Quantcast
Channel: Gawker
Viewing all 24829 articles
Browse latest View live

Deaf Toddler Hears His Dad's Voice for the First Time Thanks to Science

$
0
0

Little Grayson Clamp is three years old, but he just heard his dad's voice for the first time three weeks ago.

The North Carolina toddler was born without a cochlear nerve — the bridge between the auditory portion of the inner ear and the brain — but a cochlear implant, which has worked wonders for others, did nothing for him.

That's when Grayson's adoptive parents, Len and Nicole, decided to enroll him in an ongoing FDA trial for a new kind of "miracle device" known as an "auditory brain stem implant."

Grayson is the first child in America to be implanted with the microchip, which aims to act as a substitute for the missing nerve.

In recently released video from the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Grayson can be seen "lighting up" to the sound of his father saying "daddy loves you."

"It's been phenomenal for us," said Len.

Nicole noted that they still have much work ahead of them teaching their son how to process his newly acquired sense.

[H/T: HyperVocal]


Why Don't You Go Live in a Human-Sized Bird Nest You Big Fucking Bird

$
0
0

Why Don't You Go Live in a Human-Sized Bird Nest You Big Fucking Bird

According to the New York Times, a human newspaper definitely not written by birds, one cool thing that humans like to do nowadays is build giant bird nests to sleep in. Walking to a neighbor's house instead of flying there, eating normal human food besides seeds, and constructing humongous bird nests out of twigs— all things we humans do so often we don't even have to remind ourselves constantly to check and make sure we're doing them so as not to draw attention to ourselves.

If anything, says the New York Times, it makes more sense for humans like us to be in a bird nest than to ever not be in one.

Prehumans, of course, were born in nests, and we used to be pretty good at making them.

Our ancestors were fantastic nest-makers! And not because they were birds—obviously not, humans can't come from birds and we're all birds here, I MEAN HUMANS, absolutely zero humans pretending to birds, haha, can you imagine *blink* *twitch*—but because it's simply in our nature to see a pile of sticks, rearrange them dangling precariously from a tree in a way that is visually pleasing and structurally sound, and crawl inside.

Yes, chirps the New York Times, giant human-sized bird nests are definitely "having a bit of a moment."

[Weaver bird-inspired nest by Porky Hefer; for more images, visit his website]

To contact the author of this post, email caity@gawker.com.

Meet Arthur Sulzberger's New Girlfriend, Gabrielle Greene

$
0
0

Meet Arthur Sulzberger's New Girlfriend, Gabrielle GreeneNew York Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. is dating again. Capital New York's Joe Pompeo reports that Sulzberger's newest girlfriend is a private equity director named Gabrielle Greene.

The two made an appearance together at the paper's headquarters for a party for advertisers earlier this week. And the couple posed for pictures at the Financial Times's 125th anniversary party last month (here's a photo of the happy couple).

You may remember Sulzberger's previous girlfriend, Claudia Gonzalez (Sulzberger separated from his wife five years ago). Gonzalez was the one who apparently caused quite a bit of tension between Arthur and Janet Robinson, the Times' longtime chief executive. Robinson was shown the door, unexpectedly, in December 2011.

Then again, it couldn't be that unexpected that Gonzalez would have thoughts on Robinson's job performance; Sulzberger likes to consult his significant others on business matters. In Alex Jones and Susan Tifft’s great book about the Sulzberger-Ochs family, The Trust, they wrote of Sulzberger's then-wife Gail Gregg:

She was forceful and self-assured–the very strengths he tried to cultivate in himself, though his way of expressing them tended to be cocky and confrontational.

[...]

Their marriage was one of trust, friendship, respect, political sympathy teamwork. Unlike Punch [Arthur's father], who never discussed business with Carol, Arthur Jr. valued Gail’s counsel and freely told other executives that he ran many decisions by her.

Sulzberger broke things off with Gonzalez some time last year. A person familiar with the Sulzbergers told me his commitment to Gonzalez (and, apparently, her young children) became too much for him, even "after he had installed the bunk beds" for her young kids, our source says.

As for Greene, she's had a long background in private equity and hedge funds, including a stint at Bain & Company. She sits on the board at Whole Foods, and we're sure the Times' new CEO, Mark Thompson, is just thrilled with the idea of talking to her about what's happening at The New York Times Company.

[Photo of Sulzberger via Getty]

Dan Brown's Ideal Reading Experience Is Not Having to Read

$
0
0

Dan Brown's Ideal Reading Experience Is Not Having to Read

How did Dan Brown, the immensely popular and successful bad writer behind such hits as The Da Vinci Code and Hey, There's a Treasure Map Under This Painting!, get to be such an immensely popular and successful bad writer? He just loves "reading," meaning "listening to stuff."

From a Q&A with the New York Times book review:

Describe your ideal reading experience (when, where, what, how).

The most pleasurable reading experience I’ve had recently was just last week — jogging on the beach with an audiobook of Malcolm Gladwell’s “What the Dog Saw.” I was so engrossed in his essay “The Ketchup Conundrum” that I ran an extra mile just to find out how it ended.

Dan Brown's favorite Da Vinci painting is Seeing The Mona Lisa in a Bugs Bunny Cartoon Once.

(To be fair, "Renowned author Dan Brown hated the critics.")

[NYT. Photo: AP]

Another O.J.? Patriots' Aaron Hernandez Faces Arrest For Murder

$
0
0

Another O.J.? Patriots' Aaron Hernandez Faces Arrest For Murder

According to a Boston law enforcement source, Aaron Hernandez will likely be arrested in connection to the murder of 27-year-old Odin Lloyd. According to witnesses, the 23-year-old New England Patriots player was with the victim the night of the crime. Lloyd was dating Hernandez girlfriend's sister.

Hernandez drove for 30 minutes as news helicopters and reporters chased him through the city—a bit a la OJ Simpson (coincidentally, that chase happened 19 years ago yesterday.) Apparently, the helicopters lost him as he entered the building in which his lawyer's office is located. Numerous reports said that the police had already questioned Hernandez before the report of his rumored impending arrest.

Update: Boston Herald says the Sports Illustrated report on the "likely arrest" of Hernandez is not true, Deadspin reports. You can follow their live coverage here.

Lifehacker Why We Should Rethink the Eight-Hour Workday | Kotaku Sorry Consoles, Apple's Controller

The Fatness of James Gandolfini: Inspiring, Iconic, and Probably Fatal

$
0
0

The Fatness of James Gandolfini: Inspiring, Iconic, and Probably Fatal

I never met James Gandolfini. His work as Tony Soprano strikes me as a unique and staggering artistic achievement, but I am a non-expert fan, with no experience in acting or television. To my surprise, though, he is the first celebrity whose death has touched me in that way that celebrity deaths seem to touch people.

What’s happening, specifically, is that I am mourning him as a fat man. Gandolfini was an icon for a community that I am a part of. It’s tough to confirm his iconic status, because the community is not exactly one that people are jumping to claim allegiance to. Still, if I may use myself to generalize, fat people consume art through a fat lens, and through that lens there may be nobody who was more important on screen than James Gandolfini.

That makes his death, very much at the mercy of his fatness, painful. When I read the headline, the first thing I thought was, Man, I hope it was a plane crash.

For me, as a fat kid, watching The Sopranos was a triumphant experience, one that made me feel different as a person. Gandolfini, in that role, was sexy. His very explicit sex scenes—and there were many—were entirely believable, and sensing that was even more exciting to twelve-year-old me than the general pleasures of seeing breasts on TV. It made perfect sense that beautiful women would orbit around him. He felt desired and desirable, two feelings that I had never considered to be possibilities for myself.

I know there’s tons of problematic stuff to point out here. I know that the character’s mystique in the show came, in large part, from the fact that he was a dangerous, wealthy, manipulative sociopath who was verbally and occasionally physically abusive to women who often came to him needing something. I get that. I’m not trying to belittle it.

But what translated to me, and I know I’m not alone in this, was Gandolfini’s body and the way he handled it—the grace and confidence with which he operated. His bulk was a character in the show, and he embraced it without embarrassment. He could let it be a punchline when need be, then switch in an instant to its being something formidable or alluring. He moved with power, not shame.

He transformed the genre of fat-guy performance by playing into all of its tropes while simultaneously exploding them. Obituaries will likely describe Gandolfini as getting his start playing "heavies," a word whose double meaning can't be unintentional—the blunt, lumbering henchman. Tony Soprano, the big boss, fits that type, huge and terrifying. But Galdolfini made the heavy at times beautiful, at times sad. In other words, human.

So he hit the notes of the portly sitcom dad: waddling down the driveway to get the paper at some point in every episode, shoveling deli meats into his mouth in cutaway shots. But through all the slapstick, he delivered the first performance I ever saw where the funny fat guy wasn't only funny.

The nobility that he leant his fatness, the way he fashioned a career both in spite and because of it, leaves us with a tricky problem of how to understand his death. Let’s be honest, even if tomorrow an official report comes out of the hospital in Rome saying it wasn’t a heart attack, James Gandolfini died of obesity. What can you write about that?

Heath Ledger, another gifted actor gone too soon, brought with him an easy narrative to mourn, that of the addict. We know how to tell that one: the thin, pouty genius, whose gorgeousness suggested an artistic soul plagued by demons, that awful, meaningless word. Drug use mounted with his success—preying on his perceived sensitivity—till this outside force made him lose control and it killed him.

It's the story of Jim Morrison and River Phoenix and Bradley Nowell—and even of fat stars, like John Belushi and Chris Farley. When their too-large bodies died of overdoses, it allowed their deaths to be unquestionably tragic, and the comedy of their too-large bodies to remain comedy. It happened so quickly, and nothing could be done.

A person's mounting obesity isn't so easy to compartmentalize or make into a villain. We are unable to separate someone’s weight, no matter how dangerous or excessive, from their identity. And there are no interventions—beyond the Biggest Loser kind, reserved for powerless people who have brought themselves in front of the camera to be shamed back to life. For a man like Gandolfini, and for most of us, there are only uncomfortable jokes, or silence. It just feels different.

But why? The way that Hollywood party boys come to embody the vice we expect from them, so too did Gandolfini. In sad-watching as many Sopranos clips as possible, careening back and forth between all the seasons, I’ve been astounded by just how much fatter he got from the first season to the sixth. It must be a near-hundred-pound fluctuation, over the course of eight years. In front of everyone’s eyes, while giving Emmy acceptance speeches and starring in that shit movie with Brad Pitt. Self-destruction could not be more conspicuous. Needle tracks are, at least, hide-able with a sleeve.

The Sopranos even references this tragic course. In season four, there’s an episode where Tony organizes an intervention for Chris, his nephew, a junkie. It’s the perfect Sopranos mixture of poignancy and dark humor, and it culminates with Chris looking at Tony and saying, “I’m killing myself? With the way you eat, you’ll have a heart attack by fifty.” He’s then beaten for insubordination, because that is something you just cannot say.

No one mobilized to save James Gandolfini. His now very obvious march toward killing himself was met with responses befitting the same tropes that his acting had so beautifully moved beyond. We joked about Gandolfini-breathing, that lawnmower sound he began to take on in later seasons of The Sopranos, even though it was the sound of a body struggling to be alive. Or we looked at the combination of his girth and kindness and wrote about him being jolly, a gentle giant.

Gandolfini once said, in probably his most famous interview quote, “I’m a neurotic mess. I’m basically a 260-pound Woody Allen.” He later amended it to a “295 pound Woody Allen.” The quote was charming because of the perceived valley between Allen, small and frightened, and the characteristics that we associate with a 260-pound dude, gregarious, oblivious. But anybody who has been anywhere near 260 pounds knows that feeling like Woody Allen comes with the territory. Self-loathing, self-destruction, a fear of death that seems realer than your average —that’s what 260 pounds means.

How could Gandolfini not feel it? How could the psychic toll of being known for something that will soon hurt you not lead to a little neurosis? I’m not saying he was crying for help or that the quote wasn't hilarious, but from here, right now, it should also be remembered as heartbreaking.

How do we see fatness? It’s a question worth asking, nowhere close to being answerable, even with all those documentaries about the epidemic. Gandolfini embodied all of the emotional complexities of the way I have experienced my own fatness. There is the effort to not be ashamed, to claim some part of how I look and am as beautiful. And then there’s the danger in not feeling shame, in letting the fatness become how you’re identified.

And now, as I write this, there’s the taboo. I feel fear in publicly identifying myself as a fat guy, as though somehow people who know me and see me every day could be shocked. I feel guilt in identifying Gandolfini as a fat guy, let alone discussing his weight at length, even though his weight is captured on tape forever, even though it’s part of how he will be remembered, with every obituary trying to find the pleasantest possible adjectives—burly, stocky, barrel-chested, bear-like.

I’m not trying to reduce him. It feels ridiculous to talk about the negative repercussions of a truly gifted, maybe-self-accepting fat star, when the anti-fat vitriol of our celebrity culture is far more insidious. Still, he’s dead, and he died in a way that seems inevitable and preventable only now that it has happened.

Lucas Mann is the author of Class A: Baseball in the Middle of Everywhere.

Thanks to fear of the Fed's upcoming actions and some trouble in China's credit markets, the stock m

$
0
0

Thanks to fear of the Fed's upcoming actions and some trouble in China's credit markets, the stock market is down more than 350 points today, and the value of gold is plunging. Please put your fearful predictions and paranoid speculation in the comment section below.


The Topless Kate Upton Video TMZ Doesn't Want You to See Uncensored

$
0
0

The Topless Kate Upton Video TMZ Doesn't Want You to See Uncensored

Earlier today, shameless gossip e-rag TMZ posted what is quite possibly its most shameful article to date: "Kate Upton SUPER TOPLESS On a Horse."

The criticism isn't levied against the site for posting a video of Kate Upton topless — that part's par for the course.

It's levied against the site for posting a video of Kate Upton topless and then censoring it.

"Unfortunately, we can't show you the completely uncensored version," claims TMZ before proceeding to add insult to injury by offering up the worst consolation prize since the participation ribbon: Footage of the TMZ staff watching the uncensored version of the video for themselves.

Despite TMZ's intentional lack of context, it's been determined that the video was recorded during Kate Upton's photoshoot for Complex magazine two years ago.

It's unclear why the video is just surfacing now, but since TMZ seems to own the exclusive publishing rights, it's unlikely we'll be seeing an uncensored version anytime soon.

That's the bad news.

The good news is, we get to sit back and watch as the Internet goes into full meltdown mode over being unable to see yet another pair of differently colored circular protuberances protruding from a fashion model's pectoral flesh globes:

Oh, if only there was an uncensored video of Kate Upton's nipples somewhere on the web...

The Topless Kate Upton Video TMZ Doesn't Want You to See Uncensored

[screengrab via TMZ]

British People Wearing Bonkers Headgear: An Explanation of Ladies Day

$
0
0

British People Wearing Bonkers Headgear: An Explanation of Ladies Day

Today marked an annual ceremony called Ladies Day, when Royalty and their hangers-on gather to ostensibly attend a horse race in the small town of Ascot in England. The exclusive Royal Enclosure also requires attendees to adhere to particular fashion requirements, which prompt the question: Dear England, what the fuck is on your head?

British People Wearing Bonkers Headgear: An Explanation of Ladies Day

The days of balancing finery upon your hair to communicate class stature are not over. This custom is still raging on into 2013 at the Royal Ascot's Ladies Day.

To begin, let's go over some terms, vocabulary and history, shall we?

  • The Royal Ascot is a racecourse in England, in a small town of Ascot, Berkshire. It was founded on August 11, 1711, decades before our dear nation was a glint in someone's eye. Who knows why no one had anything better to do on that day?
  • The Royal Meeting is a five-day event in June held at the Ascot, which is now most famous for its sartorial fuckery.
  • The Royal Enclosure is a separate area to ensure privacy for the royal family and their guests. King George IV established the exclusive enclosure in 1822. One must be "brandishing" a royal invitation to get in.
  • Brandish means to flourish or wave something excitedly or threateningly.
  • Ladies' Day is the Thursday of Royal Meeting, in which women in the Royal Enclosure are required to wear a hat that covers "the crown of their head." It was founded in 1823, though the requirement of women to wear hats is a tradition dating back to the middle ages, when Churches were like cover up your sexy head hair. Don't worry—there are "dress code assistants" on hand, who can dole out fascinators to people that forgot their bonnets. Expect to be judged.
  • Fascinators are petite hats, in short supply this year.
  • The Royal Procession starts each day of Royal Week. This parade dates back to the 1820s. The Queen and the Royal Party arrive in horse-drawn landaus.
  • Landaus are four-wheeled, convertible carriages.
  • The Car Park Picnic is what the British call tailgating.
  • Singing Round the Bandstand is a tradition only dating back forty years, which involves an after-race medley of British standards. Songbooks are handed out so everyone knows what the fuck to sing.
  • The Grandstand is a roofed stand for spectators at a racecourse.
  • Grandstanding is to show off, usually ostentatiously.

British People Wearing Bonkers Headgear: An Explanation of Ladies Day

To gain entry into the Enclosure, you must be sponsored. This sponsorship has to be signed by someone who has been to the Royal Enclosure for at least four years. While convicted criminals and "undischarged bankrupts" (people that have declared bankruptcy) are excluded from the enclosure, divorcées have been allowed since 1955.

Now that you've made it inside, you're wondering about hat etiquette on Ladies Day, which can tidily be summed up as the following: FUCK IT. Don't bother being concerned about blocking someone's view. Ladies Day is not about the race, it's about the shit that you've piled onto your head. Oh and did I mention horses briefly? Because forget those beasts, you wanna put birds on your head if you'd really like to fit in. Also this.

British People Wearing Bonkers Headgear: An Explanation of Ladies Day

Here are some highfalutin highlights from 2013, year of our hat:

  • There's a hat apparently constructed from dozens of thin mints linked together into a semi-geometric explosion.
  • The outfit of veteran racing pundit John McCririck, which reminded me of this fashion tip: before you leave your home, you should always take off the last thing you put on, so that your outfit isn't overcrowded. What could he have possible left in his home? He's wearing all his things.
  • One hat appears to have stifled and killed a Avatar creature, whose remains are flinging themselves out from underneath a mollusk shell.
  • Potted plant, growing from human brain.
  • Dutch artist Larisa Katz, who claims that her jacket is "the first 3D printed jacket in the world." Her hat is a homemade crafts project made from ice-cream cartons.
  • Made in Chelsea's Cheska Hull who certainly yelled "Gimme that seat cushion! It's going on my head."

So it's a mixed bag to be sure—there are some hats that are atrocious, some that are bewildering, some that are made of strange materials, some that render you speechless with concern. But to each her own (hat), right? You know the phrase, that's what makes horse racing? That's definitely what that means.

Again, this Royal Ascot Ladies Day is an annual thing, happening just across the ocean. When Ladies Day was founded in 1823, an anonymous poet wrote "the women, like angels, look sweetly divine." But, now it is the hat that reaches into the ether. Keep imitating angels in heaven, hats. Looking forward to seeing you in tip-top form next year.

[Images via Wenn]

To contact the author of this post, email maggie@gawker.com.

Psychopathic Price Gougers: Midtown Pedicabs

$
0
0

Psychopathic Price Gougers: Midtown Pedicabs

Laramie Flick, pictured above, is the acting President of the New York City Pedicab Owner's Association (an unpaid position). Flick works three days a week, 8 months out of the year; he writes and paints 4 days a week, likely makes as much money as waiters in NYC's best restaurants, pays all of his bills, has buns of steel, and carries pepper spray to protect himself from his psychopathic price gouging colleagues.*

Over the past 9 years, Flick has become a demi-god among the pedicabs in Midtown Manhattan. He has devoted his partial immortality to saving hundreds of unassuming tourists from getting charged obscene amounts of money for short rides in and around Central Park. He has been challenged to fist fights and not a day goes by that he does not get a dirty look from one of his thieving colleagues—but he sees this as a small price to pay for justice.

In a matter of days The Department of Consumer Affairs will institute a required 'per minute' pricing model (as opposed to a proprietary formula that factors in number of passengers and distance) that Flick hopes will help curb the problem, but in the mean time, I would not trust anyone but him.

*If you need a job, there is lots of opportunity here, and according to Laramie, occupational hazards are not as grave as one would expect. The bike is virtually impossible to flip over and can easily sustain a car hitting it, assuming it is going less than 15 miles an hour.Psychopathic Price Gougers: Midtown PedicabsPsychopathic Price Gougers: Midtown PedicabsPsychopathic Price Gougers: Midtown PedicabsPsychopathic Price Gougers: Midtown PedicabsPsychopathic Price Gougers: Midtown PedicabsPsychopathic Price Gougers: Midtown PedicabsPsychopathic Price Gougers: Midtown PedicabsPsychopathic Price Gougers: Midtown PedicabsPsychopathic Price Gougers: Midtown PedicabsPsychopathic Price Gougers: Midtown Pedicabs

[Images by Victor G. Jeffreys II]

Getting Sued by American Express Led Me Out of the Ruins of My Life

$
0
0

Getting Sued by American Express Led Me Out of the Ruins of My Life

An unexpected ring on my doorbell awoke me early one Sunday morning and I stumbled bleary-eyed to my front door and was greeted by a tall, strapping, sunglasses-wearing sheriff with an incongruously chipper expression clutching a sheath of papers.

“Are you Nathan Rabin?” the sheriff asked brightly before I responded affirmatively and he shoved a document in my hand reading, “American Express Vs. Nathan Rabin.”

“What was that?” my wife asked as she shook awoke.

“I think I just got sued by American Express.” I responded numbly, still trying to process what had just happened.

My psyche had a bifurcated response to this unexpected and unwanted visitor, this uniformed portent of doom. The logical, rational part of my brain processed the morning events as unfortunate but not entirely unexpected development. I had stopped paying my credit card bills. My credit card company sued me. It wasn’t that difficult to understand. The lizard part of my brain, however, was convinced I was doomed to live out my days in a debtor’s prison. Who needed logical evidence? A sheriff. Legal documents. A court case. Scary prosecuting lawyers. In my panic-stricken mind, it all amounted to a future locked in a Dickensian prison for perpetuity.

I flashed back to the phone call seven or eight months earlier where I had agreed to go into a debt consolidation program to handle what at the time seemed like an impossible and unmanageable level of debt. It’s telling that what I remembered most vividly about the conversation where I agreed to enter the debt consolidation program was not what the agent at the other end of the line but rather how he said it. I remembered less the specifics of the programs I was about to enter into less than the avuncular, reassuring tone in his voice that implicitly said, “Everything is going to be all right. You got yourself into a hell of a mess but we’re going to help you get out of it. It’ll be tough but you’ll be all right and we will protect you and make you feel safe.”

In the moment, I desperately wanted to believe that what the man said was true and that if I committed myself to the program and executed it honestly and faithfully then after three years in a scary and perilous and exceedingly expensive wilderness and about twenty thousand dollars in fees I would emerge at the end of the journey debt-free and ready to take control of my financial life.

As outlined by the nice-sounding man on the other end of the line, the road ahead of me would be incredibly difficult. He was not offering to settle my accounts quickly or cheaply. Even if I did everything the debt consolidation program asked of me, my credit score would be decimated. I would have to give up all of my credit cards and, in a flagrant violation of the American way of life, only use money I actually possessed. I was told that debt collectors would stop at nothing to get to me so I could expect a never-ending deluge of calls and letters from debt collectors and, yes, even the possibility, however faint, of legal action somewhere down the road.

The man on the other end of the line was not promising to pay off the accounts for pennies on the dollar. No, even if I did all that was asked of me, I would end up paying well over half of what I owed, albeit—and this is the part I really should have thought a whole lot more about before I took the plunge and signed on to the program—primarily to the debt consolidation group for legal fees and negotiating fees and structuring fees and any number of hidden costs I probably should have paid a lot more attention to at the time if I hadn’t been so hypnotized by the comforting gentleness in the man’s voice.

The journey that the debt consolidation program offered wasn’t perfect. It wasn’t ideal. Hell, it wasn’t even particularly good. From the outset, it was apparent that these people were parasites. I just hoped that they were parasites that would act in my best interests, that they would be bullies that would protect me from other bullies. I saw the debt consolidation program as the lesser of two evils. Sure, they were vultures benefiting from the naïveté and desperation of the poor and stressed but, at the very least, they had to be better than credit card companies and debt collectors, right? That’s setting the bar awfully low. I had no idea at the time how greatly I had over-estimated the integrity, honesty and morality of debt consolidation industry.

I had no one to blame but myself for my plunge into insolvency. In a fit of manic ambition in the summer of 2010 I bought a home, moved in with a girlfriend who would become my wife and signed a contract with Scribner to write a book about fan subcultures that would eventually be called You Don’t Know Me But You Don’t Like Me. It was a book I wasn’t sure I had the skill set or journalistic chops to write and the advance was modest enough that financially the book would be a break-even proposition under the best of circumstances once the considerable costs of touring the country following a band and going to myriad festivals and cruises were included. Yes, cruises. Weep not for me, reader, for I went broke in the stupidest, most self-indulgent and moronic manner imaginable. I halfway convinced myself that for my book about fan subcultures I needed to go on the Kid Rock Chillin’ The Most Cruise and Jam Cruise, that these were not ridiculous, unnecessary extravagances but rather essential sociological experiences related to my study of fan subcultures it was crucial for me to document.

So in 2010 I went on cruises and traveled to festivals and followed Phish for an entire summer as my bank account dwindled, my credit card debt accelerated and a crippling, rare, debilitating and uncharacteristic bout of writer’s block and professional insecurity resulted in me being unable to get anything usable out of the vast majority of the experiences from my first year of researching the book. A book I had set out to finish in a year now looked like it would take at least two years to research and write, and cost well over twice what I had originally anticipated. The payday for completing my book that would solve so many of my financial problems sank further and further into the future until it began to seem theoretical at best.

I had always prided myself on being responsible and well-organized but as the book I struggled to write slipped away from me I grew careless and overwhelmed. I was overcome with guilt and shame over having wasted so much money with so little to show for it. I felt like I had let down my editor and my agent and my publisher and the people I was writing about. It wasn’t until I forgave myself for fucking up so badly and so consistently that I gained the strength and focus to finish my book and begin the process of rebuilding my professional and financial life.

So I justified the expense, hassle and restrictions of the debt consolidation program in part as a steep if reasonable cost to pay, karmically speaking, for having been so careless in the research of my book. It would be tough, but what in this world isn’t? I just wanted to wipe the slate clean, to atone for my financial sins and be granted absolution. This was about more than just money: it was a spiritual yearning, a need to make what had gone terribly wrong right again.

When I enter the debt consolidation program late in 2011 I owed something in the area of thirty-six thousand dollars on six or seven credit cards against a life savings of a few thousand dollars, mostly wrapped up in the stock market, a losing game I never quite had the heart to quit playing. Between my mortgage, bills and living expenses, I barely had enough left over every month to pay the minimum due on each of my accounts, which made making any kind of substantial dent in that thirty-six thousand dollars damn near impossible.

The debt consolidation program offered to resolve my 36,000 dollar debt for 20,000 dollars over a three-year program that began, tellingly enough with the debt consolidation paying itself well over six thousand dollars for services before it even considered paying off any of my creditors. The idea was for me to stop paying off my creditors immediately so that after a year and a half or two years or two and a half years they’d be so desperate to recoup their money that they would settle for accepting twenty to twenty percent of what they owed. In the meantime my credit would be decimated, I’d be hounded by creditors and I would no longer be able to exercise my god-given American right to spend money I didn’t actually have.

Signing on to the program kicked off a solid year of living from paycheck to paycheck, incurring thousands of dollars in overdraft fees and bounced checks and more weeks than I care to remember when the balance of my checking account averaged somewhere in the area of negative four hundred dollars. Financially speaking, I was in quicksand: though the debt consolidation program diligently subtracted a little over five hundred and fifty nine dollars the thirteenth of any month, none of my credit card accounts were being paid off. I was falling behind on my other bills as well. I paid my mortgage later and later each month until I started to engender late fees for the first time. I had always prided myself on being financially responsible but now in the eyes of the world I was a deadbeat, a loser, a bum.

In a capitalist society we use money and status and class to keep score. By that criteria, I was a zero. I was substantially less than that. True, I had been a staff writer for The A.V. Club for fifteen years and was in the process of finishing and publishing my fourth book but American Express seemed patently unimpressed with my literary pedigree. They just wanted their fucking money and weren’t about to relent until they had it.

The debt consolidation program had promised to return control of my economic life to me for a steep fee. Instead, I felt more powerless and vulnerable than ever before. I came to see money as a poisonous, destructive force. I couldn’t imagine a future where I wasn’t constantly strapped, where I didn’t have to keep selling off my belongings to keep the lights on and food on the table. It was as if this life of perpetual financial panic was the only one I had ever known, that I’d never experienced a reality where on some days my only liquid assets were literally the spare change in the Gatorade jar at work. I began to feel as if my problems followed me around like Pigpen’s cloud of stink, that people would look at me and think, “Wow, that guy is completely fucked!” without even needing to know the specifics.

My mind is flooded with vivid snapshots from this period in the financial wilderness, like having a charge for a beer and a slice of pizza get declined at a pizza place in Brooklyn because the credit limit on the one card I still used on emergency occasions had shrunk to under seven dollars because my credit score was so awful or having to call my wife with a mouth full of Novocain and ask if she could pay for a double root canal with her father’s credit card because my debit card had just been declined. On Valentine’s Day.

It wasn’t supposed to be this way. When the sheriff showed up at my front door and completely upended my sense of security I was only five years removed from receiving a six-figure advance for writing a memoir for Scribner at 31 and only three years removed from traveling the country sharing my heartwarming tale of triumph over adversity in connection with the release of said memoir. When I spoke about how my obsession with pop culture helped me overcome a childhood of abandonment, institutionalization and despair to become a successful writer I felt like a fraud, since all happy endings are provisional, fragile and, on some level, illusory. They’re mirages that disappear in a poof more than sturdy homes to dwell in for perpetuity.

I was peddling a tale of triumph of adversity while convinced that I would forever be mired in adversity, that adversity had become my natural state. It’s hard to buy into yourself as a success story when, deep down, you fear that your success is neither merited nor real. It’s even harder to think of yourself as a success when you’re being sued by a credit card company, are mired in debt and hand-cuffed to a dodgy debt consolidation group for the indefinite future.

Being sued played havoc with my fragile self-esteem and sense of security. It felt as if the bottom had fallen out and that I had compounded the mistake of getting so deep into debt with the even greater error of hiring a debt consolidation group. I once viewed the debt consolidation group as my savior. Now I suspected I needed someone to save me from them.

Like many depressives, I engaged in apocalyptic thinking but when I told my therapist about getting sued by American Express her response surprised me.

“Yeah. The economy sucks,” she responded matter-of-factly in a way that quietly put everything into perspective. This was not some special punishment the universe had created solely for me. I was not being unduly persecuted by fate.

I had simply gotten in over my head like so many people before me. I was not alone. I was, to use a phrase that appears on the podcast often, one of many. Seemingly everybody was hurting financially. They just didn’t talk about it publicly, especially if that hurt took the terrifying, dramatic form of sheriffs and court cases and legal documents.

It’s easy to feel isolated and alone and singled out when a massive international credit card company files a lawsuit against you but I was never alone. I took enormous comfort in that.

In one of the more Kafkaesque developments of my case, I had to pay two hundred dollars to the city just to file legal papers defending myself: It cost me a big chunk of change just to show up in court to defend myself for being so broke I couldn’t pay off my creditors any longer.

For many Americans, debt is part of everyday life. When that sheriff showed up at my front door debt went from being an unfortunate but eminently bearable abstraction to a terrifying, concrete reality, from a constantly shifting and morphing sum of money that I would probably have to pay off at some point, maybe, in the future, to a terrifying reality that could very easily lead to my wages being garnished and my possessions being re-possessed. The not-so-subtle intimation of the sheriff’s visit that ominous morning was that the state of Chicago would take my shit by force if necessary because I had gotten myself into that bad of a bind.

During my first appearance before a judge at The Daley Center in Chicago I endured a scary gauntlet of metal detectors and case numbers and a glowering bailiff who broadcasted her contempt for humanity with every fiber of her being and a judge who looked exactly like Rod Blagojevich and regarded my feeble attempts to defend myself with the debt consolidation group’s help with an all-too-understandable combination of pity and irritation.

Over time I came to appreciate the banal comedy of the courtroom. It felt like I had a five-episode arc as a hapless defendant on a mediocre 1980s legal sitcom about a corrupt Chicago judge and the kooky courtroom he presides over. The wood paneling of the courtroom, the judge who looked exactly like Rod Blagojevich and spoke in a Chicago accent as thick as a slice of deep dish from Lou Malnati’s, the quietly enraged bailiff with her mouth fixed in a permanent frown, her eyes locked in a permanent scowl: it was a very Chicago kind of tragicomedy and I was just grateful that I was but a visitor and not a permanent fixture, a guest star and not someone locked into this dreariness day in and day out.

The debt consolidation group I had signed up with had “Law” in its name but that seemed to be the extent of its connection with the legal profession. During my dealings with the debt consolidation group, the phrase, “Now I’m not a lawyer, but” popped up so frequently and with such dispiriting predictability that it threatened to become a catchphrase.

It wasn’t until after I had been sued that I came to the troubling realization that it was in the debt consolidation group’s best interests to keep me in debt as long as possible. As long as I was still in the system and wrestling with outstanding debts the company could continue to collect fees but the moment I was debt-free the money train would end and those delicious charges would disappear. I had signed on with the debt consolidation group thinking it was the lesser of two evils. I was wrong. I thought I needed them to protect me from credit card companies. It turned out I needed someone to protect me from the debt consolidation company.

So I started opening the letters debt collectors sent me and was pleasantly surprised to find them filled with exceedingly reasonable offers to settle my outstanding debts for twenty five to thirty five percent of the original total. At this point a strange reversal occurred as the debt collectors I had considered the enemy I now came to see as allies with the same goal as me: ending my debt as quickly and cleanly as possible. I similarly came to see the debt consolidation group as a formidable obstacle intent on eking every last penny out of me and keeping me in debt as long as possible.

So I started calling up the debt collectors and settling with them outside the debt consolidation program, which wouldn’t even speak to many of my creditors until much further along in the process (i.e after the debt consolidation group collected all of its own fees). Little by little, I started scrounging up enough money to start paying off my creditors one at a time. It was incredibly liberating paying off a six thousand dollar debt for two thousand dollars. I began to see a sliver of light in a vast eternity of darkness.

I raised a few thousand dollars by selling off my stocks, received some timely aid from my wife’s family and received an additional windfall when we got married. I sold everything I could. Best of all, I was no longer spending tens of thousands of dollars researching a book I was, by that point, well on my way to finishing. I sure as shit wasn’t going on any more cruises, for professional reasons or otherwise. I was no longer careless. I was deliberate. I was focused.

I discovered that I was just as capable of settling with my creditors as the debt consolidation group was. There was no art or science to it, just basic common sense: it was ultimately just a matter of either accepting the offer on the table or proposing a settlement somewhere in the 25 to 35 percent range. I was overjoyed to finally be paying off my debts. It felt as if my financial karma was finally spinning in the right direction. The debt consolidation group warned me that if I settled with American Express too quickly it would make me a much more appealing target for lawsuits from my other creditors but if I paid off all my other creditors that would obviously not be a problem. I diligently began pulling myself out of a deep mountain of debt, one credit card account at a time until eventually the only account I had left was American Express.

I had presumably paid the debt consolidation group somewhere between five to eight thousand dollars for its negotiating prowess and legal expertise but if I had scrawled, “Credit card companies are dumb and bad and money should belong to everyone” on a piece of cardboard paper in red crayon and embellished the statement with flowers and hearts it would have represented only slightly less impressive a legal case than the one my debt consolidation group prepared for me. The judge—who I’m still halfway convinced actually somehow was Rod Blagojevich and not an uncanny lookalike—stopped just short of rolling his eyes and making the universal gesture for jerking off whenever I would stand in front of him and mumble the two or three sentences the debt consolidation group told me to say each time I’d appear in court for some minor matter.

My misadventures in penury ended not with a bang but with a whimper. When I received the final payment for a book I’d written about musical subcultures I was able to call up the opposing lawyers and settle immediately for seventy-five percent of what I owed (not a great deal, sure, but at that point I just wanted the experience to be over). The debt consolidation group had assured me that if I was willing to fight it out in court for five or six months they might be able to knock off five hundred dollars off that amount (while in the process collecting well over five hundred dollars in fees for themselves in the process) but at that point I just wanted the headache to end.

I look back at my descent into debt with incredible gratitude rather than bitterness. My relationship with money is a lot healthier and more functional now. I take profound satisfaction in being able to pay off my bills. I appreciate money like I never did before. I’m even grateful that the debt consolidation group set me on the road to being debt-free, even if I ended up doing most of the work myself.

Empathy is a wonderful gift. I found that my anger subsided when I empathized and identified not just with the other people being sued by American Express (of whom I imagine there are a great deal) but also with the opposing lawyer and even the credit card company suing me. The lawyer with the bad hair plugs did not have some special vendetta against me. He was just a schmuck with a bad job and cheap suits making the best of the shitty hand life had dealt him. And while I came to take a dim view of capitalism and particularly credit card companies during my misadventures in penury and extreme debt you ultimately can’t fault a credit card company for acting like a credit card company or a debt consolidation group for acting like a debt consolidation group.

I can’t even be mad at the people who worked for the debt consolidation group: they were just cogs in a machine that exploits the vulnerability and naiveté of the desperate and strapped. That empathy extends to not beating myself up over wasting a massive amount of money on the debt consolidation program. I was naive and overwhelmed and I made bad decisions out of fear and desperation. There’s no crime in that unless your ferocious inner prosecutor decides to make the case and after my experiences with American Express and the debt consolidation group I’m eager to avoid legal entanglements of any kind, be they metaphorical, psychological or symbolic.

Nathan Rabin is a staff writer for The Dissolve, the new film site from Pitchfork Media. He was previously the head writer for The A.V Club, a position he held for sixteen years. You can help him further escape a life of destitution by buying his new book You Don’t Know Me But You Don’t Like Me (preferably through the Amazon link on this site!). This essay was originally published on The Mental Illness Happy Hour Blog.

This Interoffice Birthday Card Is Almost Too Corporate for Words

$
0
0

This Interoffice Birthday Card Is Almost Too Corporate for Words

And I mean that literally: Besides employee names, this interoffice birthday card contains all of six words.

Though it might seem callous and dystopian at first blush, anyone who has ever worked in an office knows that the staggering number of man-hours wasted each year on trying to come up with something witty to say on those blasted birthday/get well soon/forced retirement/too bad your cat died cards could be far better wasted looking at funny videos online.

Also, employing this method makes it much easier to determine who should be spared when you inevitably snap.

This Interoffice Birthday Card Is Almost Too Corporate for Words

[H/T: Uproxx, photo via Reddit]

Thirdhand smoke will fuck you up just like secondhand smoke.

Teen's Carjacking Attempt Foiled by Inability to Drive Stick

$
0
0

Teen's Carjacking Attempt Foiled by Inability to Drive Stick

A Florida teen foiled his own attempt to steal a car at gunpoint when he realized he didn't know how to drive a vehicle with standard transmission.

19-year-old Antoren Bell, who also goes by Chief Keef (no relation), was reportedly one of three teens who flagged down a car driving through in Escambia County.

The driver later told local authorities she stopped the car to offer the boys a ride, when Bell suddenly pulled out a gun and ordered her to exit the vehicle.

According to thr Escambia County Sheriff's Office, "[Bell] abandoned the car a short time later because he couldn't drive a stick shift."

The victim identified Bell in a photo lineup, and he was subsequently picked up and charged with vehicle theft, robbery and criminal mischief.

Bell remained in custody yesterday in lieu of a $400,000 bond.

[H/T: The Raw Story, screengrab via WEAR-TV]


Congratulations to Howard Kurtz on His New Job

$
0
0

Congratulations to Howard Kurtz on His New Job

Here's a story. In 2004, I was a reporter for the Chicago Tribune, covering television. In January of that year, I began looking into a story about political donations made by reporters, editors, anchors, executives and other employees at media companies.

This is, of course, an evergreen story. All the information you need is available online at databases of Federal Election Commission records. Just plug "Fox News," or "NBC," or "Tribune Company" into the Employer field, and you get a list of names of employees of those firms who've donated to various candidates or political committees. Scan the list for names of editorial employees—as opposed to, say, an advertising sales staffer—and you have yourself a story about reporters crossing lines into political advocacy. Any reporter with an internet connection can do it at any time.

So I was doing it. And I came up with a few names, including someone called Bert Solivan, who described himself on FEC records as a vice president for news information at Fox News Channel and general manager of Foxnews.com. Solivan had made two $240 donations to the National Republican Senatorial Committee. (Fox News' Neil Cavuto and Griff Jenkins, who was Oliver North's producer at the time, had also donated to Republicans. There were names from a bunch of other outlets, as well.)

I called Bert Solivan to ask him why, as someone who appeared to exercise editorial control over the "news information" that Fox News purveyed, he felt it was appropriate to throw in with the Republican Party in the run-up to a presidential election campaign. The call was returned by Irena Briganti, a Fox News flack who can be exceedingly unpleasant when she wants to. She often wants to.

Briganti insisted to me, emphatically, that Solivan was not an editorial employee. His job, she said, was entirely technical in nature. He ran information systems. He had zero impact on Fox News' newsgathering. He was free to donate as he pleased, she said, and it would be unfair to criticize him, or Fox News, for his political affiliations. In the course of our conversation, in order to rebut Briganti's accusation that I was singling out Fox News for criticism, I told her about the various other editorial employees at other news outlets that I had identified as donors.

I argued with Briganti for quite a while about Solivan. My position, as I recall it, was that irrespective of her claims about his actual duties, the fact that someone with the title of "vice president for news information" at a cable news outlet was donating to political campaigns was a story—or part of a larger one about donations from news staffers—and that I intended to write it. As for Jenkins and Cavuto, I didn't really care. They were obviously partisan Republicans on the air and off.

So I continued to reach out to people at the other news outlets I had turned up. A few days later—in my recollection it was two days after my conversation with Briganti, but this is a while ago—I saw this headline on a story by the Washington Post's Howard Kurtz: "Journalists Not Loath to Donate To Politicians; Media Companies' Policies Vary Widely".

More than 100 journalists and executives at major media companies, from NBC's top executive to a Fox News anchor to reporters or editors for the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, USA Today, CBS and ABC, have made political contributions in recent years.

Like I said, the story was available to any reporter with an internet connection. There was no particular time peg for it. Maybe Kurtz just had the same idea at precisely the same time that I did. Or maybe someone gave him the idea. I don't know.

There was one curious thing about Kurtz's story, though: The name Bert Solivan didn't appear in it. Cavuto did, as did Jenkins. The last sentence of the story—which is preserved online here—read, "Many of the other media employees in the FEC records worked in business or technical jobs or are no longer employed by those outlets." Kurtz must have concluded that Solivan's was, as Briganti surely told him, a "technical job."

I dropped my story. I didn't see much of a point in replicating Kurtz's piece with the addition of one employee that Fox claimed worked in a technical capacity. About a year-and-a-half later, Bert Solivan got a promotion at Fox News. The press release announcing it said this about his previous duties as vice president for news information: "Solivan’s other responsibilities included overseeing FOX News’ 24-hour news research department and its on-air fact writing operations." That was, of course, directly at odds with Briganti's claims to me. "On-air fact writing" included, I was later told, the news ticker or "crawl" at the bottom of the screen, as well as information presented in graphics and captions. (I wrote about it at the time on my blog.)

So as it turns out, I had been preparing a story indicating that the man responsible for the factual information in all of Fox News' graphics and news ticker was a GOP donor. I had called Briganti about it, and in doing so relayed to her the names of several other reporters who had made similar donations. Briganti had demonstrated a strong desire to keep Solivan's name out of my story. Roughly two days later, the Washington Post published a story by Howard Kurtz featuring all of the names I had relayed to Briganti—but no Bert Solivan.

A few months after his story about political donations, Kurtz wrote a negative review of Robert Greenwald's anti-Roger Ailes film Outfoxed. He also wrote a related item, quoting Briganti, accusing the New York Times Magazine of "ambushing" Fox News in a feature about the movie. More recently, Ailes turned to Kurtz for an exclusive interview in June 2011 after two damaging stories in Rolling Stone and New York magazine portrayed him as a paranoid lunatic. A few months after that, Kurtz wrote an influential story claiming that Fox News had become more "moderate" under Ailes' strategic guidance. Several months after that, a "senior Fox News executive" turned to Kurtz to express "regret" after (the now moderate!) Ailes called the New York Times "lying scum." Kurtz transmitted the apology, as well as Ailes' "respect" for Times editor Jill Abramson, but did not note that Ailes had called her "lying scum" in the course of telling a bald-faced lie himself.

Anyway, Fox News just hired Howard Kurtz to host a Sunday morning show about the media.

[Photo via Getty]

The Worst Email from a Rich Jackass You'll Ever Read

$
0
0

The Worst Email from a Rich Jackass You'll Ever Read

Interior designer Micky Hurley and graphic designer Malu Custer Edwards are the Chilean power couple accused of keeping their nanny in "slave-like conditions" on Manhattan's Upper East Side. Last week, the New York Post reported that Hurley and Edwards, both members of Chile's aristocratic elite, are in the midst of a lawsuit filed by Felicitas del Carmen Villanueva Garnica, a 50-year-old nanny who says the duo paid her about $2 an hour for her labor and let their children beat her.

Garnica started with the Hurley-Edwards family in Chile and came to America with them after being enticed with promises of $10 an hour, healthcare, lodging, and more. Once in Manhattan, the reality was much different: Hurley, Edwards, and their three children lived the high life, complete with glowing coverage in the New York Observer and New York magazine, which covered the clan's globetrotting sailing trip last year under the heading, "The Well-Heeled Family of Five." Garnica, on the other hand, alleges that she was refused a living wage while also being physically and emotionally abused.

Garnica followed the couple when they decided to move to SoHo so that Edwards could study graphic design at the New School. But Garnica alleges that when they arrived in January, 2011, everything changed. The children grew violent and the couple refused to feed her adequately, although they were regulars at Balthazar and "spent lavishly" on themselves.

Garnica says that the last straw came in March 2011, when a member of the Hurley-Edwards family hit her in the head with the refrigerator door. That day she walked out and went to Safe Horizon, a nonprofit support group for abuse victims. Soon after that, the state Department of Labor ordered Hurley and Edwards to pay Garnica more than $6,000 in back wages.

Two years later, as Garnica's lawsuit makes its way through the courts, a Chilean photographer named Roque Rodriguez has come forth to claim that penny-pinching, deceit, and vitriol are all par for the course when it comes to Micky Hurley. Chilean news outlet The Clinic published a group of emails this week purportedly sent between Hurley and Rodriguez, who apparently did some interior design photography for Hurley in 2009. After daring to request money he was still owed for the job in 2010, Rodriguez says he was subjected to an email assault that could have made Maryland's famed "deranged sorority girl" proud, complete with this precious line: "[Y]ou will never have a Baroness for a grandmother like me."

Ain't blue bloods grand?

The full email exchange, originally written in Spanish, can be found here. A translated version, courtesy of Victor Jeffreys and Peter Krupa, is below.

Asunto: Fwd: Mail de la discordia

Asunto: Caso Hurley

From: M&M Hurley <xx@yahoo.com>

To: roque rodriguez <xx@yahoo.com>

Sent: Mon, October 4, 2010 12:34:50 PM

Subject:

Hi Roque, how are you? What happened with the photographs? I have been in NY for 2 months and tomorrow I leave for Key Biscayne to finish an apartment that I am decorating and a client wants to see photos from Lo Curro [Ed note: Lo Curro is an ultra-exclusive neighborhood in Santiago].

Send me the photos (take time to interrupt your daily party in Berlin).

And answer this email.

Micky

HURLEY & CO.

www. hurleyandcompany.com

———————-

From: roque rodriguez <xx@yahoo.com>

To: M&M Hurley <xx@yahoo.com>

Sent: Mon, October 4, 2010 1:00:39 PM

Subject: Re:

Hi Micky! Transfer the US$240 that you owe me from 5 months ago for this job to my account and I would be happy to send you the photos.

[then he gives his banking details]

Datos: Banco Santander, cta cte 0437xxxx, Rut. 11740.xxx-x, Roque Rodríguez Castillo, xxxxx@yahoo.com

Saludos,

Roque

—————-

From: M&M Hurley <xx@yahoo.com>

To: roque rodriguez <xx@yahoo.com>

Sent: Mon, October 4, 2010 3:28:44 PM

Subject: Re:

Stop with your nonsense. I DO NOT OWE YOU ANYTHING!!!! How am I going to PAY if you don’t deliver the job to me.

HURLEY & CO.

www. hurleyandcompany.com

———————

From: roque rodriguez <xx@yahoo.com>

To: M&M Hurley <xx@yahoo.com>

Sent: Mon, October 4, 2010 4:43:04 PM

Subject: Re:

The job has been ready for months and don’t come at me with this bullshit, Micky. If you want your photos, I will send them to you after you transfer [the funds] online into my account, simple and easy.

Let me know by tomorrow if you want them, if not, I will erase them from my files as they are taking up space on my hard drive. At the end of the day, if you are not willing to pay, I will not be bitter about the US$240, but forget about me ever working with you in the future.

I was looking at your website and I see that almost half of the images there are mine... and I also saw that the photos that we took in different apartments in NY are included as work you've done. I didn't know you decorated all those places...

Saludos,

R.

—————————-

MAIL DE HURLEY:

Read carefully what I am writing here, as it will be the last time I do so. Listen you poor, miserable, ROTEQUE [Ed note: "Roteque" does not have a direct translation to English. It implies someone from a lower class and is an incredibly offensive word. The most awful adjective you can think of], low-born social climber. Delete your grubby photos. DON'T COME THREATENING ME YOU WORTHLESS LITTLE SHIT. NEVER. Remember, you are ALWAYS going to be from a different class, you were born where you were born, and even if you were reborn a billion times, you will never have a Baroness for a grandmother like me.

This is what I get for working with street trash like you. For your information, the photos on my webpage, the ones that I have not bothered updating, are from STYLING. I don't have to fake my way through with other peoples' work. They know my work, they know I have a good eye, and I've been on the cover of magazines a number of times.

What’s more, you wretch, in April Architectural Design is coming to photograph the apartment I am decorating in Miami. With all of its Matisse, Dufy, and Bonard paintings. So I guess you can see, you idiot, the level I’m on. Oh! and the gentleman from Sutton Place asked me to renovate his home in Greenwich...what do you think of that? Jealous?? I would have paid you your miserable US$240 immediately if you if you’d delivered the work first, AS IT SHOULD BE. Delete my email address and all of my information. You, parvenu, are dead to me. Malu once asked me how I could trust you so much. It’s obvious now, when you give poor trash an inch, they take a mile.

You screwed me over with the Lo Curro photos, very unprofessional. Just remember, because you have angered me you will NEVER work for ANY magazine or newspaper in Chile.

Goodbye, great-grandson of a seamstress.

HURLEY & CO.

www. hurleyandcompany.com

An emailed request for comment from Micky Hurley has not been returned.

[Image via Facebook]

Jezebel On Miley Cyrus, Ratchet Culture and Accessorizing With Black People | Gawker Getting Sued by

Instagram's new video feature has already reached its logical conclusion: Twerkforthegram, which pro

A "Sheep-Eating" Plant Just Bloomed for the First Time in the UK

$
0
0

A "Sheep-Eating" Plant Just Bloomed for the First Time in the UK

“Sheep-eating” plants are not only a thing that exist; they've crossed the Atlantic from their native South America and are growing in the United Kingdom, where the first one bloomed on Thursday.

The plant, called the Puya chilensis, is covered with razor-sharp spines and has a 10-foot tall flower spike. It's been growing in the Royal Horticultural Society at Wisley for 15 years now.

But about the sheep-eating. From the BBC:

In the Andes it uses its sharp spines to snare and trap sheep and other animals, which slowly starve to death.

The animals then decay at the base of the plant, acting as a fertiliser.

As you might expect, the plant grown in the UK was not fertilized with the rotting flesh of a sheep, or any other animals.

"We keep it well fed with liquid fertiliser as feeding it on its natural diet might prove a bit problematic,” horticulturalist Cara Smith told the BBC.

"It's growing in the arid section of our glasshouse with its deadly spines well out of reach of both children and sheep alike."

[Image via Flickr]

To contact the author of this post, email taylor@gawker.com

Viewing all 24829 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images