Quantcast
Channel: Gawker
Viewing all 24829 articles
Browse latest View live

A Conversation With Johari Osayi Idusuyi, the Hero Who Read Through a Trump Rally

$
0
0

A Conversation With Johari Osayi Idusuyi, the Hero Who Read Through a Trump Rally

The identity of the woman who perfectly expressed a sane person’s reaction to being at a Donald Trump rally by whipping out a book and refusing to put it down has been revealed. Twenty-three year-old Johari Osayi Idusuyi is the woman behind the head flip heard ‘round the nation.

A writer and student at Lincoln Land Community College in Springfield, Illinois, Idusuyi found herself not only in the right place at the right time, but with the right book in hand. Citizen is an award-winning work by Claudia Rankine that explores the pervasiveness of racism and microaggressions in America.

In the viral footage, we see Idusuyi interrupted by an older white couple and scolded for not paying attention to Trump’s speech. “I’m a young 20-year-old black woman who doesn’t care about this Trump rally, and I’m pretty sure that angered her a lot,” Idusuyi says.

Many assumed that the incident was planned, but it was actually a bit of a fluke brought on by Trump’s own terrible behavior. Idusuyi decided to attend the rally with a surprising amount of optimism and willingness to at least hear what the second-place Republican candidate had to say. What ensued was an accidental protest, of sorts, but one that got its message across quite clearly.

I spoke to Johari Osayi Idusuyi on the phone about how she ended up at a Donald Trump rally in the first place and what exactly went down during her exchange with the angry couple. Our conversation has been edited for clarity and length.

http://theslot.jezebel.com/we-are-all-thi...

I have to ask, are you a Donald Trump supporter?

I came to the rally with genuine intentions, but I’m definitely not a supporter.

How exactly did you end up at the rally in the first place?

I heard about it the night before and I wasn’t really interested in going, but my friend Gabby Chavez said, “My family bailed out on me.” I was going to go to just see Donald Trump. It’s an opportunity to see a presidential candidate. We tried to take an unbiased stand. Maybe he’ll talk about something of substance, we thought. So I think it was just to see and if that failed, then we would have a good story.

Well now you definitely do!

I guess so. I could have never planned this.

How did you end up right behind Trump?

Basically, ask and you shall receive. I asked if anyone was sitting there and I didn’t know it was the VIP section. I just asked one of the volunteers and she said, “No, it’s VIP.” Then a gentleman approached us after I left the original volunteer and he said, “Would you like to sit in VIP?” and I said, “OK.” I mean, why not? I think we were chosen for obvious reasons. We are minorities and there weren’t a lot of minorities there. He also instructed us to sit in the middle, so we kind of already knew what this was.

The people sitting next to you were your friends?

Yes, I was sitting with my friends Gabby Chavez, Montel Morgan, then it was me and then DeWayne Williams. Those were the friends I was with at the time. We weren’t trying to start anything. We weren’t trying to make a scene and it wasn’t originally planned to be a protest. We just wanted to go in with an open mind and it turned into something bigger.

Did you see any other people of color being led to the VIP area? It seemed like a pretty diverse crowd for a Donald Trump rally.

I’m not sure how the other people got there, but I think of how we got there and how we were instructed to sit in the middle. So that was very strategic.

Why did you decide to start reading Claudia Rankine’s Citizen in the middle of the rally?

Like I said, we went with an open mind and then it all started. There were some “Dump Trump” protesters. The way the supporters treated the protestors was really unbelievable and that’s what made me mad. All four of us as a collective group, our energy shifted. The way Donald Trump said, “Get them out of here”—when you say those words, that activates your supporters to be able to be the same way. Then there was a man who snatched a lady’s Obama hat. She was one of the protesters and was leaving and her hair just went with the hat. Then he threw it into crowd and everybody cheered. I thought, “That’s bullying. That’s aggressive.” I don’t think Trump handled it with grace. I thought, “Oh, you’re really not empathetic at all.” That’s when the shift happened.

You saw his reaction and you decided to react?

Exactly. And there was also another incident. There was one protester left and the crowd started pointing at her and booing. First of all, she’s a young woman. She doesn’t have her friends anymore. If she’s the only one left, just let her be. There was just a lot of bullying going on and I didn’t like that. And some people were cheering. To hear 10,000 people cheer for something so disrespectful is what made me so mad. And that’s when I was like, I am now genuinely not interested in your speech. I wanted to leave, but I came, I’m in the middle, I’m on camera, so I might as well read because I don’t have anything else to do. I’m not going to waste my time listening to somebody who I can’t respect anymore, so I started to read.

Was it just a coincidence that you had Citizen on you?

I was just reading the book at the time. I actually wanted to bring two books. It was The Alchemist and that book, but I forgot The Alchemist on my table. I just started to read it. Then I was like, I’m in the middle, I’m on camera, so why not use the opportunity to promote a great book? I didn’t expect to get in an argument with the people behind me.

Yes, explain that exchange.

I got tapped on the shoulder. I think it was a couple. The man, he was mad but not as mad as his maybe-spouse. He had a more calm demeanor, just like, if you don’t want to be here, leave. They both said it but hers was more from a place of genuine disgust and anger. I feel like he was a mouthpiece for her. And he probably was kind of mad, but I don’t think he would have tapped me on the shoulder if it wasn’t for the woman. The woman kept saying, “If you don’t wanna be here then leave. You didn’t even stand for the Pledge of Allegiance.” I said, “I do want to be here, that’s why I’m here. You don’t know who I am. I’m reading my book because I’m uninterested. Did you not just see what happened? This person disrespects women, minorities, everybody and you’re still supporting him. He’s not saying anything of substance.” If I met this couple at an event or a dinner party, I would think they were nice people. They probably are nice people. But I don’t think they have any right to tell me what to do. The lady, actually, she mumbled something. I didn’t hear but my friend told me the next day that she said, “I’m so glad you’re not my daughter,” or something along those lines. And I was thinking, “I’m glad I’m not your daughter either!”

So I guess it’s safe to say that Trump doesn’t have your vote?

Definitely not.


Contact the author at kara.brown@jezebel.com .

Image courtesy of Johari Osayi Idusuyi


Politician Responsible for Closing Public Toilets Gets Fined for Peeing in the Street

$
0
0

Politician Responsible for Closing Public Toilets Gets Fined for Peeing in the Street

A Scottish chief councillor who voted earlier this year to shut down all public toilets in his district of South Lanarkshire was fined by police Saturday morning for hmm guess what pissing in the street. It’s a shame there were no public restrooms around for him to use.

Councillor Jackie Burns jumped out of a taxi line to answer the call of nature, but immediate thereafter, he had to answer the call of a police offer, who was probably all “sorry mate, yae should hae made it tae the pisher in time.”

“I was approached by police, who gave me a £40 fine which I have duly paid. I am embarrassed by the incident and have apologized,” Burns said, according to Yahoo News UK.

Burns said in May that the local loos would be closed as a cost-saving measure due to a $33 million cutback by the Scottish government.

The council was doubtless faced with some tough choices regarding cuts, but if we can learn anything from the cautionary tale of the shit-streaked Boschian hellscape that is downtown San Francisco, it’s that human beings don’t magically stop defecating once you take away their facilities.

[h/t BoingBoing]

IKEA Workers Have Asked for a Union and the Company Hasn't Responded 

$
0
0

IKEA Workers Have Asked for a Union and the Company Hasn't Responded 

Yesterday, a large group of workers at an IKEA store in Massachusetts told the company they want to unionize. IKEA’s response so far? Nothing.

First, some background: while IKEA enjoys a reputation as a generally progressive and forward-thinking company, its record on labor relations is not completely sunny. It’s been the target of labor strikes in Europe, and unions in America have made complaints to the NLRB that IKEA illegally harassed workers here for trying to unionize. The company also employs the law firm Jackson Lewis, which specializes in helping companies fight against their own workers on labor issues.

Yesterday, overnight warehouse workers at the IKEA store in Stoughton, Massachusetts submitted a letter signed by three quarters of employees telling the store that they want to join the UFCW, and asking the company to voluntarily recognize them as a union. In their letter, the workers say that they “love working at IKEA,” and that “We believe that a union is the best way to work together to live our values and build an even better IKEA.” Already, Democratic presidential candidates Bernie Sanders and Martin O’Malley have made public statements of support for the workers’ unionization effort, and urged the company to recognize the union without further delay.

At this point, the company faces a very simple choice. It has been presented with evidence that a large majority of these workers want a union. The decent thing to do is to recognize the union and begin negotiating with it in good faith. IKEA has many unionized retail workers around the world, but this would be the first retail store in the U.S. to unionize.

Or, the company can pay a lot of money to its anti-union law firm—money that could be used to, for example, boost worker salaries—and fight the effort to unionize. This choice, in essence, would represent a corporate decision by IKEA to go to war with its own employees.

So far, the union has not gotten an official reply from IKEA. We contacted IKEA, but our call has not been returned. The company has responded to questions on Twitter by referring to its standard statement of “Co-worker principles.”

It would be much easier to simply call off the attack dog lawyers and recognize the union. There is no excuse not to. No excuse.

[Photo via UFCW]

The Safety Myth About Black Colleges 

$
0
0

The Safety Myth About Black Colleges 

In recent weeks, calls for widespread institutional change at some predominantly white colleges and universities have captured the nation’s collective attention. On one side, free speech fundamentalists at schools like UCLA, Yale, and the University of Missouri insist that one’s First Amendment right outweighs issues of racial insensitivity. Nobody ever guaranteed a hostile-free learning environment, they say. On the other side, black students feel unsafe as a result of unregulated free speech masked as open intellectual exchange.

On social media, the response among some in the HBCU community has been unforgiving. The thinking is: black students chose to accept racial insensitivity the moment they enrolled at institutions where they would be demographically outflanked.

The obvious assumption is that HBCUs fill a void left open by the lack of safety for black students at PWIs. The come-celebrate-your-unapologetic-blackness-with-us brigade strikes again.

But the claim that HBCUs are safe shining cities atop the hill is mythical. Using instances of racial insensitivity and systemic disregard for black students at PWIs to claim HBCUs as the corrective is disingenuous if not outright irresponsible. They are no safer for black students than PWIs. And to say otherwise is to ignore the well-founded grievances of queer and trans students, students who dare speak out against sexual violence, and those demanding of their institutions adequate resources and facilities.

There is clearly precedent for this myth. Throughout the American social and political imagination—exemplified through literature, television, and social life—HBCUs possess a savior-like quality, rescuing students from the cruel white world beyond their gates. Implicit in many avowals of HBCU life is that safety is rewarded by the mere fact of being black. This thinking is the basis on which Ta-Nehisi Coates recalls his undergraduate years at Howard University. “My mecca was, is, and shall always be Howard University,” he wrote in Between The World and Me. It’s also the basis of shows like A Different World and The Cosby Show. Want to feel safe? Join an HBCU.

That mecca—that space to thrive, flourish and grow—is a powerful space indeed, and as an HBCU graduate I know these spaces give students room to exist and learn beyond the gaze of white racial insensitivity. In September, Donovan X. Ramsey wrote about the critical importance of HBCUs like Morehouse College in a post-Ferguson world. At Morehouse, Ramsey said he existed in a safe space where his “blackness did not render [him] suspicious or scary.”

But I also know that HBCUs have never been truly safe for all its students. I know that black queer and trans students have been struggling for visibility and safety at black colleges for a very long time. I know that black colleges have the same issues with being held accountable on matters of intimate partner violence and sexual violence as predominantly white colleges. And I know that HBCU students have been at the forefront of holding their institutions accountable for ensuring the full safety of students as much as black PWI students have at their institutions.

So while blackness may be a prerequisite for the kind of safety HBCUs offer historically, it is not tantamount to saying HBCUs are safe-spaces for black students today.

The story about what safety entails is richer and more complex. The #TakeBackHU campaign on the campus of Howard University, the work by black women to combat often-unreported sexual violence at Spelman College, and the efforts among gender nonconforming and queer students at Morehouse are all parts of this more tangled, messy story about how students, even in spaces of supposed racial harmony, are pushing radically for accountability, often with heavy opposition.

None of this is to favor one kind of institution over another. Nor is it to pathologize HBCUs as being fraught with more problems than their PWI counterparts. The fact is that HBCU and black PWI students are all pleading with their institutions for care and support, for at least a recognition that the spaces they inhabit are affirming and safe. So it does not seem too much to ask that we trash the inherited assumption that a space is safe because it may be populated with those who look like us. We have to dig deeper than that.

This would mean giving space to students to contest institutional policies they don’t believe are in the best interest of the collegiate community. It would mean fighting to provide faculty with adequate resources to support black students. It would mean holding students and administration accountable for sexual and gender-based violence. It would mean advocating against unsafe, unclean and undignified campus facilities. It would mean pushing back against administrative efforts to passively and actively support the erasure of gender non-conforming, trans and queer students. It would mean recognizing the radical work of students at black and white colleges as connected rather than disjointed.

Whether or not people will draw connections to this more complicated story of safety for black students, the work is already being done to imagine better, safer institutions at HBCUs and PWIs. And we would do well to join them or not stand in their way by insisting that safety has a rightful presence in one place and not the other.

Jared Loggins is a journalist and PhD student in Political Science at UCLA.

[Image via Getty]

Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

$
0
0

Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

Here are the best of today’s deals. Get every great deal every day on Kinja Deals, follow us on Facebook and Twitter to never miss a deal, join us on Kinja Gear to read about great products, and on Kinja Co-Op to help us find the best.


More Deals

Today’s Best Gaming Deals​

http://deals.kinja.com/there-s-no-nee...

Today’s Best Media Deals

http://deals.kinja.com/todays-best-me...

Today’s Best App Deals

http://deals.kinja.com/todays-best-ap...

Today’s Best Apparel Deals

http://deals.kinja.com/todays-best-ap...


Top Deals


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

Just in time for winter, Amazon’s offering big discounts on Adidas sweat pants and hoodies to help you stay active over the holiday season. [Save 50% or More : Select adidas Training Apparel]

As for your feet, you can also save 45% on Timberland PRO work and safety shoes. [45% Off Timberland PRO Work & Safety Shoes]

Just remember that these are both Gold Box deals, meaning these prices are only available today, or until sold out.


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

We already mentioned Target’s Buy 2, Get 1 Free video game deal earlier this week, but now that Fallout 4 and Rise of the Tomb Raider (not to mention Black Ops III and Assassin’s Creed Syndicate) are included in the selection, it bears repeating. [Buy Two Video Games, Get One Free]


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

Delta’s In2ition line recently took home the title of your favorite shower head, and the entire line is on sale today in Amazon’s Gold Box.

http://co-op.kinja.com/most-popular-s...

Inside, you’ll find find In2ition shower heads with four settings, five settings, massaging H2Okinetic options, and even arm-mounted models. And of course, each one features a flexible handshower that docks directly into the main shower head, giving you added flexibility.

Whichever model you choose, just remember that this is a Gold Box deal, meaning these prices are only available today, or until sold out. [Delta In2ition Shower Head Sale]


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

If you don’t mind buying a refurb, Groupon is selling the new, voice-controlled Roku 3 for $70 today, the best price we’ve seen. [Refurb Roku 3 Streaming Media Player with Voice Search, $70]

https://www.groupon.com/deals/gg-roku-...


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

Nothing says “generic gift” quite like a barbecue set, and that’s okay! Chances are, you’ll need a handful of generally-agreeable and non-controversial gifts for random cousins or office secret santas this holiday season anyway, so go ahead and knock them off your list for $22. [VonShef 18 Piece Stainless Steel BBQ Tool Set With Carry Case, $22 with code 6BHFYDBI]

http://www.amazon.com/VonShef-Piece-...


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

If you haven’t upgraded your home’s network to 802.11ac yet, Apple’s AirPort Extreme is one of the easiest ways to make the leap. There are faster routers, and ones with more configuration options and ports, but none are as dead simple to set up and maintain as Apple’s.

Rakuten is selling refurbished models available for $114 right now, which is $15 less than Apple’s own refurb price, and $66 less than buying it new from Amazon (where it has a 4.6 star review average). I suspect this will sell out relatively quickly. [Refurb Apple AirPort Extreme, $114]

http://www.rakuten.com/prod/apple-air...


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

If you own pets, but don’t want to own a colony of ants, you need to keep your kibble locked up tight. IRIS’s airtight pet food container kit is a bestseller on Amazon, and you can own it for an all-time low $16 today, complete with a smaller bin for cat food or treats. This same deal was available a few weeks ago, but it sold out quickly, so lock in your order before it’s too late. [IRIS Airtight Pet Food Container Combo Kit, $16]

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B007RBB63K/...


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

If you want to dip your toes into 3D printing, this barebones Maker Select printer is only $349 today on Monoprice. Despite its low price, it still has the same 1.75mm resolution of Monoprice’s $500 and $700 models, and actually has a larger total build volume of 7.9” x 7.9” x 7.1”. [Maker Select 3D Printer, $349]

http://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=1...


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

Do you still use a tape measure, like some kind of caveman? This laser distance measurer takes instant distance readings of up to 164’, and includes several built-in area calculation functions, in case you’re a little rusty on your elementary school math. [Digital Laser Distance Meter, $32 with code X5BJMAHC]

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00KK98CEC


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

Today only, Amazon’s marking the complete Sopranos Blu-ray set down to $75, an all-time low by $25. It even includes digital copies for free! [The Sopranos: The Complete Series, $75]

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00L5QX1FO/...


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

There’s no need to wait for Black Friday; the PS4 console bundle deals have already started. Today, you get your choice of two base bundles, plus extra games, accessories, and/or movies to sweeten the pot.

PlayStation 4 500GB Console - Uncharted: The Nathan Drake Collection Bundle with Assassin’s Creed Syndicate and Final Fantasy Type-0 ($350) | Amazon

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B017RZEZ7O/...

PlayStation 4 1TB Call of Duty: Black Ops III Limited Edition Bundle with Fallout 4, PowerA DualShock Charging Stand, and Two Movies ($430) | Best Buy

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/sony-play...


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

Full disclosure: This isn’t a deal. $10 is the normal price for a Nyko Smart Clip, but I feel like it bears mentioning in the age of Fallout 4. As Polygon pointed out yesterday, if you weren’t able to score a Pip-Boy edition, this clip will mount your phone above a DualShock 4 or Xbox One gamepad, and give you easy access to the Pip-Boy app while you play.

Nyko Smart Clip for PS4 ($10) | Amazon

http://www.amazon.com/Nyko-Smart-Cli...

Nyko Smart Clip for Xbox One ($10) | Amazon

http://www.amazon.com/Nyko-Smart-Cli...


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

Anker’s ubiquitous Astro series of USB battery packs are some of the most popular items we’ve ever posted, but today we have a deal on the smallest member of their newer, more powerful PowerCore line. [Anker PowerCore 10400 Portable Charger, $16 with code XCWT4JFT]

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00Z9QVE4Q/...


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

If you’re a satisfied Apple Watch owner, but don’t want to pay Apple a month’s rent just for a metal band, this third party option is down to just $25 today, and is available in multiple colors and sizes to match any Apple watch. [Oittm Stainless Steel Apple Watch Bands, $25 with code PX2WNBYC]

http://www.amazon.com/Oittm-Stainles...


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

Full disclosure, I don’t know if TENS (Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) massagers actually do anything useful. I use one occasionally after playing tennis, and I think it helps reduce muscle pain, but it could be a placebo effect! In any event, this is not a medical endorsement, simply a deal post, and this is about as cheap as you’ll ever see one of these things. [Magicfly Massage Electronic Pulse with Tens Massage Therapy, $16 with code C4MMPX22]

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B013FVRBJI


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

Short of munching on raw carrots, air-popped popcorn is about as healthy as snacks get, and this $16 National Presto Poplite can make 18 cups in under three minutes. [National Presto Poplite Hot Air Popper, $16]

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00DXRHQK4/...


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

This microfiber towel is considered by many detailing aficionados to be the best for drying off your car after you wash it. In fact, I can personally confirm that it’s less a towel and more a towel-shaped sponge. It’s also down to one of the lowest prices Amazon’s ever listed. [Meguiar’s X2000 Microfiber Drying Towel, $7]

http://www.amazon.com/Meguiars-X2000...


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

These Are Your Five Favorite Face Masks


Today's Best Deals: Shower Heads, Adidas Gear, Voice-Controlled Roku, and More

Your Favorite Meat Thermometer: Thermapen


Tech


Storage

Power

http://www.amazon.com/Inateck-Deskto...

Audio

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00ZF45JAM

Home Theater

http://www.walmart.com/ip/Sceptre-U50...

Computers & Accessories

PC Parts

Mobile Devices

Photography

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0091V38NK/...


Home


http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00UW7IXGY/...

Beauty & Grooming

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0018MQHO2/...

Kitchen

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00QTB4IW0/

Fitness

Apparel

Camping & Outdoors

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0157WNUD4

Tools & Auto

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00YE5Q182


Commerce Content is independent of Editorial and Advertising, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here to learn more. We want your feedback.

Send deal submissions to Deals@Gawker and all other inquiries to Shane@Gawker

How an Opinion Becomes a Pageant Speech in a Few Easy Steps

$
0
0

How an Opinion Becomes a Pageant Speech in a Few Easy Steps

Last year, out actor Zachary Quinto pissed off many people when he dared to share his opinion about PrEP, the treatment-as-prevention daily pill regimen that essentially works as a vaccine against HIV. In his interview for the 2014 Out100, here is what Quinto said:

AIDS has lost the edge of horror it possessed when it swept through the world in the ’80s. Today’s generation sees it more as something to live with and something to be much less fearful of. And that comes with a sense of, dare I say, laziness.

...We need to be really vigilant and open about the fact that these drugs are not to be taken to increase our ability to have recreational sex. There’s an incredible underlying irresponsibility to that way of thinking…and we don’t yet know enough about this vein of medication to see where it’ll take us down the line.

There are a few things there that are vaguely disappointing (the primary one being that a young gay man seemed to be dissuading people from taking a life-saving drug that has few known side effects), but as a whole, he was right. For everyone’s sake, it’s better to look at PrEP as a solution to a problem, rather than a license to have nonstop anonymous raw sex. In fact, the amount of gay men engaging in nonstop raw sex before the FDA approved Truvda as PrEP in 2012 speaks to just how needed something like this was. PrEP is not a cure-all or a magical solution to all your sexual problems, it’s just one pill that gives you one less thing to worry about.

To further tease out Quinto’s point, it may be the case that the reduction of anxiety related to contracting HIV is enough to make sex more recreational, and, in that way, PrEP does in fact increase our ability to have recreational sex. And that, I would argue, is a good thing. I would also argue that to take PrEP is to be really vigilant, and, in fact, the exact opposite of lazy.*

Maybe this is all just semantics, and Quinto is just an actor (not an expert or academic or doctor) whose opinions should be interpreted with some perspective. But it wasn’t an entirely stupid or ill-informed statement, and it was one that was useful to have been made publicly by a prominent out celebrity.

Last year was a fun year for talking about gay sex, thanks to PrEP. People said smart things and people said dumb things. That’s how discourse has always worked, of course, but now we have an electronic paper trail and the ability to respond loudly to things that we do not like. I was happy that people were talking about the generally taboo subject of man-on-man sex, period, especially condomless man-on-man sex, which is something many people do while pretending that they don’t. It felt, last year, like PrEP helped make us more honest, and given everyone’s unique point of views, some people’s honesty doesn’t jibe with others’ experiences. Again, it’s how these things work.

Quinto’s statement caused enough controversy (“Zachary Quinto, Check Your Privilege on HIV,” read a headline on The Advocate) that he responded to the responses with a piece on the Huffington Post called “On the Response to My OUT 100 Interview.” In it, Quinto fleshed out his original point, writing:

I have had numerous conversations in my travels with young gay people who see the threat of HIV as diminished to the point of near irrelevance. I have heard too many stories of young people taking PrEP as an insurance policy against their tendency toward unprotected non-monogamous sex. THAT is my only outrage.

That’s reasonable. Conceptualizing HIV in 2015 is a tightrope walk—the virus brings with it a series of health challenges that you’re better off without having to face, but, at the same time, it’s treatable (provided that you have the resources to be treated). You don’t want HIV, but you also don’t want to not want to so badly that you end up stigmatizing the healthy people who live with it. None of this stuff is simple, and an essay is a much better way to address the complexity than a brief quote in a magazine. And despite the tediousness of people talking about how people talk about things, it was good to see an honest and unflinching discussion of these issues play out in public, something Quinto acknowledged in the opening of the piece (while bemoaning his words being “misconstrued”).

But despite the fact that our culture’s memory capacity often seems nonexistent, some hastily-stated opinions are indelible. And so another gay magazine, the UK’s Attitude, recently asked Quinto about his now year-old lightning-rod comment that he’d already clarified at length.

The cutest, most pull-able resulting quote from this new interview is, “​People said something about ‘slut-shaming’. I’m like, ‘Come on please, that’s absurd. I love sluts.’” But the core of his response was this:

I’m not trying to say people shouldn’t take PrEP, or that people shouldn’t have sex, or that sex isn’t amazing. It is. I’m just saying we should support each other and be responsible, whatever that means to you.

It’s couched, it’s safe, it’s inclusive. Quinto’s entire point of view—right or wrong, supposedly informed or ignorant—has been ironed out beyond recognition. It seems that Quinto has learned his lesson from saying something challenging. “We should support each other and be responsible, whatever that means to you,” is actually meaningless. Be nice and strive for world peace, everyone. Whatever “nice” and “world peace” mean to you.

Why even bother saying anything at all if all it amounts to in the end is something that cowers as much as a beauty pageant contestant in the interview round, afraid of saying something real and offending anyone?

[Image via Getty]

*Update note: Inspired by this post, I amended this piece to include Quinto’s full quote about “laziness” and HIV, as well as my response to it.

Nouman Raja, the Palm Beach Gardens police officer who fatally shot Corey Jones in October, has been

Donald Trump’s New Deal

$
0
0

Donald Trump’s New Deal

Most people consider Donald Trump to be a gratuitous self-promoter, a somewhat charismatic actor, a clown, a demagogue, a misogynist, or a racist. But what everyone needs to understand about him is that what he considers himself, first and foremost, is a builder. In his latest book, Crippled America: How to Make America Great Again—the third book that he has written as a politician, after The America We Deserve (2000) and Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again (2011)—he repeats the same gesture that he also makes in the other two, namely that he constantly cites his building accomplishments as qualifications that make him better suited than any career politician imaginable to be President of the United States.

The most essential passage in Crippled America comes in the chapter titled “Teaching the Media Dollars & Sense” when Trump explains how he finally lost his temper with the media, even though “reporters have been writing about me and talking about me, even interviewing me, in newspapers, magazines, and television for almost four decades.” Trump had made the principled decision “to ignore most of these attacks,” but things changed when a relative of his reported to Trump that someone in the media had attempted to invalidate Trump’s reputation as a master builder.

“My cousin, John Walter, called and started complaining about a particular story he’d heard saying that I hadn’t built a building since 1992 and told me I had to set the record straight,” Trump declares. “I couldn’t let reporters continue to get it so wrong.”

You can almost see his nostrils flare as he continues:

“I hadn’t built a building since 1992? That’s just bizarre. You’d have to be blind as well as ignorant to say something like that. It’s got to be the easiest thing in the world to check the things that I’ve accomplished.”

Trump goes on to provide an exhaustive list of post-1992 Trump construction projects, too long to reproduce here, following which he exclaims, “And many, many more. I’ve obviously been a very busy man since 1992!”

Trump’s sense that people do not respect his accomplishments as a builder as much as they should is one of Crippled America’s major themes and he goes out of his way to mention building and his ability to build whenever he can.

In another chapter— titled “Our Infrastructure is Crumbling”—Trump states that, “When you talk about building, you had better talk about Trump. There is no single builder in this country who has his name on as great a range of projects as I’ve constructed.”

Trump’s heated effort to remind the American people to appreciate him as a great builder suffuses so much of Crippled America that I have become convinced that Trump is running for President just so he can build a 1,000-mile wall on the Mexican border as a statement of what he himself, as America’s greatest builder, is capable of; and that the rest of his presidential campaign, including his alarmist, racist remarks about illegal immigration, only exist to bolster his real cause: to build the wall.

http://www.amazon.com/Crippled-Ameri...

If that sounds ludicrous, it is only because no one understands how truly insane Trump really is. He cherishes his identity as a builder as the essence of his innermost, authentic self, and in order to see exactly how, one must look beyond Trump’s trilogy of political books, to his first trilogy of books, the memoirs Trump: The Art of the Deal (1987), Trump: Surviving at the Top (1990) and Trump: The Art of the Comeback (1998). Together, they comprise a loose trilogy, very analogous in structure to Star Wars Episodes IV-VI, which forms the backbone of the Trump legend.

Contained in these three books is the saga of great early success, downfall, and redemption that provides the basis for all that Trump claims about himself: he came to prominence in the 70s and 80s by tearing down old buildings and erecting gleaming glass-and-steel structures like the Grand Hyatt and Trump Tower and in so doing helped kick off the luxury real estate boom of the 80s (The Art of the Deal); went broke when the real estate market dipped in the early 90s and simultaneously was eviscerated in the press during his divorce from Ivana Trump (Surviving at the Top, the Empire Strikes Back of Trump); and then paid off his debts, returned to full preeminence, acquired the Miss Universe pageant, negotiated an advantageous divorce settlement with Ivana, and went to dinner at Le Cirque with Michael Jackson (The Art of the Comeback).

Throughout, Trump takes building seriously, or so he claims, but possibly not as seriously as he takes The Art of the Deal, a holy text in Trump World. It is great fun to imagine his children Ivanka, Robert, and Donald, Jr. and other retainers sitting around in a gaudy, gold-hued lounge somewhere in Trump Tower having a reading-group discussion about it. For in The Art of the Deal, Trump emerges not only as a builder, but also as a self-builder.

Trump makes clear repeatedly that not merely the events described in The Art of the Deal, but the experience of packaging them into a book and sharing them with the public had a transformative effect on his life. In the Acknowledgements of Surviving at the Top, Trump confesses, “Looking back on it, I see that writing The Art of the Deal was one of the most satisfying and fulfilling experiences of my life.” Trump reveals in Deal that it was through the business ventures described in its pages that he fully becomes himself for the first time, though that is not the only thing about the book that makes it so special to him. What Trump perceives as the enthusiastic public response to Deal is significant because it also gives him the sense that the public could recognize what he had become, and share the experience of his becoming with him.

One must read The Art of the Deal in order to understand why the Trump of this month’s Crippled America is acting so bitter about America’s refusal to recognize him as the nation’s greatest builder. The episodic series of real estate deals that Trump and co-author Tony Schwartz narrate in the book demonstrate how a kind of vague public-mindedness has always been an essential feature of what has come to be known as the “Trump brand,” no matter how shallow or ultimately false Trump’s heavily brand-conscious version of populism may be.

This is especially so in the chapters about the construction of Trump Tower and the renovation of the Wollman Rink, the latter of which has been a fixture of Trump’s political writing since at least 2000.

There is a lot of vintage 80s “greed is good”-type stuff in the chapter on Trump Tower; Trump makes completely clear that he wants the building to be as tall as possible to pack in the largest number of condominiums with the best possible views, so that he can charge as much as he can. Trump’s demand that it be a “great skyscraper” and “the most fantastic building in New York” also demonstrates his unsurprising desire to build a giant phallic monument to himself. It is also well known that Trump utilized illegal immigrant labor in the construction of Trump Tower, and he never mentions that anywhere.

In order to get a zoning variance from the City Planning Commission, though, he and architect Der Scutt add a six-story public atrium to the ground level. Trump quickly falls in love with the atrium, extolling how its “glamour” is decisive in imbuing Trump Tower with what he calls its “mystical aura” when it opens in 1983. The City Planning Commission lauds the battery of shops in the atrium—which to this day is still open to visitors from 8:00 am to 10:00 pm, though I don’t recommend Trump Bar, the uncharacteristically divey tavern in the atrium—as “extraordinary public amenities,” and Trump lavishes much more attention in Deal on the unique spatial experience that his atrium can provide casual visitors than he does on the actual condominiums located farther up the building.

It is appropriate that the Trump Tower public atrium resembles a giant womb, however, because it infantilizes visitors. It reduces participation in “public” space to mere spectatorship by placing visitors in the position of vicarious participants in the lives of Trump and his clients. In this sense, the Trump Tower atrium plays the same role in the promotion of the Trump myth that media have played in it ever since: Trump’s books, his cameo in Home Alone 2, The Apprentice, and the now-defunct Trump University all reinforce the illusion that the very rich can share their wealth with the public, in a virtual sense, purely by making their wealth known to the public.


“The rest of his presidential campaign, including his alarmist, racist remarks about illegal immigration, only exist to bolster his real cause: to build the wall.”


No matter how flimsy the illusion of Trump’s populism may be, he needs to maintain it so that his buildings will be viewed, however illegitimately, as contributing to the public good. That is what makes the Wollman Rink section of Deal such a significant episode from Trump’s early career for Trump’s post-2000 life as a politician and political-book writer. Even though Trump’s renovation of Wollman Rink is uncharacteristic of the building he has done throughout his career, he has inflated it into legend because it lets him publicly play out the conservative fantasy that any private-sector businessman can finish better, cheaper, and faster what any elected official would take years just to botch up.

Wollman Rink opened in Central Park in 1950 and closed for renovations in 1980. Trump moved into Trump Tower that same year. By 1986, when the city announced plans to scrap all of the work that had been done on Wollman Rink since 1980 and start over, Trump had become frustrated by the city’s lack of progress because “I had a view of Wollman Rink” from Trump Tower and “it was not a pretty sight.”

On May 28, 1986, he writes a letter to Koch that includes the following: “I am offering to construct and pay for a brand new Wollman Ice-Skating Rink and have it open to the public by November of this winter. I would lease the rink from the city at a fair market rental, and run it properly after its completion.” Koch releases a response to the press, but the press takes Trump’s side, and Trump finishes the renovation in four months, albeit without paying the contractor who he actually hired to do it.

If more people read back into Trump’s bibliography, and could see how often references to the Wollman Rink renovation recur in his political writing, the absurdity of the outsize significance that the Rink holds for Trump would blow their minds.

And whenever he discusses Wollman Rink, over the decades, he usually uses follows the same template. Whereas in Deal Trump calls a Ed Koch “a bully, plain and simple” and a “closet coward,” in The America We Deserve (2000), he says that Koch is “ridiculously incompetent,” that NYC “for six years bungled, bobbled, and botched the job of fixing a no-story municipal skating rink” before Trump got involved and “got the job done in four months flat, $750,000 under budget, and a full month ahead of schedule”; in Time to Get Tough (2011) he writes that “for seven straight years [I thought he said it was six], the rink was closed on account of New York City’s management fiasco” and “I told the city I would have Wollman Rink finished in six months” and “I did it in four”; and, finally, in Crippled America (2015), he reminds the reader once again that “New York City wasted seven years trying to get a skating rink done. I did it in less than four months—and got it done under budget.”

Conservatives since time immemorial have argued that businesspeople would do a better job running the government than the government itself does, but Trump leans on this myth more heavily than most because the association between populism and “Trump” is so essential to the brand, but at the same time so tenuous. Despite the small scale of the ice-skating rink renovation, Trump clings to the Wollman episode because it provides the only example of him contributing to the public good concretely, rather than through media that afford the public the opportunity to experience his wealth vicariously.

Notwithstanding any project in particular, the real reason why Trump thinks of himself as a public builder is that the act of building itself fills him with fiendish glee, and, in the same way that he thinks of the Trump Tower atrium as a “public amenity” because of the vicarious enjoyment of his own wealth that it affords to visitors, he believes that anything that gives him the pleasure he craves will automatically trickle down to society in one way or another. At one point in Crippled America, he claims, “I speak for the people!” but does not explain why or how, and the lack of an explanation suggests that he imagines a connection between himself and his millions of spectators that is too irrational to be explained.

In the annals of Trump, the closest analogue to his plan to build a 1,000-mile wall on the border with Mexico has to be “Television City,” the complex that Trump had unsuccessfully tried to build on the far Upper West Side of Manhattan in the 80s. Trump wanted to build “the tallest building in the world” there, and even he admitted that there was no good economic reason to do it: “If maximum profit is your sole motive,” he writes in The Art of the Deal, “you’re far better off putting up three 50-story towers than one 150-story skyscraper.”

But he pursues the building 150-story tower anyway—and ultimately fails—because of the pure aesthetic experience that it would afford: “I’ve always loved tall buildings,” he writes, “I remember coming in with my father as a kid and pleading with him to take us to the Empire State Building, which at the time was the world’s tallest building.” He also relishes “bringing the world’s tallest building back to New York” from Chicago.

As Trump says in the opening sentences of The Art of the Deal, “I don’t do it for the money... I do it to do it”—and that would be OK if Trump were legitimately building for the public. But he’s not: he builds solely for his own self-aggrandizement, but under the assumption the public will experience his pleasure with him vicariously.

It’s obvious that building a 1,000-mile wall excites him as much as any of these older projects ever did and that he can’t wait to be able to journey to the Southwest and start digging, building, and dealmaking at whatever the cost. That is why it is almost sad that he should pitch this blatant attempt to recapture the glory of his Deal years with Crippled America, his worst book by far.

Some people might look at what I am arguing and conclude that, by emphasizing the role of Trump’s desire to build and be worshipped as a builder in provoking his unhinged run for president, I am underestimating Trump’s sheer virulent racism. After all, he uses the term “anchor babies” constantly throughout Crippled America and he expresses a clear determination to end birthright citizenship as currently guaranteed by the 14th Amendment. That point of view is not incompatible with my assessment, however, in which Trump’s narcissism is equivalent to an endless internal hall of mirrors from which he can never escape, and the humanity of the people who he has defamed by calling them “anchor babies” and “rapists” can never reach him and has no meaning.

Patrick W. Gallagher hosts Animal Farm Reading Series, NYC’s destination for the newest and best writing in any genre. His novel POLLEN is coming soon for download to all digital formats.

[Image via Getty]


Watch Bob Dole Giggle Over How Much He Hates Ted Cruz

$
0
0

Watch Bob Dole Giggle Over How Much He Hates Ted Cruz

Perpetual former candidate for president and (occasionally) vice president Bob Dole has a few opinions about what will soon be the latest crop of former candidates for president. Namely, that he thinks they’re all real swell guys. Well—except for one.

Speaking to ABC News about the country’s prospects, Dole announces jovially, “There are a lot of good candidates. I like [extended pause] nearly all of them.”

Suddenly—his brow furrows. He turns to the women at his right. “Except...” he whispers. “Except for Cruz.”

Then, the 92-year-old man begins to giggle. Over his deep sense of loathing for Ted Cruz, Bob Dole giggles.

Except for Cruz.

[h/t Talking Points Memo]


Contact the author at ashley@gawker.com. Image via Getty.

ISIS Claims Responsibility for Suicide Bombings in Beirut That Killed at Least 41

$
0
0

ISIS Claims Responsibility for Suicide Bombings in Beirut That Killed at Least 41

Two suicide bombers killed at least 41 people and injured 200 more Thursday evening in Beirut neighborhood considered a Hezbollah-stronghold, according to the Lebanese health minister.

Reuters reports that ISIS has claimed responsibility for the blasts, though there’s been no official confirmation yet.

The bombings reportedly struck a Shi’ite community center and a bakery about 500 feet away; both blasts occurred within five minutes, according to Lebanese state-run National News Agency.

Authorities have closed entrances to the neighborhood, Bourj al-Barajneh, and cautioned civilians to stay away from the blast sites.

Richard Hall, a journalist for the Global Post, is tweeting updates from the scene:


Image via AP. Contact the author at taylor@gawker.com.

One Sorority Finally Comes Out Against Bullshit Campus Sexual Assault Bill 

$
0
0

One Sorority Finally Comes Out Against Bullshit Campus Sexual Assault Bill 

The so-called “Safe Campus Act,” a nonsense bill that would keep colleges from punishing rapists unless victims agree to go to the police, had seemingly unanimous support from national fraternity and sorority organizations—until today. Alpha Phi has become the first sorority to come out against the bill in a statement made “at the request of many of our members and chapters.”

In the statement, released to the Huffington Post, the Alpha Phi International Executive Board and Executive Office Staff make it clear that the sorority has “not endorsed” the Safe Campus Act and “has not committed to any financial support” to it.

“We believe our sisters who are survivors should have choices in how, when and to whom they go to for support or to report the crime,” the statement reads. “They should have their own voice and the support and encouragement they need to move forward including reporting as they choose to.”

The Safe Campus Act—which, as the Huffington Post points out, is “universally opposed by rape victims’ advocacy groups”—was proposed by Republican Reps. Pete Sessions, Kay Granger, and Matt Salmon in July. The bill would prevent colleges from investigating sexual assault allegations and punishing perpetrators unless the victim agrees to make a police report. Even then, as Slate noted last month, colleges would have to wait to punish a perpetrator until the police complete their investigation. The whole process could take years, leaving potential rapists free to roam campus and victims at risk for retaliation. This nightmare situation would, victims’ advocacy groups argue, discourage sexual assault reporting even more.

In short, the Safe Campus Act would make colleges less safe, infringe upon students’ Title IX rights, and make it even easier than it already is for students to get away with rape.

It’s not so surprising then that fraternities, which so often deal with fallout from rape accusations, are in favor of the bill. What’s interesting is that until today, the National Panhellenic Conference of sororities was also united in supporting it.

A coalition of Greek organizations including the National Panhellenic Conference, the North American Interfraternity Conference, the Kappa Alpha Order, the Alpha Tau Omega fraternity, and the Sigma Nu fraternity has been lobbying for the Safe Campus Act for months with the help of former Mississippi Sen. Trent Lott (a former Sigma Nu). According to the Huffington Post, the coalition has so far committed $200,000 to the cause.

Sens. Claire McCaskill and Kirsten Gillibrand, who have co-sponsored their own campus sexual assault bill in the Senate, find this troubling. “I would be very upset if I were a young woman in a sorority today,” McCaskill told Slate last month.

Alpha Phi’s full statement, via the Huffington Post, is below.

Dear Sisters,

We are writing at the request of many of our members and chapters to clarify Alpha Phi’s position on the 2015 Safe Campus and Fair Campus Acts which have been endorsed by the National Panhellenic Conference. Alpha Phi has not endorsed this legislation and has not committed to any financial support.

We believe in our principle of Watchcare that provides for unconditional support of our sisters at all times, including those who are survivors of sexual assault. We accept any social consequences that may be implied by others as we stand beside our sisters and support them if they choose to report the crime.

We believe our sisters who are survivors should have choices in how, when and to whom they go to for support or to report the crime. They should have their own voice and the support and encouragement they need to move forward including reporting as they choose to.

We believe universities should remain accountable for the safety of their campuses, and should continue to raise the bar to ensure that they report and respond to crimes and keep students safe. Their ability to do so should not be diminished.

We believe that each of our chapters and our members should have their own voice and should work with their communities to fight sexual assault. Alpha Phi members are strong women and leaders who can and will make a difference.

We believe in our members. We believe in Alpha Phi.

Loyally,

The Alpha Phi International Executive Board and Executive Office Staff


Photo via Pinterest. Contact the author at allie@gawker.com.

News Corp Denies Killing Story That Could Have Prevented the Crash of Metrojet Flight 9268

$
0
0

News Corp Denies Killing Story That Could Have Prevented the Crash of Metrojet Flight 9268

Last week, Nick Parker of The Sun exposed the shoddy security standards at Egypt’s Sharm El-Sheik International Airport, from which Metrojet Flight 9268 departed on October 31 before mysteriously crashing on the Sinai Peninsula. The airport’s security is so lax, Parker reported, that British tourists have been able to circumvent the airport’s standard security protocols by slipping airport personnel as little as 15 pounds. If you’re inclined to believe an explosive device took down Flight 9268 (as the U.S. government allegedly does), Parker’s story explains how such a device could have made its way onboard. It’s an undeniably juicy scoop.

The British magazine Private Eye, however, has an even juicier story-behind-the-story concerning the publication of Parker’s exposé. According to an unbylined piece in the magazine’s most recent issue, Parker proposed a similar investigation about Shark El-Sheik’s security issues in June of this year—long before the crash of Flight 9268—only to be told by executives at News Corp, which owns The Sun, that his story would invite potential legal action in the United States. “So the Sun missed its chance the expose the security failings at Sharm el Sheik,” the piece concludes. “Five months later, 224 Russians were blown out of the sky.”

Private Eye does not publish the majority of its articles online, but readers in Britain began posting photos of the story on Twitter yesterday:

The relevant portion:

It was while at Sharm airport in June this year that Parker heard of corrupt officials letting tourists avoid the queues—and bypass security and baggage checks—in return for cash backhanders. He contacted his newsdesk and proposed an exposé of the lax security that was jeopardising the lives of holidaymakers. He would find an official, offer a £20 note and see if he could indeed get a bag through to flight-side without any checking.

The newsdesk then contacted managing editor Stig Abell’s office, which informed chief compliance officer Imogen Haddon, who in turn consulted News Corp’s head office in new York and its management and standards committee (MSC)—whereupon an urgent message was sent to Parker ordering him not to go ahead.

News Corp’s reaction, the report argues, was based on the management and standards committee’s fear that “if [Parker] handed over £20 it might lead to charges against News Corp in America under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which applies to any company with US connections (such as News Corp) bribing foreign officials anywhere in the world.” The likelihood of such prosecution is unclear, but the committee’s apparent aversion to taking such risks is fairly understandable: It was formed, after all, in the wake of the News International phone-hacking and bribery scandals that led to the shuttering of News of the World. And one of the central characters in those scandals was none other than Nick Parker himself.

News Corp is not taking Private Eye’s allegations lightly, though. A spokeswoman for the company referred Gawker to the following tweets by Parker’s editor, Stig Abell, who forcefully denied the story’s particulars:

Private Eye did not immediately respond to a request for comment regarding Abell’s denials; we’ll update this post if we hear back from the magazine. If you know anything else about this—or any other stories that News Corp is sitting on!—please get in touch.

Email: trotter@gawker.com · PGP key + fingerprint · DM: @jktrotter · Photo credit: AP

Maybe the College Kids Should Destroy College? 

$
0
0

Maybe the College Kids Should Destroy College? 

It is fair to say that, in examining the twin meltdowns at Yale and the University of Missouri, the pundit class has come down against the tactics of the students, who, in both cases, have been militant and aggressive. The writers have seen parts of each protest—Yale students berating a professor, Mizzou students boxing out a photographer—as a threat to college as we know it. But could colleges not stand to be threatened?

Conor Friedersdorf at The Atlantic, in a piece called “The New Intolerance of Student Activism,” dissects the Yale controversy—over a professor couple’s admonitions about the university’s admonitions about possibly offensive Halloween costumes—and concludes that the students’ “flagrant intolerance” is “illiberal.”

Though it can be tough to burrow into the hardline opinions and strategies of today’s students—and, damn, can they can seem so adorably foolish—Friedersdorf and his ilk are defending the tradition of American colleges without inquiring why contemporary students might be looking to rearrange the campuses they now inhabit.

Friedersdorf’s main problem is that despite thousands of words examining the Yale crisis, he fails to acknowledge the bigger picture, which is that colleges—elite ones, anyway—are white institutions, which is to say not only are they primarily directed, cared for and populated by white people, but that their entire mode of being from their beginnings has been molded by white people: the way white people think and act, what white people want to see in the world, what makes white people comfortable. Admissions policies have broadened through the decades, but the system still guides students onto a particular road, paved by and for a particular sort of person.

To focus so much scrutiny on the little events—students screaming at professors, professors screaming at students—is to miss the most broad question raised by the kids driving these sorts of clashes: What if we just did college differently? Friedersdorf alleges that the students at Yale who don’t want to engage in further debate about Halloween costumes are anti-liberal, but his column is inherently regressive—it is essentially a very longwinded argument in favor of the status quo. Friedersdorf thinks of colleges in the grand tradition of incubators of thought, and implicitly argues that there’s no real reason to change how they operate or their reason for existence.

But this characterization of colleges is idealist. It’s something out of a movie. An imagined utopia of 40 years ago. What exactly is so important about Yale that the school isn’t worth breaking? Plenty of great and smart people who have immeasurably improved our lives on Earth have passed through Yale—or any Ivy—but so too have some of the literal worst people alive. John Yoo went to Yale. Dick Cheney went to Yale. George W. Bush went to Yale, lmao. The entire investment banking industry, which exists to cheat this country and its people out of their money, inhales graduates of Ivy League schools. If the elite institutions that shaped these people—both the aerospace engineers and the robber barons—were suddenly turned on their heads, what exactly would happen? Are we sure the world would be worse off? How bad could it be if we tried to find out?

The actions of Melissa Click, the communications professor at Mizzou, were over-the-top and embarrassing, but the handwringing over it happening on the campus that houses one of the country’s oldest and most celebrated journalism schools was kind of hilarious, too. When I was at Mizzou seven or eight years ago, the consensus among my friends (all of whom were journalism students) was that the J-School, a hallowed institution, desperately needed to be upturned. The people at the very top of the J-School were jokes (literally), and so, too, were the classes. The school, like the industry it fed into, was crushingly slow to adapt to the changing nature of publishing, and students who left the school when I graduated (with a political science degree) were no more prepared to be journalists than the ones, like me, who worked for the independent student paper under the direction of other students who knew the world they were entering into better than the administrators.

Melissa Click’s anti-media barricading is not a way forward, but questioning the way things are done, even if messily, is the hallmark of a modern and adaptive society. This is especially true for a place like a college campus, which ideally shapes society instead of reflecting it. College students exist to learn from the institutions they attend, but the reverse is also true. It would be condescending to one’s own existence to not believe so. I side closer to Friedersdorf on the subject of the email sent by Erika Christakis—I find it innocuous at worst—but trying to shove the resultant bile back down the throats of the students responding to it is an attitude that is plainly conservative.

It’s also worth remembering, of course, that Yale and the Christakis family have won. Christakis and her husband are still “masters” of the dorm. Students put forth their ideas—including resignation—and Yale stood its ground. Some schools might not have, but Yale did. At Mizzou, the day after the entire profession of journalism pushed back against the anti-media protest, the inhabitants of the rogue tent city were reminding each other to “welcome and thank” the media. The exchange of ideas settled and a verdict was been rendered. Ultimately, the system Friedersdorf holds dear worked, which makes this all feel sort of silly, doesn’t it?

[image via AP]


Contact the author at jordan@gawker.com.

Ben Carson said yesterday that free college education would cause “the destruction of the nation.”

$
0
0

Ben Carson said yesterday that free college education would cause “the destruction of the nation.” We’re now in the part of the campaign where we just listen to Ben Carson talk until all his poll numbers go down for good.

Deadspin I Own A Tainted Volkswagen.


Donald Trump Compares Ben Carson's "Pathological" Temper to Child Molestation at Unhinged Iowa Rally

$
0
0

Donald Trump Compares Ben Carson's "Pathological" Temper to Child Molestation at Unhinged Iowa Rally

The infinite monkey theorem postulates that, given an infinite amount of time, a monkey banging on a typewriter will almost surely produce the works of Shakespeare. Here is the Trump corollary: given an hour and 35 minutes in Iowa, Donald Trump regurgitating everything he’s ever said will accidentally quote Beckett.

In 95 minutes, Trump repeats everything he’s said at every event, every rally, every debate in the past five months, as if speaking from the other side of a fugue state. He sighed. He laughed. He said, “We have to be mean.” He moped. He signed a book for someone in the audience and threw it them, saying, “There you go baby, I love you. Thank you.” He talked about deals. He sounded very, very tired. This, a campaign stop in Fort Dodge, Iowa, is Trump’s fourth state in as many days, the Washington Post reports.

At one point, he enumerated his rivals’ strengths and flaws, dedicating nearly nine minutes to Ben Carson.

“Carson is an enigma to me,” he said, before offering a summary of one of Carson’s books. “He said that he’s ‘pathological’ and that he’s got, basically, pathological disease...I don’t want a person that’s got pathological disease.”

(What is pathological disease?)

“If you’re pathological—there’s no cure for that, folks. There’s no cure for that,” Trump said. “If you’re a child molester—a sick puppy—a child molester, there’s no cure for that. There’s only one cure, we don’t want to talk about that cure. That’s the ultimate cure. Well, there’s death, and there’s the other thing.”

The whole speech is below. It is worth watching, in full or in part, as an artifact of a brilliant, exhausted performer running on fumes. “This is a special night. I’ve really enjoyed being with you,” Trump said as he came to a...conclusion? “It’s sad in many ways, because we’re talking about so many negative topics, but in certain ways it’s beautiful. It’s beautiful.”

Donald Trump: death is the ultimate cure—death, and the other thing.


GIF by Ashley. Contact the author of this post: brendan.oconnor@gawker.com.

Wesleyan Grad Pleads Guilty After Molly Overdose of 11 Students

$
0
0

Wesleyan Grad Pleads Guilty After Molly Overdose of 11 Students

A former Wesleyan University student admitted Thursday that he had led a campus drug ring that left at least 11 students in the hospital after he sold them a bad batch of molly.

The nightmare reportedly began February 22, when a wave of students were hospitalized prompting the university president to send out a campus-wide message urging students to check on their friends.

Zachary Kramer, 22, was arrested days after the overdoses spread across campus leaving at least one sophomore in critical condition. Another student’s heart stopped.

http://gawker.com/four-wesleyan-...

The details, via the Washington Post (An October Rolling Stone profile also offers a more in-depth look):

According to a federal indictment, Kramer returned from winter break in January with at least 25 grams of what he believed to be MDMA, a Schedule-I psychotropic drug often known as “Molly.” That semester, he was one of the school’s chief suppliers of Molly, which he allegedly sold at $80 to $100 a gram. He also gave it to some friends (referred to in the indictment as “distributors”) for redistribution to other students on campus, the indictmentsaid.

After the overdoses, the indictment said, Kramer urged his distributors not to speak with the police and told other students that that one of his “distributors” was the source of the purported “bad” Molly. He and some of his distributors destroyed their supply of the drug.

As it turns out, federal prosecutors say, it wasn’t Molly at all—it was a synthetic cannaboid containing AB Fubinaca, also known as K2 or Spice.

Kramer, who authorities say was the primary supplier of Molly at the university, pleaded guilty to federal drug charges and could face up to a year-and-a-half behind bars.


Contact the author at gabrielle@gawker.com.

Vatican City is its own state with its own laws and you may be surprised to learn that one of those

Jezebel A Conversation With Johari Osayi Idusuyi, the Hero Who Read Through a Trump Rally | Deadspin

"Protein Cheerios"--Are Bullshit!!

$
0
0

"Protein Cheerios"--Are Bullshit!!

Now there is a product for sale called “Protein Cheerios” and—surprise—it is not a good source of protein, for you, the consumer.

http://gawker.com/5992607/americ...

Let’s face it: you, the consumer, are one gullible motherfucker. “Where can I get some of this protein I’ve been hearing so much about, on ‘Doctor Oz Daytime Show?’” you ask yourself, in all likelihood. Then you gullibly walk down the cereal aisle ready to purchase any old product containing the word “PROTEIN” emblazoned on it—even if that product is cereal.

Protein is not generally found in high quantities in cereal. IDIOTS!

Now a consumer group that exists to protect you, the consumer, from your own lack of common sense, is suing the Cheerios Corporation over its marketing of “Protein Cheerios.” The only way “Protein Cheerios” would be a legitimate product would be if they were a box of Cheerios containing dozens of boiled eggs mixed in with the Cheerios. That’s not what they are though—they’re just cereal. Furthermore, as the Washington Post reports, “Protein Cheerios” barely have any more protein than regular Cheerios—which don’t have much protein... because they’re cereal! Duh!

Do the math: “a single serving of Protein Cheerios has seven grams of protein and seventeen grams of sugar. A serving of the original Cheerios, meanwhile, has three grams of protein and only a single gram of sugar...For regular Cheerios, the nutrition facts correspond to 28 grams of cereal. For Protein Cheerios, however, the listed protein and sugar contents correspond to 55 grams.”

So “Protein Cheerios” actually has a single gram of protein more than regular Cheerios per equal serving. And—again—Cheerios are not a good source of protein (they are cereal).

Honestly how are you, the consumer, ever going to get swoll at this rate.

[Photo: Flickr]

Viewing all 24829 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images