Let us all bow our heads and say a prayer for Don Thompson, fired this week as CEO of McDonald's merely because he was bad at his job, and his company is bad, and performing badly.
There is a (true) theory of corporate management that (accurately) describes why CEOs of big companies are paid so much, and also why they get hired and fired seemingly as frequently as losing NFL coaches. Horace Dediu describes it like this: "They demand and are unquestionably given absurd pay that has no relationship to performance. Such pay has no relationship to performance because it isn't designed to reward performance but to account for the risk of arbitrary and very public sacrifice. Boards (and hence shareholders) are deliberately hiring a scapegoat for sins as yet unknown."
In this formulation, CEOs are paid 331 times what their average workers are not because of their magical management skills
Don Thompson lasted less than three years at the head of McDonald's. During that time, the company's stock price went down, sales declined
That is beside the point. The real question is not whether Don Thompson was worth $10 million a year. The real question is whether anyone can be a "good" CEO of a company like McDonald's, without changing its food quality, its worker pay policies, its menu, its ubiquity, its encouragement of sloth in the populace, its sickening branding—everything about it, essentially. Can you be a good CEO of a bad company? It seems doubtful. But we won't learn the answer from Don Thompson, a bad CEO.
[Photo: AP]