is that a college-aged David Cameron (pictured in the Mail to aid your imagination) took out his pre-prime ministerial member and stuck it into the head of a pig as it lay, dead, locked in an eternal silent scream, in the lap of another young man at a Piers Gaveston society event.

And a “Piers Gaveston society” is what, exactly?

The University of Oxford, founded as early as 1096, is Britain’s oldest and most elite university. With that prestige, and with Britain’s intensely ridiculous aristocratic traditions, comes the existence of several secretive and exclusive societies—think Yale’s Skull and Bones but with perhaps more focus on getting totally sloshed. These groups pride themselves on frightfully naughty behavior: drinking, taking drugs, trashing pubs, and generally revelling in the excess and protection that extreme wealth and privilege provide. For example, the Mirror has reported that the Bullingdon Club, which Cameron definitely did join, requires members to burn a £50 note in front of a beggar, in a city with a homeless population that has increased thanks partly to the University’s monopoly on property.

And supposedly the Piers Gaveston society (or “Piers Gav”) is one of the most depraved of the lot. It’s named after some dead posh bloke from the 14th Century, though it was founded in 1977. According to the Guardian, members give themselves stupid nicknames like “Poker” or “Dispenser,” leaving the rest of us to imagine what an awfully interesting story there must be behind such a name. The Independent described the Piers Gav summer ball as involving a “live sex show”:

Guests—men wearing drag, women ‘hooker’ costumers – are bussed out to a secret location, often a country mansion, for an evening of bizarre rituals, drugs, pumping dancing music and sexual excess.

One year, party-goers were reportedly blindfolded and arrived at the venue to witness a live sex show, with drugs of all kinds alleged to have been freely available.

It’s also worth noting that the Guardian quotes a Piers Gav party attendee saying it “seemed like not-terribly-debauched public [in the UK that means private] schoolboys’ idea of debauchery.” There’s also no evidence Cameron was part of it, and the society’s founder has denied Cameron was a member.

Still, according to Ashcroft’s book, “there are a number of accounts of pigs’ heads at debauched parties in Cameron’s day.” Perhaps it was all just a cheeky but harmless literary homage to Lord of the Flies.

What’s the evidence for the claim?

The Mail’s excerpt says that a Member of Parliament “first made the allegation out of the blue at a business dinner in June 2014,” later repeating it twice more. The MP claimed to have seen photographic evidence of the event, giving the dimensions of the photo and the name of the person who possessed it — though, crucially, the photo’s owner has “failed to respond” to the authors’ requests.

And it could be tricky legally for the owner of Britain’s most important photo to come forward, if it exists. British obscenity law expert Myles Jackman noted at his blog that “whilst the act itself is legal”—yes, really—“possessing a photograph of it could be a criminal offense attracting up to two years imprisonment.” He also pointed out that a defence could be mounted on the grounds that the image is not “pornographic.” Either way, I’m confident we’re not going to have to deal with seeing this harrowing vision any time soon.

Have the Taiwanese animated this yet?

Yes! Yes they have. Here it is. It’s very good.

What if it’s not true (and it probably isn’t)? Why would Ashcroft allege this?

Some are speculating that Ashcroft’s book, including the piggy tale, is an act of revenge for his snub by Cameron in the last Conservative government. Ashcroft was offered a very junior post after being embroiled in a scandal over his “non-dom” or non-domiciled status, meaning he didn’t pay tax in the UK. Ashcroft was expecting something much more senior, as he was a top donor to the party. Ashcroft has said the book is “not about settling scores” with Cameron, but he’s certainly struck a resounding blow.

What has the reaction been?

Brits have reacted as they usually do: by taking the piss. British Twitter was on fire last night, and various media outlets have rounded up the best tweets from #PigGate, though in my opinion this is the only tweet you need. There’s a parody account, sure, but we don’t have to dignify that by linking to it— although it’s worth noting the account is followed by the Russian embassy in the UK, who recently trolled us all with a tweet about David Cameron’s response to Jeremy Corbyn being elected leader of the opposition party Labour. Great brand work, guys!

Many people immediately drew parallels with Charlie Brooker’s 2011 TV series Black Mirror, the first episode of which depicts a prime minister being forced to have sex with a pig on live TV to save the life of a British princess, who has been captured by terrorists. Brooker tweeted last night that he had never heard the allegations when he wrote the script.

Cameron’s office has not commented on the allegation, saying it would “not dignify” the book with a response—the whole book, apparently, allowing them to not-dignify other, more substantive claims about what Cameron knew of Ashcroft’s tax status in the book. A local Conservative party event at a “pig race” in Yorkshire has been cancelled today.

Perhaps best of all was the intrepidly wrong Louise Mensch, a former MP who cocks up on Twitter over and over again. This time, she cast a lonely figure in not just denying the pig-fuckery, but in defending it even if it did occur:

So what, eh? So he fucked a dead pig in its face. Who among us, etc.

Why does this matter?

It actually doesn’t! Nothing matters. But it probably won’t even affect Cameron that much. The Telegraph’s James Kirkup argues that many voters will continue to believe it now even if it’s proven untrue, and that this doesn’t matter at all, because “there really aren’t any political consequences of a story that the Prime Minister did something rude to a dead pig. It won’t change anyone’s mind about him, though it may convince some that they were right in what they already thought.” Either way, if the evidence exists it’s already proved difficult to locate. Cameron will probably just have to put up with receiving several tweets a day calling him a pigfucker until he leaves office. And for those of us who were disappointed by the results of the May general election, who were dismayed to face another five years of welfare cuts and austerity and posh gits in charge, it’s nice to have something to laugh about.

[Image by Jim Cooke, photo via Getty.]


Libby Watson is a British writer who usually lives in Washington, D.C., temporarily exiled in Britain.

Johnny Depp's 6 Most Inexplicable Career Decisions

$
0
0

Johnny Depp's 6 Most Inexplicable Career Decisions

We are not anti-Johnny Depp. We love films like Edward Scissorhands, Ed Wood, Donnie Brasco, and Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas—all of which are highlighted by stellar Depp performances. But for a Hollywood A-lister, he’s made some undeniably bizarre career decisions, and here are his oddest.

1) The Lone Ranger

In the wake of what Variety dubbed “one of the biggest trainwrecks of the year,” the trade publication reported that Depp and producer Jerry Bruckheimer blamed “critics” for The Lone Ranger’s box-office failings. Clearly, the fact that the 2013 movie was way too long, way too dull, and featured a Depp in Tonto “redface” drag that Time magazine kindly dubbed “problematic” had nothing to do with it.

A lot of movies are too long and too dull though. Not many in this day and age, however, dare poke into the realms of cultural appropriation. As Slate’s review of the film points out:

The Lone Ranger does its best not to marginalize Tonto: For the majority of the story, this is his film, not the Lone Ranger’s. Depp and the screenwriters Justin Haythe, Ted Elliott, and Terry Rossio have gone to great lengths to reverse some of the antiquated tropes found in many classic westerns. But they were also obligated to remain at least somewhat faithful to their original source—and sometimes they end up reinforcing the stereotypes they’re trying to subvert.

Before the film was released, Depp told Rolling Stone (which mentioned out that the actor “has Native American blood” without offering any specifics) that he wanted Tonto to be “no joke:”

“First of all, I wouldn’t fuck with someone with a dead bird on their head. Second of all, he’s got the fucking paint on his face, which scares me ... I wanted to maybe give some hope to kids on the res­ervations,” says Depp, who’s wearing an ancient Comanche symbol on the end of his rope necklace. “They’re living without running water and seeing problems with drugs and booze. But I wanted to be able to show these kids, ‘Fuck that! You’re still warriors, man.’”

A worthy goal, and probably a heartfelt intention... brought to the big screen by an actor who told Entertainment Weekly that he had “some Native American somewhere down the line” wearing a costume inspired by a fantastical painting by a white artist.

Johnny Depp's 6 Most Inexplicable Career Decisions

2) Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales

Okay, this movie isn’t even out yet. But hear us through!

In 2003, Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl—a movie many discounted prematurely, considering it was based on a Disneyland ride—proved a surprisingly fun mega-hit. It earned Depp his first Oscar nomination, and seems to have given him the confidence to pursue ever-wackier roles, some of which appear on this list.

It’s now 12 years later, and the Pirates franchise is still lurching onward, with Depp traveling to Australia in early 2015 to reapply those gold teeth and dreadlocks, and film the fifth installment: Dead Men Tell No Tales (the logline is “Captain Jack Sparrow searches for the trident of Poseidon”).

Look, we all know why he’s playing the same character yet again (because $$$$$). But doesn’t he have enough $$$$$ at this point? What creative and artistic satisfaction could he possibly getting out of this? Did he sign a Disney blood oath or something? Dead Men is due in 2017; however, Dead Man, the Jim Jarmusch neo-Western Depp starred in back when he was still an exciting actor, came out in 1995. And it’s awesome.

3) From Hell

Johnny Depp's 6 Most Inexplicable Career Decisions

Johnny Depp as a haunted London detective chasing Jack the Ripper, with the at-the-time inspired choice of the Hughes Brothers (Dead Presidents) behind the helm? What could go wrong? A lot of things, it turned out, especially the fact that From Hell, drawn from a graphic novel that focused on the mystery and mysticism surrounding the Ripper case, became a film more about Depp’s eccentric performance choices (including his iffy accent) than anything else.

And truth be told, we didn’t hate this Alan Moore adaptation as much as the famously Hollywood-averse author did. But we see where he was coming from when he took Depp to task in an interview with MTV:

I mean the police inspector in “From Hell,” Fred Abberline, was based on real life: He was an unassuming man in middle age who was not a heavy drinker and who, as far as I know, remained faithful to his wife throughout his entire life. Johnny Depp saw fit to play this character as an absinthe-swilling, opium-den-frequenting dandy with a haircut that, in the Metropolitan Police force in 1888, would have gotten him beaten up by the other officers.

Johnny Depp's 6 Most Inexplicable Career Decisions

4) Charlie and the Chocolate Factory

Not every Johnny Depp-Tim Burton collaboration has been a self-indulgent ride on a train bound for Whimsytown. We’ve already expressed our love for Ed Wood; there’s also the wonderful Edward Scissorhands and Corpse Bride (a winning Depp voice performance that’s up there with the non-Burton entry Rango), and the entertaining if imperfect Sleepy Hollow movie.

More at issue, in chronological order, are Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (more gloomy than quirky, but included here because Depp sings), Alice in Wonderland, and Dark Shadows.

We’re picturing the meetings that happened before each of these, and they consist of Burton silently nodding as Depp outlined his vision for each character, allowing every zany indulgence a free pass. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, already treading on sacred ground by remaking what was already the definitive film version of the Roald Dahl book, makes this list chiefly because it’s so freaking creepy, and (unlike in Alice in Wonderland, where at least there’s other weird performances to look at) Depp is in your face running on 11 the entire time.

Roger Ebert’s review took the most issue with the fact that Depp seemed to be (perhaps subconsiously) paying homage to Michael Jackson, who went on trial for child molestation in 2005, the same year the film was released:

Johnny Depp may deny that he had Michael Jackson in mind when he created the look and feel of Willy Wonka, but moviegoers trust their eyes, and when they see Willy opening the doors of the factory to welcome the five little winners, they will be relieved that the kids brought along adult guardians. Depp’s Wonka—his dandy’s clothes, his unnaturally pale face, his makeup and lipstick, his hat, his manner—reminds me inescapably of Jackson.

Gene Wilder, iconic star of the 1971 adaptation Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, reserved his criticism more for the remake itself, telling Entertainment Weekly:

“It’s just some people sitting around thinking, ‘How can we make some more money?’ Why else would you remake Willy Wonka? I don’t see the point of going back and doing it all over again,” Wilder said at the time. “I like Johnny Depp and I appreciate that he has said on the record that my shoes would be hard to fill. But I don’t know how it will all turn out. Right now, the only thing that does take some of the edge off this for me is that Willy Wonka’s name isn’t in the title.”

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory also gets elevated to a spot on this list because along with Captain Jack Sparrow, Willy Wonka seems to be the character that made Depp dive full-throttle into the realm of hair, make-up, and funky prosthetics. A gateway drug, if you will. How else to explain this Alice in Wonderland look ...

Johnny Depp's 6 Most Inexplicable Career Decisions

...other than, as Variety does, as having “Bozo-like red hair, unblinking emerald eyes, gap teeth, bushy eyebrows and makeup that makes coulrophobia a most rational fear”?

5) Into the Woods

Depp, having gotten a taste of on-screen crooning in Sweeney Todd, returned for more in this fairy-tale musical adaptation, playing the predatory Big Bad Wolf. The film’s producer, John DeLuca, told the Hollywood Reporter that a real effort went into “not making [the Big Bad Wolf’s scenes] too heavy on the pedophilia front.” Seems prudent.

Depp’s brief on-screen presence was still so distracting that The Stranger titled its review of the film “Johnny Depp Can’t Quite Ruin Into the Woods,” noting that his acting here is “all eyeballs and aimlessness and weirdness for weirdness’s sake ... In the best-known stage version of Into the Woods, the wolf was outfitted with a really good mask that moved when he sang. But in this movie, it appears the costume and makeup people just let Johnny Depp wear whatever he was wearing when he walked onto the set.”

Sounds about right. Here’s the scene; judge for yourself:

6) Mortdecai

Confession: we didn’t even watch this box-office bomb, which was released in January and was dubbed an (extremely) early contender for worst movie of 2015.

It’s about a kooky art dealer obsessed with tracking down a stolen painting. The Telegraph called it “psychotically unfunny,” and the paper didn’t stop there:

Mortdecai: mort de cinéma, more like. It’s hard to think of a way in which the experience of watching the new Johnny Depp film could be any worse, unless you returned home afterwards to discover that Depp himself had popped round while you were out and set fire to your house. This is comfortably the actor’s worst film since Alice in Wonderland, and even dedicated fans will find their hearts shrivelling up like week-old party balloons at its all-pervading air of clenched desperation.

Johnny Depp's 6 Most Inexplicable Career Decisions

Also, he has a mustache.

Not on this list: Depp’s current release, Black Mass, which is maybe the least inexplicable career decision he’s ever made; it’s a calculated move to tackle a grittier role than anything else he’s bothered with lately.

Though we didn’t care for the film, it signals a more encouraging direction than the upcoming Alice in Wonderland sequel. And at this point, one film can hardly be enough to spur a full-on comeback, even for an actor we once admired. But maybe... it’s a start?

Pizza Rat, Pizza Rat, I Love You

$
0
0

Pizza Rat, Pizza Rat, I Love You

Rats rarely bring us joy, so let’s take the opportunity to cherish this wonderful video of a little cheesehound dragging a slice of pizza down the steps of the First Avenue L station in Manhattan.

I like to imagine that this is a scene from a Ratatouille sequel where Remy the Rat, like Kevin McCallister before him, has to learn how to survive in this crazy city they call the Big Apple.

Remy, my friend, it looks like you’re doing just fine.

[video via Matt Little]


Contact the author at jordan@gawker.com.

Don’t forget: You can email us tips at tips@gawker.com, call them in at 646-470-4295, send them dire

Summer Ain't Over Yet: The Dew Boys Are Still Bongin'

$
0
0

The air might be a little nippier than usual, and soon we’ll all have seasonal depression, but for now... twist open a two-liter, grab your neon hose, and head to the nearest federal parking lot.

If you look at the bottom right of the image, you’ll note that they already crushed a bottle of what appears to be Code Red.


Contact the author at biddle@gawker.com.
Public PGP key
PGP fingerprint: E93A 40D1 FA38 4B2B 1477 C855 3DEA F030 F340 E2C7

Pharmaceutical Greed Villain Martin Shkreli Will Fight the Whole Internet

$
0
0

Pharmaceutical Greed Villain Martin Shkreli Will Fight the Whole Internet

Given that Big Pharma executives are mostly visible monsters with fangs and horns, they usually avoid the spotlight. But after raising the cost of a life-saving pill by 5,000 percent, Turing CEO Martin Shkreli is loudly telling the world to fuck off.

Only a bad guy from Captain Planet could come up with a more brazenly amoral business scheme: Turing Pharmaceuticals purchased the rights to Daraprim, a 62-year-old drug used to treat toxoplasmosis, a parasitic affliction that affects tens of millions in the U.S. alone. Daraprim is particularly important for AIDS and cancer patients, whose weakened immune systems are ravaged by toxoplasmosis. Shkreli has now directly, intentionally switched the drug from affordable to insanely out of reach, Healio reports:

Since its acquisition, the price of pyrimethamine has increased from $13.50 per tablet to $750 per tablet, according to IDSA and HIVMA. In an open letter to Turing, the organizations urged the pharmaceutical company to revise its pricing strategy for the generic medication.

“Under the current pricing structure, it is estimated that the annual cost of treatment for toxoplasmosis, for the pyrimethamine component alone, will be $336,000 for patients who weigh less than 60 kg and $634,500 for patients who weigh more than 60 kg,” they wrote. “This cost is unjustifiable for the medically vulnerable patient population in need of this medication and unsustainable for the health care system.”

Shkreli isn’t just a regular, run-of-the-mill pharmaceutical industry monster. He’s a monster who used to work (of course) in finance, a former hedge funder accused of having tried to manipulate FDA regulations on drug companies whose stocks he was shorting. He was forced out of the last drug company he started, which is now suing him for $65 million. He’s also a probable charlatan who has claimed to have invented his own pharmaceuticals, despite his lack of any medical or scientific education.

(Shkreli is able to do price-gouge a generic drug by exploiting a few FDA loopholes that give companies exclusive licensing rights to certain older drugs, and allow them to deny other companies the access to those drugs needed to prove that a generic alternative is chemically identical.)

According to USA Today, Turing claims the proceeds of the now-exorbitantly priced toxoplasmosis drug will be used to research treatments and raise awareness for toxoplasmosis:

Rothenberg defended Daraprim’s price, saying that the company will use the money it makes from sales to further research treatments for toxoplasmosis. They also plan to invest in marketing and education tools to make people more aware of the disease.

This could also be phrased as “attempting to grow the size of the potential market for this suddenly much more profitable drug.”

Rather than hide and count his blood money, Shkreli is conducting a social media blitz. He spent much of last night bickering with John Carroll, a science writer who runs a pharma news website and has been critical of Shkreli for pulling a nearly identical price-gouging stunt at his last company.

And it’s not just journalists. Shkreli’s also sparring with pretty much anyone who criticizes his obscene business practices:

Here he is accusing a guy with 25 followers of having no life:

The man is relentless. He cannot be daunted:

Pharmaceutical Greed Villain Martin Shkreli Will Fight the Whole Internet

He’s also taken to Reddit to directly engage with people who hate his guts (a suicide mission if there ever was one):

Pharmaceutical Greed Villain Martin Shkreli Will Fight the Whole Internet

“This was a strangely inexpensive drug.”

This is not the first time that Shkreli’s combined love of parasitical rent-seeking and social media engagement have landed him in hot water. At his last company, Retrophin, shareholders were furious when Shrkeli appeared to tweet hints about company acquisitions before they were officially announced.

And, well, there was also this:

More recently, three alias Twitter accounts were found to be under the control of unidentified Retrophin employees, according to people familiar with the situation. The link was found after the IP address of one of the alias Twitter accounts matched the IP address of Retrophin’s headquarters.

The most prolific of these accounts, @Thug_BioAnalyst, tweeted in “ghetto slang” expressing support for Retrophin and calling out other drug stocks, including TherapeuticsMD (TXMD), as shorts.

Pharmaceutical Greed Villain Martin Shkreli Will Fight the Whole Internet

Ironically, Shkreli’s insistence on trolling anyone who contacts him will probably do little but “make people more aware” of how grotesque the whole pharmaceutical industry is, and how insane our drug pricing system is compared to the drug pricing in every other wealthy nation. The attention Shkreli has attracted has already prompted Hillary Clinton to tweet her objection to the news, immediately causing a dip in the NASDAQ biotech index:

There appears to be real fear on the part of Big Pharma that the utter shamelessness of this incredibly hatable greedhead could ruin the racket for the respectable and mostly anonymous greedheads in the rest of the industry.

In case you need any more help making a decision about Martin Shkreli and Turing Pharmaceuticals, here is a photo of Martin Shkreli posted by Martin Shkreli:



Contact the author at biddle@gawker.com.
Public PGP key
PGP fingerprint: E93A 40D1 FA38 4B2B 1477 C855 3DEA F030 F340 E2C7

America Still Sucks at Dealing with Race, Says New Poll

$
0
0

America Still Sucks at Dealing with Race, Says New Poll

One year after the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri and three months after the mass shooting at South Carolina’s Emanuel A.M.E. Church, race is America’s ever-glowing lightning rod—and a new poll says we’re not getting better at it.

On the eve of a new PBS special called “American After Charleston,” airing on Monday, PBS Newshour and Marist College’s Institute for Public Opinion polled a number of Americans about race. Here’s what they found:

  • Most consider race relations worse than they were one year ago: 60 percent of whites felt they were worse, while 58 percent of blacks felt the same.
  • 76 percent of blacks don’t feel like they have the same opportunities for employment as a white person, while 52 percent of whites think blacks do.
  • 87 percent of blacks don’t think they have the same chance at receiving equal justice as whites, while 50 percent of whites think blacks do.
  • 65 percent of blacks feel Black Lives Matter focuses on racial discrimination, compared to 25 percent of whites; 59 percent of whites think BLM detracts from the “real issues,” compared to 26 percent of blacks.

When asked about the 2016 presidential election, 33 percent of whites and 19 percent of blacks polled felt race relations have been given too much attention, while 56 percent of blacks and 31 percent of whites think the topic’s been given too little attention.

In America, race is usually only given attention when tragedy strikes on a national level, like Brown’s death or the scene at Emanuel, and our culture has no other choice but to talk about the racialicious elephant in the room. That said, if we can’t discuss race and the disparities that arise from all of our differences, how are we supposed to move forward? The answer is, we won’t.


Contact the author at Hillary@jezebel.com.

Image via Getty.


A Statistical Analysis of the New York Times "Sunday Routine" 

$
0
0

A Statistical Analysis of the New York Times "Sunday Routine" 

As all New Yorkers know, the best section in the New York Times bar none is the “Sunday Routine.” So far this year, 38 people have been featured in the “Sunday Routine.” What is their Sunday routine?

WHO IS FEATURED IN THE SUNDAY ROUTINE?

Business executive- 10 (26%)
Nonprofit executive- 8 (21%)
Fashion designer- 4 (11%)
Musician or Artist- 3 (8%)
Government official- 3 (8%)
Actor, actress, or TV star- 3 (8%)
Chef- 2 (5%)
Journalist- 1 (2.6%)
Comedian- 1 (2.6%)
Athlete- 1 (2.6%)
Explorer- 1 (2.6%)
Lighting designer- 1 (2.6%)

DO THEY GO TO THE PARK ON SUNDAY?

Yes- 24 (63%)
No- 14 (37%)

DO THEY EXERCISE ON SUNDAY?

Yes- 27 (71%)
No- 11 (29%)

DO THEY WATCH TV AND/ OR MOVIES ON SUNDAY?

Yes- 31 (82%)
No- 7 (18%)

DO THEY HAVE BRUNCH ON SUNDAY?

Y-38 (100%)
N- 0 (0%)

Seems like everyone does pretty much the same stuff on Sunday. So what makes the “Sunday Routine” section so fascinating? I don’t know. It just is.

What’s your Sunday routine? Unless it’s in the New York Times, I don’t care.

[Photo via, via]

Invasion of Tropical Air Could Trigger Dangerous Flash Flooding in the Southwest This Week

$
0
0

Invasion of Tropical Air Could Trigger Dangerous Flash Flooding in the Southwest This Week

The decaying remnants of a tropical depression will move through the desert southwest over the next couple of days, dragging with it enough tropical air that residents might think they woke up in southern Florida. This excess moisture will lead to very heavy rain that could easily produce flash flooding in vulnerable areas.

It is unbelievably gross right now in places like Arizona and southern California. The “it’s a dry heat” joke is just a dream on a day like today. Take a look at this dew point map—cooler colors show drier air, while warmer colors show air you can swim through.

Invasion of Tropical Air Could Trigger Dangerous Flash Flooding in the Southwest This Week

The 11:00 AM temperature in Phoenix was a manageable 85°F, but the dew point was 73°F. To put that in perspective, the dew point in Key West, Florida, at the same time was also 73°F, and the dew point in Honolulu was 74°F. Dew point values in the 70s are gross. Very gross. We’re talking about moisture that makes you sweat within a minute of stepping outside.

The dew point is a much better measure of the moisture in the air than relative humidity, since the relative humidity is...well, relative. Air temperature goes up, relative humidity goes down. Air temperature goes down, relative humidity goes up. That’s why the relative humidity can be 35% on a hot day and it still feels like death.

Normally when you think of a desert, you think of air so dry it can crack your skin in half at the first gust of wind. Most of the southwest is as humid as the Gulf Coast and Hawaii right now because of Tropical Depression Sixteen-E, a system that just made landfall on the eastern shore of the Gulf of California (or the Sea of Cortez, depending on your preferred name for it).

Invasion of Tropical Air Could Trigger Dangerous Flash Flooding in the Southwest This Week

On its current path, what’s left of the system will trek right over Arizona and New Mexico through the day today and tomorrow, bringing with it oodles (technical term) of deep, tropical moisture from the Pacific. In addition to the dew point, one of the ways we can judge how much moisture is present in the atmosphere is a metric called “precipitable water,” often abbreviated as PWAT.

Precipitable water, measured in inches, is the amount of rain that would fall if you condensed all of the moisture in a small column of the atmosphere. For example, if the PWAT is 1.35” in Little Rock, it means that if you were to wring out all of the moisture in the atmosphere over Arkansas’ capital city, it would produce 1.35” of rain.

The notability of these values is relative to where they were measured—a PWAT of 0.60” on a late September day is normal in northern Maine, but it would be well below normal—nearing record lows—down in southeastern Louisiana.

Invasion of Tropical Air Could Trigger Dangerous Flash Flooding in the Southwest This Week

This morning’s weather balloon launch in Tucson, Arizona, found a PWAT over the southeastern part of the state of 1.69”. For the desert, that’s significant. Above is a chart from the Storm Prediction Center showing PWAT averages from tens of thousands of early morning (1200z) weather balloon soundings in Tucson since the 1950s.

The thick black line in the middle shows you the average PWAT values in Tucson on any given day, while the thin red line and the thin blue line show you the record highest and record lowest PWAT values on each day.

The PWAT of 1.69” recorded by this morning’s weather balloon is a record for the morning of September 21, and it’s well above the average of about 0.89” you’d typically see on the first day of astronomical fall and the tail-end of monsoon season.

All of this is delightfully geeky, sure, but what does it mean in practical use? Higher PWAT values mean that showers and thunderstorms have more moisture to work with; when storms can tap into deeper moisture reserves, it means there’s a real chance that areas will see heavier, more prolific rainfall, and that’s not something you want in a desert.

Invasion of Tropical Air Could Trigger Dangerous Flash Flooding in the Southwest This Week

This morning’s forecast from the Weather Prediction Center shows several inches of rain falling over the desert southwest—mainly over Arizona—with some areas seeing two or maybe even three or more inches of rain if they get caught under the heaviest thunderstorms. Flash flood watches are in effect from southern California through western New Mexico, and as of this post, there’s already a flash flood warning up for Nogales, Arizona, due to 1.50” to 2.00” of rain falling in just a couple of hours.

If you’re going to be in the area at any point through mid-week, keep an eye on arroyos (washes) and areas that traditionally flood when it rains heavily. Don’t drive through a flooded roadway—no matter what’s on the other side of that flood, fording a water-covered roadway isn’t worth risking your life and the lives of your rescuers. It doesn’t take much water to lift a vehicle and hurl it downstream. Even if you survive, Arizona has a “Stupid Motorists Law” on the books that makes you pay for your water rescue if you drive through a flood.

[Images: AP, GREarth, author, SPC, author]


Email: dennis.mersereau@gawker.com | Twitter: @wxdam

If you enjoy The Vane, then you’ll love my upcoming book, The Extreme Weather Survival Manual, which comes out on October 6 and is now available for pre-order on Amazon.

Why I Quit My Dream Newspaper Job After Four Months 

$
0
0

Why I Quit My Dream Newspaper Job After Four Months 

Two months ago, I quit the best job I ever had. At least, I’m sure that’s how it looks. Writing is one of those professions that automatically elicits people’s opinions about your work, and since quitting, I’ve encountered enough split-second pauses to develop a strong feeling that the decision makes me look either stupid, incompetent, or both.

The supporting evidence is considerable. When I left, I had little to no nest-egg to live on. I had a few prospects, but nothing sustainable. Now I’m up to my ears in credit-card debt. I haven’t received a paycheck in weeks. I also can’t recall a time in my adult life when I’ve been happier.

The perks of life as your own boss are as obvious as its downsides, but I don’t believe anyone really wants to be a freelancer, at least not at first. Upon graduating J-School in 2010, I had braced myself for the absence of job security, only to be saved by an unlikely staff position in the eleventh hour. Then, two years later—seven months into my second job—the magazine’s new owners cleaned house and my colleagues and I found ourselves unemployed. So I turned to freelancing as a transition, vowing to collect a little money until I could replace my old gig. After all, no benefits? No office or support system? Just slaving away, piecing together an adult-sized income a couple hundred bucks at a time? Who would want that kind of hell?

Against all my expectations: me.

Two and a half years after the layoff, I was still self-employed. I had good bylines, great relationships with supportive editors, and, most remarkably, a network of journalists who had my back, should I need additional help. I’d still been steadily interviewing, for more jobs than I can count now—but somehow each opportunity eventually disappeared, often for odd reasons, some of which I still don’t understand. In the meantime, I sometimes found myself actually enjoying working alone on my couch. I wasn’t making two dollars a word or anything, but I started earning a decent, mostly-consistent living after a while; at one point, I even got paid to write about freelancing itself. Each time a new writer emailed me for guidance, it felt like another confirmation of my success, a sign, even: I didn’t need a full-time gig anymore.

But then one of these evaporated jobs came back to life, and after a few more interviews (all of which, in total, ended up spanning nine months), the Los Angeles Times offered me a job. By any reasonable professional standard, it was a Great Job: The publication was impressive, it was a high-profile management position—pop music editor!—and it came with one of those unicorn salaries (plus benefits) to which most journalists rabidly aspire. The offer alone was enough to send anyone I told into shrieks of congratulations.

So I accepted it. Sure, I felt steadyish on my own. But I knew how quickly freelance life can slide into panic about money and inescapable anxiety brought on by unpredictable checks. I remembered, when it was bad, the regular paralysis of despair—the pity parties I would throw, crying on the couch and clinging to my dog until he wriggled free of my smothering embrace, asking myself why nobody wanted me enough to put their faith in me as a full-time staffer. I remembered the antidepressants I had to start taking about 18 months into self-employment when suddenly I found myself missing deadlines because I couldn’t get out of bed in the morning. Freelancing, for the joy of independence it gives you, can be an impossibly lonely place. And big career moves are the point of it all, right? The Times really seemed to want me, so much that they offered a salary bump for a dog-walker when I expressed concern about leaving Oscar at home all day. It’s really, really hard to turn down a Great Job; it seems unthinkable to turn down a Great Job That Badly Needs You.

Four months later, I was handing in my resignation letter.

A bad job can make you feel immediately unhinged, and even more so when, on the surface, it looks so much like success. Of course, there were red flags: that nine-month interview process, for one; the fact that one of the oldest, most tumultuous journalistic bureaucracies in the nation hired a twenty-something female editor to manage an all-male, all-older and nearly all-white team should’ve been another. At least I know what I’m getting into, I’d reasoned. But seeing red flags, it turns out, is not the same as anticipating what dealing with those red flags will do to you.

Things started fine enough. On my first day, everyone seemed relieved to see me, if wary of the prospect of change. (Newspapers!) The editor-in-chief warned me not to adapt to the organization; instead, he said, the organization needed to adapt to me. (I was naïve not to understand immediately that this would be impossible, especially when my own boss explained in private soon thereafter that the company was a living contradiction, one whose employees frequently said one thing and did the opposite. He himself would not prove an exception to this rule.)

The next few months followed that pattern to the letter. In a series of events that’s probably familiar to young people in any industry, I was welcomed into the company for my digital expertise and energy, then given no resources, accommodations or support to actually put those assets to work. My emails would often be ignored or forgotten, my specific requests taken as suggestions, my questions laughed at in edit meetings. When I would ask for support with my staff, I was told I just needed to be “nicer” (a code word many women in management know all too well). Suddenly, all those supposedly manageable red flags metamorphosed into bloodsucking chupacabras, and before long, the full-time job I thought I wanted—thought I needed, and needed me—was turning me inside out and backwards more violently than freelancing ever had.

The panic attacks from my self-employment days resumed, now coming at least weekly, if not more. The old money worries shifted: now I fretted not about the lack of it, but about whether I could do a suffocating job that turned me into the worst version of myself just for the paycheck. At the same time, I could barely leave the house or turn on my computer without someone I asking me all about how it was going. I flinched talking to people at parties because I’d inevitably have to answer those questions for total strangers all over again. “It’s challenging,” I’d say vaguely, if I was feeling standoffish. On a bad night, I’d overshare: “It’s the worst, actually, I’ve never been more unhappy!!!” I hated telling dates where I worked, because the energy would immediately change; the man across from me would always become either visibly intimidated or way too interested. And I couldn’t lie to my friends and family about how it was going, which meant I was always complaining. It became all-consuming, my one defining characteristic. Home for a holiday, I visited a friend at his parents’ house; his mother hugged me, and said, “So I hear you hate your job.”

I wracked my brain for weeks. I wouldn’t last; I couldn’t be a quitter. I was still getting brand-new congratulations, and to leave so quickly seemed mortifying. I wondered what people would think of me, if I’d ever get another job again, and more troublingly, if I wasn’t good enough to—if I wasn’t cut out for a staff position at all. I was swimming in doubt. Did every editor encounter this kind of pushback going into a legacy brand, or was it just me? Was I overreacting thinking my experience would have been different were I a white man? All I knew was that, in practice, my colleagues gave me no enthusiasm or positivity or even just trust in my leadership—no baseline benefit of the doubt. With no support system, I was immediately asked to prove to a section that was already downtrodden, and mismanaged and doubtful that I could turn everything around.

Legacy institutions have a conflicted relationship to change. They need it, but fear it—particularly the uneven way it always comes. Newness feels like destabilization; innovation, even when it’s obviously necessary, feels like danger. Freelancing, which rewards adaptability above all else, had taught me entirely different. I loved being able to quickly prove my ideas had merit—to trust that, if one publication didn’t trust a pitch, another would. Part of what had made me a successful writer and editor was being flexible and being open. To see those qualities as irrelevant to the office, or even laughable, made me feel alien to myself. Everything felt wrong.

I had (and still have) no idea how I was supposed to inspire stubborn, conservative people (dudes) to trust me, let alone change course. Maybe I really wasn’t management material (whatever that is). Maybe I’d changed too much as a freelancer. Anyone who runs their own business can tell you that working for yourself can dramatically change your approach to the very concept of work. Maybe I’d been spoiled for the real world by so much working from my couch, being able to do whatever I wanted for longer than I’d ever spent in a staff position.

But one day, while venting to a former editor (one who stuck it out in a similarly unhappy, high-profile job for over a year before leaving), she asked me whether I had been able to choose my own team. Of course not, I said, the staff writers have been there for years, and when I started, it was implied that new hires were out of the question. She asked whether I was allowed to assign pieces to writers I liked outside the organization. I said no; I had recently been informed our freelance budget had been eaten up before I even arrived. “Of course they don’t want to take notes from you,” she replied. “I got rid of almost everyone when I came in.”

The Los Angeles Times’s problems are many, and public—and my particular experiences were so common among women in this field that listing them would feel like I was quoting Lady Journalist Mad Libs. But the last straw came one day, in the middle of a check-in with my bosses, when I expressed my relief that I’d been able to continue writing as I edited. They responded by saying, “Actually, you should stop writing for a while.”

It felt clear then. Four months be damned. I’d rather be proud of my work than miserable.

This decision put me at the height of privilege, of course. The impostor-syndrome-advocating life coach in the back of my head screaming “HAHA, you think you’re special? Everyone hates their jobs; you’re lucky yours looks good on paper. Deal with it” was enough to remind me of that. The fine print in the above epiphany is that I realized how lucky I was to be able to choose—to not have to stick it out in an unwinnable situation because I had to, like so many people do. I was too young to fake it, phone it in, get lazy, lose the ravenous hunger that everybody in this industry needs. I was fortunate enough to be able to act on that, and that was, in the end, the realization I needed to act.

Now, I have a balance on my credit cards (to say nothing of student loans and car payments). Much of what little money I had saved has since gone to back taxes. (LOL, freelancing.) I’ve considered temping, maybe waiting tables, until I can get back on my feet. But each time I start flipping out again, I remember what another friend asked as I was deciding whether to quit: “What’s scarier, being in debt or being in that building for another six months?”

My answer for her was automatic. I had been in debt before; I know how it feels like you’re fluttering in the wind with no counterweights, like you could nosedive into the pavement at any moment. But after almost three years on my own, I also know how to dig myself out. And best of all, now I’m choosing it—not the other way around. Self-employment isn’t a storm to be weathered anymore. (The statistics prove it, even if I can’t, and with my industry’s retention rates, who’s to say I would have kept that job for much longer anyway?) Freelancing can be just as challenging and frustrating as any staff position that may come along (and I hope they still do after this essay is published), but it’s infinitely more reliable than a platonic “dream job” ideal that, in this industry, grows rarer by the hour. A dream job, I now think, may be literally that—a position that exists only in the imagination. For me, at least, it was always just a dream.

Illustration by Tara Jacoby

Devon Maloney is a journalist and writer living in Los Angeles. Her work has appeared in Vanity Fair, New York magazine, WIRED, GQ, Grantland, Vice, Nylon, Out, Billboard, Pitchfork, MTV, the Village Voice and Spin.

Scott Walker Finally Realizes Nobody Likes Scott Walker, Drops Out of Race

$
0
0

Scott Walker Finally Realizes Nobody Likes Scott Walker, Drops Out of Race

After polling at a humiliating (less than) one-half of one percent, Scott Walker has apparently realized that, maybe, 2016 just isn’t his year. At a press conference set for 6 p.m. Eastern, Walker is expected to withdraw his candidacy.

The Wisconsin governor has been on a steady downswing since entering the race as everyone’s trendy presidential pick, what with his distaste for livable minimum wages and lady parts both. But after being called “a national disgrace” by the AFL-CIO and registering at a solid asterisk on the polls, Walker’s reign of terror on our TVs has finally, mercifully come to end.

Two down, 347 more to go.

[h/t New York Times]


Contact the author at ashley@gawker.com. Image via AP.

Keeping Up With the Kontinuity Errors: When Was Rob Really Invited On the Armenia Trip?   

$
0
0

Keeping Up With the Kontinuity Errors: When Was Rob Really Invited On the Armenia Trip?   

This Sunday, Keeping Up With the Kardashians returned to E! for its 11th season. Today, keen-eyed Kardashians scholar Mariah Smith returns to Gawker for her second season. Every week, Smith uses paparazzi photos, gossip-blog coverage, the family’s own Instagram and Twitter accounts, and common sense, to investigate, and establish a detailed and accurate shooting schedule of Keeping Up With the Kardashians—laying bare the distorted timelines and manufactured plotline of America’s royal family. Welcome back for another season of Keeping Up With the Kontinuity Errors.


Hello again, dolls! The break has been fab, but I’ve got a new outfit, new notebook, and new errors, and I’m ready for the first day of school. There’s no time like the present to get to work, so let’s dive in and uncover all we missed over the summer. We can kiss when it’s done. #LetsHitIt

On Sunday night’s episode, our A-plot was Kim and Khloe’s trip to Armenia, our B-Plot was Kylie’s teenage ways, and our C-plot was Kris Jenner’s sadness. Like most things, only the Ace matters, so we’re picking the A-plot for this recap.

Scene 2: Filmed on May 10, 2015

Kim Kardashian West, of www.KimKardashianWest.com, visits her youngest Kardashian sister Khloe Kardashian (née Odom, née Kardashain), of www.KhloeWithAK.com in Khloe’s closet. Armed with day old fro-yo, Kim asks Khloe about their upcoming trip to Armenia. Khloe is packing, and Kim reminds her to pack for colder weather and conservatively because they will be bringing a lot of attention to the country. Khloe predicts that she, Kim, North and Kanye will “rule that town.” Khloe’s prediction and Kim’s eating of sprinkled fro-yo were filmed on May 10, 2015.

Keeping Up With the Kontinuity Errors: When Was Rob Really Invited On the Armenia Trip?   


Scene 3: Filmed on June 30, 2015

At her own home, Khloe gets a visit from Kris Jenner. Kris Jenner, arrives frenzied and pressed to force Rob into going to Armenia with his sisters who leave that night. Khloe reminds her mom that she told her he was not going. Khloe tells Kris that it would be great if Rob could join them, but they don’t want to force the issue. We’re super proud of Khloe because forcing the issue seven weeks after the trip had taken place would have been a travesty. This scene was filmed on June 30, 2015, nearly two months after Khloe began packing for, and presumably went to, Armenia.

Keeping Up With the Kontinuity Errors: When Was Rob Really Invited On the Armenia Trip?   

Keeping Up With the Kontinuity Errors: When Was Rob Really Invited On the Armenia Trip?   


Scene 4: Filmed on April 8, 2015

The most famous Armenian girls in the world finally touch down in Yerevan, Armenia. They are joined by notable musician and fashion designer, Kanye West, along with his child kin, North West. Immediately upon arrival, Kim, Khloe, Kanye, and North are greeted with song, bread, and what appears to be every single person who was free in Armenia that night. What’s even more impressive is the spectacular manipulation of time both Kim and Khloe were able to create. Instead of going to Armenia straight from Calabasas, California, Kim and Khloe visited the future, considering that they touched down in Armenia over a month before Khloe had packed a single item of clothing for the trip. This scene was filmed on April 8, 2015.

Keeping Up With the Kontinuity Errors: When Was Rob Really Invited On the Armenia Trip?   


Scene 5: Filmed on April 9, 2015

All dolled up with various places to go, Kim chats with Khloe in their Armenian hotel room before they paint the town Kardashian. Kim’s face doesn’t move, but her eyes dance and her mouth tells Khloe that she’s expecting baby number two. Kim’s pregnancy news is only the secondary piece of information she has for Khloe. Kim literally sits Khloe down, and tells her now that she’s pregnant Khloe has got to step up her game and be the Sexy Kardashian. According to Kim, Kourtney is just flat out unsexy now, and what with her being pregnant, Khloe’s all they got. Gotta love family! This scene was filmed on April 9, 2015.

Keeping Up With the Kontinuity Errors: When Was Rob Really Invited On the Armenia Trip?   

Keeping Up With the Kontinuity Errors: When Was Rob Really Invited On the Armenia Trip?   


Scene 9: Filmed on April 12, 2015

One of Kim and Khloe’s stops in Armenia finds them at a carpet factory where they are served a private dinner, receive a private fashion show, try on traditional Armenian garments, compare themselves to storybook monkeys, and dance. Kim even took a necklace right off the body of an entertainer. Just great, simple fun. This scene was filmed on April 12, 2015.

Keeping Up With the Kontinuity Errors: When Was Rob Really Invited On the Armenia Trip?   


Scene 12: Filmed on April 9, 2015

By the grace of Nori and Kim’s unborn son, Kanye West allowed the E! crew to film the pilot of his new show Keeping Up With Kanye as he visited young Armenian musicians. Per Kanye’s request, this scene was shot like Stanley Kubrick, and we got deep insight into his fears of 3D printers and the internet. What Kanye isn’t afraid of is the word, “dope,” which he said approximately 50 times, and for which we are grateful. This scene was filmed on April 9, 2015.

Keeping Up With the Kontinuity Errors: When Was Rob Really Invited On the Armenia Trip?   

Keeping Up With the Kontinuity Errors: When Was Rob Really Invited On the Armenia Trip?   


Scene 21: Filmed on April 10, 2015

In the final scene, Kim and Khloe visit the Armenian Genocide Memorial with Kanye and their kousins, Kourtni and Kara. It’s always comforting to see our entertainers bring attention and context to historical events, but it’s even greater to see this documented via Instagram via a full screen graphic on a cable television reality show. Thank you E! and thank you Kim Kardashian West. We remember, we Instagram. This scene was filmed on April 10, 2015.

Keeping Up With the Kontinuity Errors: When Was Rob Really Invited On the Armenia Trip?   


Well, Dolls, I’ve got to Dash because that’s my time. Come see about your girl next week for another re-cap of KUWTArmenianPrincessAndKhloe on KUWTKE. #PrintedShoes

Images via E!


Mariah Smith is writer and comedic performer who keeps up with the Kardashians. For more Keeping Up With The Kontinuity Errors click here. You can follow her on twitter @mRiah.

http://kuwtke.tumblr.com/

A new report says America’s affordable housing crisis will soon grow worse, with an 11% rise in hous

Cops: "Monster" Disemboweled Girlfriend After She Screamed Ex’s Name During Drunken Sex

$
0
0

Cops: "Monster" Disemboweled Girlfriend After She Screamed Ex’s Name During Drunken Sex

Early Sunday morning, police responding to a call from a Sunrise, Florida, apartment found a 24-year-old man crying on his bathroom floor next to his girlfriend’s body. He was surrounded by both the woman’s blood and her “body tissue.”

The Sun-Sentinel reports that Fidel Lopez, 24, called 911 just after 3:30 a.m. Sunday, claiming that his girlfriend, Maria Nemeth, 31, couldn’t breathe and appeared to be dying. Responding officers discovered a gruesome scene: Nemeth dead on the bathroom floor, with her blood and organs scattered throughout the apartment.

At first, Lopez told police that he and Nemeth had been having rough sex before she went to the bathroom, where he said she throw up and collapsed. When police pushed, Lopez allegedly confessed to a horrific crime. From the Sun-Sentinel:

Lopez told detectives he became a “monster” when Nemeth called out her ex-husband’s name two times while they were having sex. He said hearing someone else’s name during sex upset and enraged him, investigators said.

Lopez said he left Nemeth in the closet where they were having sex and started breaking things throughout the apartment, smashing the rear sliding glass door and punching holes in the walls, police said.

He went back to the closet where Nemeth was lying unconscious and he started inserting a beer bottle, a flat iron for hair, and both fists inside of her, investigators said.

Lopez allegedly told detectives that he put his forearm—up to his elbow, the Sun-Sentinel reports—inside Nemeth and tore out chunks of her intestines. Then, after reportedly trying to wake Nemeth by splashing water on her face, Lopez said he washed the blood from his hands and smoked a cigarette outside. Some time later, after realizing she wasn’t breathing, he told police that he called 911.

He was arrested Sunday afternoon and is being held on first-degree murder charges.


Contact the author at taylor@gawker.com.


Ryan Reynolds Is No Longer Speaking to a Bad Friend Who Tried Sell Pictures of His Baby

$
0
0

Ryan Reynolds Is No Longer Speaking to a Bad Friend Who Tried Sell Pictures of His Baby

Suburban father Ryan Reynolds is working through some of the typical challenges new dads face, like having to cut ties with a lifelong friend who tried to sell private family photos of Reynolds and Blake Lively in the delivery room with their daughter. Just dad things.

Minivan Wilder told GQ that he had been close pals with this snake-in-the-grass since childhood, making the betrayal that much harder to bear:

“A guy that I’d known for my whole life, one of my closest friends growing up, he had been shopping pictures of my baby around. I kind of got in front of it, which is good. But it was a slightly dark period. A bad couple of weeks.”

The culprit was easy to find, as Reynolds and Lively had only sent their baby photos to a select group. Remember, this is the couple that refused to release their daughter’s name—it was James—for more than a month after her birth. They weren’t sending delivery room selfies to just anyone. Just, like, their closest family and closest friends.

“They’re just, like, my closest family and my closest friends,” Reynolds told GQ.

See? I told you. But one of those close friends apparently needed money more than he needed the love and trust of America’s most beloved gender-neutrally-named family.

“Were you like, ‘Next time you need a check, just ask’?” GQ’s Zach Baron asked. A reasonable question, but no. Ryan Reynolds was not just like that, because his bad friend had worn his patience and wallet thin.

“Well, I think he’d asked for a check enough times where I was like, ‘There’s no more checks to be had,’” Reynolds explained.

Like many a suburban father: Tough, but fair.

His bad friend’s punishment is to become a bad ex-friend, never to be seen by, spoken to, or named in a GQ interview by Ryan Reynolds again.

“Oh, well, now I’m never going to see you or talk to you again, unfortunately,” Reynolds said to the anonymous traitor.

And that’s kind of how it worked out. Right, Ryan?

“That’s kind of how it worked out.”

Sucks, dude.

[h/t Time, Photo of the soulful eyes into which the vile betrayer will never again gaze, sorry: Getty Images]

Gizmodo When Are You Going to Get Your Prescription MDMA?

What "Very Bad Story" Might Have Made Scott Walker End His Campaign?

$
0
0

What "Very Bad Story" Might Have Made Scott Walker End His Campaign?

Today, Wisconsin governor Scott Walker finally abandoned a presidential campaign that had been taking on water for months. But did he drop out simply because he can’t win, or is there something more to it?

http://gawker.com/scott-walker-f...

Over the weekend, Buzzfeed’s McKay Coppins, a reliable source of what passes for thought among Republicans insiders, reported that Walker’s campaign was splintering. According to Coppins, “a number of Walker donors and supporters” had been disseminating a rumor about Walker’s campaign manager Rick Wiley in an attempt to get Wiley, who they felt was sinking the campaign, moved off of his perch as Walker’s go-to advisor.

The details of the rumor appear to be serious enough that Buzzfeed chose only to write about the existence of the rumor itself—“BuzzFeed News could not confirm the details of the rumor, and will not publish it,” Coppins grimly noted.

Reporting the existence of a rumor but keeping the details secret is a method both Coppins and Buzzfeed have employed at least once before. A few years ago, Coppins wrote about pernicious stories orbiting Marco Rubio, which Coppins declined to elaborate on. It turned out that a few popular rumors, which were never confirmed and don’t seem to be true, stated that Rubio had fathered children outside of his marriage.

After Walker’s camp sprung an afternoon leak about him ending his candidacy, Republican shit-shoveler and ex-Walker campaign employee Liz Mair tweeted her thoughts as to where Walker’s campaign went wrong. But she also floated the theory that Walker chose to kill his campaign (abruptly enough that it reportedly surprised his underlings) because of a “very bad story that could well have been coming.”

Unless Walker’s campaign was sprouting enough scandals to last two lifetimes, it seems as if Mair and Coppins are talking about the same rumor. Of course, neither Mair or Coppins, both of whom have deep ties to the Republican establishment, can’t burn their sources (or future employers), so whatever story was potentially strong enough to kill Scott Walker’s campaign has gone unwritten.

We, on the other hand, don’t have that problem. Do you know what the Walker rumor is (assuming there is only one)? If so, we’d love to hear from you.

[image via AP]


Contact the author at jordan@gawker.com / SecureDrop

Ex-Peanut Executive Gets 28 Years in Prison for Deadly Salmonella Outbreak

$
0
0

Ex-Peanut Executive Gets 28 Years in Prison for Deadly Salmonella Outbreak

The former owner of Peanut Corporation of America was sentenced to 28 years in prison today for his role in a salmonella outbreak blamed for killing nine people and sickening at least 714 more, USA Today reports.

Last September, 61-year-old Stewart Parnell was convicted of more than 70 criminal charges, including conspiracy and obstruction of justice, for knowingly selling salmonella-tainted peanut butter and faking lab results designed to screen for the bacteria. From The Washington Post:

Court documents revealed that Parnell approved shipments despite containers that were partially “covered in dust and rat crap.” In one e-mail, after being informed that a customer’s shipment might be delayed because the results of a salmonella test were not yet available, Parnell wrote, ‘S—-, just ship it. I can’t afford to loose [sic] another customer.”

As the salmonella outbreak spread, inspectors from the Food and Drug Administration descended on the Georgia plant and documented a litany of unsanitary conditions, including mold, roaches, dirty equipment, holes big enough to allow rodents inside and a failure to separate raw and cooked products.

Parnell’s maximum potential sentence was 803 years in prison, but U.S. District Judge W. Louis Sands reportedly said “this is not a murder case” at Monday’s sentencing hearing.

“These acts were driven simply by the desire to profit and to protect profits notwithstanding the known risks,” said Sands. “This is commonly and accurately referred to as greed.”

Food safety lawyer William Marler, who represented many of the victims, acknowledged that the sentence was the longest ever in a food poisoning case, but said, “I think the fact that he was prosecuted at all is a victory for consumers.”

“This sentence is going to send a stiff, cold wind through Board Rooms across the U.S.” wrote Marler on Twitter.

[Image via AP Images]

Man Found Guilty of Murder for Pushing Wife Off Cliff on Anniversary Hike

$
0
0

Man Found Guilty of Murder for Pushing Wife Off Cliff on Anniversary Hike

A Colorado man was convicted of first-degree murder on Monday after prosecutors say he fatally shoved his wife off a 128-foot cliff in Rocky Mountain National Park in order to collect millions of dollars in insurance money, Buzzfeed reports.

According to prosecutors, 59-year-old Harold Henthorn secretly insured the life of his second wife, Dr. Toni Henthorn, for $4.7 million before she fell to her death during a hike celebrating their wedding anniversary in 2012. From KMGH:

Prosecutors also asserted that Henthorn scouted the park nine times before the day he allegedly shoved his wife off the cliff. He had marked a map with an “X” on the location where she fell, prosecutors said.

When questioned about the “X,” an affidavit stated Henthorn “appeared at a loss for words” and “could not explain why there was an ‘X’ on the map.’”

Federal prosecutor Valeria Spencer noted that the death of Henthorn’s second wife was “eerily, creepily” similar to that of his first wife, who was crushed by a car while changing a tire in 1995.

In both cases, Spencer said, the women died in remote locations with Henthorn as the only witness, their bodies were quickly cremated and Henthorn subsequently collected enormous life insurance policies, sending relatives messages saying, “My bride is gone.”

The death of Henthorn’s first wife was eventually ruled to be an accident, but that case has now been reopened, KDVR reports.

According to NBC News, it took the jury only 10 hours to find Henthorn guilty of murder. He now faces a mandatory term of life prison when he is sentenced in December.

“Believe it or not I forgive him for doing it,” said Toni Henthorn’s mother, Yvonne Bertolet. “I feel for him and his family.”

[Image via KDVR]

Viewing all 24829 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images