Quantcast
Channel: Gawker
Viewing all 24829 articles
Browse latest View live

Obsessed Stalker Spends 6 Months Taping an Asshole Who Runs Red Lights

$
0
0

Who's worse in this situation? The jerk who keeps pulling the same dangerous stunt of faking a left turn so he can run a red and cut off the traffic going straight, or the stalker who's been recording this behavior for more than 6 months and turned it into a 20-minute montage?

Before you answer, consider that the red-light runner has apparently been doing the same thing for 2 years, and that the person following him around with a camera has spent 2 years seething about it.

Trick question. They're both awful.

If the cameraman's plan was to bust the reckless driver and stop him from endangering other motorists, it doesn't seem to have worked very well. If his plan was to maintain an obsessive hobby for months, though: great success!

[h/t Reddit]


10 Things En Vogue Wants You to Know About An En Vogue Christmas

$
0
0

I thought the Lifetime original movie An En Vogue Christmas, which premiered Saturday, would be a vaguely bio-pic trip down memory lane with a Christmas thread, but instead we got something a little more abstract. An En Vogue Christmas exists in a delightful quasi-reality where the era-defining musical group is also a clique of fictional characters, in the vein of real band/sitcom stars The Monkees.

The plot, briefly: young Kendall (Genelle Williams) grows up in a concert hall run by her dad and her uncle (national treasure David Alan Grier) where En Vogue often performs. Flash forward a couple decades, suddenly the concert hall needs a lot of cash! The only solution: another En Vogue concert! But will they come back together to do one last show? And what about all that money Kendall's Uncle stole from them?

Sure, the embezzlement plotline gets a little dry, but it serves to confine all the conflict and in-fighting between the fictional characters, leaving the ladies of En Vogue to float above it all until they swoop in and provide a Christmas Miracle in lieu of Santa Claus or Angel Clarence.

By existing in fiction, En Vogue Christmas becomes a platform for all the messages En Vogue wants to get across, without having to reference the group's complicated history. Shrewd move, and sort of fascinating? On a branding level, it's pretty fascinating to examine what En Vogue really really wants us to take away from this movie.

SUCH AS:

10. En Vogue is a trio. I'm going to guess this has something to do with her very public fretting that this movie would be a "trainwreck," but even in 90's flashbacks Dawn Robinson simply doesn't exist. The closest we get to acknowledging the group rose to fame as a quartet is the cryptic remark "It isn't the four of us anymore," which I had to rewind to catch.

10 Things En Vogue Wants You to Know About An En Vogue Christmas

9. En Vogue has a résumé that could knock you out of the park, see clip above.

8. There are a lot of international pop stars out there who can't harmonize to save their lives, but they're famous because their daddies pay for high-power publicists.

7. When En Vogue harmonizes magic fills the air, ghostly memories fill this mortal realm, and Christmas is saved.

6. If En Vogue ever announced they were going back on tour they would break the internet faster than a Kardashian butt covered in baby oil flies down a Slip n' Slide. They would be 75% of the trending social media in North America (or something)!

5. If you steal a lot of money from En Vogue, but then you use it to pay for your niece's college education, En Vogue will be pretty chill about it. En Vogue is sorta okay with you stealing from them if it's for college.

4. The ladies of En Vogue are angels.

3. The ladies of En Vogue love each other, love singing together, apparently they even spend major holidays together, but they aren't really into performing onstage together.

2. Your dorky white assistant does not impress En Vogue.

1. En Vogue knows the Lifetime regular viewers in your world—your mom, your aunt, your niece, myself—love the song Free Your Mind. The movie opened with a rendition of it and referenced it again about 18 times in the rest of the script. Even if you somehow skipped a decade worth of VMAS you still know: if you free your mind the rest will follow.

[Videos, image via Lifetime]

Morning After is a new home for television discussion online, brought to you by Gawker. Follow @GawkerMA and read more about it here.

Powerful Women: What Is Your Morning Routine?

$
0
0

Powerful Women: What Is Your Morning Routine?

Today, Forbes published a roundup of the "morning routines" of "12 Women Leaders." Sadly, Angela Merkel is not included in the roundup, but RLJ Lodging Trust CFO Leslie Hale is! Same diff. Here is a snippet of designer Stacey Bendet's morning routine:

4:45 Wake up and have a bowl of quinoa cereal. I do an hour or so of 3rd or 4th series ashtanga yoga.

6am My little ladies wake up and I make their breakfast—green milk (almond milk with coconut water, banana and steamed baby spinach) and either whole wheat French toast or pancakes. I usually run downstairs to get dressed while they eat and then I get them dressed and do their hair.

Weird, we have the same morning schedule. For contrast, here is woman leader/Gawker Managing Editor Lacey Donohue's morning routine:

Lacey: 4:45 a.m. wake up to buzz on my phone with someone asking me a question

Lacey: 5:00 turn alarm off when it goes off because i'm already up

Lacey: 5:05 chug entire glass of water because I read somewhere years ago that it's good for you

Leah Finnegan: do you put lemon in it?

Lacey: no, too much work

Lacey: 5:06 make coffee and turn on computer on the kitchen counter

Lacey: 5:07 put on bathrobe and uggs

Lacey: 5:08 begin work on couch

Lacey: 7:00 move to desk and take off bathrobe to be more dignified

Lacey: and then sometime between 7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m I sneak in a shower

Women can be so different from each other! Tell us below, powerful women, what is your morning routine?

[Photo via Shutterstock]

The Wrap Issues Bullshit Apology for "The Rape of Bill Cosby"

$
0
0

The Wrap Issues Bullshit Apology for "The Rape of Bill Cosby"

Hollywood trade news sweatshop The Wrap published a column by professional antagonist Richard Stellar this past weekend titled, "The Rape of Bill Cosby." Guess what the column was about.

Stellar's column opens with a strong sentiment: All the journos and writers and bloggers who have hopped on the Bill Cosby coverage train are prostitutes sucking Quantcast's dick: "The issue is the scurrilous environment where media outlets and journalists lie in wait, like aging corpulent prostitutes, their hair dyed flame red and their nails like elongated daggers — waiting to blow any John who dares to topple those who may be kings. It's once again an example of the TMZ-isation of journalism."http://gawker.com/bill-cosby-is-...

He quickly pivots to smarmy condescension, that we—the media—are failing to inform you of issues important to our democracy, "issues like Ferguson, IS, immigration reform, and 46 abducted students in Mexico."

But the heart of his piece is this paragraph, where he decries the dozens of women who have come forward with horrifying stories of having been allegedly drugged and sexually assaulted by Cosby as fame-whoring opportunists:

The concept of justice is disregarded. The statute of limitations is ignored. The recollections of events that happened as long as fifty years ago are dredged up by aging actresses who have one eye on the CNN camera, and the other on a book or reality show deal. If the statute of limitations was as long as the 15 minutes of fame that these lost souls are trying to recapture, then our prisons would be as vacant as the Holiday Inn in Acapulco (you probably have no idea what that means because you're not used to real news).

"I'm not saying that what these woman claim happened, didn't happen," Stellar quickly follows, seeing smoke. "I get it—Cos was the campfire that parents would sit at with their children, and chuckle at his homespun humor and life lessons." (You are not alone in thinking Stellar knighting Bill Cosby with a BFF nickname like "Cos" is queasy.) He decides to fling a can a lighter fluid on the fire, and puts the onus on the comedian's alleged victims (emphasis ours):

When we all retreated back to our tents with our tummys full of S'mores and toasted marshmallows, Cos was back in his tent, banging the camp counselor after doping her with quaaludes. Yes, that could well have happened, and once those women realized the violation that they endured at the hands of Cosby, then they should have reported it then — not a generation later.

http://gawker.com/who-wants-to-r...

Unsurprisingly, Stellar's piece drew vehement outrage, forcing Wrap editor Sharon Waxman to issue an apology of sorts yesterday ("About That Bill Cosby Post….") by distancing her and The Wrap from Stellar's position:

Our Hollyblogs are written by independent bloggers and represent their own views. Their blogs are edited, but not with the same scrutiny as staff writers who do represent TheWrap.

Richard Stellar has been blogging for TheWrap almost since the site has existed. His views are often contrarian, but that should never disqualify someone from a community forum.

On the other hand, an opinion piece with a contrarian view can provoke, but it should not offend. Clearly it has done so, and for that I apologize. That was not intentional.

Except...Waxman didn't actually have a problem with the column?

"I read the blog in advance of publication and felt – and still feel – that it represents a valid point of view," she wrote. "Stellar critiques the media – meaning, TheWrap, since we've covered this story extensively – for suddenly jumping all over this scandal, and he questions the motives of women coming forward now, since there is no real possibility of trying these cases in court."

Waxman then recites a classic (and hollow) First Amendment defense:

Many readers clearly disagree, but that is the very point of a community forum. What would be the point of only publishing points of view with which we agree? Allowing for dissenting views is essential to the exercise of free speech. The Cosby case strikes a nerve, partly because it is so at odds with the comedian's longtime public image, and because the alleged behavior so … well, sick.

The fierceness with which Stellar's views are attacked truly gives me pause (i.e. any questioning of an accusation makes him pro-rape?), and makes me wonder what we are losing in our society as polarized opinions retreat to their own echo chambers.

"My strong belief is that the antidote to speech you do not agree with is more speech. And more speech. That's the underpinning of our democracy," Waxman continued.

Sharon Waxman: Your right to free speech does not absolve you or Richard Stellar from being held responsible for the idiotic things you say. You cannot hurl shit from your website and then complain of having dirty hands.

Stellar issued his own update to the column (after Waxman neutralized the headline to "In Defense of Bill Cosby (Guest Opinion Blog)"). He admits to having been insensitive and moronic:

I apologize to anyone who has faced the horrific physical and mental pain that comes with forcible abuse and unwelcome sexual advances. Rape is a strong term, and we often forget that what might appear as protestations that are muted by either the deliberate or clandestine ingestion of drugs is as heinous as being forced to submit sexually at gun point. They are both rape. When you add that to a public figure who abuses that power, and considers his celebrity to be the ultimate aphrodisiac – you have a lethal combination that should not be defended.

Clearly, the women who have come forward now, do so more out of frustration with the legal system than, as I described, their desire to fix one eye on a CNN camera, and the other on a reality show contract. That was not only mean, but incendiary to anyone who has experienced that sort of abuse. I was reminded by people very close to me, that if any of those women were my daughter, friend, or close associate – I would take a different tact with Cosby that would not end up in a blog. I had to think about that, and admit that they were right.

And then, presumably comfortable with the taste of his own foot, he invokes the Holocaust. "I've prided myself in defending those who have no voices – the elderly, victims of child abuse, and survivors of the Holocaust," Stellar writes. "If a Holocaust survivor was discounted because they did not speak out many decades ago, I would be enraged. Therefore, I understand your rage."

Alleged victims of Bill Cosby: Richard Stellar and Sharon Waxman and The Wrap think you're attention-grubbing sycophants, but "understand your rage." How comforting.

[Image via Getty]

Why Don't We Eat Cranberry Sauce All Year?

$
0
0

Why Don't We Eat Cranberry Sauce All Year?

It is almost Thanksgiving time. You know what that means: cranberry sauce on your plate! Soon, Thanksgiving will be over. Then there's no more cranberry sauce on your plate. What's the reason for this treason?

Let's keep it real and factual. Consider the facts and only the facts.

1. Cranberry sauce is good.

I don't give a god damn if you eat it out of the can or if you make it fresh and fruity. It's mighty tasty. Now back to the facts.

2. You only really eat cranberry sauce during the holiday time.

Everyone gets the cranberry sauce at Thanksgiving. Some lucky sons of bitches get it at Christmas time too. Then for the rest of the year it's nowhere to be found. Don't tell me "it's in the grocery store" or "you can make it at home whenever you want to." That doesn't mean anything. It ain't on America's menu!

People eat turkey all year round. People eat mashed potatoes all year round. People eat stuffing, and macaroni and cheese, and biscuits, and pie all year round. (Except orange pie, and why not??)

And that's not all.

People eat corn all year round. People eat green bean casserole and sweet potato casserole all year round. People eat cornbread and buttery rolls all year round. People eat ham all year round. People eat all types of salad—whatever kind of salad your family happens to serve at Thanksgiving, be it simple iceberg lettuce or something more complex—all year round.

But people do not eat cranberry sauce all year round and it just doesn't add up.

What would make me "thankful" this year? Cranberry sauce, and its year-round availability as a common side dish anywhere you go.

I like cranberry sauce. You like cranberry sauce. Let's eat it—all the time.

[Photo: Flickr]

Inside The Secret Chinese Supercar Subculture Of Southern Californa

$
0
0

Inside The Secret Chinese Supercar Subculture Of Southern Californa

The Chinese government does not like its country's ultra-rich to show off their wealth. But their reach doesn't seem to cover Southern California, where the children of China's elite get to show off. How? With Lamborghinis and Maseratis, of course.

Chinese elite send their children to study in the United States. When they do, their parents give them enough money to buy as nice a car as they want.

Since flaunting your wealth is still frowned upon, these young, rich students organize private meets to see each other's rides.

Vocativ went to one of these meets and found a secretive car culture straight out of a movie.

"Why did you pick this car?" asks the interviewer of a student who picked up a $270,000 Ferrari California. Here's the guy's response, which is indicative of the spending power these kids command.

I just study in California, and this car's name is California. Very romantic.

This is not altogether different from what you find in many areas with rich Chinese students. Vancouver has a bit of a reputation for this. And China isn't the only country exports its wealthy kids to lead to supercar booms elsewhere. London is known for its Supercar Summer, where the wealthiest children of the Gulf states ride Lamborghinis, Ferraris, and everything else.

Watch the full video above to get a sense of why these kids drive Audis to school, but keep their top-of-the-line Maserati in the garage.

(Hat tip to Digg!)

Cross Lemond Bishop, Go Directly to Jail on Good Wife's Winter Finale

$
0
0

Last night, that CBS show about a stoic lawyer-mom everyone keeps telling you is crazy good (and that typically totes is), The Good Wife ended the first half of its sixth season with the trial of Logan Huntzberger lookalike Cary Agos.

At the risk of offending all the Judys from Marketing across the land, The Good Wife is not a perfect show. For all that it has going for it, the show's best assets (a phenomenal pool of recurring characters and a multifaceted lead character juggling multiple identities) can occasionally be its biggest liabilities. Season six has been running full steam ahead, never quite letting a new status quo settle before shaking it again. From Alicia now running for State's Attorney to the merging of her new firm with Diane Lockhart to reckoning with a privately open marriage, all while dealing with Cary's out-of-left-field federal prosecution, it has been both thrilling and exhausting. And though these are all interesting stories on their own, the necessary juggling act between them also occasionally lessens them. A year after the trauma of season 5, the show has yet to catch its breath.

To be clear, having a metric crap ton of great characters is obviously an asset but one that can occasionally feel like ADD, given the limitations of network television (forty-something minutes, twenty-two times a year.) The show's awareness of Alicia's overextended life lead to one of the best moments of its entire run when, earlier this season, Alicia learned that her teenage son Zach hid his girlfriend's abortion from her last season.

After necessarily sidelining him last year, this season has been all about Cary who, in the blink of an eye, found himself in a legal tailspin and facing 15 years of jail time. Despite opening a new firm together, Cary and Alicia's friendship has never quite matched Diane and Will's intimacy from earlier seasons. Season Six has succeeded in making their partnership and bond a self-evident fact of life for both characters. While we haven't seen them dance together, their professional kinship, cemented by their first hug just a few weeks ago, has become crucial to the show. It is ultimately what leads to Cary refusing to flee the country and will be all the more interesting to witness with him behind bars come January.

Cross Lemond Bishop, Go Directly to Jail on Good Wife's Winter Finale

The show has also been known to take some colossal missteps; all linked to Kalinda, oddly enough. From her husband to the unsatisfying conclusion of her friendship with Alicia, to her filler lesbian-hookup-of-the-week, the show has always struggled to find a place for its go-to bat-swinger. This season has given us a more grounded Kalinda by emotionally rooting her to Cary and having her go to great lengths to save him, including crossing Lemond Bishop, a drug kingpin whose toothy smiles could make Heisenberg shit himself.

So, 122 episodes in, is the Good Wife still a fantastic show? Yes, but like any show that has achieved greatness, you also can't help but hold it to its own standard. If nothing else, sending a lead character to jail for two years—an amount of time that's actually fully doable at this point—is another ballsy move by a show already known to take very wide swings.

  • With Archie Panjabi leaving at the end of this season, let's all have a preemptive moment of silence for her now inevitably gruesome cut-to-black death at the hands of Lemond Bishop.
  • Where is Robin?
  • Oh, hi Jackie. Bye Jackie.
  • NOT FEELING IT: Alicia's budding relationship with sad-eyed McGoo Finn (Matthew Goode). Sorry to all shippers, but his serene voice and shrug of a personality still do nothing for me.

[Images and video via CBS]

Morning After is a new home for television discussion online, brought to you by Gawker. Follow @GawkerMA and read more about it here.

A Snowstorm Will Make Your East Coast Thanksgiving Travel a Nightmare

$
0
0

A Snowstorm Will Make Your East Coast Thanksgiving Travel a Nightmare

A travel nightmare will unfold this week as odds increase that a highly disruptive snowstorm will affect the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast on Wednesday. Travel through all major cities from Washington D.C. to Boston will be heavily affected by this impending snowfall.

What's going on?

A Snowstorm Will Make Your East Coast Thanksgiving Travel a Nightmare

A trough in the jet stream is making its way towards the East Coast from the central Plains this morning, and it should get close enough to start messing with our weather by Wednesday. A developing low pressure system in the Gulf of Mexico will get kicked northeast by the approaching trough; the combined influence of the trough and upper-level divergence from the jet stream itself will provide optimal conditions for the low pressure system to quickly develop and strengthen as it tracks up the East Coast.

Coastal lows that originate in the Gulf of Mexico are nice and juicy with tropical moisture, so all of the models are in agreement that the storm will drop some heavy precipitation as it swings through. It's pretty certain that a storm will form at this point, but we have some lingering questions about details such as:

—Where will the worst happen?
—When will it hit?
—What kind of precipitation?
—How much will fall/accumulate?

Basically, the little details that matter are the ones we're still somewhat unsure of at this point.

What don't the forecasters know?

Often in situations like this, the most important aspect of a weather forecast isn't what we know, but rather what we don't know. The two biggest factors that will have a dramatic impact on who sees how much of what and when is track and temperature...and what are we unsure about at the moment? Track and temperature.

Track

Folks who live along the East Coast and follow weather forecasts know that the track of a coastal low means the difference between a sunny day, a washout, or a winter wonderland. There are three tracks that coastal lows can take:

A) The Fish

Out to sea, out of mind. When a coastal storm goes out to sea, it very rarely affects land and nobody but Bermuda and some ships have to worry about it. This is very unlikely to happen with this storm.

B) The Coastal Clinger

Some coastal storms wind up riding directly over the shoreline or a dozen or two miles inland. These storms often produce snow for the Appalachian Mountains and inland areas, while drenching the I-95 corridor in a cold, miserable rain. As these storms pull north and away from the megalopolis, cold air can wrap around and precipitation will often end as a small burst of snow.

This is one of the two possibilities, as is...

C) The Sweet Spot

Coastal lows that move parallel to the coast while staying a few dozen miles offshore are the "ideal" storms that produce blockbuster snows along the all-important I-95 corridor. These are the storms that shut down school for a few days and make people lose their ever-loving minds. There is one big caveat: if the low forms too far away from the coast, the precipitation shield could stay far enough offshore that it only affects coastal communities while sparing the heavily-populated areas.

LIKELY SCENARIO: A mix between B and C right now. The low will ride up the coast, but two dozen miles to the west or to the east is the difference between travel headaches and travel hell.

Temperature

Air temperatures through the bottom few thousand feet of the atmosphere are crucial when it comes to winter weather. If temperatures are too warm in that shallow layer above ground level, forget about it. The question of temperatures boils down to "where will the rain/snow line set up?"

Temperatures will be closely associated with the track of the low—if the low tracks too close to shore or even inland, warmer temperatures will follow and precipitation will be almost all rain for the major cities. If the low tracks further away from land, it can drag colder temperatures in closer to I-95, shifting the rain/snow line closer to the coast. A wobbly track could mean the precipitation starts as snow, changes to rain, then changes back to snow.

What do the models say?

The weather models are all in agreement that 1) a strengthening storm will traverse the East Coast on Wednesday, and 2) precipitation will begin Tuesday night in the southeast and spread through the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast by Wednesday. As we get closer to the event, models generally agree that the major cities will see at least some form of snowfall.

The GFS (American) model shows the storm affecting the southeastern United States on Tuesday night into Wednesday morning as all rain. The precipitation begins to encroach on the Mid-Atlantic before sunrise on Wednesday as mostly rain, before quickly changing over to snow during the mid-morning hours. The model sends the low right up that "sweet spot" track that brings snow to the entire I-95 corridor, save for rain right on the coast. The model shows the possibility of two to five inches of snow from central Virginia through the New York City metro area, with more from Connecticut up through Maine.

Then there's the GFS parallel upgrade, which is an improvement that runs parallel to the old model. If the GFS model is Coke, then the GFS upgrade is Diet Coke. Similar name, different taste. It shows almost the exact same scenario as the old GFS.

Here's a snap of the Old GFS at 54 hours, which is 1:00 PM Wednesday. The image shows mean sea level pressure (contours) with precipitation type (green/rain, blue/snow). If you look closely, there are thin blue and red contours over land. The blue contour is the 35°F line, and the red contour is the 32°F line.

A Snowstorm Will Make Your East Coast Thanksgiving Travel a Nightmare

...and here's the same image from the New GFS, showing almost the exact same thing at the same time:

A Snowstorm Will Make Your East Coast Thanksgiving Travel a Nightmare

The European model has been the most bullish about the snowstorm, showing the potential for at least a week now. The Euro tries to paint a major snowstorm with double-digit snowfall totals from the mountains of North Carolina straight northeast through Atlantic Canada. I think these snowfall totals are way overdone given the mediocre temperatures at the surface.

Even the NAM (North American Model) shows a modest blanket of snow falling from Charlottesville, Virginia northeast through all of the major cities.

How much snow will fall?

The big question. Let's look at the snowfall accumulation probabilities from the Weather Prediction Center. The following image shows the chances of four or more inches of snow accumulating during the storm. The red contour shows a high risk (70% chance) of at least four inches of snow—the WPC's latest thinking is that the worst snow will occur west of I-95.

A Snowstorm Will Make Your East Coast Thanksgiving Travel a Nightmare

Here are the odds of at least one inch of snow falling over a 24-hour period ending Thursday morning:

A Snowstorm Will Make Your East Coast Thanksgiving Travel a Nightmare

The big problem right now are forecast temperatures during the snowfall event. You can't have a major snowstorm with surface temperatures sitting at 34°F. If you take a quick look at the images from the two GFS models I posted above, you'll see that almost nobody but the mountains and central Pennsylvania are at or below freezing during the snowstorm. That's a HUGE problem with regard to accumulations.

What will likely happen?

Going region-by-region is the easiest way to cover the potential impact from Wednesday's storm, and it's worth noting that this all assumes that the European Model is stoned and producing snowfall totals far too high given surface temperatures mostly above freezing. Keep in mind that a small east or west deviation in the actual track of the low pressure system means the world in these situations.

All snowfall accumulations and maps shown below are directly from the area's respective National Weather Service office.

Washington D.C. and Baltimore:

A Snowstorm Will Make Your East Coast Thanksgiving Travel a Nightmare

BEST CASE SCENARIO: In the cities proper, rain mixed in with conversational snow at the end. West of the cities, the best case scenario is less snow that what NWS Sterling predicts as shown by the map above.

WORST CASE SCENARIO: In the cities proper, mostly snow, and up to five inches of it. West of the cities, more snow than shown on the map above. The best odds of accumulating snow in the D.C. area are, as usual, north and west of town.

Philadelphia:

BEST CASE SCENARIO: Same as Washington D.C.

WORST CASE SCENARIO: Rain quickly changing over to snow, with up to three inches possible.

The NWS office in Mount Holly, New Jersey did not produce a snowfall totals map (sorry!), but they say that the most likely scenario (as of 7:00 AM) is an inch of snow in Philly and Wilmington, Delaware, with much more as you head into central Pennsylvania.

Central Pennsylvania

A Snowstorm Will Make Your East Coast Thanksgiving Travel a Nightmare

BEST CASE SCENARIO: The low moves too far to the east (or rain holds on longer than forecast), cutting snowfall accumulation down below what NWS State College forecasts above.

WORST CASE SCENARIO: Tack on a few more inches to the predicted accumulations seen above.

New York City/Newark

A Snowstorm Will Make Your East Coast Thanksgiving Travel a Nightmare

BEST CASE SCENARIO: All rain.

WORST CASE SCENARIO: A couple of inches of snow after the rain changes over. It's worth noting that this is for New York City proper. A winter storm watch is in effect for northern New Jersey, a good chunk of southeastern New York, most of Connecticut outside of coastal communities, and western Massachusetts. The watch advises of the potential for 6-10 inches of snow, but the NWS office on Long Island warns that there will be a very sharp gradient between warning-level snow and a slushy inch. They think NYC proper will be on the "slushy inch" side of the rain/snow line, but any shift in the track could change this in a hurry.

Albany, New York

A Snowstorm Will Make Your East Coast Thanksgiving Travel a Nightmare

BEST CASE SCENARIO: Not as much snow as shown the map above.

WORST CASE SCENARIO: The amount of snow NWS Albany is forecasting, shown on the map above.

Boston

The following map shows the odds NWS Boston gives of at least two inches of snow:

A Snowstorm Will Make Your East Coast Thanksgiving Travel a Nightmare

BEST CASE SCENARIO: All rain in Boston proper with some snow at the end; negligible accumulation. Less than four inches in central Mass., southern New Hampshire, northern Connecticut.

WORST CASE SCENARIO: Shovelable snow in Boston proper. Close to double-digits in central Mass., southern New Hampshire, northern Connecticut.

North Country:

A Snowstorm Will Make Your East Coast Thanksgiving Travel a Nightmare

BEST CASE SCENARIO: The storm moves east and shirks the area out of significant snowfall.

WORST CASE SCENARIO: Again, tack on a few inches to the above snowfall forecast from NWS Burlington, who wins the prize for the prettiest maps.

Maine:

Neither of the NWS offices that cover Maine have produced snowfall maps yet, as each office waits until they issue winter storm watches/warnings to produce their forecast maps. However, if you live in Maine, you can extrapolate the maps from neighboring offices to figure out what you'll get. Most of populated Maine will see shovleable snowfall.

What do I need to know if I'm traveling?

If you're flying on Wednesday or any day through the weekend, be prepared for enormous delays or cancellations. Even if you're not flying through the cities affected, your plane might be routed through the region seeing snowfall. Cancellations and delays have a ripple effect through the system.

If you're driving, be prepared to stay home or have to take an alternate route to get to grandma's house. The sheer number of holiday travelers makes driving a mess as it is, but mix in snow on the roads with people who refuse to stay home, and we're likely going to see pileups on major highways. It will get ugly.

Keep in mind that rail travel is also affected by wintry weather if a certain amount of snow accumulates on the tracks. Just as if you were flying, be prepared for delays or cancellations and make sure you plan an alternative.

If it comes to fruition, this storm will be one that we talk about for years to come. It has the chance to make a mess of holiday travel and cause a headache on the busiest travel day of the year unlike any we've seen in decades. If you're traveling through the areas forecast to see snow, be prepared to stay home or eat airport food for longer than you'd like.

As more model runs come in and Wednesday draws closer, forecasters will continue to tweak their forecasts to account for changes. Keep checking your forecast, and make sure you're prepared for the first snowstorm of the year.

[Top image via AP, weather models via WeatherBELL, snowfall forecast images via the National Weather Service]


You can follow the author on Twitter or send him an email.


End Fraternities

$
0
0

End Fraternities

The University of Virginia, in response to a recent Rolling Stone article that exposes an alleged 2012 gang rape at the Phi Kapp Psi chapter on its campus, announced over the weekend that it was shutting down all of its fraternities immediately. The only problem with that announcement is that the university also said it plans to let the fraternities reopen January 9. The right time to bring back the fraternities is never.

That details of that incident illustrate not only how a young woman can get raped at college, but also how her school will try its hardest to do nothing about it. As Rolling Stone recounts it, a freshman student was befriended by a Kappa brother, who gained her trust over the course of the semester's few weeks. He invited her over to a party at the fraternity's towering home base, and there he brought her back to a room where he and six other men took turns raping her.

The events reported in that story are an especially gruesome version of an act that is far too common at America's fraternities—according to a 2007 study, men who enter fraternities are three times as likely to commit rape as their fellow students who do not. It is past time for the country's colleges and universities to shut down their fraternity systems, entirely and forever.

One can make the argument that fraternities do good things, and sometimes they do (often just so that they can later justify the bad shit, but I'll play along). Yet here is a simple truth: Fraternities facilitate a substantial number of rapes on college campuses that would not otherwise happen. To say that we must keep fraternities around even though they manufacture rape is to say we must accept one of humanity's most heinous acts as an unavoidable cost of operating a college campus. It is not, and we must not.

A supporter of the fraternity system, who agrees that the issue of rape at fraternities must be addressed, might argue for some nebulous idea of "reform." But why wait? Why let the slow churn of bureaucracy eventually produce something that might, at the very least, better help women after they have already been raped?

Why not, instead, eradicate the source of so many of these assaults in the first place, and why not do it immediately? Why not use the upcoming spring semester—and the subsequent summer—to wash our hands of fraternities? Why not significantly reduce the number of rapists and rape victims in our next round of incoming freshmen?

Reform means trusting the same people—the deans and presidents and administrators—who have failed to protect young women, and failed to punish the men that have hurt those young women. Here is another simple truth: The act of rape has been allowed to prosper at fraternities for decades because it was convenient for the people who run colleges to have it that way.

Now, in this moment, it is no longer convenient for the people who run colleges to allow rape to prosper at their fraternities, so they are discussing what might be done to curb it. But when the media attention dissipates—and it will dissipate—will the people who run colleges again find it more convenient to let a culture of unchecked sexual assault prosper at their fraternities? Why even risk that they will?

A supporter of the fraternity system might argue that merely eliminating fraternities will not end the problem of rape in and around college campuses. This is true. But because we cannot snap our fingers and erase rape does not mean that we shouldn't try and start that process by snapping our fingers and erasing fraternities. When it comes to combating sexual assaults on campus, we must start somewhere. Ending fraternities, it is clear, would be the most effective place to start.

If we eliminate fraternities, won't young men on college campuses just find somewhere other than fraternities to commit rape? Some will, and if you ever were looking for a reason to get behind the "ban men" meme, this would be it. But fraternities produce rapists at a rate much higher than the rest of the college population. It is not a coincidence. There are statistics, backed by common sense.

There are very few other reasons, even at colleges, for 30 or so young men to congregate daily, in private, in an environment that has proven to facilitate sexual assault. There are very few places, even in college towns, that provide the space for 30 or so young men to gather women on the weekends, serve them alcohol (and other substances mixed with alcohol), and take them away to private rooms if they decide that they want to rape them.

Fraternity houses—with their big open rooms that branch out into smaller, darker, locked rooms—provide that space. In Rolling Stone's account of the UVA case, a fraternity brother and her date left an area where dozens of people were dancing and drinking, and he led her down a hallway and into another room. This in itself did not seem suspicious, as the victim describes it, but standing in that room were six other men, who had been waiting patiently to rape this specific victim.

The entire alleged crime was institutional and collective: fraternity members, using their fraternity house. No fraternity, no gang rape.

Phi Kappa Psi, like all fraternities, exists to teach bad values to developing young man. Sent off to campus to educate themselves as individuals, fraternity members instead learn to subordinate their values and plans to a collective. After a torturous and dehumanizing selection process, fraternity members are able to write a check and purchase 30 new friends; it's not surprising that they would see sex—pour a drink, girl is yours—as similarly transactional.

The needed reforms around rape on college campuses are complex. Lawmakers and administrators need to develop new systemic policies that will protect victims and actively identify, punish, and prosecute students who have committed sexual assaults. Meanwhile, though, they need to stop those rapes from happening in the first place. There's no easier way to start that process than by eliminating fraternities.

This may sound drastic. It is not. Colleges have already decided amongst themselves that eliminating fraternities is a quick and simple way of immediately reducing instances of sexual assault.

By deciding to suspend its fraternities temporarily, the University of Virginia has acknowledged that those frats cannot be implicated in any new offenses while the eyes of America are watching. It is a tacit admission that the school cannot risk, not now, another sexual assault being committed. It has decided that the easiest and most palatable way for this to happen—for UVA's fraternity brothers not to rape—is for its fraternities to cease to exist.

So why bring them back? Shut them down and move on.

Man Stabbed 9 Times in Fight With Catcaller Who Harassed His Girlfriend

$
0
0

Man Stabbed 9 Times in Fight With Catcaller Who Harassed His Girlfriend

A San Francisco man was stabbed nine times in the arms, face, neck and back during a confrontation with a catcaller who had been following him and his girlfriend, San Francisco's ABC News 7 reports.

Ben Schwartz said he and his girlfriend, Miyoko Moody, were walking home through the Tenderloin two Saturdays ago when a man started catcalling Moody and shouting obscene comments. He says they tried to ignore the harasser and cross the street, but the man followed them.

"It turned violent very quickly, punches thrown," Schwartz told ABC 7. "Next thing I know, I kinda had a knife in the back of my neck."

Schwartz said doctors told him the knife barely missed his spinal cord. His right lung was punctured, and he's in a wheelchair, but it's only temporary.

The alleged stabber fled the scene in a silver sedan, and is still at large.

Moody started a crowdfunding effort to help with Schwartz's medical bills, and it has raised just over $30,000 in four days. Some of that money came from friends and family, but much of it was donated by strangers applauding Schwartz for confronting the catcaller.

"It's really hard to believe that guys can say vulgar and dirty crap to women and just get away with being creeps all day. It's just unacceptable behavior," Moody wrote on her GoFundMe page.

[h/t Daily Dot, Photo: ABC 7]

Woman Allegedly Kills Herself While Waving Gun She Bought for Ferguson

$
0
0

Woman Allegedly Kills Herself While Waving Gun She Bought for Ferguson

With the Darren Wilson decision on the horizon and the possibility of renewed unrest in Ferguson, paranoid Missourians are buying lots and lots of guns. In a story that sounds too pat to be true, one such new firearm owner allegedly accidentally killed herself over the weekend while waving her gun and saying "we're ready for Ferguson!"

According to Becca Campbell's boyfriend, the 26-year-old woman was riding shotgun in his car with the gun in her hand when he rear-ended the car in front of him. From CNN:

He told investigators that as they drove late Friday night, the victim waved a gun, jokingly saying the couple were ready for Ferguson, the sources said.

He ducked to get out of the way of the gun and accidentally rear-ended another car. He said the accident caused the gun to go off and she was struck by a bullet in the head, the sources said.

The victim was rushed to a hospital but died.

The shooting took place in downtown St. Louis, "in an area dominated by vacant lots beside a football stadium," CNN reports. Police are investigating the veracity of the boyfriend's story, which, given the puzzling physics—he ducked to avoid the gun, and the crash turned it around 180 degrees to point at her head?—is probably a good idea.

[Image via AP]

The grand jury decision on Ferguson, Missouri, police officer Darren Wilson in the killing of unarme

$
0
0

The grand jury decision on Ferguson, Missouri, police officer Darren Wilson in the killing of unarmed black teenager Michael Brown is in, the Washington Post reports, but it isn't clear yet whether Wilson will be indicted. We'll update when more information becomes available.

Homeland Last Night Was So Fucking Nuts Even for Homeland

$
0
0

Homeland Last Night Was So Fucking Nuts Even for Homeland

While the rumbling of Homeland's return to awesomeness has been increasing for several weeks, it was last night's episode ("Something Else Is Going On") that proved the true test: Putting such a hugely transitional episode just before the Thanksgiving holiday break means pressure to carry that momentum across the next two weeks.

So how did they do? Remember that the parallel episode ("About a Boy," episode 5) began this act with Saul's kidnapping, which means that wherever we're heading it was set up this week, with Saul and Carrie hopefully returning to the relative safety of American soil, Dennis Boyd's and Carrie's opposite contacts making their moves in the ISI, and (more urgently) the Taliban infiltrating the embassy's underground complex.

We also got to see Carrie talk Saul out of, by my count, his fifth suicide attempt in the last two weeks. This one ended better! (With nobody suiciding, despite everybody being rigged to blow.)

Carrie went ham on Dennis Boyd, which after two-thirds of a season showing her particularly in the weeds (rather than crazy-on-purpose, like last year) was a sight to see. Not since she took Brody the hell down in that bloodbath of a hotel scene have we seen her in such a controlled, shining rage.

Other than that little matter of trampling every one of Boyd's civil rights before his wife went in for the kill, though, the Drone Queen has become quite the little pacifist, going down the same track as Quinn did last year. Here's hoping she also learns a valuable lesson about body shaming by the end of it!

...Oh, unless she is dead. Because of course there's also Carrie, Saul and their entire convoy getting blown the fuck up, which on reflection is probably what flipped Alyssa out, of all the stuff that went down.

Morning After is a new home for television discussion online, brought to you by Gawker. Follow @GawkerMA and read more about it here.

Chrissy Teigen Has a Thanksgiving Dinner Manifesto

$
0
0

Chrissy Teigen Has a Thanksgiving Dinner Manifesto

Supermodel, aspiring magician, and self-proclaimed demotivational speaker Chrissy Teigen would like to remind you of one important truth this Thanksgiving: Turkey is trash.

Below, Teigen's Great Thanksgiving Dinner Manifesto of 2014.

[Image via Getty]

Here is a helpful set of instructions about the best ways to discuss the Bill Cosby allegations over


'Law and Justice Aren't the Same': Interview With a UVA Rape Survivor

$
0
0

'Law and Justice Aren't the Same': Interview With a UVA Rape Survivor

In the history of UVA, only 14 students have ever been found guilty of sexual misconduct. One of these cases was adjudicated in September 2006, while I was attending the school as an undergrad, and—though I didn't know it at the time—in class with the woman (who we'll call Kelly in this interview) who'd spent 10 months waiting for her case to be tried.

We haven't seen each other since that semester, but when I saw her allude to her experience on Facebook, I reached out, wondering what it takes to get a case through UVA's fairly complicated internal system. We talked on the phone this weekend, and what I found out was: it takes a lot.

So, the Rolling Stone article.

I want to say right off that I think UVA is fairly unremarkable. That everything I went through was pretty par for the course. People are saying stuff like, "Don't send your daughters to UVA," and even after what I've been through I don't agree. I got a really good education in spite of the system. A friend of mine was assaulted the same time that I was at another elite school in the South, and her Title IX trial was super fucked-up. Mine was bad—I went through the documents today and found some significant issues—but hers was so much worse.

I agree with you that UVA feels like it's par for the course—although to me that's more an indictment of the average than credit for the school—but I would also guess that the fact you were able to get a good education is indicative of the same tenacity that got you through this process.

Yeah. But my point is that girls aren't really better off at any other schools in particular. The culture and Title IX procedures at other schools are just as bad as UVA, if not worse. They all need to change.

Let's start from the beginning. You got to UVA in the fall of 2005.

Yes. I think my first few months of school were pretty average. I was very social, I had a big group of friends, I went to class, I went out. And like it said in the Rolling Stone article, and I bet you remember—Rugby Road in August and September is just choked with first-years, and you're walking around like, "Let's go into this random party and dance our faces off." That's how it was when I got there. It was really fun. I didn't have any problems or come to any harm.

There were some guys on the first floor of my dorm who'd started to get to know these guys in this one frat. And they were like, "We know the brothers, we can get into the party faster, we can drink upstairs." At the time, that sounded great. Free booze, you know?

Oh, definitely.

So I probably hung out upstairs at the house with these frat brothers four or five times without incident. I'd go dance with my friends on the dance floor, then go upstairs and drink with them, and it was a good time. I'd see them walking to class, we'd all say hello, they'd ask me if I was hanging out that weekend, I'd say yes. We were cool with one another.

And then it was November 11, 2005. I went out with my friend for her birthday, and we planned our meal around our later drinking—we got heavy Chinese food, made sure to eat a lot of rice. We decided to go to that frat afterwards. So we get in the line, and you remember how they ask you two questions at the door: are you a student, are you 21?

Yeah.

We said yes to both. And then we get some beers, start dancing. I probably had had about four beers before I got into the bathroom line. I should say I'm sober now, but at the time I didn't understand how heavy a drinker I was—and of course, the bathroom line was taking forever. One of the brothers I knew said, "I'll take you upstairs, you can use the bathroom there." I said thank you and followed him. Then he was like, "Would you like to hang out in my room and have a few drinks?"

That wasn't abnormal—we'd done that before. So I went into his room. I was sitting at his desk chair, and there were two other people in the room, one frat brother and another first-year girl. I didn't know them. The guy's back is to me as he's mixing his drinks, but the other two people—as I'd find out later—had a clear view.

So he comes over, hands me a drink. It was gross, like Aristocrat vodka and Crystal Light. He says, jokingly, "I put three roofies in yours." He looks at the other girl and says, "I put two roofies in yours." And to the brother: "I put no roofies in yours."

I felt a little uncomfortable, but I didn't think he was serious. We're joking, drinking. Then he comes over and is like, "Don't nurse that, hurry up." He's trying to tip my cup into my mouth; he mixes me another drink before I'm done with the first one. I was uncomfortable, but I also didn't know how to politely say no. He's like, "Chug it, don't be a pussy."

I drink awkwardly. Then I say I'm going to go downstairs and find my girlfriends. He follows me, he's glued to me like Velcro. I try to lose him in the party—there are like 200 people there—and I find my girlfriends, then the guy finds me again. He's like, "Why did you ditch me?" I get away from him with my girlfriends again.

But then later, we're back in the bathroom line, and he finds us and tells us we can use his bathroom upstairs. So we do. And we go into his room when he offers us drinks. And he did the same thing he did the previous time—poured me a strong drink, and then gave me another before I was done with the first. He only gave my friend one drink. And I remember sitting in that room leaning on my friend's shoulder, thinking how fun it was, saying, "Laura, I love you."

That's the last thing I remember.

What happened when you woke up?

I woke up with an awful feeling. The first thing I noticed was that my hair was dripping wet with sweat. I was burning up. I was in a bed, not my bed, not Laura's bed. When I recognized that I was in that guy's room from last night I immediately felt even sicker. I couldn't move at all. I felt so physically ill. I'd never felt anything like that.

Were you roofied? I've been roofied—at 16, by a guy who was in his mid-twenties—and the physical sensation on waking up was the most insane thing I've ever experienced. Not a hangover. It's distinct and different.

It's inconclusive. I know exactly what you're talking about: I was roofied a few years after that in a situation where there was no question about what had happened—and the feeling in the morning was the same.

But in this case, the two students who were in the room the first time said they didn't see him putting anything in there. And, counting up the number of drinks I'd had, I could have just experienced an alcoholic blackout. He was pouring me vodka doubles. I didn't know he had put that much vodka in them, and I had four to six of them, according to him.

Either way it's immaterial.

Yeah. So you wake up super sick. Had you been feeling sick at all the night before?

I'd felt completely fine the night before. So my boots are off, my dress is on, but it's twisted. I have no underwear. I look around and see my underwear on the end of the couch, on the other side of the room. I tried to get out of bed but I literally couldn't move. I couldn't even crawl.

I lie there for a while. No one is in the room with me. And then I hear voices in the hallway. One is the guy in question, and there are two other guys talking to him. I hear one of them say, "[This guy] is a necrophiliac, he likes to fuck dead girls."

I realized they were talking about me. They keep joking, like, "What are we gonna do, there's a dead girl in your bed."

I went into immediate survival mode. I start thinking, I need to play this smart. I can't confront them and say, "You motherfucker, what the fuck happened." So he comes back in the room, like, "You're awake? I was really worried about you."

I was like, "Oh yeah?" I ask him what happened. I tell him the last thing I remember was sitting in his room drinking. He says, "We did some shit, we hooked up, and then you got sick."

That was the end of my emotional bandwidth. I stopped asking questions.

How did you get out of there?

It was not good. It was the day of the Georgia Tech game—a home game—so there's bumper-to-bumper traffic across Charlottesville, no buses running, no cabs. I was too far away from [my dorm] to walk in the state I was in. [ed. note: it's at least a mile from any frat house to Kelly's dorm].

So they offer to give me a ride and I say yes. I'm trying to play it cool. One of the brothers—not one of the ones who assaulted me—borrows a car and takes me home. He drops me off, says, "We had such a good time last night."

It was November 12. I went in the shower, which was a mistake, but I didn't think about that—all I could think was that I just needed a shower.

Was your mind on what had happened the night before?

No. I couldn't deal with it. I was just trying to manage being so physically ill.

When did you start to process what had happened?

Sunday night I was trying to do my homework, and I couldn't. The thoughts of what happened on Friday were too invasive. I turned on some TV to white-noise it out, and Grey's Anatomy was on, and it was an episode about date rape. This girl was like, "I don't know if I've been date-raped," and then she tells this story that's not too different from mine. On the show the doctors say, "You've definitely been date-raped." And I was like, holy shit.

I went downstairs to a guy on the first floor. He said, "I think you should talk to an residential advisor." I find an RA, who says, "I think it would be good to report this. I'm going to call the police." So the police came. Everyone in the dorm starts talking—word spreads that someone's been raped. I was mortified. The cops take my clothes, take stuff for evidence, they take me to the hospital to get a rape kit.

The hospital was the worst experience of my life. Rape kits are intense to begin with: You have a group of people examining your body, they take hairs from your head, 25 pubes, they're looking at every single orifice, swabbing everything. And the nurses who did it were awful, talking about me as if I weren't there. Finally when they do talk to me, they're like, "Wow, you're not crying very much. Most people cry a lot. Are you really sure that you were raped?"

I was like, fuck off. But I didn't say anything. I was just doing what I needed to do to get through each event. And I'm from an Irish Catholic family, you know? We put our shit in a tiny little box and lock it down.

Let me ask you. Did you know you'd had sex with him?

Yes.

Had you known as soon as you woke up?

Yeah. I could feel it. I don't know what kind of sex—he says that he just inserted his fingers in my vagina. I'm not sure about that. We agree that something happened, anyway. And I never got the results of the rape kit. They were like, "You took a shower, it's been more than 24 hours, we can tell you probably had sex and that's about it."

So the rape kit was a waste of my time, almost. But one of the cops told me—and I'm glad he did—that even if I didn't decide to pursue something, I shouldn't shut doors on myself.

Let me ask you another question, which I want to preface by saying I understand, personally and well, that there's a massive difference between drunk or even blackout sex and rape. But, some people really fear the potential gray area—they fear that some girls will think "regrettable" and cry assault.

I find that idea very out of step with reality, but it's worth asking: how did you know the difference? How did you know when you woke up that you hadn't consented? That it wasn't just, you got drunk and had sex?

Because I couldn't take a breath without hearing those guys joke about fucking my dead body. I knew very deep down that something horrific had happened. I knew I had not had the chance to make the choice. I did not want to fuck that guy. I did not in any way want to give him access to my body.

I know, when I've had drunk sex—vague memories, unclear situations—that I was an active participant. People would tell me the morning after, "You said this, you did this," and I'd be like, "Sure, that sounds like me."

There is a difference between having drunk sex and having someone penetrate you when you are lying there, basically unconscious. The thing is, I had a previous experience. I'd been raped in high school. I had gotten really drunk, and my friends dropped me off at my house and put me in bed. This person broke into my house and had sex with my unconscious body.

Wow. That's horrific.

And this time felt just like that time. The feelings inside me were wrong in the same way.

Had you told anyone?

I told my two best friends, who told me I was a drunk slut. I never told anyone after that.

What made you decide to say something at UVA?

I wasn't 15 anymore. I wasn't that much older—I was 18—but I had been sitting with the knowledge that the guy in high school was still hurting other girls. And I couldn't stand the idea of letting this frat guy keep doing it.

What happened this time when you told your friends?

People were more supportive this time around, but not everyone. Two of those guys who had introduced me to the frat in the first place were like, "Well, we really want to rush that frat."

I'd say, "You know they did this to me."

They're like, "Well, they say you're lying."

What did they say you were lying about?

The guy was saying, "I asked you, you said yes, you don't remember." I had to explain over and over again that I was too incapacitated to consent, and I never would have to begin with.

When did you start thinking about bringing the issue up formally?

I started talking to deans at the school right away. The part of the Rolling Stone article that vilifies the deans at UVA—that wasn't my experience. Every single person in the administration said, "I'm sorry. Here are your options. What do you want to do?"

That was important. If you have been traumatized and had your power to choose taken away from you, it doesn't help to be railroaded into any situation. You can't be forced to testify, forced into an investigation. Bringing your rapist to light isn't always going to make the trauma better.

When did you decide to go through with proceedings?

Later that month.

What made you decide?

I was mad as hell. And one of the things that pushed me to the point of feeling like I had a case was that my girlfriends had been trying to find me before they left that party. There are always guys guarding the stairs, and they asked about me—they said, she was with [this guy], we need to find her. The stair guards were like, "They didn't go upstairs."

They described the guy, named him. The stair guards flat-out lied and said, "That guy isn't a brother here. We don't know who you're even talking about."

My friends got suspicious. They waited for the stair guards to leave. It was like 3 a.m. at this point, and they went to the room I had been in before—the room I woke up in—and they knocked and knocked and no one answered.

That's chilling that they pretended they didn't know him.

Then later, I found out that a guy in my dorm—a guy who didn't know me—had been at that party. He came home that night and said to one of his friends, "I just saw something really fucked-up." He described a girl being carried up the stairs, arms around guys' shoulders, someone pushing her legs up. He went to the stair guards—the same guys—and said, "That girl doesn't look okay." The guys said, "She's drunk, but we're taking care of it."

He came home freaked out. And he kept talking about it, and later he was with one of my girlfriends, and he told the story, saying, "I heard someone in the dorm was raped, and I'm worried that it was that girl." And my friend realized it was me. They put the stories together. So the guy contacted me and said, "I saw this and I want to help."

I'm so grateful to that guy. The only reason I think I got traction was because he was a third-party witness who didn't previously know me. His testimony made my case for me.

What was the frat guy's versions of events?

That we walked up the stairs totally fine, and started making out. He said I pulled down my dress and exposed my breasts, and he asked me if I was okay with everything, and I said yes, and then he started fingering me and asked me if I was okay, and I said yes.

And then I started puking, and they "took care of me." But one of the brothers had an older sister who was visiting. She was a nurse, and she testified, saying, in these words, "Her breathing was ragged but she was breathing. Her pulse was low, in the 20s and 30s, but she had a pulse."

At that, some people on the panel's jaws dropped. Like, her pulse was in the 30s and you didn't call the fucking ambulance? That's the fundamental issue with his story. "We were taking care of you." If they gave two shits they would have called 911.

So you had third-party witnesses. Did you consider a criminal trial?

I did, for a while. I spent probably 20 hours in the police department—the office ultimately was like, "We want you to help you, but it'll be really hard to win beyond a reasonable doubt at trial."

I don't think it's wrong that they told me that. I think it's good they told me the truth. They told me that all of my life choices would be dragged through the mud, and that was true: the Liz Seccuro trial was happening at the same time, and even for her—a 17-year-old virgin at the time of her rape—all her decisions were being questioned.

I was not a perfect victim. And I couldn't have done a criminal trial without my parents' help, and I couldn't tell them. I didn't tell them about the first rape, and I couldn't tell them about the second one. They are great, supportive parents who always loved me unconditionally and I couldn't bear to break their hearts.

Do they know now?

Yeah, they've put it together. They know now. My dad called me crying after I posted that Facebook status about the Rolling Stone article. He asked me why I didn't ask them for help. I told them the truth—that I wanted to protect them.

But now, if I were to give anyone advice, I would say: tell your parents.

Yes. So, you decide against the criminal trial. What are your options?

So, through Title IX, any school receiving federal funding has to create an atmosphere of education that is not hostile, which means one in which sexual assault is taken seriously. Each school develops its own programs under those guidelines. (Ed. note: here is UVA's policy.)

The first option is a formal trial in front of the Sexual Assault Board. Each person has an advocate—someone from the school who's trained in this type of case. You can also have outside legal representation who guides you, but who can't ask questions or cross-examine. The cases are heard by a chair—usually a dean—and two faculty members and three students. You give your position, present your witnesses, wrap up with an impact statement; the panel deliberates and gives a judgment in writing in two weeks.

Your other options are less formal. A dean can hear both sides and make a decision; or, you can go in with the accused party for mediation, which works well for harassment but not for this.

I want to say, again, that at every step the deans were very helpful. It was only the kids around me who were saying, "You were just drunk, you're lying." I think the deans are working in a broken system. (Ed. note: Dean Eramo, the current head of the Sexual Misconduct Board and the subject of attention in the Rolling Stone piece, took her position shortly after Kelly's trial in 2006.)

What specifically do you think of as broken?

After the trial was over, I was given a packet of manila envelopes with details about the proceedings that I never went through, because every time I think about what he said I want to puke.

But I opened those envelopes today. Reading through them, they made some really big mistakes. First, they used a standard of evidence called "clear and convincing." The legal standard of evidence that should be used in these cases is "preponderant," which is a lower standard of evidence.

This is a major problem, and it was only officially corrected at UVA in 2011, when the school came under investigation by the Department of Education following the "Dear Colleague" letter, which clarified Title IX responsibilities that had been on the books in clear wording since 1972—that is a massive fuck-up.

Another problem was—well, to give background, Dean Laushway really went to bat for me. He found out about my story, and in the spring of 2006, he brought charges against the frat to UJC, saying they had violated numerous policies.

(Ed. note: UJC is the University Judiciary Committee, which hears cases of alleged misconduct by UVA students or student groups. Anyone can file a case, and the UJC can impose any sanction. This is separate from the Honor Committee, another internal governing entity at UVA, which adjudicates allegations of lying, cheating, and stealing, and only has the single sanction of expulsion.)

Was his complaint successful?

Yes, they lost their charter and were kicked off campus.

It's good that you didn't have to bring that charge yourself.

Yeah. In that trial, I was a witness and not the complainant.

But afterwards, in response, the president of the fraternity filed honor charges against me and my two friends—saying that we had lied at the door about our age, and that we had admitted as much in the UJC trial. He served us with papers on a Friday and we couldn't do anything about it until Monday. And we had lied about our age, and we'd admitted it. There was clear grounds to expel us. We were terrified. (Ed. note: as the Rolling Stone article pointed out, 183 students have been expelled from UVA for honor-code violations, but none have ever been expelled for sexual assault.)

The charges quickly came under bias review, and they were dismissed, but the fraternity president just got to walk away knowing it would stay on all of our records that we were accused. One of my friends had to have Dean Laushway vouch for her before taking the bar exam, and has had to deal with this accusation every time she's applied for a government job.

Also, within that UJC trial, my side was defended by a fourth-year college student; the frat was defended by a law student. It wasn't fair.

But the frat lost their charter anyway.

And their activities were suspended until trial was over.

Did they actually suspend their activities? I remember the frats that got in trouble always just had smaller parties.

They did carry on hanging out, but the situation affected their pledging (Ed. note: UVA rush happens in January)—and all of those guys fucking hated me.

On a personal level, how were you dealing? Did this change your sex life?

The guy who did it to me was an international student. He looked a particular way, and I ended up sleeping with a lot of people who looked like him. One of the things I've talked a lot about with my therapist is that—it's very well documented that a lot of people who were raped seek out situations that recreate their rape, except for the fact that they're in charge.

So the UJC frat trial happened in the spring of 2006. When did the Title IX trial start?

The next September. The student knew I had lodged a complaint against him, and he had been gone from school since the fall semester of 2005, on advice from his family and lawyers.

Why did it take till September 2006 for the Title IX trial?

I don't know. I always said, I want to do this right fucking now.

Right now like after the UJC trial?

Right now like November 2005.

So it took 10 months. Where was your head at?

I was a ball of rage. And anger is not always useful, but at the time, it was my only fuel.

What specifically were you angry about?

He betrayed me. I had considered this guy kind of a friend. And he genuinely believed he had done nothing wrong. He would not for a second admit he had done anything wrong.

Right. Like to have sex with someone that has never expressed any sexual interest in you and that you personally got so drunk as to require medical attention—like that's just part of college.

Yeah. He genuinely believed that, and so did all of those guys. He was honestly an average dude. Bro McBroster. They all thought it was okay. And as much as I love UVA, that's really part of the foundational culture—the capacity to sustain a deep lie. The whole school venerates Thomas Jefferson, the man who said all men are created equal but also owned slaves.

I understand the capacity of people to lie to themselves. I've done it. I denied what happened to me in high school for years. And everyone at UVA is smart. They are smart kids, smart people. They entered a good university with a frat culture where you're told, "You get girls drunk and then you can fuck them and that's what we all do."

That's real.

There's a definite difference between getting drunk and having sex you don't totally remember and being so drunk that consent is not attainable at all. People say it's a fine line, and it might be: but only if you're not interested in consent—if you feel that you don't need to obtain it.

And these guys just enter this culture. They didn't create it. They just inherit it and then perpetuate it.

It also works to their favor. The Greek system is about organizing social capital and leveraging it: people will always want to keep whatever power they've got.

Yeah. And first-years at UVA can't really drink in dorms because they'll get in trouble, and they can't go to bars, and sororities are dry (Ed. note: an across-the-board UVA tradition), and they don't know the upperclassmen that have house parties, so they go to frats.

The fact that UVA sorority houses don't allow alcohol at them is dumb. Let the girls throw the parties. Everyone will get drunk and far fewer people will be assaulted.

I lived in my sorority house and my boyfriend couldn't spend the night there. Compare that to frat houses, and it's just—

It sounds like a joke to say that sororities should loosen their regulations as a means to lessening violence—but at least as far as UVA goes, if the Greek system lasts much longer, I think that's true. There's a double consciousness there—a sustained, public-facing lie about who wants what and how they can, or have to, get it.

Yeah. You can't end rape. But you can do big things to change the environment and reduce the risk. As it is right now, like the Rolling Stone article said, girls are barreled into a default situation where every variable is controlled by frat boys.

Back to your Title IX trial. What's it like?

11 a.m. to 10 p.m., and deliberation the day after.

You had to wait 10 months for a single day's trial?

Yeah. The guy called in for it—he'd withdrawn from the university.

Was that mandated by UVA?

No, it was voluntary. In the meantime, though, the frat boys were still on my case. One time someone walked up behind me on campus and whispered in my ear, "You fucking lying whore." I froze, too scared to turn around.

Would you have wanted him off campus no matter what?

Yes.

But you didn't have to formalize his departure, because he left.

Yes. And so, he phones in to the trial. The panel's asking me questions that they never ask him. The first question they ask me is, "Are you gay?"

What? Why?

My understanding was that—in their reasoning—if I didn't like dick, I would be less likely to have consented. But at the time I was 19, what the hell did I know? I was so unprepared. I wish I had lawyered up. I wish I'd had a Title IX lawyer to tell me that wasn't fair.

You never consulted with one.

No. I trusted the school would treat me fairly. I couldn't afford a lawyer myself and I didn't want to tell my parents. I'm so glad that alumna started a Crowdrise fund to help girls with legal defense—I could have used that.

What else did they ask you?

The male faculty member on the panel, a computer science professor, kept repeating these questions over and over: Had I ever cheated on a boyfriend? Had I ever had sex with multiple people at the same time? How many sexual partners?

Those kinds of questions are explicitly prohibited by Title IX, but they had a real effect. I started being like, "Did I deserve this? Maybe I deserved all of this."

Right. People draw a connective line, and it feels like a real one.

Yeah. And they didn't even ask the guy how much he drank that night, anything about his sex life. That male faculty member kept asking me, "Why the hell would you drink so much? Why?"

That was a question that I was really beating myself up about internally. I'm an alcoholic, I know that now, but all I knew then was that I had a hard time stopping drinking once I started.

You've been sober now for how long?

Two years.

That's great.

Yeah. I did honestly use alcohol to cope during college, and it did help me, until it couldn't help me anymore. I went to UVA mental health services multiple times during the wait for that trial and said, "If you do not lock me up right now, I am going to commit suicide." Once there were no beds in the hospital, and they gave me a bunch of Seroquel and kicked me out the door.

I called one of my girlfriends, who had to carry me to a bus stop, and carry me back to my dorm. I was drooling and nonfunctional—Seroquel is nothing to fuck with. She put me in bed and I slept for 36 hours straight.

Really?

Yeah. If she hadn't been there—

Did anyone acknowledge that you were experiencing a normal response to trauma?

They did. A few people at Counseling and Psychological Services helped me—they would email my professors, let them know I needed extensions, explain why I missed class.

Did you ever consider withdrawing?

My academic dean suggested I withdraw and it made me mad as hell. Sometimes, of course, it's the right choice to recover and not fight. But at the time I felt like, I would rather die than give my education up. That it was my school, I deserved to be there, to get my fucking degree.

So, the trial. What was the verdict and how was it given to you?

I got a letter that is still very hard to read. They decided he was not guilty of sexual assault, but he was guilty of sexual misconduct. It was because he knew he'd served me those drinks, four to six double vodka drinks and a beer. The sexual assault board agreed that I was intoxicated past the point of consent—but they also said that he did not intend to cause me any harm.

Let me find the wording here for why it wasn't sexual assault. [papers shuffling] So, in the decision, they said he would have had to have recognized the conditions of my intoxication and exploited it for it to be assault. They don't think he did that.

I think they are wrong.

It's probably important to note that no one is doubting his story.

Yes, and his story includes my pulse being at 30 and him not calling 911.

I do wonder if they had used the correct standard of evidence—preponderant, rather than clear and convincing—if he would have been found guilty of assault as well as misconduct.

So the difference between sexual misconduct and sexual assault is essentially the intention to harm? They said he didn't have it?

Yeah, and I disagree.

You think he did mean to harm you.

Yes.

I wonder if he never even thought it was harmful. If he thought that having sex with a vomiting, basically unconscious person was really just okay.

Yeah.

What was his punishment?

He was suspended for three years. The point was that he wouldn't be on campus while I was there. He was totally banned from grounds.

Was that a good punishment to you?

Yes, it was. It was pretty serious. If he wasn't expelled, then at least I wouldn't see him. He couldn't contact me, to return he would have to complete a class about alcohol and responsibility, he'd have to complete a class about consent.

To be clear, I think expulsion was the right punishment, but this was the functional equivalent. I felt that the punishment was warranted. After 11 months, he still didn't think he did anything wrong at all. And that's what still scares me.

Nine years have gone by since this happened. How often have you thought about it?

Every single day until April 8 of this year, when intensive therapy started to feel like it was working.

Do you think you'd have reached that point faster if UVA had handled your case differently?

Yes. I would have recovered faster. A lot of my traumatic flashbacks are to the trial, to the questions they asked me.

And you are a success story, so to speak.

I got a good outcome, but the process was terrible.

Only four out of 38 complaints even made it to UVA's Sexual Misconduct Board last year. Not a lot of people have the wherewithal to stick this process out. Are you glad you did?

Yes.

Would you do it again?

Yes. It would have been more awful to see him around, or see parties happening at that frat, and me walking by wondering if there was some other girl in there.

And now there are girls at UVA who are supporting each other openly in this in a way that they weren't able to nine years ago, or even five. That's really the essence of Title IX—it's not punishing the attacker, but helping survivors rebuild their lives. Even if your attacker doesn't get kicked off campus (even though I think he should), Title IX makes it so he changes classes, changes dorms, makes it so you don't have to see him.

There's this fundamental misunderstanding that schools are somehow able to mete out justice, and frankly, they're not. When you go to the law looking for justice, what you often get is just the law. Law and justice aren't always the same thing. Universities aren't supposed to be determining criminal guilt. Punishment is not the most important thing. It never has been.

Instead, the priority should always be on helping people recover. The sun is still rising the day after someone commits violence against you. How do you recognize that and move forward? That is where the emphasis needs to be.

Anyone seeking advice on this process can contact Kelly at kellyhoo09@gmail.com.

Image via afagen/Flickr.

Fill It With Cash, Alice Walton

Demi Lovato Says She Has Nothing In Common With Ex-BFF Miley Cyrus

$
0
0

Demi Lovato Says She Has Nothing In Common With Ex-BFF Miley Cyrus

Remember 2009, when a young Miley Cyrus brought a slightly younger Demi Lovato to the U.K. premiere of the Hannah Montana movie because they were best friends?

Like, BFFAEAE?

Demi Lovato Says She Has Nothing In Common With Ex-BFF Miley Cyrus

Those days are gone.

Demi announced once and for all during a radio interview this morning that she and Miles are no longer BFFs. They are no longer even Fs. Per Demi:

Um...we're, we're like, we're acquaintances. It's life, and people change, and, you know, I don't have anything in common with her anymore, and I wish her all the best.

It's rumored that once Demi started living a sober lifestyle last year after suffering from an eating disorder, the pair drifted apart.

Miley's new best friend rode a giant penis with her at her birthday party this weekend.

[Photos via Getty]

Darren Wilson Got Married Last Month

$
0
0

Darren Wilson Got Married Last Month

Mike Brown is dead. Darren Wilson is a husband for the second time.

According to various news reports, Wilson—the Ferguson, Mo. police officer who shot unarmed teenager Mike Brown six times, killing him in the street—quietly married his second wife, Barbara Spralding, a fellow Ferguson officer, on October 24. The two were wed in Clayton, Mo., a suburb of St. Louis, in what appears to be a private ceremony officiated by one of Wilson's lawyers, Greg Kloeppel, and a municipal judge, Christopher Graville, from Oakland, Mo.

Here, via the Times, is the marriage certificate:

Darren Wilson Got Married Last Month

Wilson, 28, and Spralding, 37, own a home together in Crestwood, another suburb of St. Louis, though they have reportedly not been spotted there since Wilson killed Brown.

Unlike Wilson's first wife Ashley, who posted the above wedding photos to her Facebook account, Spralding doesn't appear to be very active on social media. The one notable exception is what appears to be her Pinterest page, which features a recent board called "wedding ideas."

If, and when, the two have a reception is certain to be impacted by Wilson's legal fate, and on that front reports suggest that an announcement of a grand jury's findings about his case will be announced imminently.

[top images via Facebook]

My Life In The Locker Room: A Female Sportswriter Remembers The Dicks

$
0
0

My Life In The Locker Room: A Female Sportswriter Remembers The Dicks

Originally published June 4, 1992, in the Dallas Observer. Reprinted here with permission from the author, who has also provided an afterword about the response to her story.

I have one of the few jobs where the first thing people ask about is penises. Well, Reggie Jackson was my first. And yes, I was scared. I was 22 years old and the first woman ever to cover sports for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. Up until then, my assignments had been small-time: high school games and features on father-daughter doubles teams and Hacky Sack demonstrations. But now it was late September, and my editor wanted me to interview Mr. October about what it was like not to make the playoffs.

I'd heard the stories: the tales of women who felt forced to make a stand at the clubhouse door; of the way you're supposed to never look down at your notepad, or a player might think you're snagging a glimpse at his crotch; about how you've always got to be prepared with a one-liner, even if it means worrying more about snappy comebacks than snappy stories.

Dressed in a pair of virgin white flats, I trudged through the Arlington Stadium tunnel—a conglomeration of dirt and spit and sunflower seeds, caked to the walkway like 10,000-year-old bat guano at Carlsbad Caverns—dreading the task before me. It would be the last day ever for those white shoes—and my first of many covering professional sports.

And there I was at the big red clubhouse door, dented and bashed in anger so many times it conjured up an image of stone-washed hemoglobin. I pushed open the door and gazed into the visitors' locker room, a big square chamber with locker cubicles lining its perimeter and tables and chairs scattered around the center. I walked over to the only Angel who didn't yet have on some form of clothing. Mr. October, known to be Mr. Horse's Heinie on occasion, was watching a college football game in a chair in the middle of it all—naked. I remember being scared because I hadn't known how the locker room was going to look or smell or who or what I would have to wade through—literally and figuratively—to find this man.

It was mostly worn, ectoplasm-green indoor-outdoor carpeting—and stares. But on top of it being my first foray behind the red door, I was scared because of who I was interviewing: a superstar with a surly streak. I fully expected trouble. This was baptism by back draft, not fire.

But I couldn't back out. In many ways, I had made a career choice when I walked through that locker room door.

"May I talk to you?" I asked Reggie, as everyone watched and listened.

He did not answer.

"Can I talk to you for a minute," I said. Or at least that's what I thought I said. I might have actually said, "Can we talk about how your face looks like one of those ear-shaped potato chips that the lady from the Lay's factory brings on The Tonight Show once a year?"

Because his reaction to my question was to begin raising his voice to say, "There's no time."

He still didn't answer my question directly.

"Are you going to talk to me or not?" I asked.

A simple no would have sufficed. But instead, the man who is an idol to thousands of children launched into a verbal tirade loudly insulting my intelligence and shouting for someone to remove me from the clubhouse.

Here I was in my white flats, some fresh-out-of-college madras plaid skirt, one of those ridiculous spiked hairdos with tails we all wore back then, and probably enough add-a-beads to shame any Alpha Chi.

And there was Reggie, in nothing but sanitary socks.

His voice was growing louder. Mine, firmer.

Now almost everyone had stopped watching football and was watching me and Reggie. "Is she supposed to be here?" he demanded. "You can't be in here now."

"Are you going to talk to me or not?" I asked one more time interrupting.

He wouldn't answer.

"All right, heck with it then," I said. I spun around and walked out—past the staring faces, through the red door, down the 10,000-year-old bat-guano tunnel—and emerged into the dugout and the light of the real world, where I was nothing but a kid reporter who didn't get the story. It was the last time I would ever try to interview Reggie. And it was my first failure covering sports. But it wouldn't be my last.


Long before I was allowed to eat fish with bones, could go all night without peeing in my bed, or understood Gilligan's Island wasn't real, I loved baseball. It's the reason I'm a sportswriter, and I learned it from my dad. Back then, almost 30 years ago, passion for the national pastime was an heirloom fathers passed to their sons. But a little girl with blonde pin curls somehow slipped into the line of succession. I don't have a radio talk show yet, but I now make my living writing about sports—at the moment, mostly the Texas Rangers. Covering major league baseball fulltime is my goal.

Career ladders are never cushy for anybody, man or woman, unless of course your dad is president of GM or GE or whatever Nation's Bank is called this week. My dad was a buyer for Better Monkey Grip Rubber Company, and I'm not complaining. But the road has been anything but smooth. Family trips in an egg-shell-white Impala to see the cousins in Plainview took fewer rough turns.

I've wanted to write stories about baseball since I was 10 years old—to write words so good that people would read them twice. I used to write Dallas Cowboys columns in blue Crayola on a Big Chief tablet in the part of my sister's walk-in closet I had designated as the press box. Bell bottoms hung over my head as I berated Tom Landry for not getting rid of Mike Clark or praised Roger Staubach the way little kids now get all slobbery over Nolan Ryan.

I never told my friends. I always won the big awards in elementary school, went to football games, and performed in talent shows. What kind of a goob would they take me for if they knew? But after getting home from school, I'd quickly skip back to the sports section of the evening Star-Telegram to compare my work to that of the pros. Sometimes I'd turn the sound down on the TV and try to do baseball play-by-play, too. I can look back now and see I was sunk early, my heart hopelessly immersed in a severely codependent relationship with a kids' game played by grown-ups.

It began when I was 3 and my daddy took me to Turnpike Stadium—now Arlington Stadium—to see the old minor-league Spurs. We lived in Arlington, about five miles from the ball park. He carried me to the back of the outfield wall and climbed the slatted boards with his right arm and clutched me in his left. Then he held my head over the top of the wall in center. And there, not 1,000 days after I had emerged from the darkness of the womb, hundreds of bright light bulbs made me squint as I watched the first half-inning of my life, the last three outs of a Spurs game.

All I remember is green and light and the security of my daddy's arms.

We were a middle-class family of four with one kid just a few years from college and another a few years from kindergarten. We never wanted for anything we really needed, but my parents, raised in the Depression, were cautious about spending.

Buying ball tickets to as many games as my dad and I wanted to see was out of the question, so we climbed the wall in the late innings or sat in those free grassy spots behind the Cyclone fence.

There were nights in the stands, too, where, just so I could enjoy the game more, my daddy patiently tried to teach the basics of scoring to a child not yet versed in addition.

One night in the stands, I had my Helen-Keller-at-the-well experience. Suddenly it all made sense: the way the numbers went across in a line on a scoreboard, what the three numbers at the end of the nine meant, even why the shortstop didn't have a bag. "He just doesn't" was suddenly sufficient and I knew a grown-up secret, like writing checks, making babies, or reading words.

My daddy and I saw our first major-league game together on Opening Night here in 1972. Some summers we went to 20 games; others we went to about 56.

Sometimes we'd just watch any game on the TV. Other summer nights we sat on the back porch and listened to the Rangers on the radio. If my mom made us go to Wyatt's for supper, my father would wear his primitive Walkman through the serving line, once scaring the meat lady by hollering, "Dadgum Toby Harrah!" when she asked if he'd like brown gravy or cream.

He'd pull me out of school at lunch once a year to go to the spring baseball luncheon and take me to games early so I could collect autographs. The balls with the signatures still sit on my mantel, most reading like the tombstones of major-league also-rans.

When I was 14, I heard from a friend that the Rangers would soon be hiring ball girls. The rumor was bogus, but it planted an idea. I began a one-kid campaign to institute ball girls at Arlington Stadium as well as to become the first.

I wrote management repeatedly. The executive types weren't too hot on the idea. So when I was about 16, I wrote every major-league club with ball girls and asked about the pros and cons. I sent copies of their responses to the Rangers' front office. I corresponded with them for another two years before the call finally came.

They were trying ball girls.

They picked three—Cindy, because she was a perky cheerleader at the University of Texas at Arlington; Jamie, because she had modeling experience; and me, because I was a pest.

My Life In The Locker Room: A Female Sportswriter Remembers The Dicks

We shagged foul balls, but in retrospect, I guess we were more decorative than functional. They used to have us dance to the "Cotton-Eyed Joe" in the seventh inning, and for a while we shook pom-poms during rallies—acts I now, as a baseball purist, consider heresy. But hey, I was the center of attention on a baseball field; I could sell out for that.

The next year, I was booted because I couldn't do back flips.

But by then I had gotten to know the sportswriters and broadcasters, and the Star-Telegram offered me a job—in sports—typing in scores and answering the phone.

I dropped my plans to go to the University of Texas and study broadcasting. I had enough natural talent, I felt certain, that with one high heel in the door, I could work my way into a writer's job—maybe even someday cover baseball.


The realities of the corporate world and the attitudes of Texas high school and college coaches quickly clouded my idealistic vision of a quick ascent from 18-year-old ball-girl phenom to big-league ace baseball writer.

You see, folks in the world of sports weren't used to working with a "fee-male." And you know, they all say that word so well.

I started out in the office, taking scores on the phone and taking heat from the guys. Writing this the other night, tears filled my eyes, and I got that precry phlegm in my throat. I was surprised to realize that some of the wounds still hurt.

It wasn't Reggie or pro-locker-room banter.

It was an area high school coach who routinely tried to get me to drop by his house when his wife was out of town; when I refused for the third time, he refused to provide any more than perfunctory answers to my story questions.

It was when all the guys were inside doing interviews, and I was standing in the rain, makeup peeling, outside the high school locker room at Fort Worth's Farrington Field, waiting beneath the six-foot-long "No Women" sign for the players to come to the doorway. It was walking into the football locker room at the University of Texas in Austin and having a large man with burnt-orange pants and dark white face pick me up by my underarms and deposit me outside the door.

God, I hate making a scene.

I have complained little through the years because the last thing I ever wanted to do was to single myself out from the guys. I didn't want to be branded as some woman on a crusade. I've never been on any campaign to debunk the myth that testicles are somehow inherent to a full understanding of balls. I just wanted to cover sports.

But much of the early abuse came from the place I least expected it—my own paper.

Like a lot of kids starting out, I'd do office work all week and help cover games on the weekends—anything for a chance to prove my worth as a sportswriter. During my first four years at the Star-Telegram I took one day off to model at an auto show and five days off to get married. Those years were perhaps the most trying. There was a sports editor who would stop by every time he saw me eating, stare at me, and say in all seriousness, "Jenn, if you get fat, we won't love you no more." I could see my worth resided within the confines of a B cup and size six jeans. I wanted to cry each time he said that.

The guys screamed at me and demanded to know if I was "on the rag" when I was surly; yet they could scream and be surly at me all they wanted.

One editor in the chain of sports command kept trying to get me to check into the Worthington Hotel with him after work. Another superior had his assistant let me off early so he could be waiting for me in the parking lot.

He said he wanted to talk. I got in the car.

"Jenn," he asked, "do you want to be treated like an 18-year-old kid or a woman?"

At first, I thought he meant on the job. He meant on the bed.

I never went near a bedroom with any of them, but I told him "a woman" because I didn't know how answering "18" to this loaded question would affect my precarious career.

I was quite confused. My most innocent comments were greeted with sexual innuendo. I'm no wimp; I can take a lot. I know people make sexual comments to one another, and they are not always inappropriate. But this was something else.

All the culprits are either long gone or have actually apologized, saying they just didn't know better at the time.

But how was I supposed to do my job with all that crap going on? I had to think as much about how to handle the next unwanted advance or suggestive quip as I did trying to figure the Mavericks' averages.

Some readers had similar problems accepting a woman. I can't remember the number of times I've picked up the phone in the sports department, answered some trivia question, and, when the answer didn't win the guy a bar bet, had the caller demand, "Put a man on this phone." Some simply called me a "stupid bitch" and hung up.

I know they don't know what they're talking about. But the remarks still hurt.

For years I was hopelessly mired in phone answering and score taking, watching as others in similar positions moved up and on. Once, after they'd let me try my hand at writing for a year or so, editors told me I'd never make a writer. I was creative and funny, but I just couldn't write, they'd concluded. So I didn't write. For eight months, the editors refused to assign me any stones.

I was close to giving up. I seriously considered taking a job as a researcher for a law firm.

But one thing kept me in sports: I got a Rangers media pass every year. It was the lonely thread that tied me to my game.

In the arbitrary world of newspaper politics, the arrival of a new sports editor breathed life into my career. I began investigating the pay-for-play scandals of the Southwest Conference. I broke several stories, one of which won a national award for investigative sports reporting.

I remember hiding in a tree outside a North Dallas bank waiting for an SMU running back because we had heard this was where he picked up his money. Then there was the time we had a story about an SWC coach paying players, and I appeared one morning at the school where he was an assistant. Tipped off to my presence, the coach broke into a near run when I headed toward him in the hall. He ran into a dark office where I found him hiding under the desk.

Hey, this is pretty cool, I thought. When you've got dirt on them, all the condescending good-ol'-boy stuff goes out the window.

I was actually in charge.

An SMU booster threatened to have my legs broken—and I was delighted. That's something he'd say to anyone, I realized.

While all this was going on, I began helping out with Dallas Cowboys sidebar articles and weekend coverage of the Rangers. I helped cover the team for the Associated Press.

And I was entering the peak of a seven-year stint as the masked wrestling columnist Betty Ann Stout—Fort Worth's equivalent of Joe Bob Briggs—whose unofficial duties included opening appliance stores, riding elephants when the circus came to town, and acting as rodeo Grand Marshal on the backs of large, hoofed animals.


Oh sure, little stuff happened, like the time one of the Oakland A's made a big point of standing next to me naked in the middle of the clubhouse or one of the Los Angeles Raiders chucked a set of shoulder pads at my butt.

Then there was the occasion Rangers manager Doug Rader spat corn on me after I asked a dumb question. Of course, Rader would have spat corn at anybody.

By then, I had become accustomed to the nudity and byplay of the locker room. I've always considered the real hurdle of all this to be players' perception of me, not suppressing my thoughts. Before a team got used to me, there might be some giggling each time someone made a smart remark or cursed loud enough to get you kicked out of the Watauga Dairy Queen.

The players didn't know I'd grown up with games or that my best friends had usually been crude guys or that I could open a beer bottle with my incisors or that I liked to fish as much as they did. They didn't know, and it made me feel awkward that they didn't know that this stuff really didn't bother me outside of the fact that I felt obligated to respond with a remark, which took away from my ability to do my job.

I was nervous the first time I entered the Rangers locker room, about seven years ago. Not about naked bodies or about crude remarks but about how they would think I felt—and how I intended to respond with confidence, no matter what happened.

So I stepped down the tunnel from the dugout to the clubhouse and peered around the open door.

The first thing I saw was four guys in a big shower.

Because of my vantage point, it appeared I would have to walk through the shower, through the four wet, naked men, to get to the actual locker-room area. I retreated back behind the door before anyone could see me.

God, I can't believe someone didn't warn me, I thought. And what if someone saw me in this state of trepidation? It was critical no one smelled fear or I'd lose respect from the get-go.

Maybe I didn't belong here. Maybe I'd never fit in. Maybe I should write news or features because I'll never have the fortitude it takes to stay on your toes with one-liners and be tough enough to handle this.

Maybe McDonald's was hiring. But I had a deadline. I had to go in.

I wasn't afraid of naked men. I was afraid of the unknown. A few feet in, I realized a hall ran in front of the showers. You take a right turn before you have to walk straight into the naked men and the soap.

The first Ranger I interviewed was drying his stomach with a towel. Before I could utter a word, he said, "Wait, let me rub it, it will get hard."

That seemed like such a dumb thing to say. I mean, I know how penises work. And I know how smartass remarks work, too. The latter are supposed to be more humorous than the former, though adulthood has taught me different.

I'll always remember that no one else laughed, for whatever reason, and that made me feel good.

So I went about my business. I asked my question; he answered.

I should have told him how sad it was that he had to rub his own.

Nudity rarely bothered me, but I prefer never to see Nolan Ryan in anything but Ranger white or bluejeans. I have no idea why, except that Nolan Ryan and my daddy are my heroes, and I just have no need of seeing either one of their white heinies.

About 1986, there was a college football convention in Dallas. There were reporters all around the lobby of the downtown Hyatt, waiting for coaches to arrive after a golf game. I was leaning against a post, waiting for Grant Teaff, holding a notepad. That's when a security guard came up to me to ask why I was there. I told him. He told me I had to leave unless I was staying at the hotel. He could not allow me to bother the guests.

I explained again that I was a sportswriter waiting for Grant Teaff and pointed out other reporters, all men, around the lobby. He said I was loitering. I refused to leave. He said he would have me thrown out physically.

"Do you think I am a prostitute?" I asked.

"That's possible," he replied. "I don't have any idea what you're up to."

Mortified, I pondered my attire (a baggy smock top and pants). We both approached the front desk, where the clerk sided with the guard, saying I could remain for 10 more minutes, but only if I stayed out of the central lobby and remained "mobile." No sitting or leaning. Each time I stopped pacing, the clerk and guard started toward me. I'd had enough. Once I stopped and they looked up, so I started spinning around in circles.

That did it; now they were ready to call the police. I went home and called my sports editor. He got an apology from the Hyatt; I got suspected of prostitution while waiting in a hotel lobby for Grant Teaff.

About 1987, I got crossways with the sports editor. I ended up covering minor events full time, even doing the dreaded office score-taking work again. At the same time, my marriage began taking ugly, unspeakable turns. I began to wonder, what had I done with the last seven years of my life? Had all that I'd put up with just been for nothing?

When the coveted Rangers beat came open, I was passed over. My dream of covering professional baseball seemed further away than ever. And I didn't want to go back to putting up full-time with condescending high school and college coaches and jerks guarding locker room doors.

I began experiencing panic attacks and became practically addicted to the antianxiety drug Xanax, buying it from bartenders and acquaintances when my prescriptions ran dry. My face broke out. And I gained 40 pounds.

Good God, all I had wanted to do was cover sports. The bouncing, wide-eyed ball girl who wanted to write about baseball more than anything was gone, abandoned in increments on football fields, at locker room doors, in editors' offices, and on barstools. I had become a sweating mass of raw nerve endings.

I felt like a cancer victim who was finally ready to give up the fight because it meant giving up the pain and humiliation.

The dream was dead.

I went to features.


They gave me all the weird stories. They knew I could write even the most boring stuff into something of interest. But I learned to do news as well. I wrote about civil rights issues and roamed through abandoned warehouses alone in search of skinheads.

Yet all the time I was still dreaming up stories to get me to the ball park. A feature on the woman who washes the Rangers' clothes was not out of the question. A three-part series on Ruth Ryan, spouse of Nolan, turned into a delightful three-week chore that included stops at the Ryans' ranch in Alvin and the stadium.

I had started wandering longingly over to the sports department, just to talk about baseball. More than two years ago, I told the sports editor I wanted to return to sports. And I wanted to cover the Rangers someday.

I concluded my sports hiatus last year with a stint on a special projects news team, collaborating with another reporter on a series about Fort Worth's high infant-mortality rate. We won some awards, and I gained some confidence and perspective. When you've interviewed a 17-year-old mother whose daughter was stillborn for lack of prenatal care, how tough can it be to talk to a young pitcher who's lost to the Angels for lack of run support?

It was time to go back to the dream. I asked for—and received—a transfer back to sports.

In my three years away, I'd shed a husband, a house, a lot of weight, and a collection of unhealthy habits. I began bicycling and training for a marathon. Fueled by my own version of a life-affirming experience, I felt as though I was taking back 10 years of my life.

I was ready once again to be the greatest sportswriter who ever lived.


I was in the visiting clubhouse waiting to interview one of the Oakland A's this year when one of the players called, "Here, pussy"—as though he were calling a cat. But of course, he hadn't lost Fluffy; he'd found a woman in his locker room.

It doesn't make me angry anymore; it just seems silly and absurd. But some paranoia lingers. Sometimes I'm kind of quiet in a group interview, and I have this feeling other reporters will think it's because I'm a dumb ol' girl.

I'm a general assignment sports reporter now, which means I do whatever they ask of me. My aim as a writer is to make the people I cover seem human to the readers. You can't do this without asking about their dogs and their mom and what bugs them even worse than dropping the soap in the shower. It seems logical to me. I mean, we know a guy is probably happy to be a number-one draft choice, but what makes him real is how he is like or unlike us. It's the way we measure all people, the Homo sapiens equivalent of sniffing butts by the fire hydrant.

But I don't think it seems very logical to some of the other reporters. Sometimes I will request an interview at someone's house, and my peers act as though it's weird. But how can you really profile a guy if you haven't seen his coffee table or the junk stuck to his fridge?

Sometimes before the game when everyone is milling about, I go sit around the corner in equipment manager Joe Macko's office and visit for a while just so I don't wear out my welcome in the room o' nakedness. Some nights I walk out the back door where all the wives are waiting, and they stare at me strangely, as though they think I'm the woman Cosmo warned them about or something.

After a long game, while standing in the middle of the clubhouse waiting for someone to appear, I sometimes gaze off in one direction, the way you stare when you're bored and become transfixed on an object until your eyes cross and you snap back into the reality of car payments and cellulite. I was doing that one recent day when a wet, naked body walked into my trance. It might as well have been a water cooler. I had to remind myself that I should probably look away.

That's another thing that has changed. I really want to be as unobtrusive as possible, so I will turn away from someone who is dressing or, if I have the time, wait until he has put his shorts on before I approach. I've been around long enough now that if they see me turn away, they probably know it isn't because I'm scared or intimidated. I like to think I've earned a little respect.

The Mavericks pose an entirely different set of problems. I'd actually never been in an NBA locker room until last winter. Then, just as I walked in the door, it struck me that I was five feet, three inches tall—about the height of an NBA crotch.

Point guards became my instant favorites for those early post-shower interviews. It is one thing not to look at your notepad, but another not to be able to look straight ahead without a big clothesline of boy parts.

James Donaldson was the very tallest, and I almost always waited until he had some small piece of fabric on before I walked back there. If necessity of deadlines or getting to someone before another reporter called for it, sure, I'd talk to Oral Roberts's 900-foot Jesus naked, no matter where the crotch fell.

But you try to walk a fine line.

The Mavericks were a delight to be around even when pissed off. The Rangers treat me like anyone else who wanders in.

Oh sure, they may actually think I'm an idiot. But there's a strange sort of comfort in feeling that if they think I'm an idiot, it's probably not because I'm a woman but because I'm just acting like an idiot.


The most puzzled responses to my job come from the friends and acquaintances in my personal life. Kids at the tanning salon want to know if I date the players. Friends at Bible study ask if the players are mean to me. And then there's the guy—almost any guy in any bar in town—who subjects me to a sports-trivia quiz during the usual getting-acquainted foreplay.

It usually goes about like this:

Leaking testosterone and reeking of beer, a Jethro Bodin-esque character sidles up and asks what I do.

"A sportswriter, huh? So do you know about sports?" (I'm serious, they really ask this.)

"Hey, if you know so much about sports," he continues, "let's see if you can answer this question: Who was the last NFL running back to also play quarterback in an even-numbered Super Bowl?"

I falter, and he complains, "Hey, I thought you said you knew sports."

Lately I've just started saying I'm a secretary at Wolfe's Nursery. But unfortunately, in north Arlington, this seems to be an enviable attribute on a par with big Dallas hair and coaching shorts as after-five wear.

And of course, women everywhere want to know about that great walled fortress of wet boy flesh, the locker room.

We're sitting around the salon one day making bets on when the rest of the country will catch on that Ross Perot is a weasel when someone says he finished ahead of Bush and Clinton in another poll. Cindy, who is dabbing brown goop on my roots, figures this is like when the seniors get all reactionary and vote in the ugliest girl for homecoming queen, and it just might happen on a bigger scale.

Donna doesn't like politics, so she asks what it is I do for the paper again. Donna doesn't like newspapers either. Donna is a good argument for euthanasia.

The immediate response is curiosity: Do I get to go in the locker room?

Well, yeah.

So you've been in the Mavericks locker room? Yeah.

And you won't believe this, and I swear it's true: the immediate response of three women who don't even like sports outside of bungee jumping at Baja is, "You've seen Ro Blackman naked?"

Well, I guess I had; I wasn't sure.

I'm sure he's been naked in the room where I was at some time. But the point is that you don't even think much about people being naked after a while, and unless you have some peculiar reason for remembering, you don't know who you have seen naked because they all kind of waltz in and out of the shower naked, just one wet butt covered with soap film after another.

I tried to explain that it is probably a lot like being a male gynecologist: the daily procession of personal parts becomes so routine that it ceases to be of anything but professional interest.

Yet I wonder. When men gather at bars and golf courses and any of the other traditional salt licks for male bonding, do they ask the gynecologist what Mrs. Holcombe's hooters look like? Do they want to know if it's hard for him to keep his professionalism with his hand inserted in some babe's bodily cavity—and whether it's scary?

I doubt it.

Donna persists.

"I can't believe you are not in love with these men," she says, biting her cuticle. I try to explain, which is difficult because Donna and I are on different sexual wavelengths. But then Donna likes the men she meets at Baja.

If I did ever fall hopelessly head over heels for one of these men, it would not be because I had noticed a pterodactyl-size penis, but for the same reasons I'd fall for anyone else.

Like many people, Donna, who should have been named Brittany, just can't accept this.

"OK, you mean you've talked to Troy Aikman, and you didn't notice what a hunk he is?"

"Well, I have talked to Troy Aikman," I say, and one woman bites down hard on her blow-dryer and rolls her eyes as though she's just gotten the high school quarterback in spin-the-bottle.

Actually, I tell them, one of the most peculiar side effects of my job is that it seems to run off men in personal relationships. Oh sure, at first they think it's pretty cool that you're the only person at a party who can remember Neil Lomax's name or that you can name all the Rangers managers in 18 seconds—with a shot in your mouth.

But that's while they are still trying to maneuver you quickly into bed. During this phase of courtship, most men would be reassuring Lassie that her role as a dog star doesn't matter that they just like her nice, shiny coat.

For most of the guys who hang around for more than three dates, my job suddenly becomes a problem. Apparently a guy has to be awfully secure not to be intimidated by my frequent trips into locker rooms (as though I'm doing comparative shopping) or by my knowing a good bit about sports.

I can't tell you the bizarre arguments I've had with a few of these creeps who keep suggesting I become a teacher. Or go back to feature writing. Or maybe into public relations. One even said, "You know you don't have to do this work," in a tone that sounded like Sting telling Roxanne she didn't have to put on the red light.

The dirty little secret I've discovered is how little men know about sports, since this is what men are supposed to know more about than women. Most of the men I've dated certainly don't know about the social fraying of America or why it might be at all amusing that a guy named Fujimori is in charge of Peru, so you'd certainly hope they knew some inane facts about NFL rushers. All most know how to do is bitch about the Cowboys and Mavericks and Rangers—about their (a) record, (b) salaries, (c) coach or manager—and praise the "kick-butt" barbecue they make before watching 18 hours of football on Sundays. That's before they tell me I don't have any business in the locker room.


I have assimilated to a large degree but probably never will completely.

I can't understand the idiots who call the sports department and want to talk to a man on the phone instead of me—or some guy who goes out of his way to spit Niblets on me. But I can understand the athletes being naturally uncertain what to make of women, of me.

Many of the women they're around—other than the reasonably stable ones like their wives and mothers—are groupies. I understand that uniforms—unless they say, "Eb, your man who wears the star" on the lapel—are a great aphrodisiac in contemporary culture. I admit, some days even the UPS guy looks awful good.

Yet anyone who gets self-worth through random sex with a professional athlete is not exactly MENSA material. So you've got all these big-haired babes who think the electoral college is a beauty school, ready to hoist their miniskirts for the first athlete who comes along. And then you've got this woman who comes in to interview them, maybe with big hair and a short skirt too, depending on the humidity and what's off at the cleaners that day.

So why are they going to think the reporter is any different at first? Logic says they might not. So I remain cautious, probably overly cautious, about appearances.

For instance, there are things I might say to a friend or even a casual coworker that I wouldn't think a thing about, but I stop short of saying such things to the players. Like the other night when I was interviewing Kenny Rogers after the game, and I just happened to notice he had really healthy-looking hair. The hamster in my mental Wonderwheel never seems to stop running, so my mind keeps a lot of thoughts going at once. So while I'm asking him about his family's strawberry farm, I'm wondering if eggs have given him this nice, shiny coat or if he uses his wife's conditioner, and if so, what is it?

I almost said matter-of-factly, "You know, Kenny, you've got a fine head of hair." I stopped myself because he might not take it right. He might not understand that I meant its thickness and shine were enviable.

There are a lot of times I want to compliment a player or make a personal observation, just because it's my nature, but my nature has to change for a moment because I don't want anyone to get the wrong impression about my intentions.

If I ever dread talking to players now, it is not because I feel that I don't belong there. It is because it doesn't seem that any reporter should be there.

One of the most sickening feelings I get is when I have to go interview some pitcher who's been shelled or some guy who is struggling at the free throw line or a coach who is on the verge of not being a coach. I hate to invade their pain and their anger and sometimes even their happiness. What does it really matter if the rest of the world knows? I think about what it would be like to have them asking me every day, "Well, how about that really thrown-together graph there at the top?" or "You wrote a good piece, Jenn, but then your headline writers let you down at the end; what does that feel like?" or "You haven't written any good stones in the last month. Can the slump be permanent?"

Man, I'd hate them.

No less than two or three times a home stand, the feeling hits again—almost always as I walk down that tunnel from the upper deck that spits you out in back of home plate. It's just before batting practice, about 4:30 p.m. The TCBY people are pouring half gallons of yogurt stuff into the soft-serve machines; a guy is sweeping up peanuts in three-quarter time. I think how cool it is to watch a stadium yawn to life. Last night's trash still blows, even though people are sweeping all over the place. It reminds me of a debutante waking up in last night's party dress, reeking of beer.

About two yards down, I see legs behind the batting cage. Someone has come out early for batting practice. In a few more feet, the torsos appear and the warm breeze melts around my face. Near the field, I can see it is Al Newman and somebody. Always Al Newman, and he's always smiling because he's kind of happy to be here too.

The grass spreads out in the shape of a precious gem, and there are fans here and there who have come to see batting practice just because it's relaxing. Then it hits me: My job means I get to be around this game and write about it. And it's OK to spit your sunflower seed hulls on the floor. I head down the steps, past the seats where I couldn't even afford to sit when I was a kid, open heaven's gate, and walk onto the field.

Sometimes I take a seat in the dugout, where a few of the guys are filtering in, grabbing bats and bubble gum. For a minute, before I start to work, I smell the bubble gum in the breeze and look at the kids leaning over the dugout and the boys of summer in it.

And every once in a while I think about slatted billboards and a daddy's arms.

The other night, there were two girls in the clubhouse after the game. They were reporters and looked young enough to remind me of my old days—except they weren't wearing white flats.

No one did or said anything off-color. But there were a few giggles. And a few guys maybe flounced around a little more just for brief amusement. Quite normal, nothing harmful.

I mentioned this to someone later.

I noted being in the middle of the room when a player came out of the shower, spotted me, and turned around and went back in. A few minutes later he came back out wearing a towel.

By now I wouldn't really notice if he'd worn a towel or hadn't. But it struck me that something had changed: that my presence was no longer cause for flouncing; that I'd somehow earned this strange sign of courtesy and respect.

"Jenn," my friend told me, "I guess you rate a towel now."


Afterword

I didn't give it a whole lot of thought as I went into the office that day. I sat at some random desk to look busy for a while, which is what sportswriters do every week or three.

I immediately got a call from Gayle Reaves, a founder of the Association for Women Journalists.

Gayle had heard the Fort Worth Star-Telegram higher-ups had had a meeting that morning regarding my continued—or discontinued—employment. It was supposed to be about the fact that I had some negative things to say about my early work environment.

I told her I hadn't heard about it, but would let her know, assuring her I would be the last to know if I had been fired.

I had offered the story first to my sports editor, Mike Perry (standard newspaper policy). Mike called me into his office and told me he was now "into it" for passing on the piece. Apparently this happened at the morning budget meeting where "My Life in the Locker Room" was discussed at great length.

He sure wished he'd taken it, he said in hindsight. But the reality was, a newspaper did not have space for the words or freedom on the finer nuances of body-part language. It's also tricky when you give one writer a piece that showcases him or her in very many words and photos.

OK, so now it was home to take a run and try to clear my head of concerns about just what might be waiting for me at the ballpark. I was a common sight in and around the Rangers digs in those days, so it was no longer like I was some rookie, afraid to speak my mind.

I got home, took a run and cleaned up and dressed for the ballpark, grabbed my go bag with computer, lipstick, notepads, pens, hairbrush, Altoids, and antacids and headed down I-30 to see what flak awaited me.

"You know," I thought, "I doubt if any of them read the Observer."

After all, the story had just hit newsstands and restaurants and bars and grocery stores in the dead of the previous night. Places in Arlington might not get it until mid-afternoon. And surely the Observer's reader demographics did not include most ballplayers and some stadium employees.

Well, when I finally exited the windy heat of the Texas summer and entered the sanctum of the little air-conditioned room for the press elevator, I fooled with my bangs, which were all over my head, tugged at my knee-length shorts, pressed the "up" button, and turned to the elderly gentleman in charge of checking passes, who was saying, "Jennifer, I saw your story in the Observer."

Oh, Lord. And here I'd been hoping for a controlled rollout on this thing.

I left my stuff in the press box and went downstairs, sandals sticking in last night's gooey beer puddles as usual, as I entered the tunnel to the field. Gerry Fraley of The Dallas Morning News was the only other writer in the press box. He glanced sideways, kind of sneered, and stuck his head back in his laptop. Standard Fraley, so no problems there.

In the clubhouse, I was greeted by Rafael Palmeiro. Raffy, Kenny Rogers, Kevin Brown had their little clique on the far side of the clubhouse. They mostly acted like brats. Then Kevin Brown left the team and that whole bunch became as nice as could be. It was quite apparent who the poor influence was on that side of the barn.

But I digress.

Raffy said, "Hey, he wants to talk to you," pointing to Kenny Rogers. He said this about three times. I was trying to work and didn't feel I had the time for petty bullshit. So what? I had mentioned Kenny's hair in a story that had yet to even appear in some of the Observer's newsstands.

"So, they really do read." I thought.

I eventually walked over to Kenny, who was sitting on a stool by his cubicle. I said, "Raffy says you want to see me." He shook his head and said, "No, I didn't say that."

"Are you sure?"

"No, I didn't say that."

OK, pre-game festivities concluded, I went back up to the press box to start writing some pre-game sidebar. The Star-Telegram phone began to ring. I was amazed. People were calling from all over about the piece.

Perhaps the most meaningful were the calls from fellow sportswriters. Several were guys who had been my superiors at one time or another and were just so gushing with their praise. But the most moving were the ones who said something along the lines of, "Well, I just want you to know, if I ever had anything to do with any of that, I'm sorry."

It began to get kind of embarrassing.

OK, so game over and time to head back down to the clubhouse. As usual, several radio guys lined up behind me. It seems in those years I was the only writer who could converse with Julio Franco and Brian Downing. The Downing part of it, as the guys who would later be a part of The Ticket said, was because, "He wouldn't hit a girl, so we'll go in behind you."

Next to the entry door, there was a large poster of a shirtless Ruben Sierra. The poster was new. The little pranksters had used a bowl or something to draw a "circle slash" over Ruben's crotch. Several of the writers said, "I wonder what's up with that."

I said, "I think it is for my benefit."

It was.

And you know, that was the last I ever heard of it from anyone on the team. There was no fallout at the paper. I think I may have actually gained some respect in various journalism and sports circles.

The first time I saw The Best American Sports Writing, I wasn't anywhere near good enough a writer to gain entry into that elite company. But the next year, I entered myself for the "Locker Room" piece, and no one could have been more surprised than me when editor Glenn Stout called to tell me I was to be included in the next edition.

I was so happy I was almost crying, but I was trying to sound very nonchalant while Glenn was giving me the particulars. The next year, I was included as an honorable mention for two pieces. One was about the sad tale of the career of David Clyde. The other was a first-person piece about the last game at Arlington Stadium.

I was doing another piece on the last day game at the old place, and I was in the dirt bowels of that poor old Erector set where many things, including skunks and raccoons, lived. I was down there to see the guy turn off the lights for the last day game.

He let me do it. One of my greatest honors. And I have shared that with very few people. It was just one of those moments you want to hold for yourself.

Before The Best American Sports Writing for that year was in bookstores, I went on a Thelma and Louise-type journey with a girlfriend. She was a travel writer and at the end of a marriage, and we were traipsing around the Four Corners area. By then I had researched what day shipment was due in bookstores. Yes, I was that excited. We drove to a mall in Santa Fe, and there were the boxes, taped, freshly shipped, in the front of the store.

They said they weren't selling those yet because they hadn't been tagged. Oh no, I was not having that. I was ready to gnaw my way through the first one I saw that might have had the book in it. I began to rummage through the large boxes until I found the one with my publisher's name on it. I somehow persuaded them to open it and sell the book to me.

We went to a bench just outside the door and began to look through it. We got to Frank DeFord's comment at the end. He said he chose to run this piece in tandem with Roger Angell's piece because, all else aside, they were stories by a couple of kids who grew up loving baseball. My name and Roger Angell's had been mentioned in the same sentence. I began to cry.

That first-person ode to Arlington Stadium was entered in a contest. By that time I had moved east to cover the Phillies.

Late one night in spring training, one of my co-workers, also one of my best friends, called to read me something.

He was home and reading stuff on the wire, as we called it at the time.

"The Texas APME awards are out," he said.

And he began reading. You know, it was like, "So-and-so from The Beaumont Enterprise, many so-and-so's from The Dallas Morning News."

The he got to a really big one—"Best General Column Writing." Not sports writing, but the best of every column written in the state that year. Yeah, my ode to the old stadium won it all.

I was in some pretty heavy company. But I was humbled by the honor. It was like putting the lid on something.

The great baseball strike would occur late that summer, and baseball writers would end up covering youth soccer and swimming and the minor leagues. I was covering the minor league team in Wilmington, Del., one night. A kid—I mean, really a kid—started telling me women had no business in the locker room.

Man, did I ever realize how my attitude and courage level had changed. He was really mouthing off at me.

I walked over to him and asked how old he was. (He was a recent addition to the team.) It may have been his first night.

He was from Venezuela or the Dominican Republic, and guys from way south of here often start their careers as young as 16 or so.

He said he was 16. I asked him if he hoped to play in the majors one day. Affirmative. I said, "Well, you better get used to it now, because there are women all over clubhouses in the big leagues."

He started yelling again in this really high voice. I said, "Listen, I have been covering this game since I was about two years older than you are so you can just shut it right now."

He kept muttering. I walked over to the corner where two guys from my hometown had their lockers.

"Can I stand here with y'all for a while?" I asked. "I am done, but I don't want him to think I am leaving because of him."

They were happy to oblige. Then I did something I had never done. I complained.

I told the PR guy that I sure hated to bring this up, but there was no place for the way this guy was acting. My understanding was the brat later had a good talkin'-to with the manager and the GM, and as far as I know, the closest he would ever get to the bigs was buying a ticket.

It is funny. After I poured myself out in the "Locker Room" piece, I was a bit empowered. And in no mood to take shit anymore. From anyone.


Jennifer Briggs has covered the Texas Rangers, Dallas Mavericks, Dallas Cowboys, Philadelphia Phillies, and Green Bay Packers. She is an American humorist and sportswriter who now does reviews for Publishers Weekly and writes for a variety of publications, including the Dallas Observer, Fort Worth Star-Telegram, USA Today, and Sports Illustrated. She lives with three dogs in her happy bungalow in Texas. She has also authored six books and was the first Texas Rangers ball girl.

Top photo illustration by Jim Cooke; original photo by Scogin Mayo.

The Stacks is Deadspin's living archive of great journalism, curated by Bronx Banter's Alex Belth. Check out some of our favorites so far. Follow us on Twitter, @DeadspinStacks, or email us at thestacks@deadspin.com.

Viewing all 24829 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images