Quantcast
Channel: Gawker
Viewing all 24829 articles
Browse latest View live

If You Want Someone to Reply to Your Email, Be Judgy and Sad

$
0
0

What's the key to acquiring a quick reply to your email? Make the recipients think that if they do not reply immediately, it will be the final action that tips your day—nay, your life—into an abyss of distressing turmoil. No, it's not clarity, urgency, or brevity that garners replies; it's negativity and pessimism.

According to a study by software company Contactually, emails with negative words are more likely to see a quick response. Contactually studied over 100 million email conversations and grouped them according to this binary. For example, words like "missed" and "stupid" fell into the negative category, while words like "care" and "amazing" were considered positive.

Now, negative emails could receive faster replies because emergencies tend to be negative. Pessimistic people could also be more judgmental and impatient, also harsher with consequences if they don't get their way. Cheerfulness rarely implies ramifications. Really we're getting into questions of whether a carrot or a stick is more effective, or whether it is better to be feared than loved, and that's a whole other thing someone else wrote about.

This study also found that people who consistently used negative language were more likely to reply to emails within 24 hours. They saw responses to 64 percent of their emails within the day, while their happier colleagues replied to 47 percent within the day. In a similar study, researchers at Glasgow University discovered that people who replied quickly to emails are more likely to be stressed or have low self-esteem. The researchers extrapolated that people who don't let email overtake their lives, tend to have a chiller disposition.

But if you want people to respond to you quickly, spin a gloomy tone into your correspondence—and make those happy people hop to it. This news will confuse exclamation point-happy PR people to no end. I'll report back if their emails take a turn for the dark.

[image via Tamaso79/Shutterstock]


Taylor Swift Moves Magic Chair into Rhode Island Mansion

$
0
0

If you live in Rhode Island you may have noticed that lately all the dogs are lurching about on their hind legs and all the sparrows are circling ‘round and ‘round in endless, frantic circles and every day at noon the sky turns midnight black—how strange; no idea why that is. In unrelated news, Taylor Swift moved into her newly purchased Rhode Island mansion on Wednesday. She also brought the seat of all her power: a lucky chair.

Swift reportedly purchased the 11,000 square foot beachfront mansion for $17.75M at the end of April, using money she’d earned babysitting. While she also owns a house in Beverly Hills, Swift's home base is her Nashville condo that, according to this Rolling Stone profile, features a Taylor-designed “human-size birdcage” made of wood. Definitely just for decoration. Definitely not for keeping humans in. Definitely not for her to crawl into at night and fall into a twitchy sleep.

According to the Daily Mail (which offers up what looks like some beautiful water colors of Taylor swift stepping off a private plane), the Nashville pad was also—up until Wednesday—the location of the chair Swift sits in to write all her songs.

The songwriter has reportedly moved her most beloved piece of furniture into her new estate.

The young star has a chair in which she sits to compose her songs, and it was seen being delivered to her Rhode Island home.

Now the iron throne has been disturbed. Now a distinct, undeniable chill cuts through the fresh air of a New England spring.

Taylor Swift's New Girl cameo airs May 14th .

[Image via AP]

To contact the author of this post, email caity@gawker.com.

Popular Stories from Across Gawker Media

Donald Trump Lashes Out at Jon Stewart for Revealing His Birth Name

$
0
0

It all started last week when Donald Trump suddenly decidedly to launch an antisemitic spitball in the direction of The Daily Show's Jon Stewart via his Twitter account.

"I promise you that I'm much smarter than Jonathan Leibowitz - I mean Jon Stewart @TheDailyShow," tweeted Trump, adding, "Who, by the way, is totally overrated."

Anyway, big mistake.

On Wednesday's The Daily Show, Stewart responded to Trump's slimy discharge with a throwaway joke about Donald Trump's birth name being Fuckface Von Clownstick.

"That's all over Twitter, I hope," Stewart added.

And soon enough it was.

With thousands of users tweeting the hashtag #FuckFaceVonClownstick at Donald Trump, the anthropomorphic caterpillar was compelled to react:

Stewart, naturally, had the last word(s):

[H/T: Comedy Central]

Reese Witherspoon Portrays Pregnantest Person Ever In New Arrest Video

$
0
0

Looks like we’ve got even more footage of proud, drunk American Reese Witherspoon to look forward to. E! News says it’s obtained unreleased video of Witherspoon really laying the expectant mom stuff on thick with police officers.

“I am pregnant, early pregnant, it's an early pregnancy….I'm sure you have a wife, it just comes on and you have to go to the restroom."

According to E!, Witherspoon informs the officer that she's trying to keep the pregnancy secret, and worries he will "tell people." Then they gab about what hair color her hair is naturally. (Not red!) Getting arrested is fun.

Yesterday, Witherspoon agreed to pay a fine of $313 after pleading no contest to disorderly conduct.

Earlier this week, she pleaded not pregnant on Good Morning America.

[Image via AP]

To contact the author of this post, email caity@gawker.com.

So Long, Emma

$
0
0

This is our pal Emma Carmichael's last day at Deadspin and Gawker Media. She's leaving us for a site that shall remain nameless for the moment. We're too drunk already to say anything more meaningful than, "Aw, fuck," so please watch this video and please join us in wishing her well. She's the very best, and we'll miss the hell out of her.

Newspaper Memo Demands Staff Stop Wrecking Bathrooms Amid Layoffs

$
0
0

There have been some tough times recently at the Daily Gazette newspaper in Schenectady, New York. Not only did the family-owned enterprise's management cut 10 staffers in layoffs this week, including five from the newsroom, there have also been some troubles with the bathrooms not functioning properly. But, as a tipster writes, the first problem may have helped precipitate the second:

[H]ere is an email sent to employees of The Daily Gazette in Schenectady... [Gazette General Manager Daniel] Beck sent out the email after the company laid off five employees, about 25 percent of newsroom staff, on Thursday. All of the employees were veterans, some with decades of service. The newspaper is going through some hard times and some workers there are apparently upset with management. The joint is non-union, so people cannot complain without getting fired. Instead, they have been jamming stuff into toilets, causing them to explode and such. Hence this memo.

Though the memo and its stipulations read as rather Draconian—video surveillance, regulations about where people can go to the restroom, etc.—a Gazette staff member told Gawker that so far the new rules are not being enforced. "Nobody really had any idea what the email was about in the first place," this person said. "People are still wandering all around the building, only now we make jokes about how we're going to get in trouble."

Stay strong, guys. And may you long go to the bathroom whenever and wherever you damn well please.

May 2, 2013

Memorandum

To: All Gazette Employees and Agents

From: Daniel T. Beck

Re: Building Vandalism – New Work Rules

As you are probably aware, The Gazette has been experiencing ongoing problems with blocked drains throughout our building. Unfortunately, it has been proven to us that these plumbing problems and other acts of vandalism to company property are being perpetrated by our own Gazette employee(s). They occur during evenings, early morning hours and weekends. Repairs and replacement of destroyed property has run into the thousands of dollars. Further, these criminal acts also threaten the health and safety of fellow employees. They cannot and will not be tolerated.

In response, The Gazette will impose the following work rules during weekday evenings and on weekends. Employees are not to leave their designated work areas before, during or after their shifts. Employees are to use the bathrooms associated with their designated work areas and not others in different parts of the building. The Gazette will also install additional video surveillance cameras throughout the building. If you need to leave your work area as part of your duties, check with your supervisor, who will escort you or will make other provisions. Failure to comply with the above rules will be considered cause for disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment. Any employee found to be vandalizing or destroying company property will be immediately terminated and will be prosecuted to the fullest extend of the law with restitution of damages sought.

Additionally, a $1,000 reward will be paid to anyone who supplies The Gazette with information that leads to the successful conviction of guilty individual(s). It saddens me to think that a fellow employee would feel compelled to damage company property and inconvenience fellow workers and compromise their health and safety. I apologize for the necessity of imposing the above rules and any inconvenience they may cause but we cannot allow this to continue.

Thank you.

[Image via Flickr user danoxster]

Here Is Your Tasteless Muslim Terror-Bomber Birthday Greeting Card

$
0
0

Walking through a Chicago store, a Muslim activist spotted the perfect birthday card for the Fox News-hounds in our lives, featuring an adorable hijab-wearing doll with an explosive secret. Why is a tasteless greeting card newsworthy? Well, it turns out there's a little more going on behind the veil here.

The baby-faced "Talking Doll" on the card, it's suggested, has some C4 for Allah strapped on underneath her modest flower-print dress. "Pull string for message if you dare!" the card shouts. "She'll love you to death! She'll BLOW your brains out!" (The gag, apparently, is that you, dear reader, should be so luck to have a "BLOW OUT!" birthday, ha ha ho ho.)

The card's biggest problem—besides its post-Boston potential to offend, or the fact that it's more head-scratcher than knee-slapper—may be a copyright issue, according to the Council on American-Islamic Relations' Chicago Monitor:

To make matters more disturbing, the card is based on an actual doll designed by Desi Doll Company (www.desidollcompany.com) called “Aamina, the Muslim Doll.” The doll teaches kids religious greetings and sayings in Arabic with messages like “Assalamu Alaikum is the Muslim greeting, and it means peace be upon you” and “Let’s play together insha’Allah, insha’Allah means if God wills it.”

Let's hope Desi Doll Company doesn't sue the card maker, Noble Works, and put it out of business, because we would be losing so much. Noble Works has many hilarious and smart, original, edgy political cards, like the one about John McCain doing a closed-eyed impression of a Korean dictator. Or a Hillary Clinton pic asking: "Does the vast right-wing conspiracy make my ass look fat?" Or Ernesto Guevara next to Barack Obama, saying, "Che hello to my little friend." (Because, you know, Che is one of those Latins, like the Scarface cocaine mountain guy!)

To be fair, Noble Works publisher Ron Kanfi—who claims to be the brains behind the terror-bombing card—says right on the company's website that it strives to impart "a sick, provocative, and sometimes controversial spin" to politics, religion, and current events:

In fact, our other slogan is "Dare to Laugh." I can only imagine folks and friends, who receive or read our cards, can help but wonder as to whether ‘laughing’ is the appropriate thing to do. But as our moto [sic] goes: "Fuck 'em if they can't take a joke!" (did I mention we love using the F word wherever possible? Fuck yeah!

Are CAIR's members just being a bunch of oversensitive multi-culti buzzkills in their condemnation the bomber card? "There are those who will claim Muslims do not have a sense of humor," the CAIR-Chicago director Ahmed Rehab writes. "But one would like to think humor comes with (even a minimal degree of) intelligence."

Pshaw. Clearly Rehab has never seen Noble Works' "Suicide Helpline Hilarious Card," the cover of which features a woman on a phone. "HELLO. You've reached the IRAQI SUICIDE HELP HOTLINE," she says. "Please press one if you own a driver's license and can drive a small truck." ("Hope your birthday's the bomb!" Har har! Smart take. Hey, don't judge, libtard.)

[Photo via Chicago Monitor]


Harvard Prof Slams Keynesian Economics Because Keynes Was Gay

$
0
0

Harvard professor and prominent Obama-critic Niall Ferguson told more than 500 financial advisers at a conference on Thursday that Keynesian economics, an economic philosophy that advocates stimulus spending and is not kind to the idea of empire (which Ferguson loves), is flawed because Keynes was gay and uninterested in future generations.

Reportedly calling Keynes "effete" and operating on the general assumption that our own children give us concern about the future of humanity (and not empathy or kindness), Ferguson explained that Keynes was more interested in discussing "poetry" than having sex with his wife, and because of that, his complex economic philosophy doesn't make sense.

Overall, Harvard professors are having pretty bad few weeks when it comes to advocating austerity. Earlier this month, Harvard economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff were found to have used sloppy data to justify debt reduction. But at least they didn't insinuate that gay people have no capacity to feel for fellow human beings.

Check Out This Horrifying Brazilian Testicle Mascot

$
0
0

Buried in the photo gallery of a recent event attended by the Associação de Assistência às Pessoas com Câncer, a Brazilian non-profit that helps people with cancer, is a photo of its horrifying mascot.

The mascot, we are told, goes by the "Mr. Balls," and he works to raise awareness about testicular cancer. According to the AAPC website and courtesy of some Google-translating, "Both children and adults loved taking pictures with the mascot , a friendly snowman in the shape of testicle."

Is it the pubic hair that is so off-putting or the buckteeth? Definitely the buckteeth. Or maybe it's the bowl-cut. God, he (it?) is disturbing. Here's a photo of Mr. Balls and a child:

And below is a photo of Mr. Balls out and about:

Braziiiiiiiiiiil.

Steven Soderbergh has, unfortunately, retired from directing films.

$
0
0

Steven Soderbergh has, unfortunately, retired from directing films. This leaves him with a lot of free time to tweet out his terrific nation-hopping suspense novella “Glue.”

Israel Bombed Syria As U.S. Continues to Mull Military Options

$
0
0

A United States official confirmed that Israel launched an airstrike against Syria on Thursday night, escalating an already volatile situation while the United States decides whether to carry out its own strikes against the Assad regime.

Israel bombed what they believed to be "a shipment of advanced missiles bound for the Hezbollah Shiite militia in Lebanon." The Syrian regime has long been a supporter of Hezbollah, and Israel believes that it was transporting chemical weapons to its ally.

This attack happens as the United States is considering a military strike to possibly disable Syria's anti-aircraft weapons or to decimate its air force, which has given it a considerable advantage over the Syrian rebellion. President Obama has long opposed sending any American troops to Syria, and reiterated his stance against the idea on Friday.

Since reports of the Assad regime's use of chemical weapons against its own citizenry came out last week, the United States has been delicately trying to defuse the situation. While Obama believes that the United States cannot idly stand by as Syria signals an escalation in the use of unconventional weapons, he also cannot move forward with NATO support, as several member-nations have been reluctant to act.

Any military action would almost certainly have to be cleared with Syrian-ally Russia, a move possibly being worked on by the Obama administration during recent overtures to the Kremlin.

"No one is opposed to using effective, constitutional means of fighting crime.

$
0
0

"No one is opposed to using effective, constitutional means of fighting crime. The problem is that over the last decade the Police Department has shown utter contempt for Fourth Amendment guarantees of freedom from unreasonable search and seizure." — The Times comes out hard against Stop and Frisk.

All My Friends Are Dead

$
0
0

Five years off Adderall and Dexedrine and I’m still in withdrawal.

Months of yoga, years of therapy, meditating each morning—everything helps, but nothing helps completely. Every time I sit down to do work I have pain in my chest. I feel like I’ve somehow made a wrong turn in life. I miss the amphetamine salts. Drugs made me less productive and less healthy, but at least I felt better in my decline than I do in my current state.

My new life started in 10th grade at a desk in my science class in my public school on the Upper West Side of New York City. I remember the exact moment the Ritalin kicked in. I became more focused, not on the teacher, but on the wood leg of the granite lab table that I sat at. I noticed the grain, the imperfections, the dark circles where students had left gum that’d then been removed by janitors.

The teacher, a loud woman who barely knew science and preferred gossiping about the pregnant teenagers of my school to teaching biology, droned on in the background. I ignored her, as did everyone else—the usual. But the wood leg—it was so clear, and everything around it faded. It was as if I was looking through the lens of a camera with the aperture set to a pinpoint.

The rowdy kids around me talked under their breath, some passed notes, some furiously doodled, but I just stared at the wood leg. I used to raise my hand at least five times per class whether I knew the answer to questions or not, simply because I was bored. Not today. I heard the teacher calling the class to attention, and I snapped my head up. I’d been staring at the leg for 20 minutes, my attention unabated by anything else.

This was my new life. Ritalin, and later Adderall, and finally Dexedrine, allowed me to focus on anything but what I should’ve focused on. It was perfect.

Once a month I’d see a psychiatrist in the West Village for no more than 10 minutes. She’d ask me how I was, I’d say, “fine” and she’d give me whatever amount of speed I said I needed.

My five years on drugs weren’t my best academically. Amphetamines never really helped me study. I’d sit at my computer in my room and look at MySpace, or clothes, or porn. I could stay still for eight hours at a time, just staring at a computer screen. My grades went down.

But the drugs were great friends.

I never got picked on for being gay, but I was immensely uncomfortable with myself. Were it not for the amphetamines, I’m convinced I would’ve experienced the self-hatred I was bound to feel growing up queer. I didn’t want to go through the normal motions of growing up gay. Instead, I just felt high. And the great thing about being prescribed drugs as opposed to ingesting illegal ones is that you can always say your problems are your chosen disorder’s fault, not the fault of something deeper, masked by the 100 milligrams of amphetamines you take every day.

With Dexedrine, I could ignore my strict parents, ignore the fact that half my friends had decided to stop being friends with me once I came out as gay, ignore the fact that I’d eventually have to tell my parents all of this and get a real life with a boyfriend and a career. Dexedrine allowed me to zone out like no other drug did, not because it was better than cocaine, which I’d been addicted to at the age of 14, before being on prescription drugs, but because unlike cocaine, it was legally sanctioned and morally sanctified—my teachers, many of my peers, and society at large approved of my addiction. I’d gone through the medical establishment to get drugs, so I had a stamp of approval, a legal document that gave me permission to get high, mentally drop out of my life, and get a pat on the back in the process. That’s the perversity of prescription drugs. Dexedrine was a sign of my progress, not a sign of my demise.

Of course, beyond the buzz was something dangerous. Pain lurked right underneath the surface of my supposed OK-ness. As each pill started to wear off, I’d feel an immense, crushing sadness. It was part normal amphetamine withdrawal, and part realization that I hated my life.

When I entered college, things got worse. Without the worrying eyes of parents, my psychologist, or my restrictive high school, I was free to ignore my demons. I partied a lot. I smoked a lot of weed. I took too many pills. I’d pull all-nighters that involved all play, and no work. I failed three classes my first semester. I drank to fall asleep. I popped my pills when I woke up.

There was no dramatic ending to my prescription drug binge. I just had a nagging feeling that my life wasn’t real. I was living a speed-fueled dream. It wasn’t the horrible side effects of not sleeping, shutting off emotionally from my friends and relatives, and developing compulsive tendencies that got me to quit. It was just a feeling that, if I was going to be a real person, I needed to deal with my issues, and not just mediate them through medication. So during the last week of my freshman year, I took my last two Dexedrine out of the bottle on my college-apportioned dresser, swallowed them with yellow Gatorade, and didn’t go back to the school doctor. No one called me to ask why. It just ended.

It’s been five years, and I’m still not sure what happened between my last day of Dexedrine and now. What I’ve pieced together through therapy, and interviewing friends and experts for this piece, is that everything I was supposed to be working through during my years on drugs came rushing in at once. I started hearing voices. I thought I was having a psychotic break. I’d shake from nervousness. I had panic attacks. I had no clue how others perceived me, but I knew people were worried.

Slowly, things got better, and I found ways to manage all the new emotions I was feeling.

They still aren’t perfect, but they are good. Thank god I could afford six months of therapy by selling my car when I moved back to New York City from college. Thank god I can afford a gym membership and yoga classes. Thank god I have a supportive family, including two parents that are psychologists. I’m lucky, and I’m not sure where I’d be if I wasn’t. I’d probably be back on drugs.

***

I don’t feel resentment over the years I was on speed because I know I’m in good company. I take solace in the fact that I’m not just a lost boy with a crisis in personal responsibility. I’m a statistic in America’s drug problem.

There was a 17 percent increase in ADHD prescriptions between 2010 and 2011. Now, one in five high school boys are diagnosed with ADHD. In 2011, 57 million prescriptions were filled for anti-psychotics, a scary class of psycho-pharmaceuticals that have been called “chemical lobotomies”, but which are increasingly used to treat depression (even though there’s very little evidence they work to treat depression). Over the last two decades, antidepressant use has spiked by 400 percent. One in five American women are currently on an antidepressant.

Of course, we’re not all that sick, and people are starting to sound the alarm that we’re over-diagnosed and over-treated for mental illness. But I’m not sure there’s much to do about it. Yes, prescription drug companies are largely to blame for shoveling drugs in our faces. Yes, psychiatry is an extremely corrupted practice. But the problem is a deeper cultural one: America is the land of the quick fix.

For my years on Dexedrine, I mostly blame me. I was searching for an easy path to an ideal of normalcy and happiness that I could never achieve without deep thought and personal struggle. Drugs gave me the illusion of happiness, and provided everyone else with the illusion everything was okay.

***

I have this friend Flora who I’ve known since high school, and who lives on the Upper West Side in her parents’ tiny two-bedroom apartment.

She’d moved to Spain, after feeling dissatisfied with her life in New York, and taught English to elementary school students for almost two years. One day, she got a call from her aunt, who told her that her dad had been diagnosed with Lou Gehrig’s disease. The disease slowly degrades a person’s motor neurons, until they can’t walk, can’t speak, and eventually can’t breathe. No one knew how long he would live, so she needed to be home.

She got a job as a hostess at an upscale restaurant. She lived in her parents’ living room while her dad slowly started to lose muscle function, and eventually most of his voice.

A few months into her new living situation, Flora started feeling depressed and anxious and angry with her dad for making her life miserable.

“As he continued to get sicker, I felt like I couldn’t do anything,” she told me. “I felt trapped…I figured if I just get some drugs, I’d focus, apply for jobs, get out of my parents’ house, and be happier.”

Flora knew her move back to New York was the cause of her unhappiness, but she still thought drugs were the answer.

“I kind of wanted to numb myself and not feel anything,” she said. “I thought, ‘Oh, I can just get a prescription for Adderall and everything will be ok.’”

Flora went to a psychiatrist and told her about her family’s situation. She said she didn’t want to be where she was. She felt trapped.

The psychiatrist didn’t ask any questions about Flora’s situation. She gave Flora an ADHD questionnaire, and prescribed Flora Vyvanse, a close cousin of Adderall. She also prescribed her Klonopin to help her sleep at night.

Flora told me the three months she took Vyvanse were the strangest of her life. She completely withdrew—she was cold to her friends, and would snap when people talked about things she didn’t want to talk about—but she convinced herself she was getting better, and being more productive.

“But being productive was me refolding my clothes 10 times in one day,” she said. “You don’t think about the larger things at all [when you’re on Vyvanse] because you can’t get past any of the small things.”

Vyvanse helped Flora refocus her life. On Vyvanse, she was content with living in her parents’ apartment, and content to work a dead-end job, and ignore everything else.

But beneath the medication, and the incessant smoking, obsessive behavior, and social withdrawal it caused, was deep dissatisfaction.

Flora’s situation isn’t unique. Psychiatry is increasingly focused on diagnosing real-world problems as brain disorders.

The new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders comes out in a few months. It’s the standard text for psychiatry on which all diagnoses of mental disorders are based. In addition to adding several new “disorders," the authors of the new DSM have removed the bereavement exclusion for a depression diagnosis. If someone is grieving for a loved one, they can be diagnosed with clinical depression, and placed on drugs.

“There’s real distress, but to turn distress into a mental disorder is just misnaming,” Eric Maisel, a psychologist and author of several books on psychiatry told me. “Folks don’t want to say my job sucks, my relationship sucks…It’s a letting go of personal responsibility. [They think] it’s not the hardness of their life making them sad, it’s a disorder.”

In other words, we’re diagnosing life.

***

I have to come clean: The reason I’m writing this essay is to convince one person I know to get off prescription drugs. I’m too chicken to talk to my best friend, whom I’ve known since birth, about his problem. I’m too chicken to say I’m fucking angry with him. I can’t tell him I need him in my life; that I’m scared to see him; that he reminds me too much of me three years ago. It’s much easier to hide behind this essay and hope he makes it past the first 2,000 words. Hello Jamie! Please read below.

Jamie is currently attempting to taper off the 90 milligrams of Adderall he’s been taking daily since college. Maybe reading back what he told me for this essay will be the final straw that gets him to stay off the pills for good.

I met up with him on a park bench on the east side of Manhattan a couple of weeks ago to interview him for this piece. He’d attempted to go the day without Adderall, and so he fell asleep in the mid-afternoon and showed up two hours late to our interview. Jamie’s lateness is par for the course—if it’s not a sleep issue that’s holding him back one day, it’s the fact that the Adderall has made him compulsive. It takes him hours to get ready.

When Jamie finally showed up he told me he had to take an Adderall after all.

“I have an empty, dead feeling if I don’t take it,” he said. “I just feel like there’s something missing.”

I’m pretty culpable for Jamie’s current state. We took a lot of drugs together. In high school, I’d give him Dexedrine free of charge. One night, right after I’d gotten my first car, I was too drunk to drive home so we just popped Dexedrine, smoked cigarettes, and chatted. Those were some good times, and they’re probably partially to blame for Jamie getting hooked.

College was the first time Jamie and I were away from each other since elementary school. I went to some hippie school in Massachusetts no one has ever heard of, and he went to the University of Colorado Boulder. Jamie was never a good student, and he struggled at Colorado too. He also struggled with leaving a tumultuous relationship with his girlfriend behind, and making new friends. So he began buying Adderall from hallmates.

After dropping out once and returning a year later, Jamie went to a school psychologist, who referred him to a psychiatrist, who prescribed Jamie Vyvanse, and later Adderall and Paxil. That was the first time Jamie has unrestricted access to the drugs.

“I could take it whenever I wanted to without feeling embarrassed to ask,” Jamie told me. “It was all downhill from there.”

That was five years ago, and Jamie has taken Adderall almost every day since. He’s lost weight, and gained a nasty habit of chain-smoking and drinking to fall asleep. It’s hard to be around him because I can tell he’s upset. I can tell he knows he shouldn’t be on the drugs.

If Jamie was blowing lines, as I was in high school before switching to legally sanctioned drugs, I’d smack him upside the head and tell his parents to lock him in the house or send him to rehab. If he was carrying around a bottle of whiskey, my friends and I would’ve already sat him down and told him to stop.

But instead, he sees a psychiatrist who, at their last session, “just opened the door to the office a crack, handed me the prescription and I just handed him the check.”

He’s on the drugs because like all drug addicts, he’s afraid of life off of them. But, as is the case with most people taking prescription drugs, he takes them because they’re supposed to be good for him.

He takes them because if he didn’t take them, he’d have to choose a direction in life. Just like my meds allowed me to focus on everything except being gay, and Flora’s allowed her to focus on anything except her father and her job, Jamie’s are allowing him to focus on everything—getting ready, making the perfect sentence, smoking cigarettes—everything, except, well, life

“I do think I have a learning disability. I think there’s something else going on, [but Adderall] makes me focus on small things that I don’t need to be focused on,” he said. “I’m not able to think about any sort of bigger picture things.”

This is the place I was at when I got off the drugs—the negatives are starting to outweigh the positives. His heart is starting to beat irregularly because of the speed and the cigarettes. His girlfriend is pissed at him. I’m concerned enough about him to do this interview and write this essay.

It was the first really nice day of the year when I interviewed Jamie in the park. After we were done, we walked around a little bit and talked about his plan to try and get off Adderall. He’s not sure he’s going to refill his prescription, but said “it’s hell” when he’s off the drugs.

I told him about my experience. The best advice I could give him was that it’s going to suck, but you just have to deal with it. I know that’s shitty advice, but it’s true. I told him yoga, therapy, whatever, all those things help. But life is shit, wall-to-wall. I haven’t taken Adderall in five years. I don’t feel better; I don’t feel worse. I feel more accomplished, and think my life is totally different than it would’ve been if I stayed on drugs, but that doesn’t mean it’s good. That doesn’t mean I don’t crave Adderall every time I think back to my time on it.

I sometimes wonder what life would’ve been like if I just hadn’t started taking drugs. I ask Jamie if he regrets his decisions. He told me he does, for the same reason I do: he doesn’t know what life would be like if he never took the drugs.

“I don’t remember the past five years of my life,” he said. “There’s been no forward movement … This is not where I intended to be when I was 24 years old.”

Peter Moskowitz is a New York City-based journalist.

In a project overseen by contributing editor Kiese Laymon, Gawker is running a personal essay every weekend. Please send suggestions to saturdays@gawker.com.

Dog Bites Woman, Man Bites Dog

$
0
0

A woman in Iowa is recovering from injuries sustained by a dog attack, but it could have been much worse — if her husband didn't bite back.

Caren Henry was out walking her own dog when, “This dog came racing across this yard, a big dog." The dog knocked her down and started biting her face, seriously injuring her nose.

As the attack was happening, Caren's husband, Laine, was driving by. He immediately sprang into action:

“Caren turned and looked at me and I seen her face was nothing but blood, so I bit the dog literally in the nose and he let go and I grabbed our dog and I grabbed her and I put them in our pick-up and took off,” he told the local NBC affiliate.

The county has no vicious dog ordinance, so the dog who attacked Caren does not face the threat of being put down.

[Shutterstock]


Mississippi Denies Inmate DNA Test, Set to Execute Him on Tuesday

$
0
0

The State of Mississippi has denied an inmate on death row the opportunity to be exonerated through DNA testing, a procedure that is almost always followed nowadays for prisoners facing capital punishment.

Willie Jerome Manning was convicted of killing two college students in 1992, but believes DNA evidence will now set him free. In a 5-to-4 ruling, the Mississippi Supreme Court found that the evidence against Manning "was so strong that the findings of DNA tests would not make a difference."

Manning's lawyers are now appealing to the governor to order the DNA test, or at least halt the execution, which is scheduled for this Tuesday.

“Today I think it’s become increasingly rare not to go through the whole bank of tests because of what’s at stake,” Richard Dieter, the executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, told the Times.

"Any time there is legitimate, exculpatory evidence, capable of DNA testing, the state is prepared to conduct testing," Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood (pictured) said in a statement released Friday. "However when the defense waits until the 11th hour to raise such claims, which could not possibly exonerate their client, courts are loathe to be subjected to these types of dilatory defense tactics."

The prosecution's case against Manning rests on circumstantial evidence, none of which definitively puts Manning at the scene of the crime. One of the pieces of evidence used to convict Manning was that the hair of an African-American was found at the scene of the crime. Manning is black, and the victims are white.

Mississippi district attorney Forest Allgood, who prosecuted Manning, has already had two of his cases overturned by DNA testing. One of those cases involved a death row inmate. He dismissed the push for DNA testing as a stalling tactic.

The 80s Air Traffic Controller Strike Makes The Sequester Look Lame

$
0
0

Last week, air traffic controllers across the country were furloughed as a result of budget cuts by the federal government known as the sequester. Delays mounted quickly, but service was speedily restored when Congress realized they were inconvenienced slightly. What would happen, though, if this went on longer?

And what would happen if the problem got worse? Not just controllers rotating an extra day to take off the week, but whole teams walking off? And what if the lasting effects could be felt not only for a few days, but for years? Would planes fall out of the sky? Would they just ram each other on the taxiway, fighting for a runway space? Or would everyone just sit in traffic the way they normally do on the highway?

Luckily for us, but unluckily for denizens of 1980s America, such a nightmare event has happened. For those that can’t remember, the PATCO Strike of 1981 changed the way workers in public service, labor relations, and air travel operate to this day.

First, a little background. The Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization, or PATCO, was created in 1968 to provide better working conditions for its members (the air traffic controllers, of course). Air traffic control is by its very nature an extremely stressful job. They’re the ones who sit in the airport tower, directing aircraft not only in and around airports, but around the globe. To give you an idea of what that looks like, check out this video of air traffic over the Northeast US:

Organized chaos, is what it resembles. Flights buzzing around like bees with hyperactivity disorders, yet each one more than likely carries hundreds of people. If an air traffic controller messes up, as they have in the past, dozens perish at the very least, yet they must keep their cool at all times.

An air traffic controller is the one who, after being told by pilot Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger that US Airways Flight 1549 was going to attempt a landing in the Hudson River, responded not by screaming HOLY CRAP, as a normal person would, but calmly suggested perhaps a runway that wasn’t so liquidy and a bit more stable might be a bit more helpful:

Sure, we can imagine that these people are all smooth, like Clint Eastwood staring down a bear. But that’s not the reality, not the day-to-day. The day-to-day is far more stressful from that. An article that GQ published in 2009 explains exactly what they go through:

Air-traffic controllers are retiring at a rate of nearly 1,000 a year. A shriveling workforce, ever-increasing air traffic—somebody has to guide all those airplanes. You guys have to suck it up, the FAA says to the controllers. Work more hours, take fewer breaks—work six-day weeks if you have to. Yeah, you have to. Six-day workweeks are now the norm at the nation’s busiest radar facilities, which are notoriously hard to staff.

“Who cares,” ye of the Jalopnik commentariat say. “If you don’t like it, go on strike! What’s the point of having a union if you don’t even use it!”

Well, they would, if only they could. Yet the PATCO Strike of 1981 is exactly why they can’t.

In 1981 the industry of air traffic control was in a similar place to where it is today. Recently enacted airline deregulation led to a huge increase in the number of flights, yet the same amount of controllers before remained. People were feeling overwhelmed and overworked.

PATCO decided to step in. It had worked 11 years before, in 1970. Air traffic controllers back then called for a “sickout,” which is when everyone plans to call in with the flu all at the same time. Like when you tell your boss that you’re feeling a cold coming on in two weeks, just in time for Bonnaroo.

The 1970 plan worked so well that Congress introduced more automated systems, re-opened a training facility in Oklahoma City, hired more people, and gave everyone a raise. Winners all around, really.

By 1981, PATCO was feeling like it was in an even better position than it was before. Not only had the previous labor action gone according to plan, but now they had a strong ally in the White House. PATCO endorsed Republican California Governor Ronald Reagan in the 1980 election over Democratic President Jimmy Carter, an election that Reagan eventually won. Such endorsements usually translate into political capital, which is an incredibly useful bargaining chip when dealing in the public sector. Surely it would work, right?

No. Of course it didn’t work, otherwise we wouldn’t be writing about it today. Silly goose.

The whole thing went pretty disastrously for PATCO right from the get-go, right with their opening shot. Sure, when you’ve got pretty big negotiations you usually bring out the big guns, but even by 1980s union standards it seemed a bit unreasonable. When negotiations opened in February 1981, PATCO President Robert Poli asked for a $10,000 raise for everyone, the reduction from a five-day, 40-hour workweek to a four-day, 32-hour workweek, and full retirement benefits after 20 years of service.

Hot damn, that would be a good deal.

Of course they didn’t get it. Long story short, the Federal Aviation Administration rejected the offer, of course, responded with an offer of a pittance, of course, and by August of 1981, 95% of the union members voted to go on strike, of course.

As soon as the strike began, airlines reported losing $30 million a day. PATCO predicted insanity, with planes crashing into each other, hundreds, perhaps thousands (millions? billions?) of flights cancelled, and women and children crying and men gnashing their teeth.

The FAA began immediately to implement its contingency plan, which included asking airlines to voluntarily delay or cancel some flights, asking pilots to be a bit more vigilant, and calling in perhaps the best air traffic controllers in the world, the United States Air Force.

And after all that… nothing. Planes kept flying. Nobody crashed. Nobody died. Everybody still got to where they needed to go.

It spelled the end for PATCO. President Reagan, the man who the union thought was their friend, issued an extremely harsh ultimatum to the controllers: Return to work in 48 hours, or else you’ll all lose your jobs.

Forever.

The controllers would be banished from working for the federal government- which means that most would be banished forever from the one livelihood they had ever known.

PATCO scoffed, thinking that there was no way President Reagan would go through with such a drastic measure. The President had public opinion on his side, however, as most people believed that the controllers going on strike threatened the public safety.

On August 5th, 1981, two days after the strike began, 11,345 air traffic controllers who refused to return to work lost their jobs and were, indeed, banned from working for the FAA ever again. On October 22nd, 1981, PATCO was decertified by the Federal Labor Relations Authority from its right to represent workers.

So what happened after that?

Again, not much of anything. 80% of flights were maintained, with the help of those controllers that did return to work and their supervisors. The FAA said it would only need about two years to get back up to speed, even though it turned out to be more like ten.

Some of the air traffic controllers were allowed to apply for their old jobs in 1986, and they even got another union, the National Air Traffic Controllers Association in 1987. In 1993, President Bill Clinton removed the ban on the old workers entirely.

So what would happen if we got another sequester, and air traffic controllers are furloughed again? Probably nothing. But maybe in the future, they could just work from home.

Photos credit: AP

Cemeteries Keep Rejecting Tamerlan Tsarnaev's Body

$
0
0

Four cemeteries in three states have refused to bury the body of suspected Boston Marathon bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the funeral director tasked with finding a resting place has told the Daily News.

Funeral director Peter Stefan has asked cemeteries in New Jersey, Connecticut and Massachusetts, but each of the cemeteries have passed on burying the older Tsarnaev brother, who was killed during a shootout with police.

Stefan says that if no cemeteries agree, then he would “have to go to the federal government and then we have to ask them for assistance.” The Tsarnaev family has requested a Muslim burial along with a grave near their home in Massachusetts.

Protests have taken place outside of the Dyer-Lake Funeral Home in Worcester, Mass., where the body of Tsarnaev is being kept. Police have posted security outside.

“Everybody has a right to be buried. I can’t separate the sins from the sinner,” Stefan, the funeral director, said.

The burial, if a place can be located, will happen after a second "independent" autopsy, which has been requested by his family. Stefan has identified the cause of death as gun shot wounds to the body and head, and blunt force trauma to his head, which may have occurred when his younger brother Dzhokhar, reportedly ran him over during the fatal confrontation with police.


The Brooklyn Bridge has been closed as police deal with a possible suicide attempt.

DUI Arrestee Was Celebrating Getting License Back After Earlier DUI

$
0
0

Illinois resident Erin James was caught speeding early Friday morning after she spent a night out celebrating getting her driver's licence back after a DUI arrest. She was drunk this time, too.

The 58-year-old told Riverside police officers that she had been out celebrating her restored license. She then blew a .155 alcohol content, nearly double the legal limit of .08.

“Ms. James purposely drove a car that she did not own to avoid the ignition lock device and was driving back from a Forest Park bar where she was celebrating that fact that she would finally have her driving privileges back after her 2012 conviction for DUI,” Riverside Police Chief Tom Weitzel said in a statement. “Ms. James is exactly the type of motorist I want kept off the road permanently under a new proposed habitual DUI law that I will be proposing in the very near future.”

So for all you drivers getting sloppy on mint juleps right now, wait a few hours after the horse race, watch a basketball game, and eat a sandwich. Drive sober, folks!

Viewing all 24829 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images